Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Wireless Personal Communications
Erschienen in: Wireless Personal Communications 2/2017

24.06.2017

Radio Access Network Sharing in 5G: Strategies and Benefits

verfasst von: Soha Farhat, Abed Ellatif Samhat, Samer Lahoud, Bernard Cousin

Erschienen in: Wireless Personal Communications | Ausgabe 2/2017

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In a shared radio access network, a user can be served through the network of his home operator or the network of another service operator in the sharing system. Consequently, when the home operator is unable to serve its user, and there is more than one available service operator, a selection decision must be made. The decision must consider the satisfaction of three main agents: the user, his home operator and the service operator. This paper presents a strategic algorithm for the access selection decision in a multi-operator wireless network. It is based on a cost function that combines the requirements of the user, its home operator profit and the offered QoS of the service operator. This cost function takes into account the operators’ strategies for cooperation. This work focuses on the service operator strategy and proposes two strategies: a pricing strategy that consists of increasing the service cost, and a sharing strategy that consists of limiting the amount of shared resources. Simulation results prove the efficiency of the proposed algorithm and show how sharing between operators brings benefits in terms of user acceptance and profits as well. In addition, results show that the service operator strategy affects the access selection decision and the cooperation benefits; a pricing strategy can guarantee high profits for the service operator and can improve its client acceptance.
Vorheriger Artikel An Anomaly Detection Method Based on Normalized Mutual Information Feature Selection and Quantum Wavelet Neural Network
Nächster Artikel Dynamic Node Deployment and Cross Layer Opportunistic Robust Routing for PoI Coverage Using WSNs

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
5GPPP. 5g vision. Technical report, 5GPPP, (2015).
2.
HUAWEI. 5g: A technology vision. Technical report, HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD., 2013.
3.
NGM. Ngmn 5g whitepaper. Delivrable, February 2015.
4.
NEC Corporation. Ran sharing: Nec’s approach towards active radio access network sharing. White Paper, 2013.
5.
Farhat, S., Samhat, A. E., & Lahoud, S. (2014). Hybrid decision algorithm for access selection in multi-operator networks. In Wireless communications and networking conference (WCNC), 2014 IEEE, pp. 2414–2419.
6.
Markendahl, J., & Ghanbari, A. (2013). Shared smallcell networks: Multi-operator or third party solution–or both? In Fourth international workshop on indoor and outdoor small cells 2013.
7.
3rd Generation Partnership Project. Tr 22.852, study on ran sharing enhancements (release 12 & 13). Technical report, Technical Specification Group Radio Access Networks, (2013).
8.
Institute for Communication Sytems 5G innovation Center, University of Surrey. 5g whitepaper: The flat distributed cloud (fdc) 5g architecture revolution. White Paper January 2016.
9.
Checko, A., Christiansen, H. L., Yan, Ying, Scolari, L., Kardaras, G., & Berger, M. S., et al. (2015). Cloud ran for mobile networks: A technology overview. IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials, 17(1), 405–426.CrossRef
10.
Marotta, M. A., Kaminski, N., Gomez-Miguelez, I., Granville, L. Z., Rochol, J., & DaSilva, L., et al. (2015). Resource sharing in heterogeneous cloud radio access networks. IEEE Wireless Communications, 22(3), 74–82.CrossRef
11.
Farhat, S., Samhat, A. E., Lahoud, S., & Cousin, B. (2015). Comparison between access selection algorithms in multi-operator wireless networks. In International conference on applied research in computer science and engineering (ICAR), 2015 , pp, 1–8.
12.
Farhat, S., Samhat, A. E., Lahoud, S., & Cousin, B. (2014). Best operator policy in a heterogeneous wireless network. In Third international conference on e-technologies and networks for development (ICeND), 2014 , pp. 53–57.
13.
Wang, L., & Kuo, G. S. G. S. (2013). Mathematical modeling for network selection in heterogeneous wireless networks. IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials, 15(1), 271–292.CrossRef
14.
Bari, F., & Leung, V. C. M. ( 2007). Use of non-monotonic utility in multi-attribute network selection. In Wireless Telecommunications Symposium, 2007. WTS 2007, pp. 1–8.
15.
Karam, F. W., & Jensen, T. (April 2012). A qos based handover decision (nearest performance handover) algorithm for next generation networks. In 8th international conference on computing technology and information management (ICCM), 2012 , Vol. 2, pp. 554–560.
16.
Nguyen-Vuong, Q. T., Ghamri-Doudane, Y., & Agoulmine, N. (2008). On utility models for access network selection in wireless heterogeneous networks. In IEEE network operations and management symposium, 2008. NOMS 2008, pp. 144–151.
17.
Ormond, O., Murphy, J., & Muntean, G. M. (2006). Utility-based intelligent network selection in beyond 3g systems. In IEEE international conference on communications, 2006. ICC ’06, Vol. 4, pp. 1831–1836.
18.
El Helou, M., Ibrahim, M., Lahoud, S., & Khawam, K. (2013). Radio access selection approaches in heterogeneous wireless networks. In IEEE 9th international conference on wireless and mobile computing, networking and communications (WiMob), 2013 , pp. 521–528.
19.
El Helou, M., Lahoud, S., Ibrahim, M., & Khawam, K. (2013). A hybrid approach for radio access technology selection in heterogeneous wireless networks. In Proceedings of the 2013 19th European wireless conference (EW), , pp. 1–6.
20.
Karam, F. W., & Jensen, T. (2012). Performance analysis of ranking for qos handover algorithm for selection of access network in heterogeneous wireless networks. In 21st international conference on computer communications and networks (ICCCN), 2012, pp. 1–6.
21.
Martínez-Morales, J. D., Pineda-Rico, U., & Stevens-Navarro, E. (2010). Performance comparison between madm algorithms for vertical handoff in 4g networks. In 7th international conference on electrical engineering computing science and automatic control (CCE), 2010, pp. 309–314.
22.
Song, Q., & Jamalipour, A. (2005). A network selection mechanism for next generation networks. In IEEE international conference on communications, 2005. ICC 2005., Vol. 2, pp. 1418–1422.
23.
Stevens-Navarro, E., & Wong, V. W. S. (2006). Comparison between vertical handoff decision algorithms for heterogeneous wireless networks. In IEEE 63rd vehicular technology conference, 2006. VTC 2006-Spring, Vol. 2, pp. 947–951.
24.
Zhang, W. (2004). Handover decision using fuzzy madm in heterogeneous networks. In IEEE wireless communications and networking conference, 2004. WCNC, Vol. 2, pp. 653–658.
25.
Giupponi, L., AgustÍ, R., PÉrez-Romero, J., & Sallent, O. (2009) Fuzzy neural control for economic-driven radio resource management in beyond 3g networks. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C, 39(2):170–189.
26.
Giupponi, L., Agusti, R., Perez-Romero, J. & Sallent, O. (2005). Joint radio resource management algorithm for multi-rat networks. In IEEE global telecommunications conference, 2005. GLOBECOM ’05, Vol. 6, pp. 5–3855.
27.
El Helou, M., Ibrahim, M., Lahoud, S., & Khawam, K. (2014). Optimizing network information for radio access technology selection. In IEEE symposium on computers and communication (ISCC), 2014, pp. 1–6.
28.
Song, Q., & Jamalipour, A. (2006). Nxg04-2: A negotiation-based network selection scheme for next-generation mobile systems. In IEEE global telecommunications conference, 2006. GLOBECOM ’06., pp. 1–5.
29.
Akkarajitsakul, K., Hossain, E., Niyato, D., & Kim, D. I. (2011). Game theoretic approaches for multiple access in wireless networks: A survey. IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials, 13(3), 372–395.CrossRef
30.
Antoniou, J., & Pitsillides, A. (2007). 4g converged environment: Modeling network selection as a game. In 16th IST mobile and wireless communications summit, 2007, pp. 1–5.
31.
Cao, Xi-Ren, Shen, Hong-Xia, Milito, R., & Wirth, P. (2002). Internet pricing with a game theoretical approach: concepts and examples. Networking, IEEE/ACM Transactions on, 10(2), 208–216.CrossRef
32.
Charilas, D., Markaki, O., Tragos, E. (2008). A theoretical scheme for applying game theory and network selection mechanisms in access admission control. In 3rd international symposium on wireless pervasive computing, 2008. ISWPC 2008, pp. 303–307.
33.
Shih, Yuan-Yao, Pang, Ai-Chun, Tsai, Meng-Hsun, & Chai, Chien-Han. (2015). A rewarding framework for network resource sharing in co-channel hybrid access femtocell networks. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 64(11), 3079–3090.MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
34.
Zhang, H., Bennis, M., DaSilva, L. A., & Han, Z. (2014). Multi-leader multi-follower stackelberg game among wi-fi, small cell and macrocell networks. In IEEE global communications conference (GLOBECOM), 2014 , pp. 4520–4524.
35.
Taha, A. M. (2007). A framework for radio resource management in heterogenuous wireless networks. PhD thesis, Kingston. chapter 3 pp. 37-70.
36.
Fortetsanakis, G., Papadopouli, M., Karlsson, G., Dramitinos, M., & Yavuz, E. A. (2012). To subscribe, or not to subscribe: Modeling and analysis of service paradigms in cellular markets. In IEEE international symposium on dynamic spectrum access networks (DYSPAN), 2012, pp. 189–200.
37.
Gajic, V., Huang, J., & Rimoldi, B. (2014). Competition of wireless providers for atomic users. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 22(2), 512–525.CrossRef
38.
Farhat, S., Chahine, Z., Samhat, A. E., Lahoud, S., & Cousin, B. (2015). Access selection and joint pricing in multi-operator wireless networks: A stackelberg game. In Fifth international conference on digital Information and communication technology and its applications (DICTAP), 2015 , pp. 38–43.
39.
Giupponi, L., Agusti, R., Perez-Romero, J., & Salient, O. (2007). Improved revenue and radio resource usage through inter-operator joint radio resource management. In IEEE international conference on communications, 2007. ICC ’07, pp. 5793–5800.
40.
Giupponi, L., Agusti, R., Perez-Romero, J., & Sallent, O. (2008). Inter-operator agreements based on qos metrics for improved revenue and spectrum efficiency. Electronics Letters, 44(4), 303–304.CrossRef
41.
Farhat, S., Samhat, A. E., Lahoud, S., & Cousin, B. (2015). Pricing strategies in multi-operator heterogeneous wireless networks. In 2015 7th international conference on new technologies, mobility and security (NTMS), pp. 1–5.
Metadaten
Titel
Radio Access Network Sharing in 5G: Strategies and Benefits
verfasst von
Soha Farhat
Abed Ellatif Samhat
Samer Lahoud
Bernard Cousin
Publikationsdatum
24.06.2017
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Wireless Personal Communications / Ausgabe 2/2017
Print ISSN: 0929-6212
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-834X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-017-4321-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2017

Wireless Personal Communications 2/2017 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Deployment of Resource Allocation and Power Control Schemes in Long Term Evolution Advanced (LTE-A) Hybrid Network

OriginalPaper

Different I/O Standard and Technology Based Thermal Aware Energy Efficient Vedic Multiplier Design for Green Wireless Communication on FPGA

OriginalPaper

Energy Detection Performance Enhancement Using RLS and Wavelet De-noising Filters

OriginalPaper

A Multi-relay Cooperative Communication Using Space Time Spatial Phase Coding Based on OFDM

OriginalPaper

An Approach to Defend Global Eavesdropper in Sensor Networks

OriginalPaper

QoS Based IPTV Over Mobile WiMAX Networks

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise