Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Legitimacy policing of places: the impact on crime and disorder

  • Published:
Journal of Experimental Criminology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To examine whether or not spatially-focused legitimacy policing interventions reduce crime and disorder in the places where they are applied.

Methods

Building on the NPIA-funded systematic review of legitimacy policinginterventions by Mazerolle et al et al. (2013). Legitimacy in policing: asystematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 1, we conducted a systematic review of published and unpublished literature examining spatially-focused legitimacy policing. Inclusion criteria were that the intervention: (1) was police-led and included at least one element of procedural justice; (2) was focused on micro- or macro-places smaller than a city; (3) reported an outcome of crime or disorder measured at place level; and (4) used an experimental or quasi-experimental design. The review covers the years 1980–2012.

Results

The search yielded 21 documents, which evaluated 33 studies, and reported 86 outcomes of crime and disorder. Using a random-effects meta-analysis, we found that legitimacy policing focused on place reduces the levels of overall crime. Subgroup analysis demonstrated a significant reduction in measures of both overall and Part 1 crime; however, there was no significant reduction in Part 2 crimes. There was no significant heterogeneity between subgroups when moderator analysis was performed on the specific intervention type, or on a measure of increased police service and level of procedural justice.

Conclusions

Overall, we find that spatially-focused policing interventions that incorporate a procedurally just dialogue result in a measurable decrease in crime and disorder in the intervention areas. Consistent with the Mazerolle et al. review of legitimacy policing, our review also suggests that the particular vehicle of the intervention at problem places may be less important in promoting crime control than the dialogue established between police and citizens.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The Mazerolle et al (2013) search terms included five additional terms in tier 1, which were excluded from our review for greater precision. These terms were “Criminal Justice”, Court, Prison, Correction*, and Authorities.

References

(*Documents included in the systematic review)

  • Bennett, S., Denning, R., Mazerolle, L., & Stocks, B. (2009). Procedural Justice: A systematic literature search and technical report to the National Policing Improvement Agency. Brisbane: ARC Centre of Excellence in Policing and Security.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Bond, C.E.W., & Gow, D.J (1997). Policing the beat: The experience in Toowoomba, Queensland. In Policing for Prevention: Reducing crime, public intoxication and injury. Crime Prevention Studies, Volume 7. R. Homel (Ed). Monsey, New York: Criminal Justice Press. Retrieved from http://www.popcenter.org/library/crimeprevention/volume

  • Borenstein, M., Hedges, L., Higgins, J., & Rothstein, H. (2005). Comprehensive Meta-analysis Version 2. Englewood NJ: Biostat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottoms, A., & Tankebe, J. (2012). Beyond procedural justice: A dialogic approach to legitimacy in criminal justice. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 102(1), 119–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, K., Johnson, S., Guerette, R., Summers, L., & Poynton, S. (2011). Spatial displacement and diffusion of benefits among geographically focused policing initiatives. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 3, 1. doi:10.4073/csr.2011.3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braga, A. A., Hureau, D., & Winship, C. (2008). Losing faith? Police, black churches, and the resurgence of youth violence in Boston. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 6(1), 141–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braga, A. A., & Weisburd, D. L. (2010). Policing problem places: Crime hot spots and effective prevention. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Braga, A. A., Papachristos, A. V., & Hureau, D. M. (2012). The Effects of Hot Spots Policing on Crime: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Justice Quarterly, iFirst, 1–31

  • Cherney, A., & Murphy, K. (2013). Policing terrorism with procedural justice: the role of police legitimacy and law legitimacy. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology. doi:10.1177/0004865813485072.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Child and Family Policy Center (CFPC). (1999). Des Moines Weed and Seed Evaluation: Final Report. Retrieved from http://www.weedandseed.info/docs/studies

  • *Dogutas, C. (2007). Reactive vs. proactive strategies: The effectiveness of school resource officers to prevent violence in schools. (Dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (UMI No. 3286550).

  • *Driscoll, L.N., Bora, D.J., & DeTardo-Bora, K.A. (2003). Program evaluation of the ONE Wheeling Weed and Seed. Retrieved from www.jrsa.org/ws-eval/studies

  • *Dunworth, T. (2000). National evaluation of the Youth Firearms Violence Initiative. National Institute of Justice Research Brief. Retrieved from www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/184482.pdf‎

  • *Dunworth, T., & Mills, G. (1999a). National evaluation of Weed and Seed: Las Vegas, Nevada research report. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice. Retrieved from http://www.weedandseed.info/docs/studies

  • *Dunworth, T., & Mills, G. (1999b). National evaluation of Weed and Seed: Manatee and Sarasota Counties, Florida research report. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice. Retrieved from http://www.weedandseed.info/docs/studies

  • *Dunworth, T., & Mills, G. (1999c). National evaluation of Weed and Seed: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania research report. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice. Retrieved from http://www.weedandseed.info/docs/studies

  • *Dunworth, T., & Mills, G. (1999d). National evaluation of Weed and Seed: Shreveport, Louisiana research report. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice. Retrieved from http://www.weedandseed.info/docs/studies

  • Eck, J. E.(1998). Preventing crime at places. In L. W. Sherman, D. Gottfredson, D.MacKenzie, J. Eck, P. Reuter & S Bushway (Eds).Preventing Crime: WhatWorks, What Doesn’t, What’s Promising – AReport to the Attorney General of theUnited States. Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice, Office of JusticePrograms.

  • Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) (2010). Uniform Crime Report, Crime in the United States, offense definitions. Retrieved from http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2010/crime-in-the-u.s.-2010/offense-definitions

  • Farrington, D. P., Gill, M., Waples, S. J., & Argomaniz, J. (2007). The effects of closed-circuit television on crime: Meta-analysis of an English national quasiexperimental multi-site evaluation. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 3(1), 21–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, C. (2011). Missing links: How descriptive validity impacts the policy relevance of randomized controlled trials in criminology. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7(3), 201–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, C., Weisburd, D., Telep, C.W., Vitter, Z., & Bennett, T. (2014). Community-oriented policing to reduce crime, disorder and fear and increase satisfaction and legitimacy among citizens: a systematic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology

  • Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2010). Four ingredients: New recipes for procedural justice in Australian policing. Policing, 4(4), 403–410. doi:10.1093/police/paq041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, L. (1996). Policing places with drug problems. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

  • *Hallas, H.B. (2004). City of Youngstown Police Department’s Weed and Seed strategy year four evaluation report. Retrieved from www.jrsa.org/ws-eval/studies

  • *Harris, R.J., O’Connell, J.P., & Mande, M.J. (1998). City of Wilmington Operation Weed and Seed 1992 to 1996: An evaluation. Retrieved from www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/Digitization/171051NCJRS.pdf‎

  • *Harris, R. J., O’Connell, J. P., & Wilhite, S. (2005). Evaluation of Operation Weed and Seed in Wilmington, Delaware – 2001 to 2004. Dover, DE: Delaware Statistical Analysis Center. Retrieved from http://sac.omb.delaware.gov/publications/documents/2004

  • Hedges, L., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Toronto: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Henig, J.R. (1984). Citizens against crime: An assessment of the Neighbourhood Watch Program in Washington D.C.. Occasional Paper No 2, Centre for Washington Area Studies, George Washington University.

  • Higgins, J. P. T., & Thompson, S. G. (2002). Quantifying heterogeneity in a metaanalysis. Statistics in Medicine, 21, 1539–1558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinds, L., & Murphy, K. (2007). Public satisfaction with police: Using procedural justice to improve police legitimacy. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 40(1), 27–42. doi:10.1375/acri.40.1.27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, J., Bradford, B., Hough, M., Myhill, A., Quinton, P., & Tyler, T. R. (2012a). Why do People Comply with the Law?: Legitimacy and the Influence of Legal Institutions. British Journal of Criminology, 52, 1051–1071. doi:10.1093/bjc/azs032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Josi, D. A., Donahue, M. E., Magnus, R. E., & Bennett, K. J. (2000). Savannah’s Weed and Seed program evaluation (1999): Final report. Savannah, GA: Statistical Analysis Center, Criminal Justice Coordinating Council of Georgia. Retrieved from http://www.weedandseed.info/docs/studies

  • Kane, R. J. (2005). Compromised police legitimacy as a predictor of violent crime in structurally disadvantaged communities. Criminology, 43(2), 469–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelling, G, L., & Wilson, J. Q. (1982). Broken windows: the police and neighborhood safety. Atlantic Monthly, 249, 29–38

  • Kessler, D. A., & Borella, D. (1997). Taking back Druid Hills: An evaluation of a community policing effort in Birmingham, Alabama. Law and Policy, 19(1), 95–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, D. S., & Papachristos, A. V. (2011). Cultural Mechanisms and the Persistence of Neighborhood Violence. American Journal of Sociology, 116(4), 1190–1233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, J., Bradford, B., Stanko, B., & Hohl, K. (2012b). Just authority? Trust in the police in England and Wales. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazerolle, L., Soole, D. W., & Rombouts, S. (2007).Street-level drug law enforcement: A meta-analytic review. Campbell Collaboration systematicreview final report. Available onlineat: http://campbellcollaboration.org/lib/download/123/.

  • Mazerolle, L., Bennett, S., Davis, J., Sargeant, E., & Manning, M. (2013). Legitimacy in policing: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 1. doi: 10.4073/csr.2013.1

  • Mazerolle, L., Sargeant, E., Cherney, A., Bennett, S., Murphy, K., Antrobus, E., & Martin, P. (2014). Procedural justice and legitimacy in policing. In L. Cynthia & C. Christopher Koper (Eds.), Procedural justice and legitimacy in policing. Switzerland: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, K., & Cherney, A. (2011). Fostering cooperation with the police: How do ethnic minorities in Australia respond to procedural justice-based policing? Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 44(2), 235–257. doi:10.1177/0004865811405260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, K., & Cherney, A. (2012). Understanding Cooperation With Police in a Diverse Society. British Journal of Criminology, 52(1), 181–201. doi:10.1093/bjc/azr065.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, K., Hinds, L., & Fleming, J. (2008). Encouraging public cooperation and support for police. Policing and Society, 18(2), 136–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, B. J. (2003). Perceptions of principals, school resource officers, and school resource officer supervisors of the School Resource Officer Program in comprehensive high schools in Riverside County, California. Dissertation, University of La Verne

  • Nivette, A. E., & Eisner, M. (2013). Do legitimate polities have fewer homicides? A cross-national analysis. Homicide Studies, 17(1), 3–26. doi:10.1177/1088767912452131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *North Central Florida Health Planning Council, Inc. (NCFHPC) (1999). City of Ocala Weed and Seed evaluation final report. https://www.bja.gov/evaluation/program-crime-prevention/cbcp7.htm

  • Papachristos, A. V., Meares, T. L., & Fagan, J. (2012). Criminology: Why do criminals obey the law? The influence of legitimacy and social networks on active gun offenders. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 102, 397–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reisig, M. D., Bratton, J., & Gertz, M. G. (2007). The construct validity and refinement of process-based policing measures. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34(8), 1005–1028. doi:10.1177/0093854807301275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reisig, M. D., & Lloyd, C. (2009). Procedural Justice, Police Legitimacy, and Helping the Police Fight Crime. Police Quarterly, 12(1), 42–62. doi:10.1177/1098611108327311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reisig, M. D., Tankebe, J., & Mesko, G. (2013). Compliance with the Law in Slovenia: The Role of Procedural Justice and Police Legitimacy. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 1-18

  • Reisig, M. D., Wolfe, S. E., & Holtfreter, K. (2011). Legal cynicism, legitimacy and criminal offending: The nonconfounding effect of low self-control. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38(12), 1265–1279. doi:10.1177/0093854811424707.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, H. R., Sutton, A. J., & Borenstein, M. (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis: prevention, assessment and adjustments. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R.J. (1986). Neighbourhood family structure and the risk of personal victimization. In R.J. Sampson and J.M Byrne (Eds.), The Social Ecology of Crime (pp. 25−46). New York: Springer.

  • *Segrave, M., & Collins, L. (2005). Evaluation of a suburban crime prevention team. Australian Institute of Criminology, Technical and Background Paper, No. 14

  • Shaw, C. R. & McKay, H. D.(1942). Juvenile delinquency and urban areas; A study of rates of delinquents in relation to differential characteristics of local communities in American cities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

  • Sherman, L. W., Gartin, P. R., & Buerger, M. E. (1989). Hot spots of predatory crime: Routine activities and the criminology of place. Criminoloy, 27(1), 27–56. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1989.tb00862.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Singer, L. (2004). Reassurance policing: An evaluation of the local management of community safety. Home Office Research Studies (Vol. 228). London: Home Office.

  • Sunshine, J., & Tyler, T. R. (2003). The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for policing. Law and Society Review, 37(3), 513–548. doi:10.1111/1540-5893.3703002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Telep, C., & Weisburd, D. (2014). What Has Been Learned from Systematic Reviews in Policing?. In Farrington, D.P., & Weisburd, D. (Eds.), Systematic Reviews (SRs) in Criminology: What Have We Learned? New York: Springer (in press)

  • *Tita, G., Riley, K. J., Ridgeway, G., Grammich, C., Abrahamse, A. F., & Greenwood, P. W. (2003). Reducing gun violence : results from an intervention in East Los Angeles. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation

  • *Tuffin, R., Morris, J., & Poole, A. (2006). An evaluation of the impact of the National Reassurance Policing programme. Home Office Research Study, 296. London: Development and Statistics Directorate, Home Office Research.

  • Tyler, T. R. (2001). Public trust and confidence in legal authorities: What do majority and minority group members want from the law and legal institutitions? Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 19(2), 215–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R. (2002). A national survey for monitoring police legitimacy. Justice Research and Policy, 4, 71–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R. (2004a). Enhancing police legitimacy. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 593(1), 84–99. doi:10.1177/0002716203262627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R. (2004b). Procedural justice. In A. Sarat (Ed.), The Blackwell Companion to Law and Society. Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R. (2008). Psychology and institutional design. Review of Law and Economics, 4(3), 801–887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R., & Fagan, J. (2008). Legitimacy and cooperation: Why do people help the police fight crime in their communities? Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 6, 231–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R., & Huo, Y. J. (2002). Trust in the law: Encouraging public cooperation with the police and courts. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R., & Murphy, K. (2011) Procedural justice, police legitimacy and cooperation with the police: A new paradigm for policing. Briefing Paper. Brisbane: ARC Centre of Excellence in Policing and Security.

  • Weisburd, D., Bushway, S., Lum, C., & Yang, S.-M. (2004). Trajectories of crime at places: A longitudinal study of street segments in the city of Seattle. Criminology, 42(2), 283–322. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2004.tb00521.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisburd, D., Bennett, T., Gill, C., & Telep, C. (2012). Title registration for a review proposal: Community-oriented policing to reduce crime, disorder and fear and increase legitimacy and citizen satisfaction in neighborhoods. The Campbell Collaboration Library of Systematic Reviews. Retrieved from http://campbellcollaboration.org/lib/project/202

  • *Zevitz, R. G., Palazzari, T., Frinzi, J. N., & Mallinger, A. (1997). Milwaukee Weed and Seed program evaluation final report. Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University. Retrieved from http://www.weedandseed.info/docs/studies

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Institute for Social Science Research, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, 4072, Australia

    Angela Higginson & Lorraine Mazerolle

Authors
  1. Angela Higginson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lorraine Mazerolle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angela Higginson.

Appendix A

Appendix A

Fig. 2
figure 2

Meta-analysis of the effect of geographically focused legitimacy policing on combined measures of crime

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Meta-analysis of the effect of geographically focused legitimacy policing on measures of total crime

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

Meta-analysis of the effect of geographically focused legitimacy policing on measures of Part 1 crime

Full size image
Fig. 5
figure 5

Meta-analysis of the effect of geographically focused legitimacy policing on measures of Part 2 crime

Full size image
Fig. 6
figure 6

Meta-analysis of the effect of geographically focused legitimacy policing on combined measures of crime, by intervention type

Full size image
Fig. 7
figure 7

Meta-analysis of the effect of geographically focused legitimacy policing on combined measures of crime, by level of additional police service and level of procedural justice

Full size image
Fig. 8
figure 8

Funnel plot with imputed studies from trim-and-fill analysis

Full size image

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Higginson, A., Mazerolle, L. Legitimacy policing of places: the impact on crime and disorder. J Exp Criminol 10, 429–457 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-014-9215-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-014-9215-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation