Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Telecommunication Systems
Erschienen in: Telecommunication Systems 2/2018

25.05.2017

A queueing model of an energy harvesting sensor node with data buffering

verfasst von: Eline De Cuypere, Koen De Turck, Dieter Fiems

Erschienen in: Telecommunication Systems | Ausgabe 2/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Battery lifetime is a key impediment to long-lasting low power sensor nodes and networks thereof. Energy harvesting—conversion of ambient energy into electrical energy—has emerged as a viable alternative to battery power. Indeed, the harvested energy mitigates the dependency on battery power and can be used to transmit data. However, unfair data delivery delay and energy expenditure among sensors remain important issues for such networks. We study performance of sensor networks with mobile sinks: a mobile sink moves towards the transmission range of the different static sensor nodes to collect their data. We propose and analyse a Markovian queueing system to study the impact of uncertainty in energy harvesting, energy expenditure, data acquisition and data transmission. In particular, the energy harvesting sensor node is described by a system with two queues, one queue corresponding to the battery and the other to the data buffer. We illustrate our approach by numerical examples which show that energy harvesting correlation considerably affects performance measures like the mean data delay and the effective data collection rate.
Vorheriger Artikel Performance analysis of end-to-end SNR estimators for AF relaying
Nächster Artikel Budget-constraint mechanism for incremental multi-labeling crowdsensing

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
Akyildiz, I. F., Su, W., Sankarasubramaniam, Y., & Cayirci, E. (2002). Wireless sensor networks: A survey. Computer Networks, 38(4), 393–422.CrossRef
2.
Akyildiz, I. F., & Vuran, M. C. (2010). Wireless sensor networks. New York: Wiley.CrossRef
3.
Tan, Y. K., & Panda, S. K. (2010). Review of energy harvesting technologies for sustainable wireless sensor network. In W. Seah & Y. K. Tan (Eds.), Sustainable wireless sensor network (Chap. 2). INTECH.
4.
Alemdar, H., & Ersoy, C. (2010). Wireless sensor networks for healthcare: A survey. Computer Networks, 54(15), 2688–2710.CrossRef
5.
Sahu, A., Fernandez, E. B., Cardei, M., & Vanhilst, M. (2010). A pattern for a sensor node. In Proceedings of the 17th conference on pattern languages of programs.
6.
Sudevalayam, S., & Kulkarni, P. (2011). Energy harvesting sensor nodes: Survey and implications. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, 13, 443–461.CrossRef
7.
Anastasi, G., Conti, M., Di Francesco, M., & Passarella, A. (2009). Energy conservation in wireless sensor networks: A survey. Ad Hoc Networks, 7, 537–568.CrossRef
8.
Paradiso, J. A., & Starner, T. (2005). Energy scavenging for mobile and wireless electronics. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 4, 18–27.CrossRef
9.
Gunduz, D., Stamatiou, K., Michelusi, N., & Zorzi, M. (2014). Designing intelligent energy harvesting communication systems. IEEE Communications Magazine, 52(1), 210–216.CrossRef
10.
Lu, X., Wang, P., Niyato, D., Kim, D. I., & Han, Z. (2015). Wireless networks with RF energy harvesting: A contemporary survey. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, 17(2), 757–789.CrossRef
11.
Yang, C., & Chin, K. (2017). On nodes placement in energy harvesting wireless sensor networks for coverage and connectivity. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 13(1), 27–36.CrossRef
12.
Yang, F., Du, L., Chen, W. G., Li, J., Wang, Y. Y., & Wang, D. S. (2017). Hybrid energy harvesting for condition monitoring sensors in power grids. Energy, 118, 435–445.CrossRef
13.
Bi, Y., Niu, J., Sun, L., Huangfu, W., & Sun, Y. (2007). Moving schemes for mobile sinks in wireless sensor networks. In IEEE international performance computing, and communications conference, (pp. 101–108).
14.
Di Francesco, M., Das, S. K., & Anastasi, G. (2011). Data collection in wireless sensor networks with mobile elements: A survey. ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks, 8(1), 1–31.CrossRef
15.
Gao, S., Zhang, H., & Das, S. K. (2011). Efficient data collection in wireless sensor networks with path-constrained mobile sinks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 10(4), 592–608.CrossRef
16.
Turgut, D., & Bölöni, L. (2009). Heuristic approaches for transmission scheduling in sensor networks with multiple mobile sinks. The Computer Journal, 54(3), 332–344.CrossRef
17.
Yun, Y., & Xia, Y. (2010). Maximizing the lifetime of wireless sensor networks with mobile sink in delay-tolerant applications. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 9, 1308–1318.CrossRef
18.
Liang, W., Luo, J., & Xu, X. (2010). Prolonging network lifetime via a controlled mobile sink in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE global communications conference (GLOBECOM), Miami, Florida.
19.
Liang, W., & Luo, J. (2011). Network lifetime maximization in sensor networks with multiple mobile sinks. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on local computer networks (LCN), Bonn, Germany.
20.
Kaswan, A., Nitesh, K., & Prasanta, J. K. (2017). Energy efficient path selection for mobile sink and data gathering in wireless sensor networks. AEU-International Journal of Electronics and Communications, 73, 110–118.CrossRef
21.
Wang, C., Guo, S., & Yang, T. (2016). An optimization framework for mobile data collection in energy-harvesting wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 15(12), 2969–2986.CrossRef
22.
Khan, T. H. F., & Kumar, D. S. (2016). Mobile collector aided energy reduced (MCER) data collection in agricultural wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 6th IEEE international conference on advanced computing, (pp. 629–633).
23.
Truong, T. T., Brown, K. N., & Sreenan, C. J. (2010). Using mobile sinks in wireless sensor networks to improve building emergency response. In Proceedings of the royal Irish academy research. Colloquium on wireless as an enabling technology.
24.
Kim, C., Cho, H., Kim, S., Yang, T., & Kim, S. H. (2016). Sink mobility support scheme for continuous object tracking in wireless sensor networks. In 30th IEEE international conference on advanced information networking and applications, (pp. 452–457).
25.
Sharma, V., Mukherji, U., & Joseph, V. (2010). Optimal energy management policies for energy harvesting sensor nodes. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 6, 1326–1336.CrossRef
26.
Yang, J., & Ulukus, S. (2012). Optimal packet scheduling in an energy harvesting communication system. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 60(1), 220–230.CrossRef
27.
Tutuncuoglu, K., & Yener, A. (2012). Optimum transmission policies for battery limited energy harvesting nodes. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 11, 1180–1189.CrossRef
28.
Ozel, O., & Ulukus, S. (2010). Information-theoretic analysis of an energy harvesting communication system. In Proceedings of the 21st IEEE international symposium on personal, indoor and mobile radio communications, (pp. 330–335). Istanbul, Turkey, 26–30 Sept. 2010.
29.
Rajesh, R., Sharma, V., & Viswanath, P.(2011). Information capacity of Energy harvesting. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE international symposium on information theory, (pp. 2363–2367). St. Petersburg, Russia, 31 July-5 Aug. 2011.
30.
Zhang, S., & Seyedi, A. (2011). Analysis and design of energy harvesting wireless sensor networks with linear topology. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on communications (ICC), Kyoto, Japan, 5–9 June 2011.
31.
Meshkati, F., Poor, H. V., & Schwartz, S. C. (2007). Energy-efficient resource allocation in wireless networks. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 24, 58–68.CrossRef
32.
Tsuo, F. Y., Tan, H. P., Chew, Y. H., & Wei, H. Y. (2011). Energy-aware transmission control for wireless sensor networks powered by ambient energy harvesting: A game-theoretic approach. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on communications (ICC), Kyoto, Japan, 5–9 June 2011.
33.
Altman, E., Fiems, D., Haddad, M., & Gaillard, J. (2012). Semi-dynamic hawk and dove game applied to power control. In Proceedings of the 31st annual IEEE international conference on computer communications (INFOCOM).
34.
Haddad, M., Altman, E., Gaillard, J., & Fiems, D. (2012). A semi-dynamic evolutionary power control game. In Proceedings of networking 2012, lecture notes in computer science vol. 7290, (pp. 392–403).
35.
Niyato, D., Rashid, M. M., & Bhargave, V. K. (2007). Wireless sensor networks with energy harvesting technologies: A game-theoretic approach to optimal energy management. IEEE Wireless Communications, 14, 90–96.CrossRef
36.
Jornet, J. S., & Akyildiz, I. F. (2012). Joint energy harvesting and communication analysis for perpetual wireless nanosensor networks in the terahertz band. IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology, 11, 570–580.CrossRef
37.
Seyedi, A., & Sikdar, B. (2010). Performance modelling of transmission schedulers capable of energy harvesting. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on communications (ICC), Cape Town.
38.
Seyedi, A., & Sikdar, B. (2010). Energy efficient transmission strategies for body sensor networks with energy harvesting. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 58(7), 2116–2126.CrossRef
39.
Ventura, J., & Chowdhury, K. (2011). Markov modelling of energy harvesting body sensor networks. In Proceedings of PIMRC, (pp. 2168–2172). Toronto.
40.
Ho, C. K., Khoa, P. D., & Ming, P. C. (2010). Markovian models for harvested energy in wireless communications. In Proceedings of the 10th international conference on computational science, Amsterdam (ICCS).
41.
Lee, P., Eu, Z. A., Han, M., & Tan, H. (2011). Empirical modeling of a solar powered energy harvesting wireless sensor node for time-slotted operation. In Porceedings of the IEEE wireless communications and networking conference (WCNC), (pp. 179–184). Cancun.
42.
Michelusi, N., Stamatiou, K., & Zorzi, M. (2013). Transmission policies for energy harvesting sensors with time-correlated energy supply. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 61(7), 2988–3001.CrossRef
43.
Michelusi, N., Badia, L., Carli, R., Corradini, L., & Zorzi, M. (2013). Energy management policies for harvesting-based wireless sensor devices with battery degradation. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 61(12), 4934–4947.CrossRef
44.
Michelusi, N., Badia, L., & Zorzi, M. (2014). Optimal transmission policies for energy harvesting devices with limited state-of-charge knowledge. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 62(11), 3969–3982.CrossRef
45.
Ren, X., & Liang, W. (2012). Delay-tolerant data gathering in energy harvesting sensor networks with a mobile sink. In Proc eedings of the IEEE global communications conference (GLOBECOM), Anaheim, California.
46.
Ren, X., & Liang, W. (2013). The use of a mobile sink for quality data collection in energy harvesting sensor networks. In IEEE wireless communications and networking conference. (pp. 1145–1150), Shanghai.
47.
Ren, X., Liang, W., & Xu, W. (2015). Data collection maximization in renewable sensor networks via time-slot scheduling. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 64(7), 1870–1883.CrossRef
48.
Mehrabi, A., & Kim, K. (2016). Maximizing data collection throughput on a path in energy harvesting sensor networks using a mobile sink. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 15(3), 690–704.CrossRef
49.
Wittevrongel, S., & Bruneel, H. (1994). A heuristic analytic technique to calculate the cell loss ration in a leaky bucket with bursty input traffic. AEUE—International Journal of Electronics and Communications, 48(3), 162–169.
50.
Wittevrongel, S., & Bruneel, H. (1996). Analytic study of the queueing performance and the departure process of a leaky bucket with bursty input traffic. AEUE—International Journal of Electronics and Communications, 50(1), 1–10.
51.
52.
De Cuypere, E., & Fiems, D. (2011). Performance evaluation of a kitting process. In Proceedings of the 17th international conference on analytical and stochastic modelling techniques and applications, lecture notes in computer science, (p. 6751).
53.
De Cuypere, E., De Turck, K., & Fiems, D. (2012). Performance analysis of a decoupling stock in a Make-to-Order system. In Proceedings of the 14th IFAC symposium on information control problems in manufacturing, Bucharest, Romenia.
54.
De Cuypere, E., De Turck, K., & Fiems, D. (2012). Stochastic modelling of energy harvesting for low power sensor nodes. In Proceedings of the 7th international conference on queueing theory and network applications, Kyoto, Japan.
55.
Valentini, R., Dang, N., Levorato, M., & Bozorgzadeh, E. (2015). Modeling and control battery aging in energy harvesting systems. In Proceedings of SmartGridComm, (pp. 515–520).
56.
Gelenbe, E., & Ceran, E. T. (2016). Energy packet networks with energy harvesting. IEEE Access, 4, 1321–1331.CrossRef
57.
Latouche, G., & Ramaswami, V. (1999). Introduction to matrix analytic methods in stochastic modeling. SIAM.
58.
Latouche, G. (1981). Queues with paired customers. Journal of Applied Probability, 18, 684–696.CrossRef
59.
Asmussen, S., & Glynn, P. W. (2007). Stochastic simulation: Algorithms and analysis. Berlin: Springer.
Metadaten
Titel
A queueing model of an energy harvesting sensor node with data buffering
verfasst von
Eline De Cuypere
Koen De Turck
Dieter Fiems
Publikationsdatum
25.05.2017
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Telecommunication Systems / Ausgabe 2/2018
Print ISSN: 1018-4864
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-9451
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-017-0338-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2018

Telecommunication Systems 2/2018 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Secure and efficient anonymous authentication scheme for three-tier mobile healthcare systems with wearable sensors

OriginalPaper

Defending against phishing attacks: taxonomy of methods, current issues and future directions

OriginalPaper

Design, implementation and performance evaluation of a proactive overload control mechanism for networks of SIP servers

OriginalPaper

Anomaly-based framework for detecting dynamic spectrum access attacks in cognitive radio networks

OriginalPaper

Challenges and research directions for Internet of Things

OriginalPaper

Performance analysis of end-to-end SNR estimators for AF relaying

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise