Skip to main content
Log in

The Incidence and Impact of Policy-Oriented Collective Action: Competing Views

  • Published:
Sociological Forum

Abstract

This article asks four questions: (1) What are our theoretical expectations about the incidence of policy-oriented collective action and its impact? (2) What do the data show about the incidence of collective action and its impact? (3) How might the impact of collective action be related to its incidence? (4) What do our findings imply for our understanding of democratic politics? We suggest that predictions that little collective action will occur are more accurate than conventionally believed; that such action is often ineffective; that it may be ineffective partly because it is so infrequent; and that the analysis of the determinants of policy change should be rethought as a result.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrews, Kenneth T., and Bob Edwards 2004 “Advocacy organizations in the U.S. political process.” Annual Review of Sociology 30:479–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ansolabehere, Stephen, John de Figueiredo, and James M. Snyder, Jr. 2003 “Why is there so little money in U.S. politics?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 17: 105–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, R. Douglas 1990 The Logic of Congressional Action. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, Frank, and Beth Leech 1998 Basic Interests. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 2001 “Interest niches and policy bandwagons.” Journal of Politics 63:1191–1213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burstein, Paul 1998a “Interest organizations, political parties, and the study of democratic politics.” In Anne Costain and Andrew McFarland (eds.), Social Movements and American Political Institutions: 39–56. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1998b Discrimination, Jobs, and Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 2003 “The impact of public opinion on public policy.” Political Research Quarterly 56:29–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burstein, Paul, and April Linton 2002 “The impact of political parties, interest groups, and social movement organizations on public policy.” Social Forces 81:380–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmines, Edward, and James Stimson 1989 Issue Evolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, Robert A. 1956 A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earl, Jennifer, Andrew Martin, John D. McCarthy, and Sarah A. Soule 2004 “The use of newspaper data in the study of collective action.” Annual Review of Sociology 30:65–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fireman, Bruce, and William A. Gamson 1979 “Utilitarian logic in the resource mobilization perspective.” In Mayer Zald and John McCarthy (eds.), The Dynamics of Social Movements: 8–45. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fording, Richard C. 2001 “The political response to black insurgency: A critical test of competing theories of the state.” American Political Science Review 95:115–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamson, William A. 1975 The Strategy of Social Protest. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, Wendy L., and Neil J. Mitchell 2000 “Disaggregating and explaining corporate political activity: Domestic and foreign corporations in national politics.” American Political Science Review 94:891–903.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilgartner, Steven, and Charles Bosk 1988 “The rise and fall of social problems.” American Journal of Sociology 94:53–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, Ronald, and Gabriela Catterberg 2002 “Trends in political action.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology 18:300–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacob, Herbert 1988 Silent Revolution: The Transformation of Divorce Law in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, J. Craig, David Jacobs, and Jon Agnone 2003 “Political opportunities and African-American protest, 1948–1997.” American Journal of Sociology 109:277–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Bryan D. 1994 Reconceiving Decision-Making in Democratic Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klandermans, Bert 1984 “Mobilization and participation.” American Sociological Review 49:583–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kollman, Ken 1998 Outside Lobbying. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krehbiel, Keith 1991 Information and Legislative Organization. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichbach, Mark Irving 1985 “Protest in America: Univariate ARIMA models of the postwar era.” Western Political Quarterly 38:388–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1995 The Rebel's Dilemma. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohmann, Susanne 1993 “A signalling model of informative and manipulative political action.” American Political Science Review 87: 319–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1994 “The dynamics of information cascades.” World Politics 47:42–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, Doug 1999 Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, Doug, Sidney Tarrow, and Charles Tilly 1996 “To map contentious politics.” Mobilization 1:17–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, Doug, and Yang Su 2002 “The war at home: Antiwar protests and congressional voting, 1965 to 1973.” American Sociological Review 67:696–721.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, John D., Clark McPhail, and Jackie Smith 1996 “Images of protest: Dimensions of selection bias in media coverage of Washington demonstrations.” American Sociological Review 61:478–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, Will H. 1995 “Rational rebels: Overcoming the free-rider problem.” Political Research Quarterly 48:417–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, Pamela E. 1993 “Formal models of collective action.” Annual Review of Sociology 19:271–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, Pamela E., and Daniel J. Myers 1999 “How events enter the public sphere.” American Journal of Sociology 105:38–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, Mancur 1971 The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Orig. pub. 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riker, William, and Peter Ordeshook 1968 “A theory of the calculus of voting.” American Political Science Review 72:25–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, Rachel, and Kathryn Ward 1996 “Evolution of the contemporary U.S. women's movement.” In Louis Kreisberg (ed.), Research in Social Movements, Conflict, and Change: 51–73. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Richard A. 1995 “Interest group influence in the U.S. Congress.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 20:89–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soule, Sarah A., Doug McAdam, John McCarthy, and Yang Su 1999 “Protest events: Cause or consequence of state action? The U.S. Women's Movement and federal congressional activities, 1956–1979.” Mobilization 4:239–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soule, Sarah A., and Susan Olzak 2004 “When do movements matter? The politics of contingency and the Equal Rights Amendment.” American Sociological Review 69:473–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarrow, Sidney 1994 Power in Movement: Social Movements, Collective Action, and Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Charles, and David Jodice 1983 The World Handbook of Social and Political Indicators. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasi, Ion Bogdan, and Michael Macy 2003 “The mobilizer's dilemma: Crisis, empowerment, and collective action.” Social Forces 81:983–998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verba, Sidney, Kay Lehman Schlozman, and Henry E. Brady 1995 Voice and Equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, John R. 1996 Interest Groups and Congress: Lobbying, Contributions, and Influence. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Burstein.

Additional information

This is a revised version of a paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, San Francisco, California, August 2004. The research was supported in part by NSF grant SES-0001509.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Burstein, P., Sausner, S. The Incidence and Impact of Policy-Oriented Collective Action: Competing Views. Sociol Forum 20, 403–419 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11206-005-6595-4

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11206-005-6595-4

Keywords

Navigation