Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Implicit Science Stereotypes Mediate the Relationship between Gender and Academic Participation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While the gender gap in mathematics and science has narrowed, men pursue these fields at a higher rate than women. In this study, 165 men and women at a university in the northeastern United States completed implicit and explicit measures of science stereotypes (association between male and science, relative to female and humanities), and gender identity (association between the concept “self” and one’s own gender, relative to the concept “other” and the other gender), and reported plans to pursue science-oriented and humanities-oriented academic programs and careers. Although men were more likely than women to plan to pursue science, this gap in students’ intentions was completely accounted for by implicit stereotypes. Moreover, implicit gender identity moderated the relationship between women’s stereotypes and their academic plans, such that implicit stereotypes only predicted plans for women who strongly implicitly identified as female. These findings illustrate how an understanding of implicit cognitions can illuminate between-group disparities as well as within-group variability in science pursuit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G. W. (1979). The nature of prejudice (25th ed.). Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambady, N., Shih, M., Kim, A., & Pittinsky, T. L. (2001). Stereotype susceptibility in children: Effects of identity activation on quantitative performance. Psychological Science, 12, 385–390. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00371.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arcuri, L., Castelli, L., Galdi, S., Zogmaister, C., & Amadori, A. (2008). Predicting the vote: Implicit attitudes as predictors of the future behavior of decided and undecided voters. Political Psychology, 29, 369–387. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00635.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aronson, J., Lustina, M. J., Good, C., Keough, K., Steele, C. M., & Brown, J. (1999) When white men can’t do math: Necessary and sufficient factors in stereotype threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 29–46. doi:10.1006/jesp.1998.1371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blair, I. V. (2002). The malleability of automatic stereotypes and prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 242–261. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0603_8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bleeker, M. M., & Jacobs, J. E. (2004). Achievement in math and science: Do mothers’ beliefs matter 12 years later? Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 97–109. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheryan, S., Plaut, V. C., Davies, P., & Steele, C. M. (2009). Ambient belonging: How stereotypical cues impact gender participation in computer science. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1045–1060. doi:10.1037/a0016239.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, G. L., Garcia, J., Apfel, N., & Master, A. (2006). Reducing the racial achievement gap: A social-psychological intervention. Science, 313, 1307–1310. doi:10.1126/science.1128317.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, W. A., Nezlek, J. B., & Banaji, M. R. (2004). Implicit and explicit ethnocentrism: Revisiting the ideologies of prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1332–1346. doi:10.1177/0146167204264654.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, W. A., Preacher, K. J., & Banaji, M. R. (2001). Implicit attitude measures: Consistency, stability, and convergent validity. Psychological Science, 12, 163–170. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00328.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cvencek, D., Meltzoff, A. N., & Greenwald, A. G. (2011). Math-gender stereotypes in elementary-school children. Child Development, 82, 766–779. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01529.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, N., & Asgari, S. (2004). Seeing is believing: Exposure to counterstereotypic women leaders and its effect on automatic gender stereotyping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 642–658. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2004.02.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, N., & Rivera, L. M. (2006). From automatic antigay prejudice to behavior: The moderating role of conscious beliefs about gender and behavioral control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 268–280. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.2.268.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, P. G., Spencer, S. J., Quinn, D. M., & Gerhardstein, R. (2002). Consuming images: How television commercials that elicit stereotype threat can restrain women academically and professionally. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1615–1628. doi:10.1177/014616702237644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Else-Quest, N. M., Hyde, J. S., & Linn, M. C. (2010). Cross-national patterns of gender differences in mathematics: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 103–127. doi:10.1037/a0018053.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson, K., & Lindholm, T. (2007). Making gender matter: The role of gender-based expectancies and gender identification on women’s and men’s math performance in Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 48, 329–338. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.2007.00588.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galdi, S., Arcuri, L., & Gawronski, B. (2008). Automatic mental associations predict future choices of undecided decision-makers. Science, 321, 1100–1102. doi:10.1126/science.1160769.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 692–731. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.692.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, J., & Knowles, E. D. (2008). Implicit motivation to control prejudice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 164–172. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2007.01.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glashouwer, K. A., & de Jong, P. J. (2010). Disorder-specific automatic self-associations in depression and anxiety: Results of The Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety. Psychological Medicine: A Journal of Research in Psychiatry and the Allied Sciences, 40, 1101–1111. doi:10.1017/S0033291709991371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102, 4–27. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.102.1.4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A. G., Banaji, M. R., Rudman, L. A., Farnham, S. D., Nosek, B. A., & Mellott, D. S. (2002). A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept. Psychological Review, 109, 3–25. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.109.1.3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. K. L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197–216. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A. G., Poehlman, T. A., Uhlmann, E., & Banaji, M. R. (2009). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 17–41. doi:10.1037/a0015575.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gregg, A. P., Seibt, B., & Banaji, M. R. (2006). Easier done than undone: Asymmetry in the malleability of implicit preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 1–20. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.1.1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, D. F., Benbow, C. P., Geary, D. C., Gur, R. C., Hyde, J. S., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (2007). The science of sex differences in science and mathematics. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 8, 51. doi:10.1111/j.1529-1006.2007.00032.x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C., Corbett, C., & St. Rose, A. (2010). Why so few? Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, W., Gawronski, B., Gschwender, T., Le, H., & Schmitt, M. (2005). A meta-analysis on the correlation between the Implicit Association Test and explicit self-report measures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1369–1385. doi:10.1177/0146167205275613.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, W., Gschwender, T., Friese, M., Wiers, R. W., & Schmitt, M. (2008). Working memory capacity and self-regulatory behavior: Toward an individual differences perspective on behavior determination by automatic versus controlled processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 962–977. doi:10.1037/a0012705.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, J. S., & Mertz, J. E. (2009). Gender, culture, and mathematics performance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 8801–8807. doi:10.1073/pnas.0901265106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. E., & Eccles, J. S. (1985). Gender differences in math ability: The impact of media reports on parents. Education Researcher, 14, 20–25. doi:10.3102/0013189X014003020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, J., & Dauenheimer, D. (2003). Stereotype threat in the classroom: Dejection mediates the disrupting threat effect on women’s math performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 371–381. doi:10.1177/0146167202250218.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kiefer, A. K., & Sekaquaptewa, D. (2007). Implicit stereotypes, gender identification, and math-related outcomes: A prospective study of female college students. Psychological Science, 18, 13–18. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01841.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, K. A., Banaji, M. R., Nosek, B. A., & Greenwald, A. G. (2007). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: IV: What we know (so far) about the method. In B. Wittenbrink & N. S. Schwarz (Eds.), Implicit measures of attitudes: Procedures and controversies (pp. 59–102). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, K. A., & Driver-Linn, E. (2008). Change in implicit cognitions predicts change in behavioral intentions. Poster presented at Society of Personality and Social Psychology Annual Conference, Albuquerque, NM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenton, A. P., Bruder, M., & Sedikides, C. (2009). A meta-analysis on the malleability of automatic gender stereotypes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33, 183–196. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2009.01488.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, T. (2010). The female factor: After Harvard controversy, conditions change but reputation lingers. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com

  • Logel, C., Walton, G. M., Spencer, S. J., Iserman, E. C., & von Hippel, W. (2009). Interacting with sexist men triggers social identity threat among female engineers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1089–1103. doi:10.1037/a0015703.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luhtanen, R., & Crocker, J. (1992). A collective self-esteem scale: Self-evaluation of one’s social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 302–318. doi:10.1177/0146167292183006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, D. M., Stapel, D. A., & Muller, D. (2005). We can do it: The interplay of construal orientation and social comparisons under threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 432–446. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.432.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, D. M., & Stapel, D. A. (2006). Distinguishing stereotype threat from priming effects: On the role of the social self and threat-based concerns. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 243–254. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.2.243.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, C. J., Anderson, N. E., & Lovibond, P. F. (2003). Measuring evaluative conditioning using the Implicit Association Test. Learning and Motivation, 34, 203–217. doi:10.1016/S0023-9690(03)00003-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miyake, A., Kost-Smith, L. E., Finkelstein, N. D., Pollock, S. J., Cohen, G. L., & Ito, T. A. (2010). Reducing the gender achievement gap in college science: A classroom study of values affirmation. Science, 330, 1234–123. doi:10.1126/science.1195996.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Molesworth, B. C., & Chang, B. (2009). Predicting pilots’ risk-taking behavior through an Implicit Association Test. Human Factors, 51, 845–857. doi:10.1177/0018720809357756.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, M. C., Steele, C. M., & Gross, J. J. (2007). Signaling threat: How situational cues affect women in math, science, and engineering settings. Psychological Science, 18, 879–885. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01995.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • National Science Foundation. (2008a). Thirty-three years of women in S&E faculty positions. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/infbrief/nsf08308/

  • National Science Foundation. (2008b). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/pdf/tabc-4.pdf

  • Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002). Math = Male, Me = Female, therefore Math ≠ Me. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 44–59. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.1.44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nosek, B. A., Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (2007). The Implicit Association Test at age 7: A methodological and conceptual review. In J. A. Bargh (Ed.), Automatic processes in social thinking and behavior (pp. 265–292). Psychology Press.

  • Nosek, B. A., & Smyth, F. L. (2007). A multitrait-multimethod validation of the Implicit Association Test: Implicit and explicit attitudes are related but distinct constructs. Experimental Psychology, 54, 14–29. doi:10.1027/1618-3169.54.1.14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nosek, B. A., & Smyth, F. L. (2011). Implicit social cognitions predict sex differences in math engagement and achievement. American Educational Research Journal. doi:10.3102/0002831211410683. Advance online publication.

  • Nosek, B. A., Smyth, F. L., Hansen, J. J., Devos, T., Lindner, N. M., Ranganath, K. A., et al. (2007). Pervasiveness and correlates of implicit attitudes and stereotypes. European Review of Social Psychology, 18, 36–88. doi:10.1080/10463280701489053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nosek, B. A., Smyth, F. L., Sriram, N., Lindner, N. M., Devos, T., Ayala, A., et al. (2009). National differences in gender-science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 106, 10593–10597. doi:10.1073/pnas.0809921106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. A., & Fazio, R. H. (2001). Implicit attitude formation through classical conditioning. Psychological Science, 12, 413–147. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00376.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. A., & Fazio, R. H. (2004). Trait inferences as a function of automatically-activated racial attitudes and motivation to control prejudiced reactions. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 26, 1–11. doi:10.1207/s15324834basp2601_1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pronin, E., Steele, C. M., & Ross, L. (2004). Identity bifurcation in response to stereotype threat: Women and mathematics. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 152–168. doi:10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00088-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rooth, D. (2010). Automatic associations and discrimination in hiring: Real world evidence. Labour Economics., 17, 523–534. doi:10.1016/j.labeco.2009.04.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmader, T. (2002). Gender identification moderates the effects of stereotype threat on women’s math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 194–201. doi:10.1006/jesp.2001.1500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmader, T., Johns, M., & Barquissau, M. (2004). The costs of accepting gender differences: The role of stereotype endorsement in women’s experience in the math domain. Sex Roles, 50, 835–850. doi:10.1023/B:SERS.0000029101.74557.a0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sekaquaptewa, D., & Thompson, M. (2003). Solo status, stereotype threat, and performance expectancies: Their effects on women’s performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 68–74. doi:10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00508-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shih, M., Pittinsky, T. L., & Ambady, N. (1999). Stereotype susceptibility: Identity salience and shifts in quantitative performance. Psychological Science, 10, 80–83. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, T. D., Dillow, S. S., & Hoffman, C. M. (2009). Digest of education statistics, 2008 (NCES 2009–020). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., & Quinn, D. M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women’s math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 4–28. doi:10.1006/jesp.1998.1373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffens, M. C., Jelenec, P., & Noack, P. (2010). On the leaky math pipeline: Comparing implicit math-gender stereotypes and math withdrawal in female and male children and adolescents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 947–963. doi:10.1037/a0019920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stout, J. G., Dasgupta, N., Hunsinger, M., & McManus, M. (2011). STEMing the tide: Using ingroup experts to inoculate women’s self-concept in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 255–270. doi:10.1037/a0021385.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Summers, L. (2005). Remarks at NBER conference on diversifying the science and engineering workforce. Retrieved from http://president.harvard.edu/speeches/summers_2005/nber.php

  • Thush, C., Wiers, R. W., Ames, S. L., Grenard, J. L., Sussman, S., & Stacy, A. W. (2007). Apples and oranges? Comparing indirect measures of alcohol-related cognition predicting alcohol use in at-risk adolescents. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 21, 587–591. doi:10.1037/0893-164X.21.4.587.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • von Hippel, W., Brener, L., & von Hippel, C. (2008). Implicit prejudice toward injecting drug users predicts intentions to change jobs among drug and alcohol nurses. Psychological Science, 19, 7–11. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02037.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walton, G. M., & Cohen, G. L. (2007). A question of belonging: Race, social fit, and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 82–96. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wiers, R. W., Beckers, L., Houben, K., & Hofmann, W. (2009). A short fuse after alcohol: Implicit power associations predict aggressiveness after alcohol consumption in young heavy drinkers with limited executive control. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 93, 300–305. doi:10.1016/j.pbb.2009.02.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, T. D., Lindsey, S., & Schooler, T. (2000). A model of dual attitudes. Psychological Review, 107, 101–126. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.107.1.101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wout, D., Danso, H., Jackson, J., & Spencer, S. (2008). The many faces of stereotype threat: Group- and self-threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 792–799. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2007.07.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This research was generously supported and facilitated by the Derek Bok Center for Teaching and Learning at Harvard University during the first author’s post-doctoral fellowship there. We thank the Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues for financial support in the form of a Grant-in-Aid award. We are also grateful to Alex Farias for his assistance with data collection and analysis, to Project Implicit at the University of Virginia for technical support, and to Nicholas Chan for assistance with manuscript preparation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kristin A. Lane.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lane, K.A., Goh, J.X. & Driver-Linn, E. Implicit Science Stereotypes Mediate the Relationship between Gender and Academic Participation. Sex Roles 66, 220–234 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0036-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0036-z

Keywords

Navigation