Abstract
Objective
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the bone healing process after surgical removal of radicular cysts by using preoperative and postoperative panoramic radiographs, which were digitized and subtracted using a projective standardization software program (Emago).
Methods
Seventeen patients with large radicular cysts treated by surgical enucleation were included in the study. All surgical procedures were performed by one of the authors (D.K.). Each patient had a panoramic preoperative radiograph (plain film) and a panoramic postoperative radiograph (plain film), which was taken 6 to 12 months after surgery. All radiographs were taken with the same panoramic unit. The part of the radiograph that included the lesion in the preoperative radiograph was digitized using a CCD digital camera at a standard distance. The postoperative radiograph was also digitized using the same standardized parameters. The preoperative and postoperative images were then manipulated by means of the projective standardization software program Emago to reveal the regenerated area. This area was calculated in pixels, and the percentage of bone healing was determined for each patient. The data were analyzed using Student's t test and the Wilcoxon test for pair differences.
Results
The percentage of bone healing ranged from 55.14% to 95.68% with a mean of 72.27%. In all cases, the differences were significantly different at P = 0.01.
Conclusions
Digitizing the part of the panoramic radiograph that included the lesion area and subsequently performing projective standardization is a suitable method for analyzing the healing process by means of subtraction radiography. The projective standardization software program performs the geometric reconstruction and subtraction process. An evaluation of the healing process can be obtained by calculating the regenerated bone area in the subtracted images.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
M-S Heo S-S Lee K-H Lee H-M Choi S-C Choi T-W Park (2001) ArticleTitleQuantitative analysis of apical root resorption by means of digital subtraction radiography Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 91 369–73 Occurrence Handle11250638
HG Grondahl K Grondahl (1983) ArticleTitleSubtraction radiography for the diagnosis of periodontal bone lesions Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 55 208–13 Occurrence Handle6340017
U Bragger (1988) ArticleTitleDigital imaging in periodontal radiography: a review J Clin Periodontol 15 551–7 Occurrence Handle3058754
MS Reddy MK Jeffcoat (1993) ArticleTitleDigital subtraction radiography Dent Clin North Am 37 553–65 Occurrence Handle8224332
RH Vandre RL Webber (1995) ArticleTitleFuture trends in dental radiography Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 80 471–8 Occurrence Handle8521112
F Masood JO Katz PK Hardman AG Glaros P Spencer (2002) ArticleTitleComparison of panoramic radiography and panoramic digital subtraction radiography in the detection of simulated osteophytic lesions of the mandibular condyle Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 93 626–31 Occurrence Handle12075216 Occurrence Handle10.1067/moe.2002.121704
A Mol (2000) ArticleTitleImage processing tools for dental applications Dent Clin North Am 44 IssueID2 299–318 Occurrence Handle10740770
A Wenzel (1993) ArticleTitleComputer-aided image manipulation of intraoral radiographs to enhance diagnosis in dental practice: a review Int Dent J 43 IssueID2 99–108 Occurrence Handle8320010
DE Parsell RS Gatewood JD Watts CF Streckfus (1998) ArticleTitleSensitivity of various radiographic methods for detection of oral cancellous bone lesions Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 86 IssueID4 498–502 Occurrence Handle9798239 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1079-2104(98)90381-X
K Nicopoulou-Karayianni U Bragger NP Lang (1997) ArticleTitleSubtraction radiography in oral implantology Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 17 IssueID3 220–31 Occurrence Handle9497714
RL Webber UE Ruttimann HG Grondahl (1982) ArticleTitleX-ray image subtraction as a basis for assessment of periodontal changes J Periodontol Res 17 509–11
UE Ruttimann RL Webber E Schmidt (1986) ArticleTitleA robust digital method for film contrast correction in subtraction radiography J Periodontol Res 21 486–95
J Ludlow DB Gilbert DA Tyndall L Baily (1995) ArticleTitleAnalysis of condylar position change on digitally subtracted Orthophos P-4 and Sectograph zonogram images Int J Adult Orthodont Orthognath Surg 10 IssueID3 201–9
EO Delano D Tyndall JB Ludlow M Trope C Lost (1998) ArticleTitleQuantitative radiographic follow-up of apical surgery: a radiometric and histologic correlation J Endod 24 IssueID6 420–6 Occurrence Handle9693587 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0099-2399(98)80025-3
MB Guglielmotti RL Cabrini (1985) ArticleTitleAlveolar wound healing and ridge remodeling after tooth extraction in the rat: a histologic, radiographic and histometric study J Oral Maxillofac Surg 43 IssueID5 359–64 Occurrence Handle3857300 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0278-2391(85)90257-5
L Bodner I Kaffe Z Cohen D Dayan (1993) ArticleTitleLong-term effect of desalivation on extraction wound healing: a densitometric study in rats Dentomaxillofac Radiol 22 IssueID4 195–8 Occurrence Handle8181646
PV Nummikoski B Steffencen K Hamilton SB Dove (2000) ArticleTitleClinical validation of a new subtraction radiography technique for periodontal bone loss detection J Periodontol 71 IssueID4 598–605 Occurrence Handle10807124 Occurrence Handle10.1902/jop.2000.71.4.598
B Kullendorff M Grondahl K Rohlin M Nilsson (1992) ArticleTitleSubtraction radiography of interradicular bone lesions Acta Odontol Scand 50 IssueID5 259–67 Occurrence Handle1441929
TM Lehmann HG Grondahl DK Benn (2000) ArticleTitleComputer-based registration for digital subtraction in dental radiology Dentomaxillofac Radiol 29 IssueID6 323–46 Occurrence Handle11114663 Occurrence Handle10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600558
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tsiklakis, K., Damaskos, S., Kalyvas, D. et al. The use of digital subtraction radiography to evaluate bone healing after surgical removal of radicular cysts. Oral Radiol 21, 56–61 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-005-0032-5
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-005-0032-5