Skip to main content
Log in

Academic Anti-Semitism and the Austrian School: Vienna, 1918–1945

  • Published:
Atlantic Economic Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The theme of academic anti-Semitism has been widely discussed recently in histories of the interwar period of the University of Vienna, in particular its Faculty of Law and Policy Sciences. This paper complements these studies by focusing on the economics chairs of this faculty and, more generally, on the fate of the younger generation of the Austrian School of Economics. After some introductory remarks the paper concentrates on three case studies: the neglect of Mises in all three appointments of economics chairs in the 1920s; the anti-Semitic overtones in the conflict between Hans Mayer and Othmar Spann, both professors of economics in the faculty; and on anti-Semitism as a determinant of success or failure in academia, and consequently of the emigration of Austrian economists. Finally, we have a short look at the development of economics at the University of Vienna during and after the Nazi regime.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See Gauakt Johannes [sic] Mayer, ÖStA, AdR, BMI, Gauakt Zl. 240.709 (enclosed in the Gauakt Johannes Sauter). For the abbreviation of archival sources, see the respective section in the references. If not indicated otherwise, translations from German-language sources are mine.

  2. See e.g. Aly (2011) and Hamann (1999); on the University of Vienna, see Rathkolb (2013). On the problem of defining a Jewish identity, see Ash (2013) and Melichar (2006).

  3. For a general overview of the faculty in the interwar period, see Goller (1997), Schartner (2011), and the contributions in Meissel et al. (2012); on the economics chairs, see Klausinger (forthcoming).

  4. Typically, German nationalist newspapers published lists of Jewish members of the faculties and warned students against attending their lectures; this might also have been a signal for making them the target of violent disturbances. On attacks against Jewish teachers, see e.g. Nemec and Taschwer (2013).

  5. For more details, see Hayek (1992, 23–25) and Klausinger (2012).

  6. See the respective documents in ÖStA, AVA, Unterricht, boxes 609–615. On the de facto existence of a numerus clausus, see e.g. the recollections of J. Herbert Furth, letter to Gottfried Haberler, May 11, 1984, in HIA, GHP, box 14, folder Haag (Furth was Haberler’s brother-in-law and a close friend of Hayek from their student days).

  7. See Hayek (1978), Robbins (1971, 107), and Craver (1986, 4–5).

  8. See on this Klausinger (forthcoming).

  9. Notably in the faculty’s final vote to include Mises in the list at third place (with 11 pro and 8 con), of the seven Jewish professors present only one (Grünberg) voted against Mises.

  10. For example, the conflict is emphasized in the memories of the Austrian economists interviewed in Craver (1986), and in the recollections of Furth mentioned above. On Mayer see also Klausinger (2013).

  11. For biographical information on Spann see Müller (2013).

  12. As representative for his early period in Vienna see Spann (1911, 1921).

  13. On the race question see Spann (1929a, b).

  14. “Grenznutzens Glück und Ende. Der ruhmlose Untergang einer vielgerühmten Lehre. – Josef Schumpeter und Johann Mayer als letzte Bannerträger”, Dötz, Nov 28, 1925, 3–4.

  15. See “Wie Professor Spann über seine Kollegen schreiben lässt”, Arbeiter-Zeitung, Dec 1, 1925, 4. Haberler and Mayer himself, in letters to Morgenstern, Nov 30 and Dec 7, 1925, and Dec 8, 1925, respectively (in DL, OMP, boxes 2 and 3), left no doubt that they associated Spann with this attack.

  16. The minutes of this session have been reprinted in Rathkolb (1989, 198).

  17. “Abhilfe muss werden! Was sich Juden und Marxisten an unseren Hochschulen erlauben”, Dötz, Sept 26, 1926.

  18. “Das Vertrauensvotum für Professor Hupka. Professor Mayer muß sich als Antragsteller bekennen”, Dötz, Dec 21, 1926.

  19. “Jüdisches Diktat an der Universität”, Dötz, July 12, 1927. Referring to these years, the confident in Gauakt Mayer even speaks of the University’s “Jewish era”.

  20. For the following, see Klausinger (2012) and the documents quoted there.

  21. Since Reder (2000) Hayek’s position towards Jews has been questioned in the literature. Yet, Hayek’s friends from student days, e.g. J. Herbert Furth (see his letter to Stephan Boehm, Mar 17, 1993, possession of Stephan Boehm), himself of Jewish origin, largely absolve Hayek from this suspicion although he was born into a family where German nationalism and anti-Semitism prevailed. Hayek (undated, 37) himself recollects the “anti-Semitism in the post-war period,” and that “outstanding teachers” were “alleged not to have been promoted solely because of their Jewishness.”

