Abstract
The condition of river, wetland and estuarine ecosystems is largely determined by the prevailing flow regime. The flow regime can be described by the magnitude, frequency, timing, duration and rate of change of both intra-annual and inter-annual events. The required flow regime, necessary to maintain the ecosystem in a particular condition, is referred to as the environmental flow requirement. To appropriately take environmental flow requirements into consideration in water resources planning and management, it is required that models used in water resources planning can accommodate the specific characteristics of the environmental flow requirements. This paper presents a new functionality in the generic water resources planning package ‘RIBASIM’, which allows for realistic allocation of particularly the high flow pulses and small and large floods that are part of an environmental flow requirement. Tests of this functionality with a model application based on the characteristics of the Mahabad basin in Iran show that the use of this functionality can help to find environmental flow release options that lead to smaller losses for other water users, which would not have been found easily if the traditional approach was used.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Badescu V, Schuiling RD (2010) Aral Sea; irretrievable loss or Irtysh imports? Water Resour Manag 24:597–616. doi:10.1007/s11269-009-9461-y
Brisbane Declaration (2007) The Brisbane Declaration: Environmental flows are essential for freshwater ecosystem health and human well-being. 10th International River Symposium, Brisbane, Australia, 3–6 September 2007
Bunn SE, Arthington AH (2002) Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity. Environ Manag 30:492–507
DLG (Dienst Landelijk Gebied), WRI (Water Research Institute) (2005a) Integrated Water Resources Management for Lake Uromiyeh Basin, Iran. Final Data Report. PvW-02.048
DLG (Dienst Landelijk Gebied), WRI (Water Research Institute) (2005b) Integrated Water Resources Management for Lake Uromiyeh Basin, Iran. Module 1. Integrated Water Resources Management. Modeling Report. PvW-02.048
European Commission (2000) Water Framework Directive, Commission of the European Communities, Directive 2000/60/EC
European Commission (2007) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council—Addressing the challenge of water scarcity and droughts in the European Union, Commission of the European Communities, SEC (2007) 993 and SEC (2007)., p 996
Hengsdijk H, Van der Krogt WNM, Verhaeghe RJ, Bindraban PS (2006) Consequences of supply and demand management options for integrated water resources management in the Jabotabek-Citarum region. J River Basin Manag 4(4):283–290
Mathews R, Richter BD (2007) Application of the indicators of hydrologic alteration software in environmental flow setting. J Am Water Resour Assoc 43(6):1400–1413
McCartney MP (2007) Decision support systems for large dam planning and operation in Africa. Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Water Management Institute., p 47, IWMI Working Paper 119
Meijer KS, Hajiamiri S (2007) Quantifying well-being values of environmental flows for equitable decision-making: A case study of the Hamoun wetlands in Iran. J River Basin Manag 5(3):223–233
Pandam Consulting Engineers (2005a) Integrated Water Resources Management for the Lake Uromiyeh Basin. Module 3: Water for Ecosystems. Goppy Babi Ali Wetland
Pandam Consulting Engineers (2005b) Integrated Water Resources Management for the Lake Uromiyeh Basin. Module 3: Water for Ecosystems. Kanibrazan Wetland
Poff NL, Allan JD, Bain MD, Karr JR, Prestegaard KL, Richter BD, Sparks RE, Stromberg JC (1997) The natural flow regime: a paradigm for river conservaton and restoration. BioScience 47:769–784
Poff NL, Richter BD, Arthington AH, Bunn SE, Naiman RJ, Kendy E, Acreman M, Apse C, Bledsoe BP, Freeman MC, Henriksen J, Jacobson RB, Kennen JG, Merritt DM, O’Keeffe JH, Olden JD, Rogers K, Tharme RE, Warner A (2010) The ecological limits of hydrologic alteration (ELOHA): a new framework for developing regional environmental flow standards. Freshw Biol 55:147–170
Richter BD, Baumgartner JV, Wigington R, Braun DP (1997) How much water does a river need? Freshw Biol 37:231–249
Suen JP (2011) Determining the ecological flow regime for existing reservoir operation. Water Resour Manag 25:817–835. doi:10.1007/s11269-010-9728-3
Tharme RE (2003) A global perspective on environmental flow assessment: emerging trends in the development and application of environmental flow methodologies for rivers. River Res Appl 19:397–441
Tisdell J (2010) Acquiring water for environmental use in australia: an analysis of policy options. Water Resour Manag 24:1515–1530. doi:10.1007/s11269-9511-5
Van der Krogt WNM (2008a) RIBASIM Version 7.00. User manual. Deltares, Delft, Netherlands
Van der Krogt WNM (2008b) RIBASIM Version 7.00. Technical reference manual. Deltares, Delft, Netherlands
Van Beek E, Bozorgy B, Vekerdy Z, Meijer KS (2008) Limits to agricultural growth in the Sistan Closed Inland Delta, Iran. Irrig Drain Syst. doi:10.1007/s10795-008-9045-7, Open Access
Verhaeghe RJ, Van der Krogt WNM (1996) Estimation of demands and balancing of resources at basin level. International Commission on Irrigation and Drainage Conference, Cairo
Acknowledgements
This paper makes use of data collected and a model developed as part of a project named “Integrated Water Resources Management in Lake Orumiyeh” financed by the Partners for Water program and the West Azerbaijan Regional Water Authority. We would like to thank the Iranian Water Research Institute for their cooperation. We would also like to express thanks to three anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments which helped improve the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Meijer, K.S., van der Krogt, W.N.M. & van Beek, E. A New Approach to Incorporating Environmental Flow Requirements in Water Allocation Modeling. Water Resour Manage 26, 1271–1286 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-011-9958-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-011-9958-z