Abstract
This conceptual paper uses the concept of coalition to theorize an alternative to categorical approaches to intersectionality based on review of an archive of oral history interviews with feminist activists who engage in coalitional work. Two complementary themes were identified: the challenge of defining similarity in order to draw members of diverse groups together, and the need to address power differentials in order to maintain a working alliance. Activists’ narratives suggest intersectionality is not only a tool for understanding difference, but also a way to illuminate less obvious similarities. This shift requires that we think about social categories in terms of stratification brought about through practices of individuals, institutions and cultures rather than only as characteristics of individuals. Implications of these themes for research practices are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bickford, S. (1997). Anti-anti-identity politics: Feminism, democracy and the complexities of citizenship. Hypatia, 12(4), 111–131.
Carby, H. V. (1992). The multicultural wars. In G. Dent (Ed.) Black popular culture (pp. 187–99). Seattle: Bay.
Christian, B. (1989). The race for theory. In K. V. Hansen, & I. J. Philipson (Eds.) Women, class and the socialist imagination (pp. 568–579). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Cohen, C. J. (1997). Punks, bulldaggers, and welfare queens: The radical potential of queer politics? GLQ, 3, 437–465.
Cohen, C. J. (1999). The boundaries of blackness: AIDS and the breakdown of black politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Cole, E. R. (Interviewer) & Cohen, C. J. (Interviewee). (2004). Cathy J. Cohen [Interview transcript]. Retrieved from Global Feminisms: Comparative Case Studies of Women’s Activism and Scholarship, Interview Transcripts: United States. Web site: http://www.umich.edu/~glblfem/us.html.
Cole, E. R., & Stewart, A. J. (2001). Invidious comparisons: Imagining a psychology of race and gender beyond differences. Political Psychology, 22, 293–308.
Cotera, M. E. (Interviewer) & Smith, A. L. (Interviewee). (2003). Andrea L. Smith [Interview transcript]. Retrieved from Global Feminisms: Comparative Case Studies of Women’s Activism and Scholarship, Interview Transcripts: United States. Web site: http://www.umich.edu/~glblfem/us.html.
Collins, P. H. (1993). Toward a new vision: Race, class, and gender as categories of analysis and connection. Race, Sex, & Class, 1, 25–45.
Collins, P. H. (2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Crenshaw, K. W. (1995). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. In K. W. Crenshaw, N. Gotanda, G. Peller, & K. Thomas (Eds.) Critical race theory: The key writings that formed the movement (pp. 357–384). New York: New Press.
Diamond, L. (2003). Was it a phase? Young women's relinquishment of lesbian/bisexual identities over a 5-year period. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 352–364.
Dozier, R. (2005). Beards, breasts, and bodies: Doing sex in a gendered world. Gender & Society, 19, 297–316.
Esses, V. M., Dovidio, J. F., & Hodson, G. (2002). Public attitudes toward immigration in the United States and Canada in response to the September 11, 2001 “Attack on America”. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 2, 69–85.
Fine, M., Weis, L., Pruit, L. P., & Burns, A. (2004). Off white: Readings on race, power, and society (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Gamson, W. A. (1961). A theory of coalition formation. American Sociological Review, 26, 373–382.
Gerstenfeld, P. B. (2002). A time to hate: Situational antecedents of intergroup bias. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 2, 61–67.
Gonzales, A., & Rolison, G. (2005). Social oppression and attitudes toward sexual practices. Journal of Black Studies, 35, 715–729.
Hegarty, P., & Pratto, F. (2004). The differences that norms make: Empiricism, social constructionism, and the interpretation of group differences. Sex Roles, 50, 445–453.
Helms, J. E., Jernigan, M., & Mascher, J. (2005). The meaning of race in psychology and how to change it. American Psychologist, 60, 27–36.
Hurtado, A. (1989). Relating to privilege: Seduction and rejection in the subordination of White women and women of color. Signs, 14, 833–855.
King, D. K. (1988). Multiple jeopardy, multiple consciousnesses: The context of a Black feminist ideology. Signs, 14, 42–72.
Lal, J. (Interviewer) & Ojeda, M. (Interviewee). (2004). Martha Ojeda [Interview transcript]. Retrieved from Global Feminisms: Comparative Case Studies of Women’s Activism and Scholarship, Interview Transcripts: United States. Web site: http://www.umich.edu/~glblfem/us.html.
Luna, Z. (Interviewer) & Ross, L. (Interviewee). (2006). Loretta Ross [Interview transcript]. Retrieved from Global Feminisms: Comparative Case Studies of Women’s Activism and Scholarship, Interview Transcripts: United States. Web site: http://www.umich.edu/~glblfem/us.html.
Lyshaug, B. (2006). Solidarity without “sisterhood”: feminism and the ethics of coalition building. Politics & Gender, 2, 77–100.
Mahalingan, R., & Leu, J. (2005). Culture, essentialism, immigration and representations of gender. Theory & Psychology, 15, 839–860.
McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs, 30, 1771–1800.
Mohanty, C. T. (2003). Feminism without borders. Durham, NC: Duke.
Naber, N. C. (2002). So our history doesn’t become your future: The local and global political of coalition building post September 11th. Journal of Asian American Studies, 5, 217–242.
Naber, N. C. (Interviewer) & Abdulhadi, R. (Interviewee). (2004). Rabab Abdulhadi [Interview transcript]. Retrieved from Global Feminisms: Comparative Case Studies of Women’s Activism and Scholarship, Interview Transcripts: United States. Web site: http://www.umich.edu/~glblfem/us.html.
Poran, M. A. (2006). The politics of protection: Body image, social pressures, and the misrepresentation of young Black women. Sex Roles, 55, 739–755.
Reagon, B. J. (1983). Coalition politics: Turning the century. In B. Smith (Ed.) Homegirls: A Black feminist anthology (pp. 356–368). NY: Kitchen Table: Women of Color Press.
Reicher, S. (2004). The context of social identity: Domination, resistance and change. Political Psychology, 25, 921–945.
Roberts, D. E. (2004). Women of color and the reproductive rights movement (book review). Journal of the History of Sexuality, 13, 535–539.
Rogers, M., & Lott, P. (1997). Backlash, the matrix of domination, and Log Cabin Republicans. Sociological Quarterly, 38, 497–512.
Settles, I. H. (2006). Use of an intersectional framework to understand Black women’s racial and gender identities. Sex Roles, 54, 589–601.
Sheldon, A. (1999). Personal and perplexing: Feminist disability politics evaluated. Disability & Society, 14, 643–657.
Silliman, J., Fried, M. G., Ross, L., & Gutierrrez, E. R. (Eds.) (2004). Undivided rights: Women of color organize for reproductive justice. Boston: South End Press.
Weis, L., Proweller, A., & Centrie, C. (2004). Excavating “A moment in history”: Privilege and loss inside working-class masculinity. In M. Fine, L. Weis, L.P. Pruit, & A. Burns (Eds.) Off white: Readings on race, power, and society (2nd ed.). (pp. 128–144). New York: Routledge.
Wong, L. (1994). Di(s)-secting and dis(s)-closing ‘whiteness’: Two tales about psychology. Feminism & Psychology, 4, 133–153.
Young, I. M. (1986). The ideal of community and the politics of differences. Social Theory and Practice, 12, 1–26.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
I thank Zakiya Luna for her research assistance, and Artemis Leontis, Peggy McCracken, Yopie Prins, Abigail Stewart, Elizabeth Wingrove and the anonymous reviewers for their feedback on previous drafts of this paper. I am also grateful to the Global Feminism Project at the University of Michigan and to the activists who agreed to be interviewed for the project for making these interviews publicly available.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cole, E.R. Coalitions as a Model for Intersectionality: From Practice to Theory. Sex Roles 59, 443–453 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9419-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9419-1