Abstract
The main objective of this paper is to examine the use of audio- versus text-based asynchronous online discussions. We report two case studies conducted within the context of semester-long teacher education courses at an Asian Pacific university. Forty-one graduate students participated in Study I. After the online discussions (both audio-based as well as text-based) had ended, qualitative data via student reflections were collected. Results revealed that audio-based discussions have six distinct perceived affordances compared to text-based ones. Interestingly, despite the reported affordances, more than half of the students reported that they preferred to use a text-based discussion if given a choice. The main reasons for their preference were explored. In Study II, 42 undergraduate students took part. Similar to Study I, participants in Study II also indicated that they felt more comfortable using a text-based discussion. The reasons for their preference were also discussed. Directions for future research are proposed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
An, Y.-J., & Frick, T. (2006). Student perceptions of asynchronous computer-mediated communication in face-to-face courses. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(2), 485–499.
Arend, B. (2009). Encouraging critical thinking in online threaded discussions. The Journal of Educators Online, 6(1). Retrieved February 15, 2012 from http://www.thejeo.com/Archives/Volume6Number1/Arendpaper.pdf.
Bowe, F. G. (2002). Deaf and hard of hearing Americans’ instant messaging and e-mail use: A national survey. American Annals of the Deaf, 147(4), 6–10.
Brick, J., & Louie, G. (1984). Language and culture—Vietnam: Background notes for teachers in the adult migrant education program. Sydney: Adult Migrant Education Service.
Chang, C.-K. (2010). Acceptability of an asynchronous learning forum on mobile devices. Behavior and Information Technology, 29(1), 22–23.
Chiu, Y.-C. J. (2009). Facilitating Asian students’ critical thinking in online discussions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 42–57.
Cho, S. P., & Carey, S. (2001). Increasing Korean oral fluency using an electronic bulletin board and Wimba-based voiced chat. The Korean Language in America, 6, 115–128.
Clark, D., & Walsh, S. (2004). iPod-learning. Brighton: Epic Group (White paper).
Durbridge, N. (1984). Media in course design, No. 9, audio cassettes. The role of technology in distance education. Kent: Croom Helm.
Girasoli, A. J., & Hannafin, R. D. (2008). Using asynchronous AV communication tools to increase academic self-efficacy. Computers & Education, 51, 1676–1682.
Hew, K. F., & Hara, N. (2007). Empirical study of motivators and barriers of teacher online knowledge sharing. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(6), 573–595.
Hew, K. F., & Knapczyk, D. (2007). Analysis of ill-structured problem solving, mentoring functions, and perceptions of practicum teachers and mentors toward online mentoring in a field-based practicum. Instructional Science, 35(1), 1–40.
Hew, K. F., Cheung, W. S., & Ng, C. S. L. (2010). Student contribution in asynchronous online discussion: A review of the research and empirical exploration. Instructional Science, 38, 571–606.
Ice, P., Curtis, R., Phillips, P., & Wells, J. (2007). Using asynchronous audio feedback to enhance teaching presence and students’ sense of community. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(2), 3–25.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
Liu, X., Doore, B., & Li, L. (2008). Scaffolding knowledge co-construction in web-based discussions through message labeling. In K. McFerrin, et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of society for information technology and teacher education international conference 2008 (pp. 3041–3046). Chesapeake: AACE.
McIntosh, S., Braul, B., & Chao, T. (2003). A case study in asynchronous voice conferencing for language instruction. Educational Media International, 40(1), 63–74.
Merriam, S. B. (2001). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Rourke, L., & Anderson, T. (2002). Using web-based, group communication systems to support case study learning at a distance. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 3(2), 1–13.
Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. New York: Wiley.
Skylar, A. A. (2009). A comparison of asynchronous online text-based lectures with synchronous interactive web conferencing lectures. Issues in Teacher education, 18(2), 69–84.
Williams, S. W., Watkins, K., Daly, B., & Courtney, B. (2001). Facilitating cross-cultural online discussion groups: Implications for practice. ETAL Distance Education, 22(1), 151–168.
Wise, A., Chang, J., Duffy, T., & del Valle, R. (2004). The effects of teacher social presence on student satisfaction, engagement, and learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 31(3), 247–271.
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hew, K.F., Cheung, W.S. Audio-based versus text-based asynchronous online discussion: two case studies. Instr Sci 41, 365–380 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-012-9232-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-012-9232-7