Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Household Budgets as a Social Indicator of Poverty and Inequality in South Africa

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the absence of a universally accepted method of calculating poverty, household expenditure can be used to provide an indication of inequality of wealth and serve as an indicator of poverty. Household expenditure comprises expenditure of private households on goods and services, irrespective of their durability. The portion of household budgets allocated to different types of goods and services provides an indication of the material standard of living of a population. The article discusses different definitions of poverty and compares the state of poverty according to these definitions in selected countries. This is followed by an analysis of South Africa’s economic position in the world and a comparison of the household budgets and demographic profile of South African households that fall into different income groups in order to identify the differences between the poorest and the wealthiest households in South Africa. Income inequality in South Africa is further elucidated by means of the Gini coefficient. A comparison is also made between the household budgets of the poorest households with the minimum financial living level requirements in South Africa to maintain their health and have acceptable standards of hygiene and sufficient clothing for their needs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chronic Poverty Research Centre: 2005, The Chronic Poverty Report 2004–2005. [Online]. Available: http://devenit.org/CPREinprelims.pdf

  • Economic Research Service: United States Department of Agriculture: 2003, International food consumption patterns. [Online]. Available: http://www.ers.usda.gov/data/InternationalFoodDemand. Accessed February 2005

  • Ernst Engel’s Law and Curves: 2001. [Online]. Available: http://faculty.washington.edu/krumme/resources/engel.html

  • Expenditure structure of private households, 2000: 2002. [Online]. Available: http://www.statistik.admin.ch/stat_ch/ber06/eu0604.htm

  • Gini coefficient: 2004. [Online]. Available: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/gini_coefficient

  • Kulutusmenojen määrä ja rakenne: 2003. [Online]. Available: http://www.stat.fi/tk/el/kultustutkimus/kultust_t2_2.html

  • Liao, Y.: 2002, Expenditure patterns of high- and low-income households. (UTC-UIC Information Brief IB-10A-02.) [Online]. Available: http://www.uic.edu

  • Martins, J.H.: 2002, Income and expenditure patterns of households in the Cape Peninsula, 2001. Research Report no 300 (Unisa, Bureau of Market Research, Pretoria)

  • Martins, J.H.: 2003, Income and expenditure patterns of households in the Durban metropolitan area, 2002. Research Report no 316 (Unisa, Bureau of Market Research, Pretoria)

  • Martins, J.H.: 2004a, Total household expenditure in South Africa by income group, life plane, life stage and product, 2004. Research Report no 326 (Unisa, Bureau of Market Research, Pretoria)

  • Martins, J.H.: 2004b. Income and expenditure patterns of households in the Gauteng metropolitan area. Research Report no 327 (Unisa, Bureau of Market Research, Pretoria)

  • Martins, J.H. and M.E. Maritz: 2004, Minimum and supplemented living levels in the main and other selected urban areas of the RSA. Research Report no. 334 (Unisa, Bureau of Market Research, Pretoria)

  • Mauritius in figures: 2002. [Online]. Available: http://statsmauritius.gov.mu/mifig02/househol.htm

  • Noble, M., A. Ratcliffe and G. Wright: 2004, Conceptualizing, Defining and Measuring Poverty in South Africa: An Argument for the analysis of South African Social Policy (University of Oxford, England)

  • Statistics South Africa: 2000, Measuring poverty in South Africa. Pretoria

  • Statistics South Africa: 2002, Income and expenditure of households, 2000. Pretoria (Statistical release P0111.)

  • Terblanche S.J. (2002). A History of Inequality in South Africa, 1652–2002.University of Natal Press, Pietermaritzburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Todaro, M.P.: 1994, Economic Development, 5th ed. (Longman, New York)

  • United Nations Development Programme (1998). UNDP Poverty Report, 1998: Overcoming Human Poverty. New York

  • United Nations Development Programme: 2000, UNDP Poverty Report, 2000: Overcoming Human Poverty. New York

  • United Nations Development Programme (2003). South African Human Development Report 2003. The Challenge of Sustainable Development in South Africa: Unlocking People’s Creativity. Oxford University Press Southern Africa, Cape Town

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Wyk, H. de J.: 2001, Personal disposable income in South Africa by population group, income group and district, 2000. Research Report no 279 (Unisa, Bureau of Market Research, Pretoria)

  • What Canadians spend: 2004. [Online]. Available: http://stategis.ic.gc.ca/epic/internet/inoca-bc.nsf/en/ca01827e.html

  • Whiteford, A. and D.E. Van Seventer: 2000, ‘South Africa's changing income distribution in the 1990s’. Studies in Economics and Econometrics, 24(3), pp. 7–30

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank: 1995, Social Indicators of Development (International Bank for Reconstruction and Development)

  • World Bank (2001). World Development Report 2000/2001: Attacking poverty – Selected World Development Indictors. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johan H. Martins.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Martins, J.H. Household Budgets as a Social Indicator of Poverty and Inequality in South Africa. Soc Indic Res 81, 203–221 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-006-9007-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-006-9007-0

Key words

Navigation