Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The use of digital subtraction radiography to evaluate bone healing after surgical removal of radicular cysts

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Oral Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the bone healing process after surgical removal of radicular cysts by using preoperative and postoperative panoramic radiographs, which were digitized and subtracted using a projective standardization software program (Emago).

Methods

Seventeen patients with large radicular cysts treated by surgical enucleation were included in the study. All surgical procedures were performed by one of the authors (D.K.). Each patient had a panoramic preoperative radiograph (plain film) and a panoramic postoperative radiograph (plain film), which was taken 6 to 12 months after surgery. All radiographs were taken with the same panoramic unit. The part of the radiograph that included the lesion in the preoperative radiograph was digitized using a CCD digital camera at a standard distance. The postoperative radiograph was also digitized using the same standardized parameters. The preoperative and postoperative images were then manipulated by means of the projective standardization software program Emago to reveal the regenerated area. This area was calculated in pixels, and the percentage of bone healing was determined for each patient. The data were analyzed using Student's t test and the Wilcoxon test for pair differences.

Results

The percentage of bone healing ranged from 55.14% to 95.68% with a mean of 72.27%. In all cases, the differences were significantly different at P = 0.01.

Conclusions

Digitizing the part of the panoramic radiograph that included the lesion area and subsequently performing projective standardization is a suitable method for analyzing the healing process by means of subtraction radiography. The projective standardization software program performs the geometric reconstruction and subtraction process. An evaluation of the healing process can be obtained by calculating the regenerated bone area in the subtracted images.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M-S Heo S-S Lee K-H Lee H-M Choi S-C Choi T-W Park (2001) ArticleTitleQuantitative analysis of apical root resorption by means of digital subtraction radiography Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 91 369–73 Occurrence Handle11250638

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. HG Grondahl K Grondahl (1983) ArticleTitleSubtraction radiography for the diagnosis of periodontal bone lesions Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 55 208–13 Occurrence Handle6340017

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. U Bragger (1988) ArticleTitleDigital imaging in periodontal radiography: a review J Clin Periodontol 15 551–7 Occurrence Handle3058754

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. MS Reddy MK Jeffcoat (1993) ArticleTitleDigital subtraction radiography Dent Clin North Am 37 553–65 Occurrence Handle8224332

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. RH Vandre RL Webber (1995) ArticleTitleFuture trends in dental radiography Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 80 471–8 Occurrence Handle8521112

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. F Masood JO Katz PK Hardman AG Glaros P Spencer (2002) ArticleTitleComparison of panoramic radiography and panoramic digital subtraction radiography in the detection of simulated osteophytic lesions of the mandibular condyle Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 93 626–31 Occurrence Handle12075216 Occurrence Handle10.1067/moe.2002.121704

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. A Mol (2000) ArticleTitleImage processing tools for dental applications Dent Clin North Am 44 IssueID2 299–318 Occurrence Handle10740770

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. A Wenzel (1993) ArticleTitleComputer-aided image manipulation of intraoral radiographs to enhance diagnosis in dental practice: a review Int Dent J 43 IssueID2 99–108 Occurrence Handle8320010

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. DE Parsell RS Gatewood JD Watts CF Streckfus (1998) ArticleTitleSensitivity of various radiographic methods for detection of oral cancellous bone lesions Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 86 IssueID4 498–502 Occurrence Handle9798239 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1079-2104(98)90381-X

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. K Nicopoulou-Karayianni U Bragger NP Lang (1997) ArticleTitleSubtraction radiography in oral implantology Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 17 IssueID3 220–31 Occurrence Handle9497714

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. RL Webber UE Ruttimann HG Grondahl (1982) ArticleTitleX-ray image subtraction as a basis for assessment of periodontal changes J Periodontol Res 17 509–11

    Google Scholar 

  12. UE Ruttimann RL Webber E Schmidt (1986) ArticleTitleA robust digital method for film contrast correction in subtraction radiography J Periodontol Res 21 486–95

    Google Scholar 

  13. J Ludlow DB Gilbert DA Tyndall L Baily (1995) ArticleTitleAnalysis of condylar position change on digitally subtracted Orthophos P-4 and Sectograph zonogram images Int J Adult Orthodont Orthognath Surg 10 IssueID3 201–9

    Google Scholar 

  14. EO Delano D Tyndall JB Ludlow M Trope C Lost (1998) ArticleTitleQuantitative radiographic follow-up of apical surgery: a radiometric and histologic correlation J Endod 24 IssueID6 420–6 Occurrence Handle9693587 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0099-2399(98)80025-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. MB Guglielmotti RL Cabrini (1985) ArticleTitleAlveolar wound healing and ridge remodeling after tooth extraction in the rat: a histologic, radiographic and histometric study J Oral Maxillofac Surg 43 IssueID5 359–64 Occurrence Handle3857300 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0278-2391(85)90257-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. L Bodner I Kaffe Z Cohen D Dayan (1993) ArticleTitleLong-term effect of desalivation on extraction wound healing: a densitometric study in rats Dentomaxillofac Radiol 22 IssueID4 195–8 Occurrence Handle8181646

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. PV Nummikoski B Steffencen K Hamilton SB Dove (2000) ArticleTitleClinical validation of a new subtraction radiography technique for periodontal bone loss detection J Periodontol 71 IssueID4 598–605 Occurrence Handle10807124 Occurrence Handle10.1902/jop.2000.71.4.598

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. B Kullendorff M Grondahl K Rohlin M Nilsson (1992) ArticleTitleSubtraction radiography of interradicular bone lesions Acta Odontol Scand 50 IssueID5 259–67 Occurrence Handle1441929

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. TM Lehmann HG Grondahl DK Benn (2000) ArticleTitleComputer-based registration for digital subtraction in dental radiology Dentomaxillofac Radiol 29 IssueID6 323–46 Occurrence Handle11114663 Occurrence Handle10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600558

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kostas Tsiklakis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tsiklakis, K., Damaskos, S., Kalyvas, D. et al. The use of digital subtraction radiography to evaluate bone healing after surgical removal of radicular cysts. Oral Radiol 21, 56–61 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-005-0032-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-005-0032-5

Key words

Navigation