Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Integrated Use of a Continuous Simulation Model and Multi-Attribute Decision-Making for Ranking Urban Watershed Management Alternatives

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to introduce a continuous simulation-based screening procedure for ranking urban watershed management alternatives using multi-attribute decision making (MADM). The procedure integrates continuous urban runoff simulation results from the United States Environmental Protection Agency’s Storm Water Management Model (SWMM) with the use of an alternative evaluation index (AEI) and MADM techniques, following the driver-pressure-state-impact-response (DPSIR) approach. The analytic hierarchy process estimates the weights of the criteria, and SWMM results are used to quantify the effects of the management alternatives on water quantity and quality metrics. In addition, the tendency of AEI to reflect resident preferences toward management objectives is incorporated to include stakeholder participation in the decision-making process. This systematic decision support process is demonstrated for a Korean urban watershed. According to the AEI, seven alternatives were divided into three groups: poor (0∼0.3), acceptable (0.3∼0.6), and good (0.6∼1). The use of multiple MADM techniques provided a consistency check. The demonstration illustrates the ability of the continuous simulation-based MADM approach to provide decision makers with a ranking of suitable urban watershed management alternatives which incorporate stakeholder feedback.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albek M, Öğütveren UB, Albek E (2003) Hydrological modeling of Seydi Suyu watershed (Turkey) with HSPF. J Hydrol 285:260–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alberti M, Booth D, Hill K, Coburn B, Avolio C, Coe S, Spirandelli D (2007) The impact of urban patterns on aquatic ecosystems: an empirical analysis in Puget lowland sub-basins. Landsc Urban Plan 80:345–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyer M, Burian SJ (2002) The effects of construction activities and the preservation of indigenous vegetation on stormwater runoff rates in urbanizing landscapes. In: Proceedings, indigenous vegetation within urban development, 14–16 August 2002, Uppsala, Sweden

  • Choi W, Deal BM (2008) Assessing hydrological impact of potential land use change through hydrological and land use change modeling for the Kishwaukee River basin (USA). J Environ Manage 88(4):1119–1130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung ES, Lee KS (2009a) Prioritization of water management for sustainability using hydrologic simulation model and multicriteria decision making techniques. J Environ Manage 90(5):1502–1511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung ES, Lee KS (2009b) Identification of spatial ranking of hydrological vulnerability using multi-criteria decision making techniques: case of Korea. Water Resour Manage 23(12):2395–2416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis MD (2007) Integrated water resource management and water sharing. J Water Resour Plan Manage 133(5):427–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Environment Agency (1999) Environmental indicators: typology and overview. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen

  • Fassio A, Giupponi C, Hiederer R, Simota C (2005) A decision support tool for simulating the effects of alternative policies affecting water resources: an application at the European scale. J Hydrol 304:462–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fattahi P, Fayyaz S (2010) A compromise programming model to integrate urban water management. Water Resour Manage 24(6):1211–1227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giupponi C, Mysiak J, Fassio A, Cogan V (2004) MULINO-DSS: a computer tool for sustainable use of water resources at the catchment scale. Math Comput Simul 64:13–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goicoechea A, Duckstein L, Fogel M (1976) Multiobjective programming in watershed management: a case study of Charleston watershed. Water Resour Res 12(6):1085–1092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guinaräes LT, Magrini A (2008) A proposal of indicators for sustainable development in the magagement of river basins. Water Resour Manage 22(9):1191–1202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann L, Torno C, Bogardi I, Higler L (1987) Methodological guidelines for the integrated environmental evaluation of water resources development. Unep/Unesco Project FP/5201-85-01, Paris

  • Heaney JP, Wright L, Sample D (2000) Chapter 3 sustainable urban water management. In: Field R, Heaney JP, Pitt R (eds) Innovative urban wet-weather flow management systems, pp 75–120

  • Hinloopen E, Nijkamp P (1990) Qualitative multiple criteria choice analysis, the dominant regime method. Qual Quant 24:37–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs BF, Chankong V, Hamadeh W, Stakhiv EZ (1992) Does choice of multicriteria method matter? An experiment in water resources planning. Water Resour Res 28:1767–1779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollis GE (1975) Effect of urbanization on floods of different recurrence intervals. Water Resour Res 11(3):431–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber WC, Dickinson RE (1998) Storm water management model, version 4: user manual, EPA 600/3-88/001a. Environmental Research Laboratory, EPA, Athens

  • ICSU (International Council for Science) (2002) Making science for sustainable development more policy relevant: new tools for analysis, ICSU series on science for sustainable development, no 8

  • Jang JH, Park HS, Park CK (2006) Analysis of the effects of sewer system on urban stream using PCSWMM based on GIS. J Korean Soc Water Qual 22(6):982–990 (in Korean)

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen R, van Herwijnen M (1992) DEFINITE: decisions on a finite set of alternatives. Institute for Environmental Studies. Kluwer, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen R, van Herwijnen M, Beinat E (2000) DEFINITE: decisions on a finite set of alternatives. Institute for Environmental Studies. Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayakrishnan R, Srinivasan R, Santhi C, Arnold JG (2005) Advances in the application of the SWAT model for water resources management. Hydrol Process 19(3):749–762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiker GA, Bridges TA, Varghese A, Seager TP, Linkov I (2005) Application of multicriteria decision analysis in environmental decision making. Integ Environ Assess Manage 1(2):95–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein R (1979) Urbanization and stream quality impairment. Water Resour Bull 15(4):948–963

    Google Scholar 

  • KOWACO (2007) Groundwater survey 2007. Ministry of Construction and Transportation, Seoul

  • Lahdelma R, Salminen P, Hokkanen J (2000) Using multicriteria methods in environmental planning and management. Environ Manage 26:595–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee KS (2008) Rehabilitation of the hydrologic cycle in the Anyangcheon watershed. Seoul National University, Seoul

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee KS, Chung ES (2007) Development of integrated watershed management schemes for intensively urbanized region in Korea. J Hydro-Environ Res 1(2):95–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee KS, Chung ES, Kim YO (2008) Integrated watershed management for mitigating streamflow depletion in an urbanized watershed in Korea. Phys Chem Earth 33(5):382–394

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra A, Kar S, Singh VP (2007) Determination of runoff and sediment yield from a small watershed in sub-humid subtropics using the HSPF model. Hydrol Process 21:3035–3045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models, part 1—a discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10(3):282–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nijkamp P, Rietveld P, Voogd H (1990) Multicriteria evaluation in physical planning. North Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Novotny V (2003) Water quality: diffuse pollution and watershed management. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Opricovic S (2009) A compromise solution in water resources planning. Water Resour Manage 23(8):1549–1561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitt RE, Chen SE, Clark SE, Swenson J, Ong CK (2008) Compaction’s impacts on urban storm-water infiltration. J Irrig Drain Eng 134(5):652–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raju KS, Duckstein L (2004) Integrated application of cluster and multicriterion analysis for ranking water resources planning strategies: a case study in Spain. J Hydroinform 6:295–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Refsgaard JC (1997) Parameterization, calibration and validation of distributed hydrologic models. J Hydrol 198:69–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossman L (2009) Storm water management model user’s manual, version 5.0. EPA/600/R-05/040, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati

  • Roy B, Slowinski R, Treichel W (1992) Multicriteria programming of water supply systems for rural areas. Water Resour Bull 28:129–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Santhi C, Arnold JG, Williams JR, Srinivasan R, Hauck LM (2001) Validation of the SWAT model on a large river basin with point and non point sources. J Am Water Resour Assoc 37(5):1169–1188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schueler T (1994) The importance of imperviousness. Watershed Prot Tech 1(3):100–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Sulis M, Marrocu M, Paniconi C (2009) Conjunctive use of a hydrological model and a multicriteria decision support system for a case study on the Caia catchment, Portugal. J Hydrol Eng 14(2):141–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tecle A, Fogel M, Duckstein L (1988) Mulitcriterion selection of wastewater management alternatives. J Water Resour Plan Manage 14:383–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tripathi MP, Panda RK (2005) Development of effective management plan for critical subwatersheds using SWAT model. Hydrol Process 19(3):809–826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trombino G, Dirrone N, Cinnirella S (2007) A business-as-usual scenario analysis for the Po Basin-North Adriatic continuum. Water Resour Manage 21(12):2063–2074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voogd H (1982) Multicriteria evaluation with mixed qualitative and quantitative data. Environ Plan B 9:221–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WSM (2004) The waterstrategyman DSS: a comprehensive decision support system for the development of sustainable water management strategies. EU DG Research, Contract No: EVK1-CT-2001-00098

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Civil Engineering, Seoul National University of Science and Technology, 172 Gongreung-2-dong, Nowon-gu, Seoul, 139-743, Republic of Korea

    Eun-Sung Chung

  2. Daerim Corporation, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Won-Pyo Hong

  3. Civil & Environmental Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Kil Seong Lee

  4. Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Utah, 122 S. Central Campus Drive, Suite 104, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA

    Steven J. Burian

Authors
  1. Eun-Sung Chung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Won-Pyo Hong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kil Seong Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Steven J. Burian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eun-Sung Chung.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chung, ES., Hong, WP., Lee, K.S. et al. Integrated Use of a Continuous Simulation Model and Multi-Attribute Decision-Making for Ranking Urban Watershed Management Alternatives. Water Resour Manage 25, 641–659 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-010-9718-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-010-9718-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation