Skip to main content
Log in

Reading the landscape: temporal and spatial changes in a patterned peatland

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Wetlands Ecology and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Everglades of south Florida is a patterned peatland that has undergone major hydrologic modification over the last century, including both drainage and impoundment. The Everglades ridge and slough patterns were originally characterized by regularly spaced elevated ridges and tree islands oriented parallel to water flow through interconnected sloughs. Many areas of the remaining Everglades have lost this patterning over time. Historical aerial photography for the years 1940, 1953, 1972, 1984, and 2004 provides source data to measure these changes over six decades. Maps were created by digitizing the ridges, tree islands, and sloughs in fifteen 24 km2 study plots located in the remaining Everglades, and metrics were developed to quantify the extent and types of changes in the patterns. Pattern metrics of length/width ratios, number of ridges, and perimeter/area ratios were used to define the details and trajectories of pattern changes in the study plots from 1940 through 2004. These metrics characterized elongation, smoothness, and abundance of ridges and tree islands. Hierarchical agglomerative cluster analysis was used to categorize these 75 maps (15 plots by 5 years) into five categories based on a suite of metrics of pattern quality. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling, an ordination technique, confirmed that these categories were distinct with the primary axis distinguished primarily by the abundance of elongated ridges in each study plot. Strong patterns like those described historically were characterized by numerous, long ridges while degraded patterns contained few large, irregularly shaped patches. Pattern degradation usually occurred with ridges fusing into fewer, less linear patches of emergent vegetation. Patterning improved in some plots, probably through wetter conditions facilitating expression of the underlying microtopography. Trajectories showing responses of individual study plots over the six decades indicated that ridge and slough patterns can degrade or improve over time scales of a decade or less. Changes in ridge and slough patterns indicate that (1) patterns can be lost quickly following severe peat dryout, yet (2) patterns appear resilient at least over multi-decadal time periods; (3) patterns can be maintained and possibly strengthened with deeper water depths, and (4) the sub-decadal response time of pattern changes visible in aerial imagery is highly useful for change detection within the landscape. This analysis suggests that restoration of some aspects of these unique peatland patterns may be possible within relatively short planning time frames. Use of aerial photography in future Everglades restoration efforts can facilitate restoration and adaptive management by documenting sub-decadal pattern changes in response to altered hydrology and water management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander TR and Crook AG (1973) South Florida ecological study, app. G: Recent and long-term vegetation changes and patterns in South Florida (EVER-N-51). South Florida Water Management District, West Palm Beach

  • Baldwin M, Hawker HW (1915) Soil survey of the Fort Lauderdale area, Florida. Field Operations of the Bureau of Soils. US Department of Agriculture, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernhardt CE, Willard DA (2009) Response of the Everglades ridge and slough landscape to climate variability and 20th-century water management. Ecol Appl 19(7):1723–1738

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Central and Southern Florida (C&SF) Project, Comprehensive Review Study, final integrated feasibility report and programmatic environmental impact statement. 1999. South Florida Water Management District, West Palm Beach (http://www.evergladesplan.org/pub/restudy_eis.aspx#mainreport)

  • Conway VM (1948) Von Post’s work on climatic rhythms. New Phytol 47:220–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crum H (1992) A focus on peatlands and peat mosses. The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, p 306

    Google Scholar 

  • Desmond G (2007) High Accuracy Elevation Data—Water Conservation and Greater Everglades Region. USGS, South Florida Information Access. http://sofia.usgs.gov/metadata/sflwww/HAED_WCA_Everglades.html

  • Dix EA, MacGonigle JN (1905) The Everglades of Florida: a region of mystery. Century Magazine 47:512–527

    Google Scholar 

  • Doren RF, Armentano TV, Whiteaker LD, Jones RD (1997) Marsh vegetation patterns and soil phosphorus gradients in the Everglades ecosystem. Aquat Bot 56:145–163

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Foster AM, Coffin AW, Capobianco KM, Smith III TJ (2004) Creation of a geospatially rectified digital archive of the 1940 aerial photography photoset: South Florida and the Everglades. USGS, Florida Integrated Science Center, Gainesville

    Google Scholar 

  • Frenzel B (1983) Mires—repositories of climatic information or self-perpetuating ecosystems? Chap. 2. In: Gore AJP (ed) Ecosystems of the World, 4A: Mires: swamp, bog, fen and moor: general studies. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Amsterdam, pp 35–65

  • Harshberger JW (1914) The vegetation of South Florida, south of 27°30′ north, exclusive of the Florida Keys. Trans Wagner Free Inst Sci 7(3):51–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey JW, Schaffranek RW, Noe GB, Larsen LG, Nowacki DJ, O’Connor BL (2009) Hydroecological factors governing surface water flow on a low-gradient floodplain. Water Resour Res 45(321):1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinselman ML (1963) Forest sites, bog processes, and peatland types in the Glacial Lake Agassiz region, Minnesota. Ecol Monogr 33:327–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinselman ML (1965) String bogs and other patterned organic terrain near Seney, Upper Michigan. Ecology 46(1/2):185–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinselman ML (1970) Landscape evolution, peatland types, and the environment in the Lake Agassiz Peatlands Natural Area, Minnesota. Ecol Monogr 45:235–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingram HAP (1983) Hydrology, Chap. 3. In: Gore APJ (ed) Ecosystems of the World 4A: Mires: swamp, bog, fen, and moor. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co., New York, pp 67–158

  • Ives LJC (1856) Memoir to accompany a military map of the peninsula of Florida, south of Tampa Bay. M.B. Wynkoop, Book & Job Printer, New York, p 42

    Google Scholar 

  • Komlos S, Goodman P, Gottlieb A, Redwine J, Newman J (2008) Predicting CERP influences on extreme high and low water levels in greater Everglades wetlands. Greater Everglades Ecosystem Restoration Conference 2008, USGS

  • Kruskal JB (1964) Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: a numerical method. Psychometrika 29:115–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kushlan JA (1990) Freshwater marshes. In: Myers RL, Ewel JJ (eds) Ecosystems of Florida. University of Central Florida Press, Orlando, pp 324–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen LG, Harvey JW (2010) How vegetation and sediment transport feedbacks drive landscape change in the Everglades and wetlands worldwide. American Naturalist 176(3):E66–E79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen LG, Harvey JW (2011) Modeling of hydroecological feedbacks predicts distinct classes of wetland channel pattern and process that influence ecological function and restoration potential. Geomorphology 126:279–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen LG, Harvey JW, Crimaldi JP (2007) A delicate balance: ecohydrological feedbacks governing landscape morphology in a lotic peatland. Ecol Monogr 77(4):591–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen L, Aumen N, Bernhardt C, Engel V, Givnish T, Hagerthey S, Harvey J, Leonard L, McCormick P, McVoy C, Noe G, Nungesser M, Rutchey K, Sklar F, Troxler T, Volin J, Willard D (2011) Recent and historic drivers of landscape change in the Everglades ridge, slough, and tree island mosaic. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 41:344–381

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leach SD, Klein H, Hampton ER (1971) Hydrologic effects of water control and management of southeastern Florida. Open file report 71005, US. Geological Survey, Tallahassee

    Google Scholar 

  • McCune B, Grace J (2002) Analysis of ecological communities. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, pp 125–142

    Google Scholar 

  • McCune B, Mefford MJ (2006) PC-ORD; Multivariate analysis of ecological data, Version 5.10. MjM Software, Gleneden Beach

    Google Scholar 

  • McVoy CW, Park WA, Obeysekera J, VanArman JA, Dreschel TW (2011) Landscapes and hydrology of the pre-drainage Everglades. University Press of Florida, Gainesville

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore PD, Bellamy DJ (1974) Peatlands. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • National Wetlands Working Group (1988) Wetlands of Canada. Ecological land classification series no. 24. Sustainable Development Branch, Environment Canada, Ottawa, ON, and Polyscience Publications Inc., Montreal, Quebec, pp 452

  • Noe GB, Harvey JW, Schaffranek RW, Larsen LG (2010) Controls of suspended sediment concentration, nutrient content, and transport in a subtropical wetland. Wetlands 30:39–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nungesser MK (2003) Modelling microtopography in boreal peatlands: hummocks and hollows. Ecol Model 165:175–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson CJ, Ferrell GM, Vaithiyanathan P (1999) Nutrient effects on stand structure, resorption efficiency, and secondary compounds in Everglades sawgrass. Ecology 80(7):2182–2192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross MS, Mitchell-Bruker S, Sah JP, Stothoff S, Ruiz PL, Reed DL, Jayachandran K, Coultas CL (2006) Interaction of hydrology and nutrient limitation in the ridge and slough landscape of the southern Everglades. Hydrobiologia 569:37–59

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rutchey K, Schall T, Coronado C, Nungesser M, Volin J, Owen D, Sklar F (2009) Landscape. In: Sklar F, Dreschel T, Warren K (eds) Ecology of the Everglades Protection Area, Chap. 6. South Florida Environmental Report. South Florida Water Management District, West Palm Beach, pp 6-83–6-87

    Google Scholar 

  • Rydin H, Jeglum J (2006) The biology of peatlands. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 343

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Science Coordinating Team (SCT) (2003) The role of flow in the Everglades ridges and slough landscape. Report to the South Florida Ecosystem Restoration Task Force Working Group, West Palm Beach

    Google Scholar 

  • Sklar FH, van der Valk A (2002) Tree islands of the Everglades. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Sklar FH, McVoy C, van Zee R, Gawlik DE, Tarboton K, Rudnick D, Miao SL, Armentano T (2002) The effects of altered hydrology on the ecology of the Everglades. In: Porter JW, Porter KG (eds) The Everglades, Florida Bay, and Coral Reefs of the Florida Keys, an Ecosystem Sourcebook, Chap. 2. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 39–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Sklar F, Coronado-Molina C, Gras A, Rutchey K, Gawlik D, Crozier G, Bauman L, Hagerthy S, Shuford R, Leeds J, Wu Y, Madden C, Garrett B, Nungesser M, Korvela M, McVoy C (2004) Ecological effects of hydrology, Chap 6. In: 2004 Everglades Consolidated Report, South Florida Water Management District, West Palm Beach, pp 6–1 to 6–58

  • Sklar FH, Cook M, Call E, Shuford R, Kobza M, Johnson R, Miao S, Korvela M, Coronado C, Bauman L, Leeds J, Garrett B, Newman J, Cline E, Newman S, Rutchey K, McVoy C (2006) Ecology of the Everglades Protection Area, Chap 6 In: 2006 South Florida Environmental Report, South Florida Water Management District, West Palm Beach, pp 6–59 to 6–60

  • Sklar FH, Cline E, Cook M, Dreschel T, Coronado C, Gawlik DE, Gu B, Hagerthey S, Lantz S, McVoy C, Miao S, Newman S, Richards J, Rutchey K, Saunders C, Scinto L, Shuford R, Thomas C (2008) Ecology of the Everglades Protection Area, Chap 6. In: 2008 South Florida Environmental Report, South Florida Water Management District, West Palm Beach, pp 6–75 to 6–77

  • Smith B (1848) Report on reconnaissance of the Everglades made to the Secretary of the Treasury, June 1848. Senate Rep. Com. No. 242, Aug. 12, 1848. 30th Congress, 1st session, Washington, p 133

  • South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) (2006) DBHydro Browser User Documentation. South Florida Water Management District, West Palm Beach, p 85. (http://my.sfwmd.gov/pls/portal/docs/PAGE/PG_GRP_SFWMD_ERA/PORTLET_DBHYDROBROWSER/DBHYDROBROWSERUSERDOCUMENTATION.PDF)

  • Stephens JC, Johnson L (1951) Subsidence of organic soils in the upper Everglades region of Florida. Soil Sci Soc Fla Proc 11:191–237

    Google Scholar 

  • US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) (2002) Final Central and Southern Florida Project Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan, Project Management Plan, WCA-3 Decompartmentalization and Sheetflow Enhancement Project, Part 1. USACE, Jacksonville. http://www.evergladesplan.org/pm/pmp/pmp_docs/pmp_12_wca/decomp_main_apr_2002.pdf

  • Walker D, Walker PM (1961) Stratigraphic evidence of regeneration in some Irish bogs. J Ecol 49:169–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watts DL, Cohen MJ, Heffernan JB, Osborne TZ (2010) Hydrologic modification and the loss of self-organized patterning in the ridge slough mosaic of the Everglades. Ecosystems 13(6):813–827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willard DA, Holmes C, Weimer LM (2001) The Florida Everglades ecosystem: climatic and anthropogenic impacts over the last two millenia. Paleoecology of South Florida, Chap. 4. Bull Am Paleontol 361:41–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Willard DA, Bernhardt CE, Holmes CW, Landacre B, Marot M (2006) Response of Everglades tree islands to environmental change. Ecol Monogr 76(4):565–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright JO (1912) The Florida Everglades: their adaptability for the growth of sugar cane. Privately published

  • Zweig CL, Kitchens WM (2008) Effects of landscape gradients on wetland vegetation communities: information for large-scale restoration. Wetlands 28:1086–1096

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank several colleagues for their suggestions, technical help, and ideas during the development of this manuscript: Drs. Christopher McVoy, Steve Friedman, Colin Saunders, and Tom Dreschel. Malak Ali’s skill in digitizing the imagery and Sue Hohner’s technical guidance in GIS and spatial analysis were invaluable. I also appreciate the comments of Dr. Fred Sklar and two anonymous reviewers. This research was funded in part by the South Florida Water Management District. Funding was provided by the South Florida Water Management District and the Restoration Coordination and Verification program of the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. K. Nungesser.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nungesser, M.K. Reading the landscape: temporal and spatial changes in a patterned peatland. Wetlands Ecol Manage 19, 475–493 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-011-9229-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-011-9229-z

Keywords

Navigation