Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Social Justice Research 2/2011

01.06.2011

Retributive and Inclusive Justice Goals and Forgiveness: The Influence of Motivational Values

verfasst von: Peter Strelan, N. T. Feather, Ian McKee

Erschienen in: Social Justice Research | Ausgabe 2/2011

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Who is more likely to forgive, given that justice is important and motivating for people? In this article, we argue that the relation between justice and forgiveness depends on the type of justice involved; specifically, the goals of justice, i.e. retributive versus inclusive. We also explored the influence of motivational values on justice goals and forgiveness. Using data from 178 undergraduate psychology students who responded to measures of retributive and inclusive justice attitudes, forgiveness attitudes and dispositions, and values, we found support for our hypotheses that retributive justice goals are negatively related to forgiving attitudes and dispositions; inclusive justice goals are positively related to forgiveness; and benevolence and power values play the dominant role in predicting forgiveness. The results have implications for how the relation between justice and forgiveness is conceptualised and applied.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Bentham, J. (1962). Principles of penal law. In J. Bowring (Ed.), The works of Jeremy Bentham (p. 396). New York: Russell and Russell. Bentham, J. (1962). Principles of penal law. In J. Bowring (Ed.), The works of Jeremy Bentham (p. 396). New York: Russell and Russell.
Zurück zum Zitat Berry, J. W., Worthington, E. L., Jr., O’Connor, L. E., Parrott, L., I. I. I., & Wade, N. G. (2005). Forgivingness, vengeful rumination, and affective traits. Journal of Personality, 73, 183–250.PubMedCrossRef Berry, J. W., Worthington, E. L., Jr., O’Connor, L. E., Parrott, L., I. I. I., & Wade, N. G. (2005). Forgivingness, vengeful rumination, and affective traits. Journal of Personality, 73, 183–250.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, shame, and reintegration. Sydney: Cambridge University Press. Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, shame, and reintegration. Sydney: Cambridge University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Brown, R. P. (2003). Measuring individual differences in the tendency to forgive: Construct validity and links with depression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 759–771.PubMedCrossRef Brown, R. P. (2003). Measuring individual differences in the tendency to forgive: Construct validity and links with depression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 759–771.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Carlsmith, K. M., Darley, J. M., & Robinson, P. H. (2002). Why do we punish? Deterrence and just deserts as motives for punishment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 284–299.PubMedCrossRef Carlsmith, K. M., Darley, J. M., & Robinson, P. H. (2002). Why do we punish? Deterrence and just deserts as motives for punishment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 284–299.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Darley, J. M. (2001). Citizens’ sense of justice and the legal system. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 10–13.CrossRef Darley, J. M. (2001). Citizens’ sense of justice and the legal system. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 10–13.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Darley, J. M., & Pittman, T. S. (2003). The psychology of compensatory and retributive justice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 324–336.PubMedCrossRef Darley, J. M., & Pittman, T. S. (2003). The psychology of compensatory and retributive justice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 324–336.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat de Keijser, J. W., van der Leeden, R., & Jackson, J. L. (2002). From moral theory to penal attitudes and back: A theoretically integrated modeling approach. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 20, 317–335.CrossRef de Keijser, J. W., van der Leeden, R., & Jackson, J. L. (2002). From moral theory to penal attitudes and back: A theoretically integrated modeling approach. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 20, 317–335.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ellsworth, P. C., & Gross, S. R. (1994). Hardening of the attitudes: Americans’ views on the death penalty. Journal of Social Issues, 50, 19–52.CrossRef Ellsworth, P. C., & Gross, S. R. (1994). Hardening of the attitudes: Americans’ views on the death penalty. Journal of Social Issues, 50, 19–52.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Enright, R. D., & Fitzgibbons, R. P. (2000). Helping clients forgive: An empirical guide for resolving anger and restoring hope. Washington, DC: APA.CrossRef Enright, R. D., & Fitzgibbons, R. P. (2000). Helping clients forgive: An empirical guide for resolving anger and restoring hope. Washington, DC: APA.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Exline, J. J., & Baumeister, R. F. (2000). Expressing forgiveness and repentance: Benefits and barriers. In M. E. McCullough, K. Pargament, & C. Thoresen (Eds.), Forgiveness: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 133–155). New York: Guilford. Exline, J. J., & Baumeister, R. F. (2000). Expressing forgiveness and repentance: Benefits and barriers. In M. E. McCullough, K. Pargament, & C. Thoresen (Eds.), Forgiveness: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 133–155). New York: Guilford.
Zurück zum Zitat Feather, N. T. (1975). Values in education and society. New York: Free Press. Feather, N. T. (1975). Values in education and society. New York: Free Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Feather, N. T. (1994). Human values and their relation to justice. Journal of Social Issues, 50, 129–151.CrossRef Feather, N. T. (1994). Human values and their relation to justice. Journal of Social Issues, 50, 129–151.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Feather, N. T. (1999). Values, achievement, and justice: Studies in the psychology of deservingness. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Feather, N. T. (1999). Values, achievement, and justice: Studies in the psychology of deservingness. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Zurück zum Zitat Feather, N. T. (2005). Values, religion, and motivation. In M. L. Maehr & S. A. Karabenick (Eds.), Motivation and religion. Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 14, pp. 35–73). Amsterdam: Elsevier. Feather, N. T. (2005). Values, religion, and motivation. In M. L. Maehr & S. A. Karabenick (Eds.), Motivation and religion. Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 14, pp. 35–73). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Zurück zum Zitat Feather, N. T., & Souter, J. (2002). Reactions to mandatory sentences in relation to the ethnic identity and criminal history of the offender. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 417–438.PubMedCrossRef Feather, N. T., & Souter, J. (2002). Reactions to mandatory sentences in relation to the ethnic identity and criminal history of the offender. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 417–438.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kant, I. (1952). The science of right (W. Hastie, Trans.). In R. Hutchins (Ed.), Great books of the Western world, Vol. 42. Kant (pp. 397–446). Chicago: Encyclopedia Brittanica. Kant, I. (1952). The science of right (W. Hastie, Trans.). In R. Hutchins (Ed.), Great books of the Western world, Vol. 42. Kant (pp. 397–446). Chicago: Encyclopedia Brittanica.
Zurück zum Zitat Karremans, J. C., & Van Lange, P. A. (2005). Does activating justice help or hurt in promoting forgiveness? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 290–297.CrossRef Karremans, J. C., & Van Lange, P. A. (2005). Does activating justice help or hurt in promoting forgiveness? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 290–297.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lerner, M. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. New York: Plenum. Lerner, M. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. New York: Plenum.
Zurück zum Zitat Lucas, T., Young, J. D., Zhdanova, L., & Alexander, S. (2010). Self and other justice beliefs, impulsivity, rumination, and forgiveness: Justice beliefs can both prevent and promote forgiveness. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 851–856.CrossRef Lucas, T., Young, J. D., Zhdanova, L., & Alexander, S. (2010). Self and other justice beliefs, impulsivity, rumination, and forgiveness: Justice beliefs can both prevent and promote forgiveness. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 851–856.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat McCullough, M. E. (2008). Beyond revenge: The evolution of the forgiveness instinct. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. McCullough, M. E. (2008). Beyond revenge: The evolution of the forgiveness instinct. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Zurück zum Zitat McCullough, M. E., & Hoyt, W. T. (2002). Transgression-related motivational dispostions: Personality substrates of forgiveness and their links to the Big Five. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1556–1573.CrossRef McCullough, M. E., & Hoyt, W. T. (2002). Transgression-related motivational dispostions: Personality substrates of forgiveness and their links to the Big Five. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1556–1573.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat McCullough, M. E., Worthington, E. L., & Rachal, K. C. (1997). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 321–336.PubMedCrossRef McCullough, M. E., Worthington, E. L., & Rachal, K. C. (1997). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 321–336.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat McKee, I. R. (2005). Modeling revenge: The roles of affect and cognition in personal retribution. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia. McKee, I. R. (2005). Modeling revenge: The roles of affect and cognition in personal retribution. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
Zurück zum Zitat McKee, I. R., & Feather, N. T. (2008). Revenge, retribution, and values: Social attitudes and punitive sentencing. Social Justice Research, 21, 138–163.CrossRef McKee, I. R., & Feather, N. T. (2008). Revenge, retribution, and values: Social attitudes and punitive sentencing. Social Justice Research, 21, 138–163.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Oswald, M. E., Hupfied, J., Klug, S. C., & Gabriel, U. (2002). Lay-perspectives on criminal deviance, goals of punishment, and punitivity. Social Justice Research, 15, 85–98.CrossRef Oswald, M. E., Hupfied, J., Klug, S. C., & Gabriel, U. (2002). Lay-perspectives on criminal deviance, goals of punishment, and punitivity. Social Justice Research, 15, 85–98.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Reed, A. I., & Aquino, K. F. (2003). Moral identity and the expanding circle of moral regard towards out-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1270–1286.PubMedCrossRef Reed, A. I., & Aquino, K. F. (2003). Moral identity and the expanding circle of moral regard towards out-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1270–1286.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ristovski, A., & Wertheim, E. H. (2005). Investigation of compensation source, trait empathy, satisfaction with outcome, and forgiveness in the criminal context. Australian Psychologist, 40, 63–69.CrossRef Ristovski, A., & Wertheim, E. H. (2005). Investigation of compensation source, trait empathy, satisfaction with outcome, and forgiveness in the criminal context. Australian Psychologist, 40, 63–69.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Roberts, J. V., & Stalans, L. J. (2004). Restorative sentencing: Exploring the views of the public. Social Justice Research, 17, 315–334.CrossRef Roberts, J. V., & Stalans, L. J. (2004). Restorative sentencing: Exploring the views of the public. Social Justice Research, 17, 315–334.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press. Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Rusbult, C. E., Hannon, P. A., Stocker, S. L., & Finkel, E. J. (2005). Forgiveness and relational repair. In E. L. Worthington (Ed.), Handbook of forgiveness (pp. 185–206). New York: Brunner-Routledge. Rusbult, C. E., Hannon, P. A., Stocker, S. L., & Finkel, E. J. (2005). Forgiveness and relational repair. In E. L. Worthington (Ed.), Handbook of forgiveness (pp. 185–206). New York: Brunner-Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Schmitt, M., Gollwitzer, M., Maes, J., & Arbach, D. (2005). Justice sensitivity: Assessment and location in the personality space. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 21, 202–211.CrossRef Schmitt, M., Gollwitzer, M., Maes, J., & Arbach, D. (2005). Justice sensitivity: Assessment and location in the personality space. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 21, 202–211.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Schwartz, S. H., & Rubel, T. (2005). Sex differences in value priorities: Cross-cultural and multimethod studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 1010–1028.PubMedCrossRef Schwartz, S. H., & Rubel, T. (2005). Sex differences in value priorities: Cross-cultural and multimethod studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 1010–1028.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sherman, L. W., Strang, H., Angel, C., Woods, D., Barnes, G. C., Bennett, S., et al. (2005). Effects of face-to-face restorative justice on victims of crime in four randomized, controlled trials. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1, 367–395.CrossRef Sherman, L. W., Strang, H., Angel, C., Woods, D., Barnes, G. C., Bennett, S., et al. (2005). Effects of face-to-face restorative justice on victims of crime in four randomized, controlled trials. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1, 367–395.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Strang, H., Sherman, L., & Angel, C. M. (2006). Victim evaluations of face-to-face restorative justice conferences: A quasi-experimental analysis. Journal of Social Issues, 62, 281–306.CrossRef Strang, H., Sherman, L., & Angel, C. M. (2006). Victim evaluations of face-to-face restorative justice conferences: A quasi-experimental analysis. Journal of Social Issues, 62, 281–306.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Strelan, P. (2007a). Who forgives others, themselves, and situations? The roles of narcissism, guilt, self-esteem, and agreeableness. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 259–269.CrossRef Strelan, P. (2007a). Who forgives others, themselves, and situations? The roles of narcissism, guilt, self-esteem, and agreeableness. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 259–269.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Strelan, P. (2007b). The prosocial, adaptive qualities of just world beliefs: Implications for the relationship between justice and forgiveness. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 881–890.CrossRef Strelan, P. (2007b). The prosocial, adaptive qualities of just world beliefs: Implications for the relationship between justice and forgiveness. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 881–890.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Strelan, P., Feather, N. T., & McKee, I. (2008). Justice and forgiveness: Experimental evidence for compatibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1538–1544.CrossRef Strelan, P., Feather, N. T., & McKee, I. (2008). Justice and forgiveness: Experimental evidence for compatibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1538–1544.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Strelan, P., & Sutton, R. M. (2011). When just world beliefs promote and when they inhibit forgiveness. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 163–168.CrossRef Strelan, P., & Sutton, R. M. (2011). When just world beliefs promote and when they inhibit forgiveness. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 163–168.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wenzel, M., Okimoto, T. G., Feather, N. T., & Platow, M. J. (2008). Retributive and restorative justice. Law and Human Behavior, 32, 375–389.PubMedCrossRef Wenzel, M., Okimoto, T. G., Feather, N. T., & Platow, M. J. (2008). Retributive and restorative justice. Law and Human Behavior, 32, 375–389.PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Yamhure Thompson, L. Y., Snyder, C. R., Hoffman, L., Michael, S. T., Rasmussen, H. N., Billings, L. S., et al. (2005). Dispositional forgiveness of self, others, and situations. Journal of Personality, 73, 313–359.CrossRef Yamhure Thompson, L. Y., Snyder, C. R., Hoffman, L., Michael, S. T., Rasmussen, H. N., Billings, L. S., et al. (2005). Dispositional forgiveness of self, others, and situations. Journal of Personality, 73, 313–359.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Retributive and Inclusive Justice Goals and Forgiveness: The Influence of Motivational Values
verfasst von
Peter Strelan
N. T. Feather
Ian McKee
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2011
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Social Justice Research / Ausgabe 2/2011
Print ISSN: 0885-7466
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-6725
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-011-0132-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2011

Social Justice Research 2/2011 Zur Ausgabe