Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Status and the Gender Stereotyped Personality Traits: Toward an Integration

  • Feminist Forum
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper integrates research findings on status and the gender stereotyped personality traits and examines the extent to which women’s lower status than men can account for two components of gender stereotyping in the United States: the belief that women and men have different personality traits and the differences in men’s and women’s perceptions of their own personality traits. In addition, it examines the extent to which status affects the evaluations associated with both genders’ self-perceived traits. Personality traits include the instrumental-assertive and expressive attributes that have been the focus of most theory and research, in addition to the instrumental-dominating, complaining, submissive, and bipolar attributes. Formulations involving the link with status are presented for each of these personality attributes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abele, A. E. (2003). The dynamics of masculine-agentic and feminine-communal traits: findings from a prospective study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 768–776.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Amato, P. R., & Rogers, S. J. (1997). A longitudinal study of marital problems and subsequent divorce. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59, 612–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anastasia, I., & Miller, M. D. (1998). Sex and gender: a study of university professors. Sex Roles, 38, 675–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C., & Berdahl, J. L. (2002). The experience of power: examining the effects of power on approach and inhibition tendencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1362–1377.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Antill, J. K. (1983). Sex role complementarity versus similarity in married couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 145–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Athenstaedt, U. (2003). On the content and structure of the gender role self-concept: including gender-stereotypical behaviors in addition to traits. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 27, 300–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence: Isolation and communion in Western man. Boston, MA: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basow, S. A., & Silberg, N. T. (1987). Student evaluations of college professors: Are female and male professors rated differently? Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 308–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bem, D. J. (1972). Self-perception theory. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. 6, pp. 1–62). New York: Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J., Fisek, M. H., Norman, R. Z., & Wagner, D. G. (1985). Formation of reward expectations in status situations. In J. Berger & M. Zelditch Jr. (Eds.), Status, rewards, and influence (pp. 215–261). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J., Fisek, M. H., Norman, R. Z., & Zelditch, M. Jr. (1977). Status characteristics and social interaction: An expectation states approach. New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J., Ridgeway, C. L., Fisek, M. H., & Norman, R. Z. (1998). The legitimation and delegitimation of power and prestige orders. American Sociological Review, 63, 379–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J., Rosenholtz, S. J., & Zelditch, M. Jr. (1980). Status organizing processes. Annual Review of Sociology, 6, 479–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berzins, J. I., Welling, M. A., & Wetter, R. E. (1978). A new measure of psychological androgyny, based on the Personality Research Form. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 126–138.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury, T. N., Campbell, S. M., & Fincham, F. D. (1995). Longitudinal and behavioral analyses of masculinity and femininity in marriage. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 328–341.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury, T. N., & Fincham, F. D. (1988). Individual difference variables in close relationships: a contextual model of marriage as an integrative framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 713–721.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, O. C. (1982). Relationship of education to sex, managerial status, and the managerial stereotype. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 380–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brody, L. R., & Hall, J. A. (1993). Gender and emotion. In M. Lewis & J. M. Haviland (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 447–460). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (1990). Unmitigated agency and unmitigated communion: an analysis of the negative components of masculinity and femininity. Sex Roles, 22, 555–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (1992). Manipulation in close relationships: five personality factors in interactional context. Journal of Personality, 60, 477–499.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., & Craik, K. H. (1983). The act frequency approach to personality. Psychological Review, 90, 105–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., & Craik, K. H. (1984). Acts, dispositions, and personality. In B. A. Maher & W. B. Maher (Eds.), Progress in experimental personality research (vol. 13, pp. 241–301). San Diego, CA: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., Gomes, M., Higgins, D. S., & Lauterbach, K. (1987). Tactics of manipulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1219–1229.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cervone, D. (1991). The two disciplines of personality psychology. Psychological Science, 2, 371–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chidester, T. R., Helmreich, R. L., Gregorich, S. E., & Geis, C. E. (1991). Pilot personality and crew coordination: implications for training and selection. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 1, 25–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, C. (1990). Emotions and micropolitics in everyday life: some patterns and paradoxes of “place.”. In T. D. Kemper (Ed.), Research agendas in the sociology of emotions (pp. 305–334). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland, J. N., Stockdale, M., & Murphy, K. R. (2000). Women and men in organizations: Sex and gender issues at work. Matwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conner, T. L. (1985). Response latencies, performance expectations and interaction patterns. In J. Berger & M. Zelditch (Eds.), Status, rewards, and influence (pp. 189–214). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constantinople, A. (1979). Sex-role acquisition: in search of the elephant. Sex Roles, 5, 121–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway, M., DiFazio, R., & Mayman, S. (1999). Judging others’ emotions as a function of the others’ status. Social Psychology Quarterly, 62, 291–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway, M., Pizzamiglio, M. T., & Mount, L. (1996). Status, communality, and agency: implications for stereotypes of gender and other groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 25–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Conway, M., & Vartanian, L. R. (2000). A status account of gender stereotypes: beyond communality and agency. Sex Roles, 43, 181–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway, M., Wood, W., Dugas, M., & Pushkar, D. (2003). Are women perceived as engaging in more maladaptive worry than men? A status interpretation. Sex Roles, 49, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1985). The NEO personality inventory manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costrich, N., Feinstein, J., Kidder, L., & Maracek, J. (1975). When stereotypes hurt: three studies of penalties for sex-role reversals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11, 520–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowen, G., & Koziej, J. (1979). The perception of sex-inconsistent behavior. Sex Roles, 5, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deaux, K. (1985). Sex and gender. Annual Review of Psychology, 36, 49–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deaux, K., & Kite, M. (1993). Gender stereotypes. In F. L. Denmark & M. A. Paludi (Eds.), Psychology of women: A handbook of issues and theories (pp. 107–130). Westport, CT: Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaux, K., & LaFrance, M. (1998). Gender. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (vol. I, 4th ed., pp. 788–827). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaux, K., & Lewis, L. L. (1984). Structure of gender stereotypes: interrelationships among components and gender label. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 991–1004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deaux, K., & Major, B. (1987). Putting gender into context: an interactive model of gender-related behavior. Psychological Review, 94, 369–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denmark, F. L. (1993). Women, leadership, and empowerment. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 17, 343–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dovidio, J. F., Brown, C. E., Heltman, K., Ellyson, S. L., & Keating, C. F. (1988). Power displays between women and men in discussions of gender-linked tasks: a multichannel study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 580–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., Beall, A. E., & Sternberg, R. J. (2004). The psychology of gender (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., & van Engen, M. I. (2003). Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: a meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 569–591.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Johnson, B. T. (1990). Gender and leadership style: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 233–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573–598.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eckes, T., & Trautner, H. M. (2000). Developmental social psychology of gender: an integrative framework. In T. Eckes & H. M. Trautner (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 3–32). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekerdt, D. J., & Vinick, B. H. (1991). Marital complaints in husband-working and husband-retired couples. Research on Aging, 13, 364–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellyson, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (1985). Power, dominance, and nonverbal behavior: basic concepts and issues. In S. L. Ellyson & J. F. Dovidio (Eds.), Power, dominance, and nonverbal behavior (pp. 1–28). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falbo, T., Hazen, M. D., & Linimon, D. (1982). The costs of selecting power bases or messages associated with the opposite sex. Sex Roles, 8, 147–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falbo, T., & Peplau, L. A. (1980). Power strategies in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 618–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feingold, A. (1994). Gender differences in personality: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 429–456.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878–902.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fora, J., & Segrin, C. (2000). Affect and behavioral involvement in spousal complaints and compliments. Journal of Family Psychology, 14, 641–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritz, H. L., & Helgeson, V. S. (1998). Distinctions of unmitigated communion from communion: self-neglect and over involvement with others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 121–140.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Geis, F. L. (1993). Self-fulfilling prophecies: a social psychological view of gender. In A. E. Beall & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology of gender (pp. 9–54). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, G. L. (1988). Leadership roles and the gender stereotype traits. Sex Roles, 18, 649–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, G. L. (1991). Gender stereotypes and power: perceptions of the roles in violent marriages. Sex Roles, 24, 439–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, G. L. (1993). Instrumental and expressive traits in social cognition: parallels with social interaction. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 119, 99–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, G. L. (1996). Status in same-gender and mixed-gender police dyads: effects on personality attributions. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59, 350–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, G. L. (2001). Woman and men police officers: Status, gender, and personality. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, G. L. (2008). Further analyses of “A study of university professors.” Unpublished manuscript, John Jay College of Criminal Justice, The City University of New York.

  • Gerber, G. L., & Piimauna, K. (2005). Gender stereotypes and sexual assault: perceptions of perpetrators and victims. Poster presented at the American Psychological Association Convention, Washington, DC., August.

  • Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1999). Sexism and other “isms”: interdependence, status, and the ambivalent content of stereotypes. In W. B. Swann Jr., J. H. Langlois, & L. A. Gilbert (Eds.), Sexism and stereotypes in modern society: The gender science of Janet Taylor Spence (pp. 195–221). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, H. G. (1975). Manual for the California personality inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagestad, G. L., & Smyer, M. A. (1982). Dissolving long-term relationships: patterns of divorce in middle age. In S. Duck (Ed.), Personal relationships: Dissolving relationships (vol. 4, pp. 115–188). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haines, E. L., & Kray, L. J. (2005). Self-power associations: the possession of power impacts women’s self-concepts. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 643–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helgeson, V. S. (1994). Relation of agency and communion to well-being: evidence and potential explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 412–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helgeson, V. S. (2003). Gender-related traits and health. In J. Suls & K. A. Wallston (Eds.), Social psychological foundations of health and illness (pp. 367–394). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helgeston, V. S., & Fritz, H. L. (1998). A theory of unmitigated communion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 173–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helgeson, V. S., & Fritz, H. L. (1999). Unmitigated agency and unmitigated communion: distinctions from agency and communion. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 131–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holahan, C. K., & Spence, J. T. (1980). Desirable and undesirable masculine and feminine traits in counseling clients and unselected students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 48, 300–302.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hollander, E. P. (1985). Leadership and power. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology: Special fields and applications (vol. II, 3rd ed. pp. 485–537). New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollander, E. P., & Offermann, L. R. (1990). Power and leadership in organizations: relationships in transition. American Psychologist, 45, 179–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60, 581–592.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D. N. (1974). Manual for the personality research form. Goshen, NY: Research Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, P. (1976). Women and power: toward a theory of effectiveness. The Journal of Social Issues, 32, 99–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, J. A., Caudill, M. S., Hathorn, S., & O’Brien, C. G. (1977). Socially undesirable sex-correlated characteristics: implications for androgyny and adjustment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45, 1185–1186.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keltner, D. (1995). Signs of appeasement: evidence for the distinct displays of embarrassment, amusement, and shame. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 441–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemper, T. D. (1978). A social interactional theory of emotions. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemper, T. D. (1991). Predicting emotions from social relations. Social Psychology Quarterly, 54, 330–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kluwer, E. S., Heesink, J. A. M., & Van De Vliert, E. (2000). The division of labor in close relationships: an asymmetrical conflict issue. Personal Relationships, 7, 263–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kowalski, R. M. (1996). Complaints and complaining: functions, antecedents, and consequences. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 179–196.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kristen, K. C., Hyde, J. S., Showers, C. J., & Boswell, B. N. (1999). Gender differences in self-esteem: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 470–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaFrance, M., Hecht, M., & Paluck, E. (2003). The contingent smile: a meta-analysis of sex differences in smiling. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 305–334.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Locksley, A., Borgida, E., Brekke, N., & Hepburn, C. (1980). Sex stereotypes and social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 36–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubinski, D., Tellegen, A., & Butcher, J. N. (1983). Musculinity, femininity, and androgyny viewed and assessed as distinct concepts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 428–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Major, B., Barr, L., Zubek, J., & Babey, S. H. (1999). Gender and self-esteem: a meta-analysis. In W. B. Swann Jr., J. H. Langlois, & L. A. Gilbert (Eds.), Sexism and stereotypes in modern society: The gender science of Janet Taylor Spence. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H., & Cross, S. (1990). The interpersonal self. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 576–608). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, S. E. (1990). On the move: The status of women in policing. Washington, DC: Police Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdams, D. P. (1992). The intimacy motive. In C. P. Smith, J. W. Atkinson, D. C. McClelland, & J. Veroff (Eds.), Motivation and personality: Handbook of thematic content analysis (pp. 224–228). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCreary, D. R., & Rhodes, N. D. (2001). On the gender-typed nature of dominant and submissive acts. Sex Roles, 44, 339–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moskowitz, D. S. (1994). Cross-situational generality and the interpersonal circumplex. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 921–933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moskowitz, D. S., Suh, E. J., & Desaulniers, J. (1994). Situational influences on gender differences in agency and communion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 753–761.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, J. G., Licht, B. G., & Pearl, R. A. (1982). Some dangers of using personality questionnaires to study personality. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 572–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlofsky, J. L., Cohen, R. S., & Ramsden, M. W. (1985). Relationship between sex-role attitudes and personality traits and the revised sex-role behavior scale. Sex Roles, 12, 377–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlofsky, J. L., & O’Heron, C. (1987). Stereotypic and nonstereotypic sex role trait and behavior orientations: implications for personal adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1034–1042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlofsky, J. L., Ramsden, M. W., & Cohen, R. S. (1982). Development of the revised sex role behavior scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 46, 632–638.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ridgeway, C. L. (1982). Status in groups: the importance of motivation. American Sociological Review, 47, 76–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridgeway, C. L. (1988). Gender differences in task groups: a status and legitimacy account. In M. Webster Jr. & M. Foschi (Eds.), Status generalization: New theory and research (pp. 188–206). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridgeway, C. L. (2006). Gender as an organizing force in social relations: implications for the future of inequality. In F. D. Blau, M. C. Brinton, & D. B. Grusky (Eds.), The declining significance of gender? (pp. 265–288). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridgeway, C. L., & Berger, J. (1988). The legitimation of power and prestige orders in task groups. In M. Webster Jr. & M. Foschi (Eds.), Status generalization: New theory and research (pp. 207–231). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridgeway, C. L., & Correll, S. J. (2004). Unpacking the gender system: a theoretical perspective on gender beliefs and social relations. Gender & Society, 18, 510–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridgeway, C. L., & Diekema, D. (1989). Dominance and collective hierarchy formation in male and female task groups. American Sociological Review, 54, 79–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridgeway, C. L., Johnson, C., & Diekema, D. (1994). External status, legitimacy, and compliance in male and female groups. Social Forces, 72, 1051–1077.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riger, S. (2000). Transforming psychology: Gender in theory and practice. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, R. M., Fogg, L. F., Helmreich, R. L., & McFadden, T. J. (1994). Psychological predictors of astronaut effectiveness. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 65, 910–915.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, R. M., Helmreich, R. L., Fogg, L., & McFadden, T. J. (1993). Assessments of astronaut effectiveness. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 64, 789–794.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, L. N., Weber, J. P., & Martin, L. (2000). Gender-related personal attributes and psychological adjustment among U.S. Army soldiers. Military Medicine, 165, 54–59.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sachau, D. A., Houlihan, D., & Gilbertson, T. (1999). Predictors of employee resistance to supervisors’ requests. The Journal of Social Psychology, 139, 611–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saragovi, C., Aube, J., Koestner, R., & Zuroff, D. (2002). Traits, motives, and depressive styles as reflections of agency and communion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 563–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saragovi, C., Koestner, R., Aube, J., & Di Cio, L. (1997). Agency, communion, and well-being: extending Helgeson’s (1994) model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 593–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shields, S. A. (2002). Speaking from the heart: Gender and the social meaning of emotion. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smoreda, Z. (1995). Power, gender stereotypes and perceptions of heterosexual couples. British Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 421–435.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., Deaux, K., & Helmreich, R. L. (1985). Sex roles in contemporary American society. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology: Special fields and applications (vol. II, 3rd ed., pp. 149–178). New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R. L., & Holahan, C. K. (1979). Negative and positive components of psychological masculinity and femininity and their relationships to self-reports of neurotic and acting out behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1673–1682.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R. L., & Stapp, J. (1975). Ratings of self and peers on sex-role attributes and their relation to self-esteem and conceptions of masculinity and femininity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 29–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steil, J. M. (1997). Marital equality: Its relationship to the well-being of husbands and wives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, D. (1984). Concurrent validity of the Bem Sex-Role Inventory: a person-environment approach. Sex Roles, 10, 713–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiedens, L. Z. (2001). Anger and advancement versus sadness and subjugation: the effect of negative emotion expressions on social status conferral. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiedens, L. Z., Ellsworth, P. C., & Mesquita, B. (2000). Stereotypes about sentiments and status: emotional expectations for high-and low-status group members. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 560–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Twenge, J. M. (2001). Changes in women’s assertiveness in response to status and roles: a cross-temporal meta-analysis, 1931–1993. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 133–145.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, D. G., & Berger, J. (1997). Gender and interpersonal task behaviors: status expectation accounts. Sociological Perspectives, 40, 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waxman, H. M., Carner, E. A., & Berkenstock, G. (1984). Job turnover and job satisfaction among nursing home aides. The Gerontologist, 24, 503–509.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, J. P., Rosen, L. N., & Weisbrod, C. (2000). Gender-based personality traits and military cohesion. Military Medicine, 165(4), iii, 297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, M. Jr. (2003). Working on status puzzles. Advances in Group Processes, 20, 173–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, M. Jr., & Foschi, M. (1988). Overview of status generalization. In M. Webster Jr. & M. Foschi (Eds.), Status generalization: New theory and research (pp. 1–20). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, M. Jr., & Sobieszek, B. (1974). Sources of self-evaluation: A formal theory of significant others and social influence. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, B. E. Jr. (1983). Sex role orientation and self-esteem: a critical meta-analytic review. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 765–778.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, B. E. (1984). Sex-role orientation and psychological well-being: two meta-analyses. Sex Roles, 12, 207–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, J. S. (1979). A psychological taxonomy of trait-descriptive terms: the interpersonal domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 395–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, J. S. (1982). Circumplex models of interpersonal behavior in clinical psychology. In P. C. Kendall & J. N. Butcher (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in clinical psychology (pp. 183–221). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. E., & Best, D. L. (1982). Measuring sex stereotypes: A thirty-nation study. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, D. G. (1992). The power motive. In C. P. Smith, J. W. Atkinson, D. C. McClelland, & J. Veroff (Eds.), Motivation and personality: Handbook of thematic content analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyer, R. S. Jr., & Lambert, A. J. (1994). The role of trait constructs in person perception: a historical perspective. In P. G. Devine, D. L. Hamilton, & T. L. Ostrom (Eds.), Social cognition: Impact on social psychology (pp. 113–143). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The preparation of this article was supported in part by grants from The City University of New York PSC-CUNY Research Award Program. I thank Jessica Rowshandel for her assistance in locating and retrieving studies for this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Psychology Department, John Jay College of Criminal Justice, The City University of New York, 445 West 59th Street, New York, NY, 10019, USA

    Gwendolyn L. Gerber

Authors
  1. Gwendolyn L. Gerber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gwendolyn L. Gerber.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gerber, G.L. Status and the Gender Stereotyped Personality Traits: Toward an Integration. Sex Roles 61, 297–316 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9529-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9529-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation