Abstract
This paper explores the fundamental ideas that have motivated the idea of emergence and the movement of emergentism. The concept of reduction, which lies at the heart of the emergence idea is explicated, and it is shown how the thesis that emergent properties are irreducible gives a unified account of emergence. The paper goes on to discuss two fundamental unresolved issues for emergentism. The first is that of giving a “positive” characterization of emergence; the second is to give a coherent explanation of how “downward” causation, a central component of emergentism, is able to avoid the problem of overdetermination.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexander S. (1927). Space, time, and deity, vol. 2. London, Macmillan
Bedau M. (1997). Weak emergence. Philosophical Perspectives, 11, 375–399
Broad C.D. (1925). The mind and its place in nature. London, Routledge & Kegan Paul
Campbell R.J., Bickhard M.H. (forthcoming). Physicalism, emergence and downward causation.
Chalmers D.J. (1996). The conscious mind. New York and Oxford, Oxford University Press
Davidson D. (1969). The individuation of events. In: Rescher N., et al.(eds),In Essays in Honor of Carl G. HempelDordrecht, Holland: Reidel Publishing Co. (Reprinted in Davidson (1980). Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford, Oxford University Press)
Gillett, C. (forthcoming). Understanding the new reductionism: the metaphysics of realization and reduction by functionalization.
Humphreys P. (1997). How properties emerge. Philosophy of Science, 64, 1–17
Kim J. (1998). Mind in a physical world. Cambridge, Mass MIT Press
Kim J. (1999). Making sense of emergence. Philosophical Studies, 95, 3–36
Kim J. (2003). Blocking causal drain and other maintenance chores with mental causation. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 67, 151–176
Kim J. (2005). Physicalism, or something near enough. Princeton, Princeton University Press
Marras A. (2002). Kim on reduction. Erkenntnis, 57, 231–257
Mills E. (1996). Interactionism and overdetermination. American Philosophical Quarterly, 33, 105–117
Morgan C.L. (1923). Emergent evolution. London, Williams and Norgate
Nagel E. (1961). The structure of science. New York, Harcourt, Brace and World
Newman D.V. (1997). Chaos, emergence, and the mind-body problem. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 79, 180–196
O’Connor, T., & Wong, H. Y. (forthcoming). The metaphysics of emergence.Noûs
Rueger A. (2000). Physical emergence, diachronic and synchronic. Synthese, 124, 297–322
Shoemaker S. (1980). Causality and properties. In: Inwagen P.V. (eds), Time and cause. Dordrecht, Holland, Reidel Publishing Co
Silberstein M. (2001). Converging on emergence. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8, 61–98
Van Gulick R. (2001). Reduction, emergence and other recent options on the mind-body problem: a philosophic overview. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8, 1–34
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Kim (2004). This paper is largely based on my “Making Sense of Emergence”, Philosophical Studies 95 (1999), 3–36, and “On Being Realistic about Emergence”. The latter was presented at the Emergence/Reduction Workshop at the Institut Jean Nicod in the fall of 2003; as this paper has been promised for another publication, the present paper was expressly composed in order to provide a critical target for the commentaries by Marras and Wong.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, J. Emergence: Core ideas and issues. Synthese 151, 547–559 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-006-9025-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-006-9025-0