Skip to main content
Log in

Decomposition dynamics and structural plant components of genetically modified Bt maize leaves do not differ from leaves of conventional hybrids

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Transgenic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The cultivation of genetically modified Bt maize has raised environmental concerns, as large amounts of plant residues remain in the field and may negatively impact the soil ecosystem. In a field experiment, decomposition of leaf residues from three genetically modified (two expressing the Cry1Ab, one the Cry3Bb1 protein) and six non-transgenic hybrids (the three corresponding non-transformed near-isolines and three conventional hybrids) was investigated using litterbags. To elucidate the mechanisms that cause differences in plant decomposition, structural plant components (i.e., C:N ratio, lignin, cellulose, hemicellulose) were examined. Furthermore, Cry1Ab and Cry3Bb1 protein concentrations in maize leaf residues were measured from harvest to the next growing season. While leaf residue decomposition in transgenic and non-transgenic plants was similar, differences among conventional cultivars were evident. Similarly, plant components among conventional hybrids differed more than between transgenic and non-transgenic hybrids. Moreover, differences in senescent plant material collected directly from plants were larger than after exposure to soil for 5 months. While the concentration of Cry3Bb1 was higher in senescent maize leaves than that of Cry1Ab, degradation was faster, indicating that Cry3Bb1 has a shorter persistence in plant residues. As decomposition patterns of Bt-transgenic maize were shown to be well within the range of common conventional hybrids, there is no indication of ecologically relevant, adverse effects on the activity of the decomposer community.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmad A, Wilde G, Yan Zhu K (2005) Detectability of coleopteran-specific Cry3Bb1 protein in soil and its effect on nontarget surface and below-ground arthropods. Environ Entomol 34:385–394

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bathon H, Singh P, Clare GK (1991) Rearing methods. In: Van der Geest LPS, Evenhuis HH (eds) Tortricid pests: their biology, natural enemies and control. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 283–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumgarte S, Tebbe CC (2005) Field studies on the environmental fate of the Cry1Ab Bt-toxin produced by transgenic maize (Mon810) and its effect on bacterial communities in the maize rhizosphere. Mol Ecol 14:2539–2551

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crecchio C, Stotzky G (1998) Insecticidal activity and biodegradation of the toxin of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki bound to humic acids from soil. Soil Biol Biochem 30:463–470

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crecchio C, Stotzky G (2001) Biodegradation and insecticidal activity of the toxin of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki bound on complexes of montmorillonite-humic acids-AI hydroxypolymers. Soil Biol Biochem 33:573–581

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Escher N, Käch B, Nentwig W (2000) Decomposition of transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis maize by microorganisms and woodlice Porcellio scaber (Crustacea: Isopoda). Basic Appl Ecol 1:161–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flores S, Saxena D, Stotzky G (2005) Transgenic Bt plants decompose less in soil than non-Bt plants. Soil Biol Biochem 37:1073–1082

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths BS, Caul S, Thompson J et al (2005) A comparison of soil microbial community structure, protozoa and nematodes in field plots of conventional and genetically modified maize expressing the Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ab toxin. Plant Soil 275:135–146

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths BS, Caul S, Thompson J et al (2007) Microbial and microfaunal community structure in cropping systems with genetically modified plants. Pedobiologia 51:195–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gugerli P (1979) Le test immuno-enzymatique (ELISA) et son application pour le diagnostic rapide des viruses de la pomme de terre. Rev Suisse d’Agric 11:253–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Gugerli P (1986) Potato viruses. In: Bergmeyer HU (ed) Methods of enzymatic analysis, vol XI. VCH Verlagsgesellschaft GmbH, Weinheim, pp 430–446

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellmich RL, Albajes R, Bergvinson D et al (2008) The present and future role of insect-resistant genetically modified maize in IPM. In: Romeis J, Shelton AM, Kennedy GG et al (eds) Integration of insect-resistant genetically modified crops within IPM programs. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 119–158

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hönemann L, Zurbrügg C, Nentwig W (2008) Effects of Bt-corn decomposition on the composition of the soil meso- and macro-fauna. Appl Soil Ecol 40:203–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins DW, Gregorich EG (2003) Detection and decay of the Bt endotoxin in soil from a field trial with genetically modified maize. Eur J Soil Sci 54:793–800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Icoz I, Stotzky G (2007) Cry3Bb1 protein from Bacillus thuringiensis in root exudates and biomass of transgenic corn does not persist in soil. Trans Res 17:609–620

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Icoz I, Stotzky G (2008) Fate and effects of insect-resistant Bt crops in soil ecosystems. Soil Biol Biochem 40:559–586

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Icoz I, Saxena D, Andow DA, Zwahlen C, Stotzky G (2008) Microbial populations and enzyme activities in soil in situ under transgenic corn expressing Cry proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis. J Environ Qual 37:647–662

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • James C (2007) Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops: 2007. ISAAA Brief No. 37, ISAAA, Ithaca, NY

  • Jung HG, Sheaffer CC (2004) Influence of Bt transgenes on cell wall lignification and digestibility of maize stover for silage. Crop Sci 44:1781–1789

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lehman MR, Osborne SL, Rosentrater KA (2008) No differences in decomposition rates observed between Bacillus thuringiensis and non-Bacillus thuringiensis corn residue incubated in the field. Agron J 100:163–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meissle M, Romeis J (2009) Insecticidal activity of Cry3Bb1 expressed in Bt maize on larvae of the Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata. Ent Exp Appl 131:308–319

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Motavalli PP, Kremer RJ, Fang M, Means NE (2004) Impact of genetically modified crops and their management on soil microbially mediated plant nutrient transformation. J Environ Qual 33:816–824

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mungai NW, Motavalli PP, Nelson KA, Kremer RJ (2005) Differences in yields, residue composition and N mineralization dynamics of Bt- and non-Bt-maize. Nutr Cycl Agroecosys 73:101–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D (2006) nlme: Linear and nonlinear mixed effect models. R package version 3.1-73

  • Poerschman J, Rauschen S, Langer U, Augustin J, Górecki T (2008) Molecular level lignin patterns of genetically modified Bt-maize MON88017 and three conventional varieties using tetramethylammonium hydroxide (TMAH)-induced thermochemolysis. J Agr Food Chem 56:11906–11913

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Poerschman J, Rauschen S, Langer U, Augustin J, Górecki T (2009) Fatty acid patterns of genetically modified Cry3Bb1 expressing Bt-maize MON88017 and its near-isogenic line. J Agr Food Chem 57:127–132

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Poerschmann J, Gathmann A, Augustin J, Langer U, Górecki T (2005) Molecular composition of leaves and stems of genetically modified Bt and near-isogenic non-Bt maize—characterization of lignin patterns. J Environ Qual 34:1508–1518

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2006) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org

  • Romeis J, Bartsch D, Bigler F et al (2008) Assessment of risk of insect-resistant transgenic crops to nontarget arthropods. Nat Biotechnol 26:203–208

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saxena D, Stotzky G (2001) Bt corn has a higher lignin content than non-Bt corn. Am J Bot 88:1704–1706

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saxena D, Stotzky G (2002) Bt toxin is not taken up from soil or hydroponic culture by corn, carrot, radish, or turnip. Plant Soil 239:165–172

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saxena D, Flores S, Stotzky G (1999) Insecticidal toxin in root exudates from Bt corn. Nature 402:480

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sims SR, Holden LR (1996) Insect bioassay for determining soil degradation of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki Cry1A(b) protein in corn tissue. Environ Entomol 25:659–664

    Google Scholar 

  • Tapp H, Stotzky G (1998) Persistence of the insecticidal toxin from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 30:471–476

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tarkalson DD, Kachman SD, Knops JMN, Thies JE, Wortmann CS (2008) Decomposition of Bt and non-Bt corn hybrid residues in the field. Nutr Cyc Agroecosys 80:211–222

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor BR, Parkinson D, Pearsons WFJ (1989) Nitrogen and lignin content as predictors of litter decay rates: a microcosm test. Ecology 70:97–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VDLUFA (1976) Methodenhandbuch Bd. III. Die Chemische Untersuchung von Futtermitteln. VDLUFA, Speyer

  • Zwahlen C, Hilbeck A, Gugerli P, Nentwig W (2003) Degradation of the Cry1Ab protein within transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis corn tissue in the field. Mol Ecol 12:765–775

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zwahlen C, Hilbeck A, Nentwig W (2007) Field decomposition of transgenic Bt maize residue and the impact on non-target soil invertebrates. Plant Soil 300:245–257

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank L. Kuhn-Nentwig for technical help in the laboratory and V. Keller and B. Tschanz for assistance in the field. We are thankful to the farmers for providing their fields. H.P Kunc, S. Dubelmann, C. Zwahlen and two anonymous reviewers gave valuable comments on an earlier draft of this article. We thank Monsanto for providing maize seeds and P. Natale and L. French for kindly providing eggs of the Colorado Potato Beetle and the European Corn Borer. We are grateful to H. Bachmann and F. Blum for instructions on the C/N analyzer. This project was funded by the Swiss Federal Office for the Environment (FOEN).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Corinne Zurbrügg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zurbrügg, C., Hönemann, L., Meissle, M. et al. Decomposition dynamics and structural plant components of genetically modified Bt maize leaves do not differ from leaves of conventional hybrids. Transgenic Res 19, 257–267 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-009-9304-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-009-9304-x

Keywords

Navigation