Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Wireless Networks
Erschienen in: Wireless Networks 4/2021

30.03.2021

Smart grid cyber-physical systems: communication technologies, standards and challenges

verfasst von: A. V. Jha, B. Appasani, A. N. Ghazali, P. Pattanayak, D. S. Gurjar, E. Kabalci, D. K. Mohanta

Erschienen in: Wireless Networks | Ausgabe 4/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The recent developments in embedded system design and communication technologies popularized the adaption of the cyber-physical system (CPS) for practical applications. A CPS is an amalgamation of a physical system, a cyber system, and their communication network. The cyber system performs extensive computational operations on the data received from the physical devices, interprets the data, and initiates effective control actions in real-time. One such CPS is the smart grid CPS (SG-CPS) consisting of physical devices with diverse communication requirements, and intermediate communication networks. Thus, reliable communication networks are paramount for the effective operation of the SG-CPS. This paper is an elaborate survey on the communication networks from the perspective of the SG-CPS. This paper presents the state-of-art communication technologies that can meet the communication requirements of the various SG-CPS applications. The communications standards and communication protocols are also comprehensively discussed. A systematic mapping among communication technologies, standards, and protocols for various SG-CPS applications has been presented based on an extensive literature survey in this paper. Furthermore, several challenges, such as security, safety, reliability and resilience, etc., have been addressed from SG-CPS’s perspective. This work also identifies the research gaps in the various domains of the SG-CPS that can be of immense benefit to the research community.
Vorheriger Artikel Latency reduction for narrowband URLLC networks: a performance evaluation
Nächster Artikel Trade-off between spectral efficiency and normalized energy in Ad-hoc wireless networks

