Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Wireless Personal Communications
Erschienen in: Wireless Personal Communications 4/2019

13.05.2019

A New System Model for Sensor Node Validation by Using OPNET

verfasst von: Abdo Mahyoub Almajidi, V. P. Pawar

Erschienen in: Wireless Personal Communications | Ausgabe 4/2019

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

WSN has been massively used in many fields as monitoring devices for several applications; these sensor-nodes can be expected to work hardly for few years without present any technical issues. The validation of sensor nodes is challenged task owning the natural of the environment, the health of this device, replacing or recharging the battery of this tiny device inaccessible place, and the distributions of a huge number of sensor-nodes. However, no validation study has been presented for sensor nodes by using OPNET simulation with ZigBee, with several sensor sets. In this paper, we are designing and implementing a validation model for WSNs to discover bad nodes in any distribution WSN. The result obtained from simulation show that while increasing the number of nodes, number of bad nodes will be increased on one target. However, increase number of targets decrease the number of bad nodes.
Vorheriger Artikel Power Control and Inter-node Interference Cancellation in Full-Duplex Networks with Residual Self-Interference
Nächster Artikel Feed Point Optimization of Koch–Minkowski Hybrid Boundary antenna for ISM Band

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
Liu, Y., & Qian, K. (2016). A novel tree-based routing protocol in ZigBee wireless network. In Proceedings of the 8th IEEE international conference on communication software and networks pattern recognition (pp. 469–473).
2.
Nasser, A. M. T., & Pawar, V. P. (2014). Contemporary affirmation of machine learning models for sensor validation and recommendations for future research directions. Global Journal, 14(3), 18–24.
3.
Nasser, A.M.T., & Pawar, V.P. (2015). Machine learning approach for sensors validation and clustering. In Proceedings of the 8th IEEE international conference on emerging research in electronics computer science and technology (ICERECT) (pp. 370–375).
4.
Bhumika., & Parmar, A.S. (2015). Performance evaluation of Zigbee 802.15.4 WPAN in the logic subnet in Opnet modeler. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on circuit, Pawer and computing technologies (ICCPCT) (pp. 1–6).
5.
Hammond, I.S., Stewart, B.G., Kocian, A., & McMeekin, S.G. (2009). A comprehensive performance study of open modeler for ZigBee wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the third IEEE international conference on next generation mobile applications (ICNGMA), services and technologies (vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 357–362).
6.
Kung, H.T., & Vlah, D. (2009). A spectral clustering approach to validating sensors via their peers in distributed sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 18th IEEE international conference on computer communications and networks (ICCCN) (vol. 8, pp. 1–7).
7.
Kerschen, G., Boe, P. D., Golinval, J. C., & Worden, K. (2005). Sensor validation using principal component analysis. The Institute of Physics Publishing Smart Materials and Structures, 14(1), 36–42.CrossRef
8.
Dunia, R., Qin, S. J., Edgar, T. F., & Mcavoy, T. J. (1996). Identification of faulty sensors using principal component analysis. AIChE Journal Process System Engineering, 42(10), 2797–2812.
9.
Kulla, J. (2010). Sensor validation using the minimum mean square error estimation. Elsevier Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 24(5), 1444–1457.CrossRef
10.
Ibarguengoytia, P.H., Sucar, L.E, & Vadera, S. (2013). A probabilistic model for sensor validation. In Proceedings of the twelfth conference on uncertainty in artificial intelligence (pp. 332–339).
11.
Mattern, D.L., & Jaw, L.C. (1998). Using neural networks for sensor validation. In Proceedings of NASA 34th Joint propulsion conference (pp. 1–12)
12.
Xu, R., Zhang, G., Zhang, X., Haynes, L., Kwan, C., & Semega, K. (2006). Sensor validation using nonlinear minor component analysis. Springer Journal Advances in Neural Networks, 3973, 352–357.
13.
Mengshoe, O.J., Darwiche, A., & Uckun, S. (2008). Sensor validation using Bayesian networks. In Proceedings of 9th international symposium on artificial intelligence, robotics, and automation in space (iSAIRAS-08).
14.
Abdelghani, M., & Friswellb, M. I. (2007). Sensor validation for structural systems with multiplicative sensor faults. Elsevier Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 21(1), 270–279.CrossRef
15.
Ibarguengoytia, P. H., Sucar, L. E., & Vadera, S. (2001). Real-time intelligent sensor validation. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 16(4), 770–775.CrossRef
16.
Jurk, P., & Hanzlek, Z. (2010). Simulation study of energy efficient scheduling for IEEE 802.15.4/ZigBee cluster-tree wireless sensor networks with time bounded data flows. In Proceedings of the international conference in emerging technology and factory automation (ETFA) (pp. 1–8).
17.
Marghescu, C., Pantazica, M., & Brodeala, A. (2011). Simulation of a wireless sensor network using Opnet. In Proceedings of the international symposium on design and technology in electronic packaging (SIITME) (pp. 249–252).
18.
Cuomo, F., Abbagnale, A., & Cipollone, E. (2013). Cross-layer network formation for energy-efficient IEEE 802.15.4/ZigBee wireless sensor networks. Elsevier Ad Hoc Networks, 11(2), 672–686.CrossRef
19.
Guo, L., Peng, Y., Wang, X., Jiang, D., & Yu, Y. (2011). Performance evaluation for on-demand routing protocols based on OPNET modules in wireless mesh networks. Elsevier Computers and Electrical Engineering, 37(1), 106–114.CrossRef
20.
Zhao, W., & Xie, J. (2011). OPNET-based modeling and simulation study on handoffs in Internet-based infrastructure wireless mesh networks. Computer Networks, 55(12), 2675–2688.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
A New System Model for Sensor Node Validation by Using OPNET
verfasst von
Abdo Mahyoub Almajidi
V. P. Pawar
Publikationsdatum
13.05.2019
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Wireless Personal Communications / Ausgabe 4/2019
Print ISSN: 0929-6212
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-834X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-019-06527-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2019

Wireless Personal Communications 4/2019 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Structured Compressive Sensing Based Block-Sparse Channel Estimation for MIMO-OFDM Systems

OriginalPaper

Feed Point Optimization of Koch–Minkowski Hybrid Boundary antenna for ISM Band

OriginalPaper

Performance Enhancement of Underwater Acoustic OFDM Communication Systems

OriginalPaper

Performance Analysis of Four Dimensional Turbo Code (4D-TC) Using Moment Based Simplified Augmented State Diagram (MSASD) Approach: Extension to LTE System

OriginalPaper

Noise Removal Using HWD Implemented by Dmeyer and Kaiser Window

OriginalPaper

Performance Enhancement of Passive Optical Communication Link with Co-simulation Approach

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise