nach oben

Erschienen in:

17.11.2018

Perceptions of Economic Inequality and Support for Redistribution: The role of Existential and Utopian Standards

verfasst von: Efraín García-Sánchez, Guillermo B. Willis, Rosa Rodríguez-Bailón, Jorge Palacio Sañudo, Jean David Polo, Erico Rentería Pérez

Erschienen in: Social Justice Research | Ausgabe 4/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Perceived greater economic inequality is supposedly associated with higher demand for redistribution. However, the findings in the literature are mixed in this regard, with some researchers providing evidence in favour of this association and some findings evidence against it. Given that perceived economic inequality and endorsement of system-justifying beliefs are related to increased inequality acceptance, we explore the interplay between them in relation to support for redistribution. This study is intended to shed light on the role of utopian standards (ideal estimates about what ought to be) as one mechanism that affects the relationship between perceived greater economic inequality and support for redistribution. Based on correlational data (N = 794), we conducted a conditional process analysis and found that perceived greater inequality displayed a negative indirect effect on support for redistribution, through acceptance of ideal level of economic inequality: Perception of higher inequality was related to increased ideal levels of inequality and thus with lower support for redistribution. In addition, we found that economic system-justifying beliefs conditioned the effect of perceived economic inequality in two ways: First, perceived economic inequality was positively associated with higher acceptance of inequality, and this association was stronger for those that justified the economic system more, and perceived greater inequality was associated with higher support for redistribution—but only for those who endorsed lower levels of economic system justification beliefs. These findings provide evidence that perceived greater economic inequality does not in itself lead to a push for more redistribution; rather, utopian standards such as ideal estimates of economic inequality, which are conditioned by system-justifying ideologies.

Nächster Artikel Digging for Gold or Justice? Misrecognition and Marginalization of “Illegal” Small-Scale Miners in Ghana

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

The over-representation of women in this study was due to the characteristics of our sample. Since most of the participants were enrolled in psychology and health university degrees, it is common to find a majority of women over men participants.

RMSEA = root mean square error of approximation; SRMR = standardized root mean square residual, CFI = Comparative fit index.

We used 7 ranges of household income in Colombian Pesos (COP) (The proportion of participants in each range is shown in parentheses): 1 = “$690,000 or less” (8.3%), 2 = “Between $690,001 and $1,500,000” (25.5%), 3 = “Between $1,500,001 and $3,500,000” (30.6%), 4 = “Between $3,000,001 and $5,000,000” (18.7%), 5 = “Between $5,000,001 and $8,000,000” (9.1%), 6 = “Between $8,000,000 and $10,000,000” (4.6%), and 7 “More than $10,000,001” (3.1%).

Available at: https://goo.gl/SWHqDV.

Alesina, A., & Angeleto, G.-M. (2005). Fairness and redistribution. American Economic Review, 95(4), 960–980.CrossRef

Alesina, A., & Giuliano, P. (2009). Preferences for redistribution. Handbook of Social Economics, 1(1B), 93–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53187-2.00001-2.CrossRef

Alesina, A., & La Ferrara, E. (2005). Preferences for redistribution in the land of opportunities. Journal of Public Economics, 89(5–6), 897–931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.05.009.CrossRef

Alesina, A., Stantcheva, S., & Teso, E. (2018). Intergenerational mobility and preferences for redistribution. American Economic Review, 108(2), 521–554. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20162015.CrossRef

Alvaredo, F., Chancel, L., Piketty, T., Saez, E., & Zucman, G. (2018). World inequality report 2018. Retrieved from wir2018.wid.world.

Atkinson, A. B. (2015). Inequality. What can be done?. London, England: Harvard University Press.CrossRef

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173.CrossRefPubMed

Bartels, L. M. (2005). Homer gets a tax cut: Inequality and public policy in the American mind. Perspectives on Politics, 3(01), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592705050036.CrossRef

Benabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2006). Belief in a just world and redistributive politics. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(2), 699–746. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2006.121.2.699.CrossRef

Binelli, C., & Loveless, M. (2016). The urban-rural divide: Perceptions of income and social inequality in Central and Eastern Europe. Economics of Transition, 24(2), 211–231. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecot.12087.CrossRef

Borge, L. E., & Rattsø, J. (2004). Income distribution and tax structure: Empirical test of the Meltzer–Richard hypothesis. European Economic Review, 48(4), 805–826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2003.09.003.CrossRef

Brooks, C., & Manza, J. (2013). A Broken public? Americans’ responses to the great recession. American Sociological Review, 78(5), 727–748. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122413498255.CrossRef

Buttrick, N. R., & Oishi, S. (2017). The psychological consequences of income inequality. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 11(3), e12304. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12304.CrossRef

Castillo, J. C. (2011). Legitimacy of inequality in a highly unequal context: Evidence from the Chilean case. Social Justice Research, 24(4), 314–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-011-0144-5.CrossRef

Castillo, J. C. (2012). Is inequality becoming just? Changes in public opinion about economic distribution in Chile. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 31(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-9856.2011.00605.x.CrossRef

Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R., & Kallgren, C. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6), 1015–1026. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.1015.CrossRef

Cimpian, A., & Salomon, E. (2014). The inherence heuristic: An intuitive means of making sense of the world, and a potential precursor to psychological essentialism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37(05), 461–480. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X13002197.CrossRefPubMed

Cruces, G., Perez-Truglia, R., & Tetaz, M. (2013). Biased perceptions of income distribution and preferences for redistribution: Evidence from a survey experiment. Journal of Public Economics, 98, 100–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2012.10.009.CrossRef

Dimick, M., Rueda, D., & Stegmueller, D. (2018). Models of other-regarding preferences, inequality, and redistribution. Annual Review of Political Science, 21(1), 441–460. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-091515-030034.CrossRef

Durante, R., Putterman, L., & van der Weele, J. (2014). Preferences for redistribution and perception of fairness: An experimental study. Journal of the European Economic Association, 12(4), 1059–1086. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeea.12082.CrossRef

Eidelman, S., & Crandall, C. S. (2012). Bias in favor of the status quo. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6(3), 270–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2012.00427.x.CrossRef

Finseraas, H. (2009). Income inequality and demand for redistribution: A multilevel analysis of european public opinion. Scandinavian Political Studies, 32(1), 94–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2008.00211.x.CrossRef

Fong, C. (2001). Social preferences, self-interest, and the demand for redistribution. Journal of Public Economics, 82(2), 225–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(00)00141-9.CrossRef

Friesen, J. P., Laurin, K., Shepherd, S., Gaucher, D., & Kay, A. C. (2018). System justification: Experimental evidence, its contextual nature, and implications for social change. British Journal of Social Psychology, 9, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12278.CrossRef

Fritz, M. S., & Mackinnon, D. P. (2015). Required sample size to detect the mediated effect. Psychological Science, 18(3), 233–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01882.x.CrossRef

García-Sánchez, E., Van der Toorn, J., Rodríguez-Bailón, R., & Willis, G. B. (2018). The vicious cycle of economic inequality: The role of ideology in shaping the relationship between “what is” and “what ought to be” in 41 countries. Social Psychological and Personality Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550618811500.CrossRef

Georgiadis, A., & Manning, A. (2012). Spend it like eckham? Inequality and redistribution in the UK, 1983–2004. Public Choice, 151(3–4), 537–563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-010-9758-7.CrossRef

Gimpelson, V., & Treisman, D. (2017). Misperceiving inequality. Economics and Politics. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecpo.12103.CrossRef

Gonthier, F. (2017). Parallel publics? Support for income redistribution in times of economic crisis. European Journal of Political Research, 56(1), 92–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12168.CrossRef

Guillaud, E. (2013). Preferences for redistribution: An empirical analysis over 33 countries. Journal of Economic Inequality, 11(1), 57–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-011-9205-0.CrossRef

Hadler, M. (2005). Why do people accept different income ratios?: A multi-level comparison of thirty countries. Acta Sociologica, 48(2), 131–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699305053768.CrossRef

Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression based approach (Vol. 2). New York: Guilford Press.

Hennes, E. P., Hannah Nam, H., Stern, C., & Jost, J. T. (2012). Not all ideologies are created equal: Epistemic, existential, and relational needs predict system-justifying attitudes. Social Cognition, 30(6), 669–688.CrossRef

Ho, A. K., Sidanius, J., Kteily, N., Sheehy-Skeffington, J., Pratto, F., Henkel, K. E., et al. (2015). The nature of social dominance orientation: Theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO₇ scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(6), 1003–1028. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000033.CrossRefPubMed

Hussak, L., & Cimpian, A. (2015). An early-emerging explanatory heuristic promotes support for the status quo. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(5), 739–752. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000033.CrossRefPubMed

Jasso, G. (2009). A new model of wage determination and wage inequality. Rationality and Society, 21(1), 113–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043463108099350.CrossRef

Jasso, G., Törnblom, K. Y., & Sabbagh, C. (2016). Distributive justice. In C. Sabbagh & M. Schmitt (Eds.), Handbook of social justice theory and research (pp. 201–218). New York, NY: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3216-0.CrossRef

Jaume, L., Etchezahar, E., & Cervone, N. (2012). La justificación del sistema económico y su relación con la orientación a la dominancia social. Boletín de Psicología, 106, 81–91.

Jost, J. T., Becker, J., Osborne, D., & Badaan, V. (2017). Missing in (Collective) action. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(2), 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417690633.CrossRef

Jost, J. T., Blount, S., Pfeffer, J., & Hunyady, G. (2003). Fair market ideology: Its cognitive-motivational underpinnings. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25(03), 53–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(03)25002-4.CrossRef

Jost, J. T., Federico, C. M., & Napier, J. L. (2009). Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 307–337. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163600.CrossRefPubMed

Jost, J. T., & Hunyady, O. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of system-justifying ideologies. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 260–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00377.x.CrossRef

Jost, J. T., Langer, M., Badaan, V., Azevedo, F., Etchezahar, E., Ungaretti, J., et al. (2017). Ideology and the limits of self-interest: System justification motivation and conservative advantages in mass politics. Traditional Issues in Psychological Science, 3(3), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1037/str0000014.CrossRef

Jost, J. T., & Thompson, E. P. (2000). Group-based dominance and opposition to equality as independent predictors of self-esteem, ethnocentrism, and social policy attitudes among African Americans and European Americans. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36(3), 209–232. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1999.1403.CrossRef

Kay, A. C., Gaucher, D., Peach, J. M., Laurin, K., Friesen, J., Zanna, M. P., et al. (2009). Inequality, discrimination, and the power of the status quo : Direct evidence for a motivation to see the way things are as the way they should be. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(3), 421–434. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015997.CrossRefPubMed

Kenworthy, L., & Mccall, L. (2008). Inequality, public opinion and redistribution. Socio-Economic Review, 6(1), 35–68. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwm006.CrossRef

Kiatpongsan, S., & Norton, M. I. (2014). How much (more) should ceos make? A universal desire for more equal pay. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 587–593. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614549773.CrossRefPubMed

Kluegel, J. R., & Smith, E. R. (1986). Beliefs about inequality. Americans’views of what is and what ought to be. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

Kteily, N. S., Sheehy-Skeffington, J., & Ho, A. K. (2017). Hierarchy in the eye of the beholder: (Anti-)egalitarianism shapes perceived levels of social inequality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(1), 136–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000097.CrossRefPubMed

Kuklinski, J. H., & Quirk, P. J. (2000). Reconsidering the rational public: Cognition, heuristics, and mass opinion. Elements of Reason: Cognition, Choice and the Bounds of Rationality. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805813.008.CrossRef

Kuklinski, J. H., Quirk, P. J., Jerit, J., Schwieder, D., & Rich, R. F. (2000). Misinformation and the currency of democratic citizenship. The Journal of Politics, 62(3), 790–816. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-3816.00033.CrossRef

Kuziemko, I., Norton, M. I., Saez, E., & Stantcheva, S. (2015). How elastic are preferences for redistribution? Evidence from randomized survey experiments. American Economic Review, 105(4), 1478–1508. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20130360.CrossRef

Loveless, M. (2013). The deterioration of democratic political culture: Consequences of the perception of inequality. Social Justice Research, 26(4), 471–491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-013-0198-7.CrossRef

Loveless, M., & Whitefield, S. (2011). Being unequal and seeing inequality: Explaining the political significance of social inequality in new market democracies. European Journal of Political Research, 50(2), 239–266. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2010.01929.x.CrossRef

Luebker, M. (2014). Income inequality, redistribution, and poverty: Contrasting rational choice and behavioral perspectives. Review of Income and Wealth, 60(1), 133–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12100.CrossRef

MacKinnon, D. P., Krull, J. L., & Lockwood, C. M. (2000). Equivalence of the mediation, confounding and suppression effect. Prevention Science : The Official Journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 1(4), 173–181. https://doi.org/10.1023/A1026595011371.CrossRef

McCall, L. (2013). The undeserving rich. American beliefs about inequality, opportunity, and redistribution. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

McCall, L., Burk, D., Laperrière, M., & Richeson, J. A. (2017). Exposure to rising inequality shapes Americans’ opportunity beliefs and policy support. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(36), 9593–9598. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1706253114.CrossRef

Meltzer, A. H., & Richard, S. (1981). A rational theory of government. Journal of Political Economy, 89(5), 914–927. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00141072.CrossRef

Norton, M. I., & Ariely, D. (2011). Building a better america—one wealth quintile at a time. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 9–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393524.CrossRefPubMed

Norton, M. I., Neal, D. T., Govan, C. L., Ariely, D., & Holland, E. (2014). The not-so-common-wealth of australia: Evidence for a cross-cultural desire for a more equal distribution of wealth. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 14(1), 339–351. https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12058.CrossRef

Osberg, L., & Smeeding, T. (2006). “Fair” inequality? Attitudes toward pay differentials: the united states in comparative perspective. American Sociological Review, 71(3), 450–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240607100305.CrossRef

Page, L., & Goldstein, D. G. (2016). Subjective beliefs about the income distribution and preferences for redistribution. Social Choice and Welfare, 47(1), 25–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-015-0945-9.CrossRef

Piketty, T. (1995). Social mobility and redistributive politics. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(3), 551–584. https://doi.org/10.2307/2946692.CrossRef

Rodriguez-Bailon, R., Bratanova, B., Willis, G. B., Lopez-Rodriguez, L., Sturrock, A., & Loughnan, S. (2017). Social class and ideologies of inequality: How they uphold unequal societies. Journal of Social Issues, 73(1), 99–116. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12206.CrossRef

Rucker, D. D., Preacher, K. J., Tormala, Z. L., & Petty, R. E. (2011). Mediation analysis in social psychology: current practices and new recommendations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(6), 359–371. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00355.x.CrossRef

Schmidt-Catran, A. W. (2016). Economic inequality and public demand for redistribution: Combining cross-sectional and longitudinal evidence. Socio-Economic Review, 14(1), 119–140. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwu030.CrossRef

Shamon, H., & Dülmer, H. (2014). Raising the question on ‘who should get what?’ again: On the importance of ideal and existential standards. Social Justice Research, 27(3), 340–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-014-0217-3.CrossRef

Shepelak, N. J., & Alwin, D. F. (1986). Beliefs about inequality and perceptions of distributive justice. American Sociological Review, 51(1), 30–46.CrossRef

Trump, K.-S. (2017). Income inequality influences perceptions of legitimate income differences. British Journal of Political Science, 1, 24. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123416000326.CrossRef

Van Heuvelen, T. (2017). Unequal views of inequality: Cross-national support for redistribution 1985–2011. Social Science Research, 64, 43–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.10.010.CrossRef

Verwiebe, R., & Wegener, B. (2000). Social inequality and the perceived income justice gap. Social Justice Research, 13(19777), 123–149.CrossRef

Wakslak, C. J., Jost, J. T., Tyler, T. R., & Chen, E. S. (2007). Moral outrage mediates the dampening effect of system justification on support for redistributive social policies. Psychological Science, 18, 267–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01887.x.CrossRefPubMed

Wilkinson, R. G., & Pickett, K. E. (2017). The enemy between us: The psychological and social costs of inequality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 47(1), 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2275.CrossRef

Willis, G. B., Rodríguez-Bailón, R., López-Rodríguez, L., & García-Sánchez, E. (2015). Legitimacy moderates the relation between perceived and ideal economic inequalities. Social Justice Research, 28(4), 493–508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-015-0253-7.CrossRef

Titel: Perceptions of Economic Inequality and Support for Redistribution: The role of Existential and Utopian Standards
verfasst von: Efraín García-Sánchez
Guillermo B. Willis
Rosa Rodríguez-Bailón
Jorge Palacio Sañudo
Jean David Polo
Erico Rentería Pérez
Publikationsdatum: 17.11.2018
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Social Justice Research / Ausgabe 4/2018
Print ISSN: 0885-7466
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-6725
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-018-0317-6