Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Influence of urbanization on riparian forest diversity and structure in the Georgia Piedmont, US

  • Published:
Plant Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Riparian forests are increasingly threatened by urban expansion and land use change worldwide. This study examined the relationships between landscape characteristics and woody plant diversity, structure, and composition of small order riparian corridors along an urban-rural land use gradient in the Georgia Piedmont, US. Riparian plant diversity, structure, and composition were related to landscape metrics and land use. Species richness was negatively associated with impervious surfaces and landscape diversity, and positively associated with forest cover and largest forest patch index. Shannon species diversity was strongly related to the biomass of non-native species, especially for the regeneration layer. Urban sites were characterized by high richness of non-native and pioneer species. Developing sites were dominated by the non-native shrub, Ligustrum sinense Lour., and several native overstory trees, mainly Acer negundo L. While agricultural and managed forest sites were composed of ubiquitous species, unmanaged forest sites had a structurally distinct midstory indicative of reduced disturbance. Urban and agricultural land uses showed decreased native stem densities and signs of overstory tree regeneration failure. Results from this study highlight the impact of the surrounding landscape matrix upon riparian forest plant diversity and structure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashton IW, Laura A, Hyatt LA, Howe KM, Gurevitch J, Lerdau MT (2005) Invasive species accelerate decomposition and litter nitrogen loss in a mixed deciduous forest. Ecol Appl 15:1263–1272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austrheim G (2002) Plant diversity patterns in semi-natural grasslands along an elevational gradient in southern Norway. Plant Ecol 161:193–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balvanera P, Pfisterer AB, Buchmann N, He J-S, Nakashizuka T, Raffaelli D, Schmid B (2006) Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services. Ecol Lett 9:1146–1156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blair RB, Launer AE (1997) Butterfly diversity and human land use: species assemblages along an urban gradient. Biol Conserv 80:113–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun EL (1950) Deciduous forests of eastern North America. Hafner Publishing Co., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Brosofske KD, Chen J, Crow TR, Saunders SC (1999) Vegetation responses to landscape structure at multiple scales across a northern Wisconsin, USA, pine barrens landscape. Plant Ecol 143:203–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown AE, Zhang L, McMahon TA, Western AW, Vertessy RA (2005a) A review of paired catchment studies for determining changes in water yield resulting from alterations in vegetation. J Hydrol 310:28–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown DG, Johnson KM, Loveland TR, Theobald DM (2005b) Rural land-use trends in the conterminous United States, 1950–2000. Ecol Appl 15:1851–1863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown KA, Scatena FN, Gurevitch J (2006) Effects of an invasive tree on community structure and diversity in a tropical forest in Puerto Rico. For Ecol Manage 226:145–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton ML, Samuelson LJ, Pan S (2005) Riparian woody plant diversity and forest structure along an urban-rural gradient. Urban Ecosys 8:93–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cadenasso ML, Pickett STA (2001) Effect of edge structure on the flux of species into forest interiors. Conserv Biol 15:91–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark A III, Phillips DR, Frederick DJ (1985) weight, volume, and physical properties of major hardwood species in the Atlantic Coastal Plains. RP-SE-250. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, southeastern forest experiment station

  • Clark A III, Phillips DR, Frederick DJ (1986) weight, volume, and physical properties of major hardwood species in the piedmont. RP-SE-255. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, southeastern forest experiment station

  • Cordell HK, Macie EA (2002) Population and demographic trends. In: Macie EA, and Hermansen LA (eds) Human influences on forest ecosystems: The southern wildland-urban interface assessment. General technical report No. SRS-55. Southern Research Station, USDA, Forest Service, Asheville, pp 11–34

  • Cowell CM (1998) Historical change in vegetation and disturbance on the Georgia piedmont. Am Midl Nat 140:78–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diaz S, Cabido M (2001) Vive la difference: plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes. Trends Ecol Evol 16:646–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fierke M, Kauffman J (2006) Riverscape-level patterns of riparian plant diversity along a successional gradient, Willamette river, Oregon. Plant Ecol 185:85–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gergel SE, Turner MG, Miller JR, Melack JM, Stanley EH (2002) Landscape indicators of human impacts to riverine systems. Aquat Sci 64:118–128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Giese LAB, Aust WM, Kolka RK, Trettin CC (2003) Biomass and carbon pools of disturbed riparian forests. For Ecol Manage 180:493–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey RK (1988) Trees, shrubs, and woody vines of Northern Florida and adjacent Georgia and Alabama. University of Georgia Press, Athens, GA

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomi T, Sidle RC, Richardson JS (2002) Understanding processes and downstream linkages of headwater systems. Bioscience 52:905–916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grime JP (2002) Declining plant diversity: empty niches or functional shifts. J Veg Sci 13:457–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groffman PM, Bain DJ, Band LE, Belt KT, Brush GS, Grove JM, Pouyat RV, Yesilonis IC, Zipperer WC (2003) Down by the riverside: urban riparian ecology. Frontiers Ecol environ 1:315–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groffman PM, Crawford MK (2003) Denitrification potential in urban riparian zones. J Environ Qual 32:1144–1149