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
Jirkovský, V., Obitko, M., Kadera, P., & Mařík, V. (2018). Toward plug play cyber-physical system components. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 14(6), 2803–2811.CrossRef
2.
Zhou, Y., Yu, F. R., Chen, J., & Kuo, Y. (2020). Cyber-physical-social systems: A state-of-the-art survey, challenges and opportunities. IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials, 22(1), 389–425.CrossRef
3.
Yu, X., & Xue, Y. (2016). Smart grids: A cyber-physical systems perspective. Proceedings of the IEEE, 104(5), 1058–1070.CrossRef
4.
Serpanos, D. (2018). The cyber-physical systems revolution. Computer, 51(3), 70–73.CrossRef
5.
Leitão, P., Karnouskos, S., Ribeiro, L., Lee, J., Strasser, T., & Colombo, A. W. (2016). Smart agents in industrial cyber-physical systems. Proceedings of the IEEE, 104(5), 1086–1101.CrossRef
6.
Harvey, M. J., Liu, X., & Chow, J. Y. J. (2016). A tablet-based surrogate system architecture for “in-situ’’ evaluation of cyber-physical transport technologies. IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine, 8(4), 79–91.CrossRef
7.
Tang, J., Ibrahim, M., & Chakrabarty, K. (2019). Randomized checkpoints: A practical defense for cyber-physical microfluidic systems. IEEE Design Test, 36(1), 5–13.CrossRef
8.
Watteyne, T., Handziski, V., Vilajosana, X., Duquennoy, S., Hahm, O., Baccelli, E., & Wolisz, A. (2016). Industrial wireless ip-based cyber -physical systems. Proceedings of the IEEE, 104(5), 1025–1038.CrossRef
9.
Rajabi Shishvan, O., Zois, D., & Soyata, T. (2018). Machine intelligence in healthcare and medical cyber physical systems: A survey. IEEE Access, 6, 46-419-46–494.CrossRef
10.
Kim, S., Won, Y., Park, I., Eun, Y., & Park, K. (2019). Cyber-physical vulnerability analysis of communication-based train control. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 6(4), 6353–6362.CrossRef
11.
Ernst, R. (2018). Automated driving: The cyber-physical perspective. Computer, 51(9), 76–79.CrossRef
12.
Moness, M., & Moustafa, A. M. (2016). A survey of cyber-physical advances and challenges of wind energy conversion systems: Prospects for internet of energy. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 3(2), 134–145.CrossRef
13.
Jia, D., Lu, K., Wang, J., Zhang, X., & Shen, X. (2016). A survey on platoon-based vehicular cyber-physical systems. IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials, 18(1), 263–284.CrossRef
14.
Atat, R., Liu, L., Wu, J., Li, G., Ye, C., & Yang, Y. (2018). Big data meet cyber-physical systems: A panoramic survey. IEEE Access, 6, 73 603-73 636.CrossRef
15.
Rossi, B., & Chren, S. (2020). Smart grids data analysis: A systematic mapping study. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 16(6), 3619–3639.CrossRef
16.
Xu, H., Yu, W., Griffith, D., & Golmie, N. (2018). A survey on industrial internet of things: A cyber-physical systems perspective. IEEE Access, 6, 78 238-78 259.CrossRef
17.
Yang, C., Zhabelova, G., Yang, C., & Vyatkin, V. (2013). Cosimulation environment for event-driven distributed controls of smart grid. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 9(3), 1423–1435.CrossRef
18.
He, H., & Yan, J. (2016). Cyber-physical attacks and defences in the smart grid: a survey. IET Cyber-Physical Systems: Theory Applications, 1(1), 13–27.CrossRef
19.
Wang, W., Xu, Y., & Khanna, M. (2011). A survey on the communication architectures in smart grid. Computer Networks, 55(15), 3604–3629.CrossRef
20.
Yan, Y., Qian, Y., Sharif, H., & Tipper, D. (2013). A survey on smart grid communication infrastructures: Motivations, requirements and challenges. IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials, 15(1), 5–20.CrossRef
21.
Gungor, V. C., Sahin, D., Kocak, T., Ergut, S., Buccella, C., Cecati, C., & Hancke, G. P. (2013). A survey on smart grid potential applications and communication requirements. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 9(1), 28–42.CrossRef
22.
Rohjans, S., Uslar, M., Bleiker, R., González, J., Specht, M., Suding, T., & Weidelt, T. (2010). Survey of smart grid standardization studies and recommendations. First IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications, 2010, 583–588.
23.
Bian, D., Kuzlu, M., Pipattanasomporn, M., Rahman, S., & Shi, D. (2019). Performance evaluation of communication technologies and network structure for smart grid applications. IET Communications, 13(8), 1025–1033.CrossRef
24.
Palensky, P., Widl, E., & Elsheikh, A. (2014). Simulating cyber-physical energy systems: Challenges, tools and methods. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 44(3), 318–326.CrossRef
25.
Poudel, S., Ni, Z., & Malla, N. (2017). Real-time cyber physical system testbed for power system security and control. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 90, 124–133.CrossRef
26.
Holm, H., Karresand, M., Vidström, A., & Westring, E. (2015). A survey of industrial control system testbeds. In S. Buchegger & M. Dam (Eds.), Secure IT systems (pp. 11–26). Cham: Springer International Publishing.CrossRef
27.
Hossain, E., Kabalci, E., Bayindir, R., & Perez, R. (2014). Microgrid testbeds around the world: State of art. Energy Conversion and Management, 86, 132–153.CrossRef
28.
Sun, C.-C., Liu, C.-C., & Xie, J. (2016). Cyber-physical system security of a power grid: State-of-the-art. Electronics, 5, 2–18.CrossRef
29.
Li, F., Shi, Y., Shinde, A., Ye, J., & Song, W. (2019). Enhanced cyber-physical security in internet of things through energy auditing. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 6(3), 5224–5231.CrossRef
30.
Liu, J., Xiao, Y., Li, S., Liang, W., & Chen, C. L. P. (2012). Cyber security and privacy issues in smart grids. IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials, 14(4), 981–997.CrossRef
31.
Giraldo, J., Sarkar, E., Cardenas, A. A., Maniatakos, M., & Kantarcioglu, M. (2017). Security and privacy in cyber-physical systems: A survey of surveys. IEEE Design & Test, 34(4), 7–17.CrossRef
32.
Tan, S., De, D., Song, W., Yang, J., & Das, S. K. (2017). Survey of security advances in smart grid: A data driven approach. IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials, 19(1), 397–422.CrossRef
33.
Kumar, P., Lin, Y., Bai, G., Paverd, A., Dong, J. S., & Martin, A. (2019). Smart grid metering networks: A survey on security, privacy and open research issues. IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials, 21(3), 2886–2927.CrossRef
34.
Jawurek, M., Kerschbaum, F., & Danezis, G. (2012). SoK: Privacy technologies for smart grids-a survey of options. Cambridge: Microsoft Res.
35.
Tuinema, B. W., Rueda Torres, J. L., Stefanov, A. I., Gonzalez-Longatt, F. M., & van der Meijden, M. A. M. M. (2020). Cyber-physical system modeling for assessment and enhancement of power grid cyber security, resilience, and reliability (pp. 237–270). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
36.
Zhu, Q. (2019). Multilayer cyber-physical security and resilience for smart grid (pp. 225–239). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
37.
Xu, S., Qian, Y., & Hu, R. Q. (2015). On reliability of smart grid neighborhood area networks. IEEE Access, 3, 2352–2365.CrossRef
38.
Ye, F., Qian, Y., Hu, R. Q., & Das, S. K. (2015). Reliable energy-efficient uplink transmission for neighborhood area networks in smart grid. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 6(5), 2179–2188.CrossRef
39.
Li, Y., Yin, X., Wang, Z., Yao, J., Shi, X., Wu, J., et al. (2019). A survey on network verification and testing with formal methods: Approaches and challenges. IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials, 21(1), 940–969.CrossRef
40.
Haggi, H., nejad, R. R., Song, M., & Sun, W. (2019). “A review of smart grid restoration to enhance cyber-physical system resilience,” In 2019 IEEE innovative smart grid technologies - Asia (ISGT Asia), pp. 4008–4013.
41.
Cheng, Z., & Chow, M. (2020). “Resilient collaborative distributed energy management system framework for cyber-physical dc microgrids,” IEEE transactions on smart Grid, pp. 1.
42.
Monostori, L. (2014). “Cyber-physical production systems: Roots, expectations and R&D challenges,” Procedia CIRP, vol. 17, pp. 9 – 13, variety Management in Manufacturing.
43.
Karnouskos, S., Colombo, A. W., Bangemann, T., Manninen, K., Camp, R., Tilly, M., Stluka, P. Jammes, F., Delsing, J., & Eliasson, J. (2012). “A SOA-based architecture for empowering future collaborative cloud-based industrial automation,” In IECON 2012 - 38th annual conference on IEEE industrial electronics society, pp. 5766–5772.
44.
Zhao, J., Wen, F., Xue, Y., Li, X., & Dong, Z. (2010). Cyber-physical power systems: Architecture, implementation techniques and challenges. Chinese Automation of Electric Power Systems, 34(16), 1–7.
45.
Deep Singh, K., & Sood, K. (2020). 5g ready optical fog-assisted cyber-physical system for iot applications. IET Cyber-Physical Systems: Theory Applications, 5(2), 137–144.CrossRef
46.
Shahid, A. (2016). Cyber-physical modeling and control of smart grids - a new paradigm. IEEE Power Energy Society Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference (ISGT), 2016, 1–5.
47.
Karnouskos, S. (2011). “Cyber-physical systems in the smartgrid,” In 2011 9th IEEE international conference on industrial informatics, pp. 20–23.
48.
Lee, E. A. (2008). “Cyber physical systems: Design challenges,” In 2008 11th IEEE international symposium on object and component-oriented real-time distributed computing (ISORC), pp. 363–369.
49.
Wan, Y., Cao, J., Zhang, S., Tu, G., Lu, C., Xu, X., & Li, K. (2014). An integrated cyber-physical simulation environment for smart grid applications. Tsinghua Science and Technology, 19(2), 133–143.CrossRef
50.
Lin, Hua, Sambamoorthy, S., Shukla, S., Thorp, J., & Mili, L. (2011). Power system and communication network co-simulation for smart grid applications. ISGT, 2011, 1–6.
51.
Li, H., Lai, L., & Poor, H. V. (2012). Multicast routing for decentralized control of cyber physical systems with an application in smart grid. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 30(6), 1097–1107.CrossRef
52.
Ilić, M. D., Xie, L., Khan, U. A., & Moura, J. M. F. (2010). Modeling of future cyber-physical energy systems for distributed sensing and control. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans, 40(4), 825–838.CrossRef
53.
Su, Z., Xu, L., Xin, S., Li, W., Shi, Z., & Guo, Q. (2017). “A future outlook for cyber-physical power system,” In 2017 IEEE conference on energy internet and energy system integration (EI2), pp. 1–4.
54.
Xin, S., Guo, Q., Sun, H., Zhang, B., Wang, J., & Chen, C. (2015). Cyber-physical modeling and cyber-contingency assessment of hierarchical control systems. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 6(5), 2375–2385.CrossRef
55.
Li, W., Ferdowsi, M., Stevic, M., Monti, A., & Ponci, F. (2014). Co-simulation for smart grid communications. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 10(4), 2374–2384.CrossRef
56.
Kosek, A. M., Lünsdorf, O., Scherfke, S., Gehrke, O., & Rohjans, S. (2014). Evaluation of smart grid control strategies in co-simulation-integration of ipsys and mosaik. Power Systems Computation Conference, 2014, 1–7.
57.
Cintuglu, M. H., Mohammed, O. A., Akkaya, K., & Uluagac, A. S. (2017). A survey on smart grid cyber-physical system testbeds. IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials, 19(1), 446–464.CrossRef
58.
Locke, G., & Gallagher, P. D. (2010). “NIST framework and roadmap for smart grid interoperability standards,” The National Institute of Standards and Technology, vol. Release 10, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
59.
Bu, S., & Yu, F. R. (2013). A game-theoretical scheme in the smart grid with demand-side management: Towards a smart cyber-physical power infrastructure. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing, 1(1), 22–32.CrossRef
60.
61.
Matveev, A. S., & Savkin, A. V. (2009). Estimation and control over communication networks. Switzerland: Birkhäuser Basel.MATH
62.
Li, H., Dimitrovski, A., Song, J. B., Han, Z., & Qian, L. (2014). Communication infrastructure design in cyber physical systems with applications in smart grids: A hybrid system framework. IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials, 16(3), 1689–1708.CrossRef
63.
Appasani, B., & Mohanta, D. K. (2018). A review on synchrophasor communication system: Communication technologies, standards and applications. Protection and Control of Modern Power Systems, 3(37), 1–7.
64.
Gungor, V. C., Sahin, D., Kocak, T., Ergut, S., Buccella, C., Cecati, C., & Hancke, G. P. (2011). Smart grid technologies: Communication technologies and standards. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 7(4), 529–539.CrossRef
65.
Naduvathuparambil, B., Valenti, M. C., & Feliachi, A. (2002). “Communication delays in wide area measurement systems,” In Proceedings of the Thirty-Fourth Southeastern Symposium on System Theory (Cat. No.02EX540), pp. 118–122.
66.
Hassan, H. A. H., Pelov, A., & Nuaymi, L. (2015). Integrating cellular networks, smart grid, and renewable energy: Analysis, architecture, and challenges. IEEE Access, 3, 2755–2770.CrossRef
67.
Kalalas, C., Thrybom, L., & Alonso-Zarate, J. (2016). Cellular communications for smart grid neighborhood area networks: A survey. IEEE Access, 4, 1469–1493.CrossRef
68.
Meloni, A., & Atzori, L. (2017). The role of satellite communications in the smart grid. IEEE Wireless Communications, 24(2), 50–56.CrossRef
69.
70.
71.
72.
Martin, K. E. (2015). Synchrophasor measurements under the ieee standard c37.118.1-2011 with amendment c37.118.1a. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 30(3), 1514–1522.CrossRef
73.
Martin, K. E., Brunello, G., Adamiak, M. G., Antonova, G., Begovic, M., Benmouyal, G., et al. (2014). An overview of the ieee standard c37.118.2-synchrophasor data transfer for power systems. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 5(4), 1980–1984.CrossRef
74.
Ustun, T. S., Farooq, S. M., & Hussain, S. M. S. (2019). A novel approach for mitigation of replay and masquerade attacks in smartgrids using iec 61850 standard. IEEE Access, 7, 15 6044-15 6053.CrossRef
75.
76.
“IEC, IEC 62056-1-0,” Electricity metering data exchange - The DLMS/COSEM suite - Part 1-0: Smart metering standardisation framework, (International Electrotechnical Commission, 2014).
77.
“IEC, IEC 62056-8-4,” Electricity metering data exchange - The DLMS/COSEM suite - Part 8-4: Communication profiles for narrow-band OFDM PLC PRIME neighbourhood networks, (International Electrotechnical Commission, 2018).
78.
79.
R. Y. et al., (2010). “The research on communication standard framework of smart grid,” In CICED 2010 proceedings, pp. 1–6.
80.
Hoga, C. (2007). New ethernet technologies for substation automation. IEEE Lausanne Power Technology, 2007, 707–712.CrossRef
81.
Appasani, B., Maddikara, J., & Mohanta, D. (2019). Standards and communication systems in smart grid. In E. Kabalci & Y. Kabalci (Eds.), Smart grids and their communication systems. energy systems in electrical engineering. Singapore: Springer.
82.
Mishra, S., Li, X., Pan, T., Kuhnle, A., Thai, M. T., & Seo, J. (2017). Price modification attack and protection scheme in smart grid. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 8(4), 1864–1875.CrossRef
83.
Sridhar, S., Hahn, A., & Govindarasu, M. (2012). Cyber attack-resilient control for smart grid. IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies (ISGT), 2012, 1–3.
84.
Clements, S., & Kirkham, H. (2010). Cyber-security considerations for the smart grid. IEEE PES General Meeting, 1–5.
85.
86.
Lyu, X., Ding, Y., & Yang, S. (2019). Safety and security risk assessment in cyber-physical systems. IET Cyber-Physical Systems: Theory Applications, 4(3), 221–232.CrossRef
87.
Li, X., Liang, X., Lu, R., Shen, X., Lin, X., & Zhu, H. (2012). Securing smart grid: cyber attacks, countermeasures, and challenges. IEEE Communications Magazine, 50(8), 38–45.CrossRef
88.
Peng, Y., Lu, T., Liu, J., Gao, Y., Guo, X., & Xie, F. (2013). Cyber-physical system risk assessment. Ninth International Conference on Intelligent Information Hiding and Multimedia Signal Processing, 2013, 442–447.
89.
Stouffer, K., Falco, J., & Scarfone, K. (2011). Guide to industrial control systems (ICS) security. NIST Special Publications, 800(82), 29–32.
90.
91.
92.
Moussa, B., Debbabi, M., & Assi, C. (2018). A detection and mitigation model for PTP delay attack in an IEC 61850 substation. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 9(5), 3954–3965.CrossRef
93.
Roy, A., Kim, D. S., & Trivedi, K. S. (2012). “Scalable optimal countermeasure selection using implicit enumeration on attack countermeasure trees,” In Proceedings of IEEE/IFIP international conference on dependable systems and networks (DSN 2012), pp. 1–12.
94.
Ten, C., Liu, C., & Govindarasu, M. (2007). Vulnerability assessment of cybersecurity for scada systems using attack trees. Proceedings of IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, 2007, 1–8.
95.
Sun, M., Mohan, L., & Sha, L. et al., (2009). “Addressing safety and security contradictions in cyber-physical systems,” In Proceedings of 1st workshop. future directions in cyber-physical systems security (CPSSW’09), Newark, New Jersey.
96.
Young, W., & Leveson, N. (2013). “Systems thinking for safety and security,” In Proceedings of 29th annual computer security applications Conference (ACSAC), New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, pp. 1–8.
97.
Shapiro, S. S. (2016). Privacy risk analysis based on system control structures: Adapting system-theoretic process analysis for privacy engineering. IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops (SPW), 2016, 17–24.
98.
Huang, K., Zhou, C., Tian, Y. Tu, W., & Peng, Y. (2017). “Application of bayesian network to data-driven cyber-security risk assessment in scada networks,” In Proceedings of 2017 27th international telecommunication networks and applications conference (ITNAC), pp. 1–6.
99.
Zhang, Q., Zhou, C., Tian, Y., Xiong, N., Qin, Y., & Hu, B. (2018). A fuzzy probability bayesian network approach for dynamic cybersecurity risk assessment in industrial control systems. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 14(6), 2497–2506.CrossRef
100.
Zhang, Q., Zhou, C., Xiong, N., Qin, Y., Li, X., & Huang, S. (2016). Multimodel-based incident prediction and risk assessment in dynamic cybersecurity protection for industrial control systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 46(10), 1429–1444.CrossRef
101.
Ding, Q., Wang, X., Zhu, J., et al. (2018). Information security framework based on blockchain for cyber-physics system. Computer Science, 45(2), 32–39.
102.
Veeramany, A., Coles, G. A., Unwin, S. D., Nguyen, T. B., & Dagle, J. E. (2018). Trial implementation of a multihazard risk assessment framework for high-impact low-frequency power grid events. IEEE Systems Journal, 12(4), 3807–3815.CrossRef
103.
Yoshimura, I., & Sato, Y. (2008). Safety achieved by the safe failure fraction (sff) in iec 61508. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 57(4), 662–669.CrossRef
104.
105.
Pan, D., Liu, F., Zhou, X., & Li, T. (2008). “Functional safety in building automation and control systems,” In Proceedings of 2008 3rd IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications, pp. 467–470.
106.
Sabaliauskaite, G., & Mathur, A. (2015). “Aligning cyber-physical system safety and security,” In Proceedings of 1st Asia - Pacific Conference on Complex Systems Design & Management, Singapore, pp. 41–53.
107.
Nourian, A., & Madnick, S. (2018). A systems theoretic approach to the security threats in cyber physical systems applied to stuxnet. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, 15(1), 2–13.CrossRef
108.
Grunske, L., Colvin, R., & Winter, K. (2007). “Probabilistic model-checking support for fmea,” In Fourth International Conference on the Quantitative Evaluation of Systems (QEST 2007), pp. 119–128.
109.
Ebeling, C. (2009). An Introduction to Reliability and Maintainability Engineering. Long Grove, Illinois: Waveland Press. (1997).
110.
Dunjó, J., Fthenakis, V., Vílchez, J., et al. (2010). Hazard and operability (HAZOP) analysis, a literature review. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 173(1–3), 19–32.CrossRef
111.
Kennedy, R., & Kirwan, B. (1998). Development of a hazard and operability-based method for identifying safety management vulnerabilities in high risk systems. Safety Science, 30(3), 249–274.CrossRef
112.
Rausand, M. (2013). Risk assessment: theory, methods, and applications. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley.MATH
113.
Banerjee, A., Venkatasubramanian, K. K., Mukherjee, T., & Gupta, S. K. S. (2012). Ensuring safety, security, and sustainability of mission-critical cyber-physical systems. Proceedings of the IEEE, 100(1), 283–299.CrossRef
114.
Modarres, M., & Cheon, S. (1999). Function-centered modeling of engineering systems using the goal tree-success tree technique and functional primitives. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 64(2), 181–200.CrossRef
115.
Brissaud, F., Barros, A., & Bérenguer, C. et al. (2009). “Reliability study of an intelligent transmitter,” In Proceedings of 15th ISSAT international conference reliability and quality in design, San Francisco, United States, pp. 224–233.
116.
Lee, D., Lee, J., & Cheon, S. et al. (2013). “Application of system-theoretic process analysis to engineered safety features-component control system,” In Proceedings of 37th enlarged halden programme group (EHPG) meeting, Storefjell, Norway.
117.
Sterbenz, J. P., Hutchison, D., Çetinkaya, E. K., Jabbar, A., Rohrer, J. P., Schöller, M., & Smith, P. (2010). Resilience and survivability in communication networks: Strategies, principles, and survey of disciplines. Computer Networks, 54(8), 1245–1265. (Resilient and Survivable networks.).MATHCrossRef
118.
Mohanta, D. K., Cherukuri, M., & Roy, D. S. (2016). A brief review of phasor measurement units as sensors for smart grid. Electric Power Components & Systems, 44(4), 411–425.CrossRef
119.
Liu, W., Liu, N., Fan, Y., Zhang, L., & Zhang, x. (2009).“Reliability analysis of wide area measurement system based on the centralized distributed model,” In 2009 IEEE/PES power systems conference and exposition, pp. 1–6.
120.
Zhao, X., Lu, J., Wang, Y., Peng, J., He, F., & Wei, H. (2009). Reliability assessment of wams based on a combined hardware and software probability model of phasor measurement units. Dianli Xitong Zidonghua Automation of Electric Power Systems, 33(16), 19–23.
121.
Goutard, E., Rudolph, T., & Mesbah, M. (2010). “Impact of communication network impairments on wide area monitoring, control and protection applications in the IEC61850 environment,” In Proceedings of 43rd international conference on large high voltage electric systems 2010, CIGRE 2010.
122.
Asprou, M., Hadjiantonis, A. M., Ciornei, I., Milis, G., & Kyriakides, E. (2012). “On the complexities of interdependent infrastructures for wide area monitoring systems,” In 2012 complexity in engineering (COMPENG). proceedings, pp. 1–6.
123.
Menike, S., Yahampath, P., Rajapakse, A., & Alfa, A. (2013). Queuing-theoretic modeling of a pmu communication network. IEEE Power Energy Society General Meeting, 2013, 1–5.
124.
Rana, A. S., Thomas, M. S., & Senroy, N. (2017). Reliability evaluation of wams using markov-based graph theory approach. IET Generation, Transmission Distribution, 11(11), 2930–2937.CrossRef
125.
Li, J., Zhang, A., Zhang, H., Liu, X., Geng, Y., & Wei, Y. (2015). Reliability evaluation of the wide area protect system. Diangong Jishu Xuebao Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 30(12), 344–350.
126.
Sodhi, R., & Sharieff, M. I. (2015). Phasor measurement unit placement framework for enhanced wide-area situational awareness. IET Generation, Transmission Distribution, 9(2), 172–182.CrossRef
127.
Castello, P., Ferrari, P., Flammini, A., Muscas, C., Pegoraro, P. A., & Rinaldi, S. (2015). A distributed pmu for electrical substations with wireless redundant process bus. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 64(5), 1149–1157.CrossRef
128.
Sterbenz, J., Cetinkaya, E. K., Hameed, M., Jabbar, A., Qian, S., & Rohrer, J. (2013). Evaluation of network resilience, survivability, and disruption tolerance: analysis, topology generation, simulation, and experimentation. Telecommunication Systems, 52(2), 705–736.
129.
Rak, J. (2015). Principles of communication networks resilience. In Resilient routing in communication networks. computer communications and networks, Springer, Cham.
Metadaten
Titel
Smart grid cyber-physical systems: communication technologies, standards and challenges
verfasst von
A. V. Jha
B. Appasani
A. N. Ghazali
P. Pattanayak
D. S. Gurjar
E. Kabalci
D. K. Mohanta
Publikationsdatum
30.03.2021
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Wireless Networks / Ausgabe 4/2021
Print ISSN: 1022-0038
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-8196
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-021-02579-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2021

Wireless Networks 4/2021 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Real-time video frame differentiation in multihomed VANETs

OriginalPaper

Trade-off between spectral efficiency and normalized energy in Ad-hoc wireless networks

OriginalPaper

A double-layer isolation mechanism for malicious nodes in wireless sensor networks

Original Paper

Secrecy performance analysis of amplify-and-forward cooperative network with relay selection in the presence of multiple eavesdroppers

Original Paper

Rendezvous points based energy-aware routing using hybrid neural network for mobile sink in wireless sensor networks

Original paper

WiMesh: leveraging mesh networking for disaster communication in resource-constrained settings

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise