Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Wireless Personal Communications
Erschienen in: Wireless Personal Communications 3/2015

01.12.2015

Provably secure one-round certificateless authenticated group key agreement protocol for secure communications

verfasst von: SK Hafizul Islam, Abhishek Singh

Erschienen in: Wireless Personal Communications | Ausgabe 3/2015

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

A novel one-round authenticated group key agreement (CL-AGKA) protocol is devised in this paper on certificateless public key cryptography. Our CL-AGKA protocol abolished the certificate management burden existing in certificate authority-based public key cryptography and the private-key escrow problem occurring in identity-based cryptography. Our CL-AGKA protocol is designed to establish an authenticated group session key between a group participants by ensuring that the session key is not revealed to any outsiders. The proposed CL-AGKA protocol designed a security model in the computational model, called the random oracle model. It is formally examined that our CL-AGKA protocol achieved the strong authenticated key exchange security and thus provably secured in the random oracle model. The security of the designed protocol is achieved against the intractability assumptions of the computational Diffie–Hellman problem and bilinear Diffie–Hellman problem. In addition, the proposed CL-AGKA protocol offered low message exchange cost and computational cost against the related group key agreement protocols.
Vorheriger Artikel Co-design Approach for Wide-Band Asymmetric Cross Shaped Slotted Patch Antenna with LNA
Nächster Artikel Feasible HCCA Polling Mechanism for Video Transmission in IEEE 802.11e WLANs

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
He, D. J., Chen, C., Ma, M. D., Chan, S. M., & Bu, J. J. (2013). A secure and efficient password-authenticated group key exchange protocol for mobile ad hoc networks. International Journal of Communication Systems, 26(4), 495–504.CrossRef
2.
Cheng, Z. Y., Liu, Y., Chang, C. C., & Guo, C. (2013). A fault-tolerant group key agreement protocol exploiting dynamic setting. International Journal of Communication Systems, 26(2), 259–275.CrossRef
3.
Tang, H. B., & Liu, X. S. (2012). Cryptanalysis of a dynamic ID-based remote user authentication with key agreement scheme. International Journal of Communication Systems, 25(12), 1639–1644.CrossRef
4.
Islam, S. H. (2014). Design and analysis of an improved smartcard based remote user password authentication scheme. International Journal of Communication Systems. doi:10.​1002/​dac.​2793
5.
Xie, Q. (2012). A new authenticated key agreement for session initiation protocol. International Journal of Communication Systems, 25(1), 47–54.CrossRef
6.
Islam, S. H., & Khan, M. K. (2014). Provably secure and pairing-free identity-based handover authentication protocol for wireless mobile networks. International Journal of Communication Systems. doi:10.​1002/​dac.​2847
7.
Chuang, Y. H., & Tseng, Y. M. (2012). Towards generalized ID-based user authentication for mobile multi-server environment. International Journal of Communication Systems, 25(4), 447–460.CrossRef
8.
Simplicio, M. A., & Sakuragui, R. R. M. (2012). Cryptanalysis of an efficient three-party password-based key exchange scheme. International Journal of Communication Systems, 25(11), 1443–1449.CrossRef
9.
He, D. B., Chen, J. H., & Hu, J. (2012). A pairing-free certificateless authenticated key agreement protocol. International Journal of Communication Systems, 25(2), 221–230.CrossRef
10.
Lin, C. Y., & Hwang, T. (2011). On a simple three-party password-based key exchange protocol. International Journal of Communication Systems, 24(11), 1520–1532.CrossRef
11.
Wu, S. H., Chen, K. F., Pu, Q., & Zhu, Y. F. (2013). Cryptanalysis and enhancements of efficient three-party password-based key exchange. International Journal of Communication Systems, 26(5), 674–686.CrossRef
12.
Bresson, E., Chevassut, O., & Pointcheval, D. (2001). Provably authenticated group Diffie–Hellman key exchange. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM conference on computer and communications security (CCS’01) (pp. 255–264), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
13.
Bresson, E., Chevassut, O., & Pointcheval, D. (2002). Dynamic group Diffie–Hellman key exchange under standard assumptions. In Proceedings of the advances in cryptology (EUROCRYPT’02) (pp. 321–336), Amsterdam, Netherlands.
14.
Bresson, E., Chevassut, O., & Pointcheval, D. (2001). Provably authenticated group Diffie–Hellman key exchange-the dynamic case. In Proceedings of the advances in cryptology (ASIACRYPT’01) (pp. 290–309), Gold Coast, Australia.
15.
Diffie, W., & Hellman, M. (1976). New directions in cryptography. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, IT–22(6), 644–654.MathSciNetCrossRef
16.
Ballare, M., & Rogaway, P. (1993). Random oracles are practical: A paradigm for designing efficient protocols. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM conference on computer and communications security (CCS’93) (pp. 62–73).
17.
Bresson, E., & Manulis, M. (2008). Securing group key exchange against strong corruptions. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM symposium on information, computer and communications security (ASIACCS’08) (pp. 249–260), Tokyo, Japan.
18.
Kim, Y., Perrig, A., & Tsudik, G. (2000). Simple and fault-tolerant key agreement for dynamic collaborative groups. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM conference on computer and communications security (CCS’00) (pp. 235–244), Athens, Greece.
19.
Dutta, R., & Barua, R. (2005). Dynamic group key agreement in tree-based setting. In Proceedings of the ACISP’05 (pp. 101–112), Brisbane, Australia
20.
Dutta, R., & Barua, R. (2008). Provably secure constant round contributory group key agreement in dynamic setting. IEEE Transaction on Information Theory, 54(5), 2007–2025.MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
21.
Kim, H. J., Lee, S. M., & Lee, D. H. (2004). Constant-round authenticated group key exchange for dynamic groups. In Proceedings of the advances in cryptology (ASIACRYPOT’04) (pp. 245–259), Jeju Island, Korea.
22.
Gorantla, M. C., Boyd, C., & Nieto, J. M. G. (2011). Modeling key compromise impersonation attacks on group key exchange protocols. ACM Transactions on Information and System Security, 14(4), 28:1–28:24.CrossRef
23.
Boneh, D., & Franklin, M. K. (2003). Identity-based encryption from the Weil pairing. SIAM Journal of Computing, 32(3), 586–615.MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
24.
Islam, S. H., & Biswas, G. P. (2013). Provably secure certificateless strong designated verifier signature scheme based on elliptic curve bilinear pairings. Journal of King Saud University—Computer and Information Sciences, 25, 51–61.CrossRef
25.
Islam, S. H., & Biswas, G. P. (2014). A Provably secure identity-based strong designated verifier proxy signature scheme from bilinear pairings. Journal of King Saud University—Computer and Information Sciences, 26(1), 55–67.CrossRef
26.
Joux, A. (2000). A one round protocol for tripartite Diffie–Hellman. In Proceedings of the 4th international symposium, ANTS-IV (pp. 385–394), Leiden, The Netherlands.
27.
Barua, R., Dutta, R., & Sarker, P. (2003) Extending Joux’s protocol to multiparty key agreement. In Proceedings of the progress in cryptology (INDOCRYPT’03) (pp. 205–217), New Delhi, India.
28.
Nalla, D., & Reddy, K. C. (2002). Identity based authenticated group key agreement protocol. In Proceedings of the progress in cryptology (INDOCRYPT’02) (pp. 215–233), Hyderabad, India.
29.
Choi, K. Y., Hwang, J. Y., & Lee, D. H. (2004). Efficient ID-based group key agreement with bilinear maps. In Proceedings of the public key cryptography (PKC’04) (pp. 130–144), Singapore.
30.
Al-Riyami, S., & Paterson, K. (2003). Certificateless public key cryptography. In Proceedings of the advances in cryptology (ASIACRYPT’03) (pp. 452–473), Taibei, Taiwan.
31.
Heo, S., Kim, Z., & Kim, K. (2007) Certificateless authenticated group key agreement protocol for dynamic groups. In Proceedings of the global telecommunications conference (GLOBECOM’07) (pp. 464–468), Washington, DC, USA.
32.
Lee, E.-J., Lee, S.-E., & Yoo, K.-Y. (2008). A certificateless authenticated group key agreement protocol providing forward security. In Proceedings of the international symposium on ubiquitous multimedia computing (UMC ’08) (pp. 124–129), Hobart, Australia.
33.
Cao, C., Ma, J., & Moon, S. (2007). Provable efficient certificatelesss group key exchange. Wuhan University Journal of Natural Sciences, 12(1), 41–45.MathSciNetCrossRef
34.
Geng, M., Zhang, F., & Gao, M. (2009). A secure certificateless authenticated group key agreement protocol. In Proceedings of the international conference on multimedia information networking and security (MINES’09) (pp. 342–346), Wuhan, China.
35.
Teng, J., & Wu, C. (2012). A provable authenticated certificateless group key agreement with constant rounds. Journal of Communications and Networks, 14(1), 104–110.CrossRef
36.
Islam, S. H., & Biswas, G. P. (2015). Design of two-party authenticated key agreement protocol based on ECC and self-certified public keys. Wireless Personal Communications. doi:10.​1007/​s11277-015-2375-5
37.
Islam, S. H., & Biswas, G. P. (2014). Dynamic ID-based remote user authentication scheme with smartcard using elliptic curve cryptography. Journal of Electronics, 31(5), 473–488.
38.
Islam, S. H., & Biswas, G. P. (2012). An efficient and provably-secure digital signature scheme based on elliptic curve bilinear pairings. Theoretical and Applied Informatics, 24(2), 109–118.CrossRef
39.
Islam, S. H., & Biswas, G. P. (2012). An improved ID-based client authentication with key agreement scheme on ECC for mobile client-server environments. Theoretical and Applied Informatics, 24(4), 293–312.CrossRef
40.
Islam, S. H., & Biswas, G. P. (2013). An efficient and secure strong designated verifier signature scheme without bilinear pairings. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Informatics, 31(3–4), 425–441.MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
41.
Lu, C.-F., Wu, T.-C., & Hsu, C.-L. (2012). Certificateless authenticated group key agreement scheme with privacy-preservation for resource-limited mobile devices. International Journal of Inovative Computing Information and Control, 8(1(B)), 599–615.
42.
Shamir, A. (1984). Identity-based cryptosystems and signature schemes. In Proceedings of the advances in cryptology (CRYPTO’84) (pp. 47–53).
43.
Islam, S. H., Khan, M. K., & Al-Khouri, A. M. (2014). Anonymous and provably secure certificateless multireceiver encryption without bilinear pairing. Security and Communication Networks. doi:10.​1002/​sec.​1165
44.
Islam, S. H., & Li, F. (2015). Leakage-free and provably secure certificateless signcryption scheme using bilinear pairings. The Computer Journal. doi:10.​1093/​comjnl/​bxv002
45.
Islam, S. H., & Biswas, G. P. (2014). Certificateless short sequential and broadcast multisignature schemes using elliptic curve bilinear pairings. Journal of King Saud University—Computer and Information Sciences, 26(1), 89–97.CrossRef
46.
Islam, S. H., & Biswas, G. P. (2013). Provably secure and pairing-free certificateless digital signature scheme using elliptic curve cryptography. International Journal of Computer Mathematics, 90(11), 2244–2258.CrossRefMATH
47.
Islam, S. H., & Biswas, G. P. (2012). A pairing-free identity-based authenticated group key agreement protocol for imbalanced mobile networks. Annals of Telecommunications, 67(11–12), 547–558.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Provably secure one-round certificateless authenticated group key agreement protocol for secure communications
verfasst von
SK Hafizul Islam
Abhishek Singh
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2015
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Wireless Personal Communications / Ausgabe 3/2015
Print ISSN: 0929-6212
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-834X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-015-2815-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2015

Wireless Personal Communications 3/2015 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Co-design Approach for Wide-Band Asymmetric Cross Shaped Slotted Patch Antenna with LNA

OriginalPaper

Optimal Solution for Channel Selection and Power Allocation for TVWS-Based Smart Metering System

ReviewPaper

A Review of Group Mobility Models for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks

OriginalPaper

Continuous Phase Modulation with Chaotic Interleaving for Different OFDM Versions

OriginalPaper

Node Mobility Support Between Multi-hop 6LoWPAN Networks Based on Proxy Mobile IPv6

OriginalPaper

Available Bandwidth Estimation Using Collision Probability, Idle Period Synchronization and Random Waiting Time in MANETs: Cognitive Agent Based Approach

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise