Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Wireless Personal Communications
Erschienen in: Wireless Personal Communications 2/2014

01.05.2014

Indoor Radio Propagation and Interference in 2.4 GHz Wireless Sensor Networks: Measurements and Analysis

verfasst von: Dragos Mihai Amzucu, Hong Li, Erik Fledderus

Erschienen in: Wireless Personal Communications | Ausgabe 2/2014

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In wireless sensor networks (WSNs), the performance and lifetime are significantly affected by the indoor propagation and the interference from other technologies using the 2.4 GHz band. Next to an overview of the propagation and coexistence issues in the literature, we present a model for analysing these effects in WSNs. We also present our measurements results on the indoor propagation, the interference of the microwave oven (MWO) and their impact on the performance of the WSN. The propagation measurements reveal significant influence of the multipath: changing a node position with a few centimetres or changing the communication channel can lead up to 30 dB difference in the received power. The power leakage of MWO has been observed around \(-\)20 dBm at 1 m distances to the oven. This leads to extra retries of the 802.15.4 messages which matches our simulation results: the packet success ratio at first try decreases to 30–40 %, which increases the average active time of the sensor, closely located to the MWO. We observe that the ON–OFF pattern of the MWO could be exploited by WSNs to improve the performance.
Vorheriger Artikel CloudThinking as an Intelligent Infrastructure for Mobile Robotics
Nächster Artikel Need for Broadband Infrastructure in a 2020 Perspective

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
IEEE. (2011). Standard for local and metropolitan area networks-Part 15.4: Low-rate wireless personal area networks (LR-WPANs). IEEE Std 802.15.4-2011 (Revision of IEEE Std 802.15.4-2006).
2.
Akyildiz, I., & Vuran, M. C. (2010). Wireless sensor networks. London: Wiley.CrossRef
3.
Hermans, F., Rensfelt, O., Voigt, T., Ngai, E., Norden, L., & Gunningberg, P. (2013). SoNIC: Classifying interference in 802.15.4 sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM/IEEE conference on information processing in wireless sensor networks (IPSN).
4.
Sikora, A., & Groza, V. F. (2005). Coexistence of IEEE802.15.4 with other systems in the 2.4 GHz-ISM-Band. In Instrumentation and measurement technology conference, 2005. IMTC.
5.
Petrova, M., Wu, L., Mahonen, P., & Riihijarvi, J. (2007). Interference measurements on performance degradation between colocated IEEE 802.11g/n and IEEE 802.15.4 networks. In Networking, 2007. ICN ’07.
6.
LaSorte, N., Rajab, S., & Refai, H. (2012). Experimental assessment of wireless coexistence for 802.15.4 in the presence of 802.11g/n. In Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC). IEEE.
7.
Florwick, J., Whiteaker, J., Amrod, A. C., & Woodhams, J. (2013) Wireless LAN design guide for Hhigh density client environments in higher education. In Design guide, Cisco.
8.
Salman, N., Rasool, I., & Kemp, A. H. (2010). Overview of the IEEE 802.15.4 standards family for low rate wireless personal area networks. In Wireless communication systems (ISWCS).
9.
Simek, M., Fuchs, M., Mraz, L., Moravek, P., & Botta, M. (2011). Measurement of LowPAN network coexistence with home microwave appliances in laboratory and home environments. In BWCCA.
10.
NXP/Jennic. (2013). Application note, co-existence of IEEE 802.15.4 at 2.4 GHz application note, JN-AN-1079, v1.1.
11.
Sha, M., Hackmann, G., & Lu, C. (2013). Real-world empirical studies on multi-channel reliability and spectrum usage for home-area sensor networks. In Network and service management. IEEE.
12.
Liang, C.-J. M., Priyantha, B., Liu, J., & Terzis, A. (2010). Surviving Wi-Fi interference in low power ZigBee networks. In SenSys.
13.
Rensfelt, O., Hermans, F., Voigt, T., Ngai, E., Norden, L.-A., & Gunningberg, P. (2012). SoNIC: Classifying and surviving interference in 802.15.4-based sensor networks. Technical report.
14.
Pollin, S., Tan, I., Hodge, B., Chun, C., & Bahai, A. (2008). Harmful coexistence between 802.15.4 and 802.11: A measurement-based study. In CrownCom 2008. 3rd International conference.
15.
Jennic. (2006). Application note, calculating 802.15.4 data rates, JN-AN-1035, 2006.
16.
Jennic. (2009). Application note, wireless network deployment guidelines application note, JN-AN-1059, 2009.
17.
ITU-R Recommendations, P.1238-7: Propagation data and prediction methods for the planning of indoor radiocommunication systems and radio local area networks in the frequency range 900 MHz to 100 GHz
18.
Plets, D., Joseph, W., & Vanhecke, K. (2012). Emmeric Tanghe and Luc Martens: Coverage prediction and optimization algorithms for indoor environments. In EURASIP.
19.
Balachander, D., & Rao, T. R. (2013). RF propagation investigations at 915/2400 MHz in indoor corridor environments for wireless sensor communications. Progress in electromagnetics research, 47, 359–381.
20.
Obayashi, S., & Zander, J. (1988). A body-shadowing model for indoor radio communication environments. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.
21.
Ziri-Castro, K. I., Scanlon, W. G., & Evans, N. E. (2003). Characterisation of body-shadowing effects in the indoor environment at 5.2 GHz. In High frequency postgraduate student colloquium.
22.
De Francisco, R. (2010). Indoor channel measurements and models at 2.4 GHz in a hospital. In GLOBECOM 2010.
23.
Watteyne, T. (2010). Mitigating multipath fading through channel hopping in wireless sensor networks. In Communications (ICC). IEEE.
24.
Yuan, W., Xiangyu, W., Linnartz, J. P. M. G., & Niemegeers, I. G. M. M. (2009). Experimental validation of a coexistence model of IEEE 802.15.4 and IEEE 802.11b/g networks. In IRADSN’09.
25.
Ho, M.-J., Rawles, M. S., Vrijkorte, M., & Fei, L. (2002). RF challenges for 2.4 and 5 GHz WLAN deployment and design. In WCNC2002. IEEE.
26.
Farahani, S. (2008). ZigBee wireless networks and transceivers (Chapter 8.5, pp. 257–258). Newnes.
27.
Kamerman, A., & Erkocevic, N. (1997). Microwave oven interference on wireless LANs operating in the 2.4 GHz ISM band. In PIMRC ’97, IEEE.
28.
Atmel. (2013). Application note, coexistance between ZigBee and other 2.4 GHz products. In AT02845.
29.
Gawthorp, P. et al. (1994). Radio spectrum measurements of individual microwave ovens. NTIA report 94–303-1.
30.
Huo, H., Xu, Y., Bilen, C. C., Zhang, H. (2009). Coexistence issues of 2.4 GHz sensor networks with other RF devices at home. In SENSORCOMM ’09.
31.
32.
Holtman, K., & van der Stok, P. (2011). Real-time routing and retry strategies for low-latency 802.15.4 control networks. In ACM SIGBED review—special issue on the 10th international workshop on real-time networks (RTN 2011).
33.
Ghare, P. H., Kothari, A. G., & Keskar, A. G. (2012). Evaluation of scalability issue of 802.15.4 MAC for body area networks. International Journal of Computer and Electrical Engineering.
34.
Ma, R., Meng, W., Chen, H.-H., & Huang, Y.-R. (2012). Coexistence of smart utility networks and WLAN/ZigBee in smart grid. In SmartGridComm. IEEE.
35.
Schwarz, R., Test & measurement product brochure \({\vert }\) 08.00 R&S\(\textregistered \) TSMW Universal Radio Network Analyzer Scanner for drive tests and I/Q streamin.
36.
Bertocco, M., Gamba, G., & Sona, A. (2008). Assessment of out-of-channel interference effects on IEEE 802.15.4 wireless sensor networks. In IMTC 2008. IEEE.
37.
Ulucinar, A. R., Korpeoglu, I., & Karasan, E. (2013). A novel measurement-based approach for modeling and computing interference factors for wireless channels. In EURASIP. Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking. doi: 10.​1186/​1687-1499-2013-68
38.
Lanzisera, S., & Pister, K. S. J. (2007). Theoretical and practical limits to sensitivity in IEEE 802.15.4 receivers. In ICECS 2007. IEEE.
39.
Zhang, X., & Shin, K. G. (2013). Cooperative carrier signaling: Harmonizing coexisting WPAN and WLAN devices. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.
40.
Yuan, W., Wang, X., & Linnartz, J.-P. M. G. ( 2007). A coexistence model of IEEE 802.15.4 and IEEE 802.11b/g. In Communications and vehicular technology in the Benelux. IEEE.
41.
Tytgat, L., Yaron, O., Pollin, S., Moerman, I., & Demeester, P. (2012). Avoiding collisions between IEEE 802.11 and IEEE 802.15.4 through coexistence aware clear channel assessment. In EURASIP.
42.
Yi, P., Iwayemi, A., & Zhou, C. (2011). Developing ZigBee deployment guideline under WiFi interference for smart grid applications. In IEEE transactions on smart grid.
43.
Zhang, X., & Shin, K. G. (2013) Gap sense: Lightweight coordination of heterogeneous wireless devices. In INFOCOM. IEEE.
44.
Jennic. (2008). Reference manual, single-ended PCB antenna module reference manual, JN-RM-2040.
45.
Azimi-Sadjadi, B., Sexton, D., Liu, P., & Mahony, M. (2006). Interference effect on IEEE 802.15. 4 performance. In INNS.
46.
Mattheijssen, P., Herben, M., Dolmans, G., & Leyten, L. (2004). Antenna-pattern diversity versus space diversity for use at handhelds. IEEE.
47.
Halperin, D., Anderson, T., & Wetherall, D. (2008). Taking the sting out of carrier sense: Interference cancellation for wireless LANs. In ACM MobiCom. Com’08
Metadaten
Titel
Indoor Radio Propagation and Interference in 2.4 GHz Wireless Sensor Networks: Measurements and Analysis
verfasst von
Dragos Mihai Amzucu
Hong Li
Erik Fledderus
Publikationsdatum
01.05.2014
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Wireless Personal Communications / Ausgabe 2/2014
Print ISSN: 0929-6212
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-834X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-014-1694-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2014

Wireless Personal Communications 2/2014 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

The Sensing Business Model

OriginalPaper

E-BEB: Enhanced Binary Exponential Backoff Algorithm for Multi-hop Wireless Ad-hoc Networks

OriginalPaper

CloudThinking as an Intelligent Infrastructure for Mobile Robotics

OriginalPaper

Hierarchical Architecture for Multi-Technology Wireless Sensor Networks for Critical Infrastructure Protection

OriginalPaper

Smart Cities via Data Aggregation

EditorialNotes

Special Issue on “Intelligent Infrastructure”

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise