Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Carbon balance of a sewage-fed aquaculture wetland

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Wetlands Ecology and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Wetlands are considered as one of the most effective carbon (C) sink among various ecosystems. To substantiate this view, the present investigation was conducted in one of the units of sewage fed East Kolkata wetlands (EKW), a Ramsar site, over a period of 3 years. The result revealed that because of high primary productivity due to abundance of primary producers and other sources of C input primarily through sewage influx, there is net positive balance of C in the system. The rate of C accumulation estimated through C budget was 1245.27–2490.55 kg C ha−1 year−1 while the rate estimated through sediment core analysis came out to be 1584 kg C ha−1 year−1. The amount of total C deposited up to 15 cm depth in sediment was 29.37 Mg ha−1, quite higher than the C deposited up to 15 cm depth of reference upland soil which was measured at 23.79 Mg ha−1. If C burial from this experiment in 55 ha is up-scaled for entire EKW of 12,500 ha area, then it empirically corresponds to 56.97–113.94 Gg CO2 captured from atmosphere per annum. EKW is not only used for aquaculture production thereby harvesting blue carbon but also has great potential to accumulate C in its sediments and thus helping mitigate climate change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adhikari S, Lal R, Sahu B (2012) Carbon sequestration in the bottom sediments of aquaculture ponds of Orissa, India. Ecol Eng 47:198–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anon (2017) Data obtained through personal communication with the wetland fisheries manager

  • APHA (2012) Standard methods for examination of water and waste water, 20th edn. American Public Health Association, AWWA, WPCA, Washington, p 1193

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhatnagar A, Devi P (2013) Water quality guidelines for the management of pond fish culture. Int J Env Sci 3(6):1980–1997

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd CE, Wood CW, Chaney PL et al (2010) Role of aquaculture pond sediments in sequestration of annual global carbon emissions. Environ Pollut 158:2537–2540

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bremner JM (1960) Determination of nitrogen in soil by the Kjeldahl method. J Agric Sci 55(1):11–33

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bunting SW, Pretty J (2007) Global carbon budgets and aquaculture—emissions, sequestration and management options. Centre for Environment and Society Occasional Paper 2007-1. University of Essex

  • De Silva SS, Soto D (2009) Climate change and aquaculture: potential impacts, adaptation and mitigation. In: Cochrane K., Young CD, Soto D, Bahri T (eds). Climate change implications for fisheries and aquaculture: overview of current scientific knowledge. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper. No. 530. Rome, FAO, 151–212

  • Dean WE, Gorham E (1998) Magnitude and significance of carbon burial in lakes, reservoirs, and peatlands. Geology 26:535–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EKWMA. East Kolkata Wetlands Management Authority (2015). http://www.ekwma.com/index.php?view=default&MenuID=20. Accessed 8 Dec 2015

  • Einsele G, Yan J, Hinderer M (2001) Atmospheric carbon burial in modern lake basins and its significance for the global carbon budget. Global Planet Change 30:167–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedlingstein P, Solomon S (2005) Contributions of past and present human generations to committed warming caused by carbon dioxide. PNAS 102:10832–10836

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner WH (1986) Water content. In: Klute A (ed) Methods of soil analysis: part 1—physical and mineralogical methods, 2nd edn. Soil Science Society of America, American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 493–544

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee GW, Bauder JW (1986) Particle-size analysis. In: Klute A (ed) Methods of soil analysis: part 1—physical and mineralogical methods, 2nd edn. Soil Science Society of America, American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 383–411

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh D (1998) Wastewater-fed aquaculture in the Wetlands of Calcutta—an overview. In: Proceedings of the International Seminar on Wastewater Reclamation and Reuse for Aquaculture. Institute of Wetland Management and Ecological Design, Wastewater-Fed Aquaculture, Calcutta

  • Grossman RB, Reinsch TG (2002) The solid phase. In: Dane JH, Topp GC (eds) Methods of soil analysis. Part 4, physical methods. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp 201–228

    Google Scholar 

  • ICAR (2011) Handbook of fisheries and aquaculture. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr R (2006) Global warming is changing the world. Science 316:188–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lal R (2008) Carbon sequestration. Phil Trans R Soc B 363:815–830

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li Z, Song Z, Li B (2013a) The production and accumulation of phytolith-occluded carbon in Baiyangdian wetland of China. Appl Geochem 37:117–124

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li Z, Song Z, Jiang P (2013b) Biogeochemical sequestration of carbon within phytoliths of wetland plants: a case study of Xixi wetland, China. Chin Sci Bull 58:2480–2487

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miller JB (2008) Sources, sinks and seasons. Nature 451:26–27

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mitra S, Wassmann R, Vlek PLG (2005) An appraisal of global wetland area and its organic carbon stock. Curr Sci 88:25–35

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mitsch WJ (2016) Wetlands and climate change. Natl Wetl Newslett 38:5–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitsch WJ, Bernal B, Nahlik AM et al (2013) Wetlands, carbon, and climate change. Landsc Ecol 28:583–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muniz JLM, Hernandez ME, Moreno-Casasola P (2013) Comparing soil carbon sequestration in coastal freshwater wetlands with various geomorphic features and plant communities in Veracruz, Mexico. Plant Soil 378:189–203

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson DW, Sommers LE (1996) Total carbon, organic carbon and organic matter: Laboratory methods. In: Sparks DL, Page AL, Helmke PA, Loeppert RH (eds) Methods of soil analysis. Part 3. Chemical methods. Soil Science Society of America, American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 961–1010

    Google Scholar 

  • NZTA (2010) Sediment accumulation monitoring techniques. New Zealand Transport Agency, Auckland Motorways, Auckland, p 11

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen SR, Dean LA (1965) Phosphorous. In: Black CA (ed) Methods of soil analysis, part 2, chemical and microbiological properties. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 1036–1037

    Google Scholar 

  • Pal S, Chattopadhyay B, Mukhopadhyay SK (2013) Variability of carbon content in water and sediment in relation with physico-chemical parameters of East Kolkata wetland ecosystem: a Ramsar Site. NeBIO J 4:70–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Pal S, Manna S, Aich A et al (2014) Assessment of the spatio-temporal distribution of soil properties in East Kolkata wetland ecosystem (A Ramsar site: 1208). J Earth Syst Sci 123:729–740

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pal S, Chattopadhyay B, Mukhopadhyay SK (2016) Spatio-temporal study of carbon sequestration through piscicultural practice at East Kolkata Wetland. J Environ Biol 37:965–971

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pal S, Datta S, Chattopadhyay B et al (2017) Potential of wetland macrophytes to sequester carbon and assessment of seasonal carbon input into the East Kolkata wetland ecosystem. Wetlands 37:497–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panigrahy S, Murthy TVR, Patel JG et al (2012) Wetlands of India: inventory and assessment at 1:50,000 scale using geospatial techniques. Curr Sci 102:852–856

    Google Scholar 

  • Pant HK, Rechcigl JE, Adjei MB (2015) Carbon sequestration in wetland: concept and estimation. Food Agric Environ 1(2):308–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul A (2011) Aquaculture in artificially developed wetlands in urban areas: relationship between soil and surface water in landscape ecology. Inst Town Plann India J 8:50–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades JD (1996) Salinity: electrical conductivity and total dissolved solids. In: Sparks DL, Page AL, Helmke PA, Loeppert RH (eds) Methods of soil analysis. Part 3. Chemical methods. Soil Science of America and American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 417–435

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith SV, Renwick WH, Bartley JD et al (2002) Distribution and significance of small, artificial water bodies across the United States landscape. Sci Total Environ 299:21–36

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tanner DK, Brazner JC, Brady VJ (2000) Factors influencing carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus content of fish from a Lake Superior coastal wetland. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 57:1243–1251

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas GW (1996) Soil pH and soil acidity. In: Sparks DL, Page AL, Helmke PA, Loeppert RH (eds) Methods of soil analysis. Part 3. Chemical methods. Soil Science of America and American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 475–490

    Google Scholar 

  • Trueman CN, Johnston G, O’hea B, MacKenzie KM (2014) Trophic interactions of fish communities at midwater depths enhance long term carbon storage and benthic production on continental slopes. Proc Royal Soc, B Biol Sci. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.0669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urbansky ET (2001) Total organic carbon analyzers as tools for measuring carbonaceous matter in natural waters. J Environ Monit 3:102–112

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vollenweider RA (1969) In: Vollenweider RA (ed) A manual on methods for measuring primary production in aquatic environments. IBP handbook no. 12. F. A. Davis Co., Philadelphia, Penn. P 213

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ICAR-Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute, Barrackpore, 700120, West Bengal, India

    Subir Kumar Nag, Saurav K. Nandy, Koushik Roy, U. K. Sarkar & B. K. Das

  2. Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, South Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, Institute of Aquaculture and Protection of Waters, University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, České Budějovice, 370 05, Czech Republic

    Koushik Roy

Authors
  1. Subir Kumar Nag
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Saurav K. Nandy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Koushik Roy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. U. K. Sarkar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. B. K. Das
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Subir Kumar Nag.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nag, S.K., Nandy, S.K., Roy, K. et al. Carbon balance of a sewage-fed aquaculture wetland. Wetlands Ecol Manage 27, 311–322 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-019-09661-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-019-09661-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation