Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

How Ambivalent Sexism Toward Women and Men Support Rape Myth Acceptance

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The goal of this study was to determine how ambivalent sexism toward women and men are both associated with rape myth acceptance. The Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance scale, Ambivalent Sexism Inventory, and Ambivalence toward Men Inventory were completed by 409 participants. Hostile sexism toward women positively correlated with rape myth acceptance. For benevolent sexism toward women, complementary gender differentiation was positively associated with rape myth acceptance whereas protective paternalism was negatively associated. Benevolent sexism toward men, but not hostile sexism, positively correlated with rape myth acceptance. Further, for female participants higher maternalism toward men corresponded with higher rape myth acceptance. These findings suggest that sexist beliefs toward both women and men are important for understanding the support of rape myths.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrams, D., Viki, G. T., Masser, B., & Bohner, G. (2003). Perceptions of stranger and acquaintance rape: The role of benevolent and hostile sexism in victim blame and rape proclivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 111–125.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Benedict, H. (1992). Virgin or vamp. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brownmiller, S. (1975). Against our will: Men, women and rape. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, M. R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 217–230.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Check, J. V. P., & Malamuth, N. (1983). Sex role stereotyping and reactions to depictions of stranger versus acquaintance rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 344–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diedrich, J. (2004, September 14). Five students questioned in attack near UWM. Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. Retrieved August 1, 2005, from http://www.jsonline.com/news/metro/sep04/258877.asp.

  • Gilmore, D. D. (1990). Manhood in the making: Cultural concepts of masculinity. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glick, P., & Fiske, S. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glick, P., & Fiske, S. (1997). Hostile and benevolent sexism: Measuring ambivalent sexist attitudes toward women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 119–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glick, P., & Fiske, S. (1999). The ambivalence toward men inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent beliefs about men. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 519–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glick, P., Fiske, S., Mladinic, A., Saiz, J., Abrams, D., Masser, B., et al. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 763–775.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glick, P., Lameiras, M., Fiske, S., Eckes, T., Masser, B., Volpato, C., et al. (2004). Bad but bold: Ambivalent attitudes toward men predict gender inequality in 16 nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 713–728.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, J. R., & McClelland, G. H. (2001). Misleading heuristics and moderated multiple regression models. Journal of Marketing Research, 38, 100–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lonsway, K. A., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1994). Rape myths: In review. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 133–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lonsway, K., & Fitzgerald, L. (1995). Attitudinal antecedents of rape myth acceptance: A theoretical and empirical reexamination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 704–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malamuth, N. M., Sockloskie, R., Koss, M. P., & Tanaka, J. (1991). The characteristics of aggressors against women: Testing a model using a national sample of college students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 670–681.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oswald, D. L., & Russell, B. L. (2006). Perceptions of sexual coercion in heterosexual dating relationships: The role of initiator gender and tactics. Journal of Sex Research, 43, 87–95.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Payne, D. L., Lonsway, K. A., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1999). Rape myth acceptance: Exploration of its structure and its measurement using the Illinois rape myth acceptance scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 27–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanday, P. (1981). The socio-cultural context of rape: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Social Issues, 37, 5–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stingl, J. (2004, September 16). Five guys in search of ‘stupid fun.’ Very stupid. Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. Retrieved August 1, 2005, from http://www.jsonline.com/news/metro/sep04/259564.asp.

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.) (pp. 56–110). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viki, G. T., & Abrams, D. (2002). But she was unfaithful: Benevolent sexism and reactions to rape victims who violate traditional gender role expectations. Sex Roles, 47, 289–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viki, G. T., Abrams, D., & Masser, B. (2004). Evaluating stranger and acquaintance rape: The role of benevolent sexism in perpetrator blame and recommended sentence length. Law and Human Behavior, 28, 295–303.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The results of this study were presented at the annual meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association (2006, May). The authors thank Kara Lindstedt, Angela Pirlott, and Sara Thimsen for their assistance with data collection.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kristine M. Chapleau.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chapleau, K.M., Oswald, D.L. & Russell, B.L. How Ambivalent Sexism Toward Women and Men Support Rape Myth Acceptance. Sex Roles 57, 131–136 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9196-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9196-2

Keywords

Navigation