Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Social Roles Questionnaire: A New Approach to Measuring Attitudes Toward Gender

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Innovative research is constrained by instruments that assume gender to be captured by dichotomous categories. This article presents the results of two studies that document the psychometric properties of the Social Roles Questionnaire (SRQ), a new measure of gender role attitudes. A social constructivist perspective guided the development of the instrument that was designed not only to capture the diversity in people’s thinking about social roles for men and women, but also to identify attitudes that transcend binary categories. The article details the process of assessing reliability and validity based on data from 414 undergraduates. Findings revealed the SRQ is reliable and valid and that women were more likely than men to endorse egalitarian and gender transcendent beliefs. Additional possible uses of the SRQ are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antill, J. K., Cotton, S., Goodnow, J. J., & Russell, G. (1996). Measures of children’s sex typing in middle childhood II. Australian Journal of Psychology, 48, 35–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baber, K. M., & Monahan, P. (1988). College women’s career and motherhood expectations: New options, old dilemmas. Sex Roles, 19, 189–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bockting, W. O. (1999). From construction to context: Gender through the eyes of the transgendered. SIECUS Report, 28, 3–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohan, J. S. (2002). Sex differences and/in the self: Classic themes, feminist variations, postmodern challenges. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 74–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. W. (2000). Masculinities and globalization. In M. Baca Zinn, P. Hondagneu-Sotelo, & M. A. Messner (Eds.), Gender through the prism of difference (pp. 49–62). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349–354.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1964). The approval motive: Studies in evaluative dependence. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, L. E., & Abbott, S. A. (2003). The social constructionist’s “essential” guide to sex. In R. Heasley & B. Crane (Eds.), Sexual lives (pp. 28–39). Boston: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, J. (1998). Sex acts: Practices of femininity and masculinity. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, L. W., & Kloska, D. D. (1995). Parents’ gender-based attitudes toward marital roles and child rearing: Development and validation of new measures. Sex Roles, 32, 273–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huston, A. C. (1983). Sex typing. In E. M. Hetherington & P. H. Mussen (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Socialization, personality, and social behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 387–467). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hy, L. X., & Loevinger, J. (1996). Measuring ego development (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, S., & McKenna, W. (2003). Who put the “trans” in transgender?: Gender theory and everyday life. In S. LaFont (Ed.), Constructing sexualities:Readings in sexuality, gender, and culture (pp. 223–236). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimmel, M. S. (2000). The gendered society. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, L. A., & King, D. W. (1997). Sex-role Egalitarianism Scale: Development, psychometric properties, and recommendations for future research. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 71–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch, M. H. (2000). Queer theory and social change. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorber, J. (2001). Gender inequality: Feminist theories and politics. Los Angeles: Roxbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurer, L. (1999). Transgressing sex and gender: Deconstruction zone ahead? SIECUS Report, 28, 14–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patten, M. L. (1997). Understanding research methods. Los Angeles: Pyrczak.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedhazur, E. J., & Schmelkin, L. P. (1991). Measurement, design, and analysis: An integrated approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruble, D. N., & Martin, C. L. (1998). Gender development. In W. Damon & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality (5th ed., pp. 933–1016). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T. (1993). Gender-related traits and gender ideology: Evidence for multifactorial theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 624–635.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. I. (1978). Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates, and antecedents. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R., & Stapp, J. (1973). A short version of the Attitudes Toward Women Scale (AWS). Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 2, 219–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swim, J. K., Aikin, K. J., Hall, W. S., & Hunter, B. A. (1995). Sexism and racism: Old fashioned and modern prejudices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 199–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swim, J. K., & Cohen, L. L. (1997). Overt, covert, and subtle sexism: A comparison between the Attitudes toward Women and Modern Sexism scales. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 103–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E. H., Pleck, J. H., & Ferrera, D. L. (1992). Men and masculinities: Scales for masculinity ideology and masculinity-related constructs. Sex Roles, 27, 573–607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twenge, J. M. (1997). Attitudes toward women 1970–1995: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 35–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, C., & Zimmerman, D. (1987). Doing gender. Gender and Society, 1, 125–151.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was funded in part by a Graduate School Summer Faculty Fellowship and by the Vice President of Research’s Discretionary Fund at the University of New Hampshire to the second author. We thank Elisa Hankenson, Rod Kovach, Karolynn Mandalone, Stacey Pieczarka, Danielle Pupa, and Elizabeth Ryan for their help in conducting this investigation. Partial results of these studies were presented at the meetings of the National Council on Family Relations, Rochester, NY, November 2001, and Houston, TX, November 2002. Both authors contributed equally to the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kristine M. Baber.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baber, K.M., Tucker, C.J. The Social Roles Questionnaire: A New Approach to Measuring Attitudes Toward Gender. Sex Roles 54, 459–467 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9018-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9018-y

Keywords

Navigation