Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Wireless Networks
Erschienen in: Wireless Networks 6/2014

01.08.2014

IBLEACH: intra-balanced LEACH protocol for wireless sensor networks

verfasst von: Ahmed Salim, Walid Osamy, Ahmed M. Khedr

Erschienen in: Wireless Networks | Ausgabe 6/2014

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Wireless sensor networks (WSNs) are composed of many low cost, low power devices with sensing, local processing and wireless communication capabilities. Recent advances in wireless networks have led to many new protocols specifically designed for WSNs where energy awareness is an essential consideration. Most of the attention, however, has been given to the routing protocols since they might differ depending on the application and network architecture. Minimizing energy dissipation and maximizing network lifetime are important issues in the design of routing protocols for WSNs. In this paper, the low-energy adaptive clustering hierarchy (LEACH) routing protocol is considered and improved. We propose a clustering routing protocol named intra-balanced LEACH (IBLEACH), which extends LEACH protocol by balancing the energy consumption in the network. The simulation results show that IBLEACH outperforms LEACH and the existing improvements of LEACH in terms of network lifetime and energy consumption minimization.
Vorheriger Artikel Measurement-adaptive cellular random access protocols
Nächster Artikel Weighted centroid localization based on compressive sensing

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
Khedr, A.M., & Osamy, W. (2011). Effective target tracking mechanism in a self-organizing wireless sensor network. Journal of Parallel an Distributed Computing, 71, 1318–1326.CrossRef
2.
Khedr, A.M., & Osamy, W. (2011). Minimum perimeter coverage of query regions in heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. Information Sciences, 181, 3130–3142.CrossRef
3.
Khedr, A. M., & Osamy, W. (2006). A topology discovery algorithm for sensor network using smart antennas. Computer Communications Journal, 29, 2261–2268.CrossRef
4.
Khedr, A. M., Osamy, W., & Agrawal, D. P. (2009). Perimeter discovery in wireless sensor networks. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing , 69, 922–929.CrossRef
5.
Khedr, A. M., & Osamy, W. (2007). Target tracking mechanism for cluster based sensor networks. Applied Mathematics and Information Science Journal, 1(3), 287–303.MATH
6.
Khedr, A. M. (2006). Tracking mobile targets using grid sensor networks. GESJ: Computer Science and Telecommunications, 3(10), 66–84.
7.
Cerpa, A., Elson, J., Estrin, D., Girod, L., Hamilton, M., & Zhao, J. (2001). Habitat monitoring: Application driver for wireless communications technology. In Workshop on data communication, Latin America and the Caribbean (pp. 20–41), Costa Rica.
8.
Estrin, D., Govindan, R., Heidemann, J., & Kumar, S. (1999). Next century challenges: Scalable coordination in sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 5th annual ACM/IEEE international conference on mobile computing and networking (pp. 263–270). Seattle, Washington, USA.
9.
Yang, H., & Sikdar, B. (2007). Optimal CH selection in the LEACH architecture. In IEEE international conference on performance, computing, and communications (pp. 93–100).
10.
Latiff, N. M. A., Tsimenidis, C. C., & Sharif, B. S. (2007). Performance comparison of optimization algorithm for clustering in wireless sensor networks. In IEEE International conference on mobile adhoc and sensor systems (pp. 1–4).
11.
Zhang, Z., & Zhang, X. (2009). Research of improved clustering routing algorithm based on load balance in wireless sensor networks. IET International communication conference on wireless mobile and computing (pp. 661–664).
12.
Heinzelman, W. R., Chandrakasan, A., & Balakrishnan, H. (2000). Energy-efficient communication protocol for wireless microsensor networks. In Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii international conference on system sciences (pp. 1–10).
13.
Heinzelman, W. R., Chandrakasan, A., & Balakrishnan, H. (2002). An applocation-specific protocol architecture for wireless microsensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 1(4), 662–666.CrossRef
14.
Ok, C., Lee, S., Mitra, P., & Kumara, S. (2010). Distributed routing in wireless sensor networks using energy welfare metric. Information Sciences, 80(9), 1656–1670.CrossRef
15.
Saleem, M., Di-Caro, GA., & Farooq, M. (2011). Swarm intelligence based routing protocol for wireless sensor networks: Survey and future directions. Information Sciences, 181(20), 4597–4624.CrossRef
16.
Srgio, S. P., Aurlio, S. S., & Perkusich, A. (2010). Broadcast routing in wireless sensor networks with dynamic power management and multi-coverage backbones. Information Sciences, 180(5), 653–663.CrossRef
17.
Rabaey, J. M., Ammer, J., da Silva, J. L. Jr, Patel, D., & Roundy, S. (2000). PicoRadio supports ad hoc ultra low power wireless networking. IEEE Computer, 33(7), 42–48.CrossRef
18.
Ye, W., Heidemann, J., & Estrin, D. (2002). An energy-efficient MAC protocol for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of IEEE Infocom, New York.
19.
Ye, F., Luo, H., Cheng, J., Lu, S., & Zhang, L. (2002). A two-tier data dissemination model for large- scale wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of Mob-com02, Atlanta, GA.
20.
Shih, E., Cho, S., Ickes, N., Min, R., Sinha, A., Wang, A., & Chandrakasan, A. (2001). Physical layer driven protocol and algorithm design for energy-efficient wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 7th annual ACM/IEEE international conference on mobile computing and networking (Mo-bicom01), Rome, Italy.
21.
Madden, S., Franklin, M. J., Hellerstein, J. M., & Hong, W. (2002). TAG: A tiny aggregation service for ad-hoc sensor networks. In ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review - OSDI ’02: Proceedings of the 5th symposium on Operating systems design and implementation (Vol. 36, pp. 131–146).
22.
Pottle, G. J., & Kaiser, W. J. (2000). Embedding the internet: Wireless integrated network sensors. Communications of the ACM, 43(5), 51–58.
23.
Wang, L., & Xiao, Y. (2006). A survey of energy- efficient scheduling mechanisms in sensor network. Journal Mobile Networks and Applications archive, 11(5), 723–740.CrossRef
24.
Tong, M., & Tang, M. (2010). LEACH-B: an improved LEACH protocol for wireless sensor network. In 6th international conference on wireless communications networking and mobile computing (WiCOM) (pp. 1–4).
25.
Hong, J., Kook, J., Lee, S., Kwon, D., & Yi, S. (2009). T-LEACH: The method of threshold-based CH replacement for wireless sensor networks. Information Systems, 11(5), 513–521.
26.
Zytoune, O., El aroussi, M., Rziza, M., & Aboutajdine, D. (2008). Stochastic low energy adaptive clustering hierarchy. ICGST-CNIR, 8(1), 47–51.
27.
Zytoune, O., Fakhri, Y., & Aboutajdine, D. (2009). A balanced cost cluster-heads selection algorithm for wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Computer Science, 4(1), 21–24.
28.
Junping, H., Yuhui, J., & Liang, D. (2008). A time-based cluster-head selection algorithm for LEACH. In Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on computers and communications, Morocco (ISCC 2008).
29.
Zhiyong, P., & Xiaojuan, L. (2010). The improvement and simulation of LEACH protocol for WSNs. In Software engineering and service sciences (ICSESS), IEEE international conference.
30.
Handy, M. J., Haase, M., & Timmermann, D. (2002). Low energy adaptive clustering hierarchy with deterministic cluster-head selection. In Mobile and wireless communications network, 2002. 4th international workshop, pp. 368–372.
31.
AbuBakr, B., & Lilien, L. (2011). Extending wireless sensor network lifetime in the LEACH-SM protocol by spare selection. In Proceedings of the fifth international conference on innovative mobile and internet services in ubiquitous computing (IMIS ’11) (pp. 277–282). Washington, DC, USA: IEEE Computer Society.
32.
33.
34.
Li, G., He, J., & Fu, Y. (2008). Group-based intrusion detection system in wireless sensor networks. Computer Communications, 31, 4324–4332.CrossRef
35.
Moshtaghi, M., Havens, T. C., Bezdek, J. C., Park, L., Leckie, C., Rajasegarar, S., Keller, J. M., Palaniswami, M.et al. (2011). Clustering ellipses for anomaly detection. Pattern Recognition, 44, 55–69.CrossRefMATH
36.
Moshtaghi, M., Rajasegarar, S., Leckie, C., & Karunasekera, S. (2009). Anomaly detection by clustering ellipsoids in wireless sensor networks. In 5th international conference on intelligent sensors, sensor networks and information processing (ISSNIP) (pp. 331–336).
37.
Rajasegarar, S., Bezdek, J. C., Leckie, C., & Palaniswami, M. (2007). Analysis of anomalies in IBRL data from a wireless sensor network deployment. In International conference on sensor technologies and applications (SensorComm) (pp. 158–163).
38.
Branch, J., Szymanski, B., Giannella, C., Ran, W., & Kargupta, H. (2006). In-network outlier detection in wireless sensor networks. In 26th IEEE international conference on distributed computing systems (ICDCS) (pp. 51–58).
Metadaten
Titel
IBLEACH: intra-balanced LEACH protocol for wireless sensor networks
verfasst von
Ahmed Salim
Walid Osamy
Ahmed M. Khedr
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2014
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Wireless Networks / Ausgabe 6/2014
Print ISSN: 1022-0038
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-8196
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-014-0691-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2014

Wireless Networks 6/2014 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

TRack others if you can: localized proximity detection for mobile networks

OriginalPaper

A novel CVM precoding scheme for PAPR reduction in OFDM transmissions

OriginalPaper

Fractionally spaced equalizer based on dynamically varying modulus algorithm for spectrally efficient channel compensation in SC-FDMA based systems

OriginalPaper

A green radio resource allocation scheme for LTE-A downlink systems with CoMP transmission

OriginalPaper

Energy-efficiency resource allocation of very large multi-user MIMO systems

OriginalPaper

Optimizing event coverage in theme parks

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise