Skip to main content
Log in

Ambivalent Sexism, Belief in a Just World, and Empathy as Predictors of Turkish Students’ Attitudes Toward Rape Victims

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study investigated whether hostile sexism, benevolent sexism, belief in a just world and empathy predict attitudes toward rape victims in a Turkish sample. Turkish college students (N = 425, mean age = 22) completed scales assessing Ambivalent Sexism, Belief in a Just World and Rape Victim Empathy as predictors of a general measure of attitudes toward rape victims. Male (as compared to female) participants had significantly less positive attitudes toward rape victims. Correlational analyses showed that, for both male and female participants, benevolent as well as hostile sexism, and belief in a just world each predicted less positive attitudes toward rape victims, but empathy predicted more positive attitudes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrams, D., Viki, G. T., Masser, B., & Bohner, G. (2003). Perceptions of stranger and acquaintance rape: The role of benevolent and hostile sexism in victim blame and rape proclivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 111–125.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Acock, A. C., & Ireland, N. K. (1983). Attribution of blame in rape cases: The impact of norm violation, gender, and sex role attitude. Sex Roles, 9, 179–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aderman, D., Brehm, S. S., & Katz, L. B. (1974). Empathic observation of an innocent victim: The just world revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 342–347.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Akvardar, Y., & Yüksel, S. (1993). Cinsel tecavüze uğrayan kişilere karşı alınan tavır (Attitudes toward rape victims). Nöropsikiyatri Arşivi, 30, 347–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Best, C. L., Dansky, B. S., & Kilpatrick, D. G. (1992). Medical students’ attitudes about female rape victims. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 7(2), 175–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumberg, M. L., & Lester, D. (1991). High school and college students’ attitudes toward rape. Adolescence, 26, 727–729.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, M. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 217–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caron, S. L., & Carter, D. B. (1997). The relationship among sex-role orientation, egalitarianism, attitudes toward sexuality, and attitudes toward violence against women. The Journal of Social Psychology, 137, 568–587.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Check, J., & Malamuth, N. (1983). Sex role stereotyping and reactions to depictions of strangers versus acquaintance rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 344–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costin, F., & Kaptanoğlu, C. (1993). Beliefs about rape and women’s social roles: A Turkish replication. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 327–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalbert, C., Montada, L., & Schmitt, M. (1987). Glaube an eine gerechte Welt als Motiv: Vali-dierungskorrelate zweier Skalen (Belief in a just world as motive validity correlates of two scales). Psychologische Beiträge, 29, 596–615.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deitz, S. R., Blackwell, K. T., Daley, P. C., & Bentley, B. J. (1982). Measurement of empathy toward rape victims and rapists. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 372–384.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deitz, S. R., Littman, M., & Bentley, B. J. (1984). Attribution of responsibility for rape: The influence of observer empathy, victim resistance, and victim attractiveness. Sex Roles, 10, 261–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feild, H. S. (1978). Attitudes toward rape: A comparative analysis of police, rapists, crisis counselors and citizens. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 146–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fonow, M. M., Richarson, L., & Wemmerus, V. A. (1992). Feminist rape education: Does it work? Gender and Society, 6, 108–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A. (1993). Just world beliefs in twelve societies. Journal of Social Psychology, 133, 317–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giacopassi, D. J., & Dull, R. T. (1986). Gender and racial differences in the acceptance of rape myths within a college population. Sex Roles, 15, 63–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilmartin-Zena, P. (1988). Gender differences in students’ attitudes toward rape. Sociological Focus, 21, 279–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56, 109–118.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glick, P., Fiske, S. T., Mladinic, A., Saiz, J. L., Abrams, D., & Masser, B., et al. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 763–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gölge, Z. B., Yavuz, M. F., Müderrisoğlu, S., & Yavuz, S. (2003). Turkish university students’ attitudes toward rape. Sex Roles, 49, 653–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinck, S. S., & Thomas, R. W. (1999). Rape myth acceptance in college students: How far we come? Sex Roles, 40, 815–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C., & Aranson, E. (1973). Attribution of fault to a rape victim as respectability of the victim. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26, 415–419.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. T., & Hundady, O. (2005). Antecendents and consequences of system-justifying ideologies. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 260–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. T., & Kay, A. C. (2005). Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: Consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 498–509.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinke, C. L., & Meyer, C. (1990). Evaluation of rape victim by men and women with high and low belief in a just world. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 13, 27–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, A. J., & Raichle, K. (2000). The role of political ideology in mediating judgments of blame in rape victims and their assailants: A test of the just world, personal responsibility, and legitimization hypotheses. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 853–863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, K. S., & Long, E. (1988). Attitudes toward rape. The Journal of Sex Research, 24, 299–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M. J. (1965). Evaluation of performance as a function of performer’s reward and attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 355–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M. J., & Miller, D. T. (1978). Just world research and the attribution process: Looking back and ahead. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 1030–1051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lonsway, K. A., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1995). Attitudinal antecedents of rape mythostile sexism acceptance: A theoretical and empirical re-examination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 704–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moghadam, V. M. (1996). Patriarchy and development. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, B., Matsuo, H., McIntyre, K. P., & Morrison, N. (2005). Attitudes toward victims of rape. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 725–737.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parla, A. (2001). The “honor” of the state: Virginity examinations in Turkey. Feminist Studies, 27, 65–88.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, Z., & Peplau, L. A. (1975). Who believes in a just world? Journal of Social Issues, 31, 65–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakallı, N. (2001). Beliefs about wife beating among Turkish college students: The effects of patriarchy, sexism and sex difference. Sex Roles, 44, 599–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakallı-Uğurlu, N. (2002). Çelişik duygulu cinsiyetçilik ölçeği: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması (Ambivalent sexism inventory: A study of validity and reliability). Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 17, 47–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakallı-Uğurlu, N., & Glick, P. (2003). Ambivalent sexism and attitudes toward women who engage in premarital sex in Turkey. The Journal of Sex Research, 40, 296–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serin, N. (2001). Eğitim Düzeyi ve Cinsiyet ile Kurbanın Durum ve Uyruğunun Tecavüze İlişkin Algılar Üzerindeki Etkileri (Effects of education level, sex, victims’ situation and nationality on perception of rape). Master’s Thesis, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusü, Ankara.

  • Sever, A., & Yurdakul, G. (2001). Culture of honor, culture of change: A feminist analysis of honor killings in rural Turkey. Violence Against Women, 7, 964–999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. A., & Frieze, I. H. (2003). Examining rape empathy from the perspective of the victim and the assailant. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 476–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K., & Green, D. (1984). Individual correlates of the belief in a just world. Psychological Reports, 34, 435–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viki, G. T., & Abrahams, D. (2002). But she was unfaithful: Benevolent sexism and reactions to rape victims who violate traditional gender role expectations. Sex Roles, 47, 289–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, C. (1988). The attitudes toward rape victims scale: Construction, validation, and cross-cultural applicability. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 12, 127–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, C. (1995). Attitudes toward rape. Feminist and social psychological perspectives. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasti, A. A., Bergman, M. E., Glomb, T. M., & Drasgow, F. (2000). Test of the cross-cultural generalizability of a model of sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 766–778.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yamawaki, N. (2007). Rape perception and the function of ambivalent sexism and gender role traditionality. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22, 406–423.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We thank Dr. Irene H. Frieze, Editor of Sex Roles, for her many suggestions concerning the organization of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nuray Sakallı-Uğurlu.

Additional information

This work is a part of Zeynep Sıla Yalçın’s thesis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sakallı-Uğurlu, N., Yalçın, Z.S. & Glick, P. Ambivalent Sexism, Belief in a Just World, and Empathy as Predictors of Turkish Students’ Attitudes Toward Rape Victims. Sex Roles 57, 889–895 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9313-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9313-2

Keywords

Navigation