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guntenspergen GR, Levenson JB (1997) Understory plant species composition in remnant stands along an urban-to-rural land-use gradient. Urban Ecosyst 1:155–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen AJ, Knight RL, Marzuff JM, Powell S, Brown K, Gude PH, Jones K (2005) Effects of exurban development on biodiversity: patterns, mechanisms, and research needs. Ecol Appl 15:1893–1905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardin JW, Leopold DJ, White FM (1996) Harlow & Harrar’s Textbook of Dendrology. McGraw Hill, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Helms BS, Feminella JW, Pan S (2005) Detection of biotic responses to urbanization using fish assemblages from small streams of western Georgia, USA. Urban Ecosyst 8:39–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill MO (1979) DECORANA–a FORTRAN program for detrended correspondence analysis and reciprocal averaging. Ecology and Systematics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopper DU, Chapin FSI, Ewel JJ, Hector A, Inchausti P, Lavorel S, Lawton JH, Lodge DM, Loreau M, Naeem S, Setala H, Symstad AJ, Vandermeer J, Wardle DA (2005) Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecol Monogr 75:3–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ikeda H (2003) Testing the intermediate disturbance hypothesis on species diversity in herbaceous plant communities along a human trampling gradient using a 4-year experiment in an old-field. Ecol Res 18:185–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins JC, Chojnacky DC, Heath LS, Birdsey RA (2003) National-scale biomass estimators for United States tree species. For Sci 49:12–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson NL, Kotz S (1970) Continuous univariate distributions. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Jongman RHG, ter Braak CJF, van Tongeren OFR (1995) Data analysis in community and landscape ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • King RS, Baker ME, Whigham DF, Weller DE, Jordan TE, Kazyak PF, Hurd MK (2005) Spatial considerations for linking watershed land cover to ecological indicators in streams. Ecol Appl 15:137–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lecerf A, Dobson M, Dang C, Chauvet E (2005) Riparian plant species loss alters trophic dynamics in detritus-based stream ecosystems. Oecologia 146:432–442

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lichstein JW, Grau HR, Aragon R (2004) Recruitment limitation in secondary forests dominated by an exotic tree. J Veg Sci 15:721–728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litton CM, Sandquist DR, Cordell S (2006) Effects of non-native grass invasion on aboveground carbon pools and tree population structure in a tropical dry forest of Hawaii. For Ecol Manag 231:105–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockaby BG, Walbridge MR (1998) Biogeochemistry. In: Messina MG, Conner WH (eds) Southern forested wetlands: ecology and management. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockaby BG, Zhang D, McDaniel J, Tian H, Pan S (2005) Interdisciplinary research at the urban-rural interface: the west GA project. Urban Ecosyst 8:7–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loewenstein NJ, Loewenstein EF (2005) Non-native plants in the understory of riparian forests across a land use gradient in the Southeast. Urban Ecosys 8:79–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackey RL, Currie D (2001) The diversity-disturbance relationship: is it generally strong and peaked?. Ecology 82:3479–3492

    Google Scholar 

  • McCune B, Grace JB, Urban DL (2002) Analysis of ecological communities. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, Oregon, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • McCune B, Mefford MJ (1999) PC-ORD version 4 multivariate analysis of ecological data. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, Oregon, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald RI, Peet RK, Urban DL (2003) Spatial pattern of Quercus regeneration limitation and Acer rubrum invasion in a Piedmont forest. J Veg Sci 14:441–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell MJ, Pickett STA (1990) Ecosystem structure and function along urban-rural gradients: an unexploited opportunity for ecology. Ecology 71:1232–1237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell MJ, Pickett STA, Groffman P, Bohlen P, Pouyat RV, Zipperer WC, Parmelee RW, Carreiro MM, Medley K (1997) Ecosystem processes along an urban-to-rural gradient. Urban Ecosyst 1:21–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGarigal K, Cushman SA, Neel MC, Ene E (2002) FRAGSTATS 3.3: Spatial Pattern Analysis Program for Categorical Maps. Computer software program produced by the authors at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Available at the following web site: www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats.html

  • McKinney ML (2006) Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biol Conserv 127:247–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medley KE, Pickett STA, McDonnell MJ (1995) Forest-landscape structure along and urban-to-rural gradient. Prof Geogr 47:159–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merriam RW, Feil E (2002) The potential impact of an introduced shrub on native plant diversity and forest regeneration. Biol Invasions 4:39–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller KE, Gorchov DL (2004) The invasive shrub, Lonicera maackii, reduces growth and fecundity of perennial forest herbs. Oecologia 139:359–375

