Abstract
I argue against the tendency in the philosophy of science literature to link abduction to the inference to the best explanation (IBE), and in particular, to claim that Peircean abduction is a conceptual predecessor to IBE. This is not to discount either abduction or IBE. Rather the purpose of this paper is to clarify the relation between Peircean abduction and IBE in accounting for ampliative inference in science. This paper aims at a proper classification—not justification—of types of scientific reasoning. In particular, I claim that Peircean abduction is an in-depth account of the process of generating explanatory hypotheses, while IBE, at least in Peter Lipton’s thorough treatment, is a more encompassing account of the processes both of generating and of evaluating scientific hypotheses. There is then a two-fold problem with the claim that abduction is IBE. On the one hand, it conflates abduction and induction, which are two distinct forms of logical inference, with two distinct aims, as shown by Charles S. Peirce; on the other hand it lacks a clear sense of the full scope of IBE as an account of scientific inference.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aliseda A. (2006) Abductive reasoning: Logical investigations into discovery and explanation. Springer, Dordrecht
Anderson D. (1986) The evolution of Peirce’s concept of abduction. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 22: 145–164
Barnes E. (1995) Inference to the loveliest explanation. Synthese 103: 252–277
Burks A. (1946) Peirce’s theory of abduction. Philosophy of Science 13: 301–306
Fann K. T. (1970) Peirce’s theory of abduction. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague
Frankfurt H. G. (1958) Peirce’s notion of abduction. The Journal of Philosophy 55: 593–596
Hanson N. R. (1965) Patterns of discovery: An inquiry into the conceptual foundations of science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Harman G. H. (1965) The inference to the best explanation. The Philosophical Review 74: 88–95
Hintikka J. (1998) What is abduction? The fundamental problem of contemporary epistemology. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 34(3): 503–533
Hookway C. (1985) Peirce. Routledge, London
Kent B. (1997) The interconnectedness of Peirce’s diagrammatic thought. In: Houser N., Roberts D., Van Evra J. (eds) Studies in the logic of Charles Sanders Peirce. Indiana University Press, Indianapolis, pp 445–459
Kitcher P. (1981) Explanatory unification. Philosophy of Science 48: 507–531
Kuhn T. (1964) The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Lipton P. (1991) Inference to the best explanation. Routledge, New York
Lipton P. (2004) Inference to the best explanation: Second edition. Routledge, New York
Minnameier G. (2004) Peirce-suit of Truth—Why inference to the best explanation and abduction ought not to be confused. Erkenntnis: An International Journal of Analytic Philosophy 60(1): 75–105
Paavola S. (2006) Hansonian and Harmanian abduction as models of discovery. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 20(1): 93–108
Peirce, C. S. (1932–1958). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Vols. 1–8. In P. Weiss, C. Hartshorne, & A. W. Burk (Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Abbreviated CP.)
Peirce C.S. (1982) Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A chronological edition. Indiana University Press, Bloomington (Abbreviated W.)
Peirce C.S. (1992) Reasoning and the logic of things. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA (Abbreviated RLT.)
Peirce C.S. (1998) The essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings 2. Indiana University Press, Indianapolis (Abbreviated EP2.)
Robin R. S. (1967) The annotated catalogue of the papers of Charles S. Peirce. University of Massachusetts Press, Amherst
Rosenthal S. (2004) Peirce’s pragmatic account of perception: Issues and implications. In: Misak C. (eds) The Cambridge companion to Peirce. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 193–213
Santaella L. (1998) La evolución de los tres tipos de argumento: Abducción, inducción y deducción. Analogía Filosófica 12(1): 9–20
Schaffner K. F. (1993) Discovery and explanation in biology and medicine. The Chicago University Press, Chicago
Schurz G. (2008) Patterns of abduction. Synthese 164: 201–234
Stjernfelt F. (2000) Diagrams as centerpiece of a Peircean epistemology. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 36(3): 357–392
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Campos, D.G. On the distinction between Peirce’s abduction and Lipton’s Inference to the best explanation. Synthese 180, 419–442 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9709-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9709-3