Skip to main content
Log in

QoS differentiation and Internet neutrality

A controversial issue within the future Internet challenge

  • Published:
Telecommunication Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Internet neutrality is a debate controversial to a tiered, application-aware Internet. Bandwidth and end-to-end delay of connections across the Internet may vary by several orders of magnitude, therefore unequal data handling per node is commonly applied to achieve differentiated QoS. This practice contradicts Internet neutrality if it is not restricted to pure application awareness. A strict separation of network operation from service provisioning would perfectly fit to achieve Internet neutrality. But this may lack economic business models for network operators, especially in a flat-rate world. This paper provides a review on differentiated quality requirements, discusses the different viewpoints of network and content providers, and closes with a discussion on potential differentiated charging intended to achieve a fair, autonomous, and cost-related revenue distribution among stakeholders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Federal Communications Comission (FCC) (2010). US national broadband plan. March 2010.

  2. Callejo-Rodriguez, M. A., & Enriquez-Gabeiras, J. (2008). Bridging the standardization gap to provide QoS in current NGN architectures. IEEE Communications Magazine, 46, 132–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Little, A. D. (2005). The Arthur D. Little global broadband report update 2005.

  4. Meddeb, A., (2010). Internet, QoS pieces of the puzzle. IEEE Communications Magazine, 48, 86–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. ITU Y.1541 (2002). Network performance objectives for IP-based services. May 2002.

  6. ITU E.802 (2007). Framework and methodologies for the determination and application of QoS parameters.

  7. ITU G.1020 (2006). Performance parameter definitions for quality of speech and other voiceband applications utilizing IP networks.

  8. Xiao, X. (2008). Technical, commercial and regulatory challenges of QoS. An Internet service model perspective. Los Altos: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Braun, T. et al.(2008). End-to-end quality of service over heterogeneous networks. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ghandour, M. et al. (2010). Ultra high performance media multicasting scheme over wavelength-routed networks. In: Optical fiber communication conference (OFC 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  11. ITU H222.0–ISO/IEC 13818-1 (2006). Information technology generic coding of moving pictures and associated audio information systems. May 2006.

  12. ITU P.800 (1996). Methods for subjective determination of transmission quality. August 1996.

  13. Reed, B. (2007). Net neutrality vs. tiered services, network world.

  14. Domzal, J., & Jajszczyk, A. (2009). Approximate flow-aware networking. In: IEEE ICC 2009 (June 2009). ISSN 1938-1883.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Briscoe, B. (2009). Internet—fairer is faster. British Telecom white paper.

  16. Floyd, S., & Jacobson, V. (1993). Random Early detection gateways for congestion avoidance. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 1(4), 397–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tran-Gia, P., Hossfeld, T., & Menth, M. (2009). Emerging issues in current future internet desing. E&I. Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik, 126(7/8), 241–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fiedler, M., Hossfeld, T., & Tran-Gia, Ph. (2010). A generic quantitative relationship between quality of experience and quality of service. IEEE Network 24(2), 36–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brikena Statovci-Halimi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Statovci-Halimi, B., Franzl, G. QoS differentiation and Internet neutrality. Telecommun Syst 52, 1605–1614 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-011-9517-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-011-9517-1

Keywords

Navigation