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mitsch WJ, Taylor JR, Benson KB (1991) Estimating primary productivity of forested wetland communities in different hydrologic landscapes. Landsc Ecol 5:75–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moffatt SF, McLachlan SM, Kenkel NC (2004) Impacts of land use on riparian forest along an urban-rural gradient in southern Manitoba. Plant Ecol 174:119–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris LL, Walck JL, Hidayati SN (2002) Growth and reproduction of the invasive Ligustrum sinense and native Forestiera ligustrina (Oleaceae): implications for the invasion and persistence of a nonnative shrub. Int J Plant Sci 163:1001–1010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naiman RJ, Decamps H (1997) The ecology of interfaces: riparian zones. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 28:621–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NOAA. (2005) Comparative climatic data for the United States through 2005. http://lwf.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/climatedata.html accessed May 2006

  • Nyland RD (2002) Silviculture: concepts and applications. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Økland RH (1996) Are ordination and constrained ordination alternative or complementary strategies in general ecological studies? J Veg Sci 7:289–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips DR (1981) Predicted total-tree biomass of understory hardwoods. Research Paper SE-223. Southern Research Station USDA Forest Service Asheville, NC

  • Pielou EC (1977) Mathematical Ecology. Wiley, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter EE, Forschner BR, Blair RB (2001) Woody vegetation and canopy fragmentation along a forest-to-urban gradient. Urban Ecosyst 5:131–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pouyat R, Groffman P, Yesilonis I, Hernandez L (2002) Soil carbon pools and fluxes in urban ecosystems. Environ Pollut 116(Supplement 1):S107–S118

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rauscher HML, David L, McGee CE, Worth CV (1997) Oak regeneration: a knowledge synthesis. FORS Complier 15: insert (electronic)

  • Renofalt BM, Jansson R, Nilsson C (2005) Spatial patterns of plant invasiveness in a riparian corridor. Landsc Ecol 20:165–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson LJ, Hogan ME (2006) Forest trees: a guide to the eastern United States. Pearson Education, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute. 2003. SAS Version 9.1 for Windows. Cary, North Carolina

  • Schoonover JE, Lockaby BG, Pan S (2005) Changes in chemical and physical properties of stream water across an urban-rural gradient in western Georgia. Urban Ecosyst 8:107–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shannon CE, Weaver W (1949) The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe DM, Stearns F, Leitner LA, Dorney JR (1986) Fate of natural vegetation during urban development of rural landscapes in southeastern Wisconsin. Urban Ecol 9:267–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stratford JA, Robinson WD (2005) Distribution of neotropical migratory bird species across an urbanizing landscape. Urban Ecosyst 8:59–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ter-Mikaelian MT, Korzukhin MD (1997) Biomass equations for sixty-five North American tree species. For Ecol Manage 97:1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trimble SW (1974) Man-induced soil erosion on the southern piedmont: 1700–1970. Soil conservation society of America. Ankeny, Iowa

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA-NRCS. 2006. State of the Land, 30 May 2006 (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/TECHNICAL/NRI/). National Resources Inventory

  • Wagner HH, Fortin M-J (2005) Spatial analysis of landscapes: concepts and statistics. Ecology 86:1975–1987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang L, Lyons J, Kanehl P, Bannerman R (2001) Impacts of urbanization on stream habitat and fish across multiple spatial scales. Environ Manage 28:255–266

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wear DN (2002) Land use. In: Wear DN, Greis JG (eds) Southern forest resource assessment. General technical report No.SRS-53. Southern Research Station, USDA, Forest Service, Washington, pp 153–172

    Google Scholar 

  • West AG, Midgley JJ, Bond WJ (2000) Regeneration failure and the potential importance of human disturbance in a subtropical forest. Appl Veg Sci 3:223–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yates ED, Levia DF Jr, Williams CL (2004) Recruitment of three non-native invasive plants into a fragmented forest in southern Illinois. For Ecol Manage 190:119–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zipperer WC (2002a) Species composition and structure of regenerated and remnant forest patches within an urban landscape. Urban Ecosyst 6:271–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zipperer WC, 2002b. Urban influences on forests. In: Macie EA, Hermansen LA (eds) Human influences on forest ecosystems: the southern wildland-urban interface assessment. General technical report SRS-55. Southern Research Station, USDA, Forest Service, Asheville, pp 73–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Zipperer WC, Wu J, Pouyat RV, Pickett STA (2000) The application of ecological principles to urban and urbanizing landscapes. Ecol Appl 10:685–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Auburn University’s Center for Forest Sustainability in the School of Forestry and Wildlife Sciences for funding this research, and we thank Skip Kizire and Henry Atkins for field assistance. Many thanks are given to the numerous private and public land owners in West Georgia who made this research possible by granting access to property.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michele L. Burton.

 

 

Appendix 1 Species sampled across all 17 sites. Non-native species indicated by (*). Note: Plants were identified only to the genus group if species could not be determined. Nomenclature followed Godfrey (1988). Habitat descriptions follow Samuelson and Hogan (2006)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Burton, M.L., Samuelson, L.J. Influence of urbanization on riparian forest diversity and structure in the Georgia Piedmont, US. Plant Ecol 195, 99–115 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-007-9305-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-007-9305-x

Keywords

Navigation