Abstract
This study examines the sustainability along with the structural stability of the U.S. federal budget deficit over the post World War II period. Allowing for an endogenously determined structural break in 1982:1, tests of unit roots based on Perron's [1997] methodology suggest a stationary and sustainable budget deficit. Moreover, threshold autoregressive and momentum threshold autoregressive models do not detect asymmetries in the response of the budget deficit to deviations from its long-run trend.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bajo-Rubio, O.; Diaz-Roldan, C.; Esteve, V. “Searching for Threshold Effects in the Evolution of Budget Deficits: An Application to the Spanish Case,” Economics Letters, 82, 2, 2004, pp. 239–43.
Bertola, G.; Drazen, A. “Trigger Points and Budget Cuts: Explaining the Effects of Fiscal Austerity,” American Economic Review, 83, 1, 1993, pp. 11–26.
Bradley, M.; Jansen, D. “Nonlinear Business Cycle Dynamics Cross-Country Evidence on the Persistence of Aggregate Shocks,” Economic Inquiry, 35, 3, 1997, pp. 495–509.
Chan, K. S. “Consistency and Limiting Distribution of the Least Squares Estimator of a Threshold Autoregressive Model,” Annals of Statistics, 21, 1, 1993, pp. 520–33.
Cunado, J.; Gil-Alana, L. A.; Gracia, F. P. “Is the US Fiscal Deficit Sustainable? A Fractionally Integrated Approach,” Journal of Economics and Business, 56, 6, 2004, pp. 501–26.
Dickey, D.; Fuller, W. A. “Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 366, 1979, pp. 427–31.
Enders, W. “Improved Critical Values for Enders and Granger Unit Root Test,” Applied Economics Letters, 8, 4, 2001, pp. 257–61.
Enders, W.; Granger, C. W. J. “Unit Root Tests and Asymmetric Adjustment with an Example Using the Term Structure of Interest Rates,” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 16, 3, 1998, pp. 304–11.
Enders, W.; Siklos, P. “Cointegration and Threshold Adjustment,” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 19, 2, 2001, pp. 166–76.
Ewing, B.T., Payne, J.E., Thompson, M.A., Al-Zoubi, O.M. Government Expenditures and Revenues: Evidence from Asymmetric Modeling, Southern Economic Journal, 2005, forthcoming.
Giavazzi, F.; Jappelli, T.; Pagano, M. “Searching for Non-Linear Effects of Fiscal Policy: Evidence from Industrial and Developing Countries,” European Economic Review, 44, 7, 2000, pp. 1259–89.
Hakkio, C. S.; Rush, M. “Is the Budget Deficit ‘Too Large’?,” Economic Inquiry, 29, 3, 1991, pp. 429–45.
Hamilton, J. D.; Flavin, M. A. “On the Limitations of Government Borrowing: A Framework for Testing,” American Economic Review, 76, 4, 1986, pp. 808–19.
Haug, A. A. “Cointegration and Government Borrowing Constraints: Evidence for the United States,” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 9, 1, 1991, pp. 97–101.
—. “Has Federal Budget Deficit Policy Changed in Recent Years?,” Economic Inquiry, 33, 1, 1995, pp. 104–18.
Kremers, J. J. M. “US Federal Indebtedness and the Conduct of Fiscal Policy,” Journal of Monetary Economics, 23, 2, 1989, pp. 219–38.
Martin, G. M. “U.S. Deficit Sustainability: A New Approach Based on Multiple Endogenous Breaks,” Journal of Applied Econometrics, 15, 1, 2000, pp. 83–105.
Neftci, S. “Are Economic Time Series Asymmetric Over the Business Cycle?,” Journal of Political Economy, 92, 2, 1984, pp. 307–28.
Payne, J. E. “International Evidence on the Sustainability of Budget Deficits,” Applied Economics Letters, 4, 12, 1997, pp. 775–79.
Perron, P. “Further Evidence on Breaking Trend Functions in Macroeconomic Variables,” Journal of Econometrics, 80, 2, 1997, pp. 355–85.
Potter, S. “A Nonlinear Approach to U.S. GNP,” Journal of Applied Econometrics, 10, 2, 1995, pp. 109–25.
Quintos, C. E. “Sustainability of the Deficit Process with Structural Shifts,” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 13, 4, 1995, pp. 409–17.
Ramsey, J.; Rothman, P. “Time Irreversibility and Business Cycle Asymmetry,” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 28, 1, 1996, pp. 1–21.
Sichel, D. “Business Cycle Asymmetry: A Deeper Look,” Economic Inquiry, 31, 2, 1993, pp. 224–36.
Tanner, E.; Liu, P. “Is the Budget Deficit ‘Too Large’? Some Further Evidence,” Economic Inquiry, 32, 3, 1994, pp. 511–18.
Trehan, B.; Walsh, C. E. “Common Trends, The Government's Budget Constraint, and Revenue Smoothing,” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12, 2–3, 1988, pp. 425–44.
—. “Testing Intertemporal Budget Constraints: Theory and Applications to US Federal Budget and Current Account Deficits,” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 23, 2, 1991, pp. 206–23.
Wilcox, D. A. “The Sustainability of Government Deficits: Implications of the Present Value Borrowing Constraint,” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 21, 3, 1989, pp. 291–306.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Payne, J.E., Mohammadi, H. Are Adjustments in the U.S. Budget Deficit Asymmetric? Another Look at Sustainability. Atl Econ J 34, 15–22 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11293-006-6116-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11293-006-6116-8