Skip to main content
Log in

Adolescents’ Expectations About Mothers’ Employment: Life Course Patterns and Parental Influence

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Because of social constraint and personal preference, cutting back and dropping out of the workforce remain common responses to the problem of balancing work and motherhood. To understand whether this phenomenon will continue, adolescents from middle-class, dual-earner families (N = 194) were asked how much they expected that they (for girls) or their future partners (for boys) would work while raising children. Nearly all expected new mothers to quit their jobs or reduce their hours temporarily, which signifies either acceptance of, or ignorance of, the penalties of career interruption among girls with high occupational aspirations. Adolescents’ expectations were associated with their mothers’ employment histories and support for gender egalitarianism, as well as the level of challenge in the home environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Although part-time work is conventionally defined as fewer than 35 h, 38 h was the cutoff here because respondents were asked to select their weekly hours of work from a categorical list of ranges, including 26–37 and 38–45 h.

  2. The Support/Challenge Questionnaire included 32 questions: 16 designed to measure support, and 16 intended to measure challenge. For this study, I used only the positively worded items because the negative items formed a distinct factor of their own in an exploratory factor model. “Family members can’t be counted on,” is a typical negatively worded support item. An example of a negative challenge item is, “Family members lack ambition and self-discipline.”

  3. A control for the father’s relationship to the child (married biological father vs. other) was included in early models but was dropped due to its lack of impact on the results.

  4. Adolescents were also asked about expected employment for fathers. As most respondents expected the father to work full-time at all points, the responses are not analyzed here.

  5. Models were also fit to the data where one parent’s egalitarianism score was omitted. The resulting regression coefficients for the other parent’s attitude were very similar to Model 2.

  6. I also tested interactions between family challenge and fathers’ egalitarianism. These interactions did not improve model fit, and the results did not suggest that fathers’ attitudes shaped the ways adolescents responded to challenge. For brevity, the results are not reported.

References

  • Acock, A. C., & Bengtson, V. L. (1978). On the relative influence of mothers and fathers: A covariance analysis of political and religious socialization. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 40, 519–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baber, K. M., & Monaghan, P. (1988). College women’s career and motherhood expectations: New options, old dilemmas. Sex Roles, 19, 189–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, K. (1993). Changing assumptions and contingent solutions: The costs and benefits of women working full- and part-time. Sex Roles, 28, 47–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bianchi, S. M., Milkie, M. A., Sayer, L. C., & Robinson, J. P. (2000). Is anyone doing the housework? Trends in the gender division of household labor. Social Forces, 79, 191–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewster, K. L., & Padavic, I. (2000). Change in gender ideology, 1977–1996: The contributions of intracohort change and population turnover. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 477–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, M. (2001). The influence of parental attitudes and behaviors on children’s attitudes toward gender and household labor in early adulthood. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 63, 111–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davey, F. H. (1998). Young women’s expected and preferred patterns of employment and child care. Sex Roles, 38, 95–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennehy, K., & Mortimer, J. T. (1993). Work and family orientations of contemporary adolescent boys and girls. In J. C. Hood (Ed.), Men, work, and family (pp. 87–107). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, F. M. (1999). Halving it all: How equally shared parenting works. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drobnic, S., & Wittig, I. (1997). Part-time work in the United States of America. In H. P. Blossfeld & C. Hakim (Eds.), Between equalization and marginalization: Women working part-time in Europe and the United States of America (pp. 289–314). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • East, P. L. (1998). Racial and ethnic differences in girls’ sexual, marital and birth expectations. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 150–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerson, K. (1985). Hard choices: How women decide about work, career, and motherhood. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, J., Bengtson, V. L., & Dunham, C. C. (1986). Attitude similarity in three-generation families: Socialization, status inheritance, or reciprocal influence? American Sociological Review, 51, 685–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gornick, J. C., & Meyers, M. K. (2003). Families that work: Policies for reconciling parenthood and employment. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagenaars, J. A. (1990). Categorical longitudinal data. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakim, C. (2000). Work–lifestyle choices in the 21st century: Preference theory. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, K. M., Duncan, G. J., & Boisjoly, J. (2002). Evaluating the role of “nothing to lose” attitudes on risky behavior in adolescence. Social Forces, 80, 1005–1039.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertz, R. (1986). More equal than others: Women and men in dual-career marriages. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, A. (1989). The second shift: Working parents and the revolution at home. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffnung, M. (2004). Wanting it all: Career, marriage, and motherhood during college-educated women’s 20s. Sex Roles, 50, 711–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoogstra, L. (2005). The design of the 500 Family Study. In B. Schneider & L. J. Waite (Eds.), Being together, working apart: Dual-career families and the work-life balance (pp. 18–38). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, G., & Uhlenberg, P. (2000). The influence of parenthood on the work effort of married men and women. Social Forces, 78, 931–947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machung, A. (1989). Talking career, thinking job: Gender differences in career and family expectations of Berkeley seniors. Feminist Studies, 15, 35–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maier, K. S. (2005). Transmitting educational values: Parent occupation and adolescent development. In B. Schneider & L. J. Waite (Eds.), Being together, working apart: Dual-career families and the work–life balance (pp. 396–418). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maines, D. R., & Hardesty, M. J. (1987). Temporality and gender: Young adults’ career and family plans. Social Forces, 66, 102–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCutcheon, A. L. (1987). Latent class analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moen, P., Erickson, M. A., & Dempster-McClain, D. (1997). Their mother’s daughters? The intergenerational transmission of gender attitudes in a world of changing roles. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59, 281–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moen, P., & Yu, Y. (2000). Effective work/life strategies: Working couples, work conditions, gender, and life quality. Social Problems, 47, 291–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nock, S. L. (1998). Marriage in men’s lives. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell, L., Betz, M., & Kurth, S. (1989). Plans for balancing work and family life: Do women pursuing nontraditional and traditional occupations differ? Sex Roles, 20, 35–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry-Jenkins, M., Repetti, R. L., & Crouter, A. C. (2000). Work and family in the 1990s. In R. M. Milardo (Ed.), Understanding families into the new millennium: A decade in review (pp. 200–217). Lawrence, KS: National Council on Family Relations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rathunde, K. (1996). Family context and talented adolescents’ optimal experience in school-related activities. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 6, 603–626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rathunde, K., Carroll, M. E., & Huang, M. P. (2000). Families and the forming of children’s occupational future. In M. Csikszentmihalyi & B. Schneider (Eds.), Becoming adult: How teenagers prepare for the world of work (pp. 113–140). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, B., & Stevenson, D. (1999). The ambitious generation: America’s teenagers motivated but directionless. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, K. A., Blood, L. L., & Maluso, D. (1992). An intergenerational analysis of expectations for women’s career and family roles. Sex Roles, 26, 273–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sewell, W. H., & Hauser, R. M. (1980). The Wisconsin longitudinal study of social and psychological factors in aspirations and achievements. Research in Sociology of Education and Socialization, 1, 59–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starrels, M. E. (1992). Attitude similarity between mothers and children regarding maternal employment. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 91–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephan, C. W., & Corder, J. (1985). The effects of dual-career families on adolescents’ sex-role attitudes, work and family plans, and choices of important others. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47, 921–929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steunkel, C. P. (2005). A strategy for working families: high-level commodification of household services. In B. Schneider & L. J. Waite (Eds.), Being together, working apart: Dual-career families and the work–life balance (pp. 252–272). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, A. (1989). Changing attitudes toward family issues in the United States. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 873–893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, A., Alwin, D. F., & Camburn, D. (1983). Causes and consequences of sex-role attitude change. American Sociological Review, 48, 211–227.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, N. W. (2002). The package deal: Marriage, work, and fatherhood in men’s lives. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermunt, J. K., & Magidson, J. (2005). Latent GOLD 4.0 user’s guide. Belmont, MA: Statistical Innovations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamaguchi, K. (2000). Multinomial logit latent class regression models: An analysis of the predictors of gender-role attitudes among Japanese women. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 1702–1740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Alfred P. Sloan Center on Parents, Children, and Work at the University of Chicago. The author would like to thank Julia McQuillan, Robert Petrin, Barbara Schneider, Linda Waite, and Kazuo Yamaguchi, as well as all participants at the Workshop on Working Families at the University of Chicago.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew N. Weinshenker.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weinshenker, M.N. Adolescents’ Expectations About Mothers’ Employment: Life Course Patterns and Parental Influence. Sex Roles 54, 845–857 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9052-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9052-9

Keywords

Navigation