  22. See e.g. Rellstab (1991, 60–65). A particular striking example are the invectives addressed at Mises, when Morgenstern found out that Mises might be a competitor in the application for a Rockefeller fellowship, see the entry in Morgenstern’s diary of Mar 16, 1925 (in DL, OMP, box 12).

  23. See “Berufungsmanöver an der Universität. Hervorragender Philosemitismus – hervorragende Gelehrsamkeit,” Dötz, Dec 30, 1926; the fact is also mentioned in the anonymous report in Gauakt Mayer.

  24. AdU, Rigorosenakten, J RA ST 271, 1925.

  25. See on this Klausinger (2004).

  26. Wieser (1926, 373) also refers to the advantage of Jews in comparison to Aryans due to their “more rapidly maturing oriental nature.”

  27. See Machlup (1980, 135–136), Craver (1986, 23–24), letter, Morgenstern to Haberler, Mar 30, 1934 (in HIA, GHP, box 65), and letter, Machlup to Mayer, Oct 21, 1935 (in HIA, FMP, box 52, folder 24).

  28. For Haberler’s very favorable judgment, see his letter to Morgenstern, Apr 6, 1927 (in DL, OMP, box 2).

  29. Another female Viennese economist, Louise Sommer, had to go to Geneva for her habilitation; see Hagemann (2002, 690).

  30. See e.g. “Professor Hold v. Ferneck – der neue Rektor der Wiener Universität,” Neues Wiener Journal, June 23, 1934, depicting the loyal Mayer as the rival candidate to Hold who was a well-known Pan-German.

  31. On Spann’s political activities and failures, see e.g. Haag (1969) and Wasserman (2010, chs. 3, 5 and 7). For a voluminous incriminating document on the Spann circle, prepared in 1936 by the Reich’s security agency see the appendix in Maass (2010).

  32. Mayer’s report is preserved in AdU, Personalakt Spann (J PA 396), Akademischer Senat, Studienjahr 1941/42, S.Z. 213.

  33. Letter to Dr. Wächter, April 9, 1939, in ÖStA, AdR, Unterricht, PA Spann, Z. 8144/1940.

  34. See Grandner (2005, 307–311).

  35. Letter to Hans Riehl, July 1, 1949, in Müller (1997, 23).

References

  • Aly, G. (2011). Warum die Deutschen? Warum die Juden? Gleichheit, Neid und Rassenhass, 1800–1933. Frankfurt: Fischer Taschenbuch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ash, M. (2013). “Jüdische Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftler an der Universität Wien von der Monarchie bis nach 1945. Stand der Forschung und offene Fragen”, in Rathkolb, ed. (2013), 93–122.

  • Baxa, J. (1931). Deutsche und undeutsche Volkswirtschaftslehre. Ständisches Leben, 1, 273–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Böhm-Bawerk, E. von (1924). Gesammelte Schriften (2 vols), F. X. Weiss, ed. Vienna: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky.

  • Braun, M. S. (1929). Theorie der staatlichen Wirtschaftspolitik. Leipzig and Vienna: Deuticke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craver, E. (1986). The emigration of the Austrian economists. History of Political Economy, 18, 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goller, P. (1997). Naturrecht, Rechtsphilosophie oder Rechtstheorie? Zur Geschichte der Rechtsphilosophie an Österreichs Universitäten (1848–1945), Frankfurt a.M. et al.: Peter Lang.

  • Grandner, M. (2005). “Das Studium an der rechts- und staatswissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Universität Wien 1945–1955”, in M. Grandner, G. Heiss, and O. Rathkolb, eds. Zukunft mit Altlasten. Die Universität Wien 1945 bis 1955. Innsbruck et al.: Studien Verlag, 290–312.

  • Haag, J. (1969). Othmar Spann and the Politics of “Totality”: Corporatism in Theory and Practice. Ph. D. thesis, Rice University.

  • Haag, J. (1973). The Spann Circle and the Jewish Question. Leo Baeck Institute Yearbook, 18, 93–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagemann, H. (2002). “Sommer, Louise”, in B. Keintzel and Ilse I. Korotin, eds. Wissenschafterinnen in und aus Österreich: Leben – Werk – Wirken. Vienna et al.: Böhlau, 690–695.

  • Hamann, B. (1999). Hitler’s Vienna: a Dictator’s Apprenticeship. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1978). “Einleitung, in Mises” (1978a), xi–xvi.

  • Hayek, F. A. (1992). “The economics of the 1920s as seen from Vienna. In P. G. Klein (Ed.), The Fortunes of Liberalism (The Collected Works of F. A. Hayek, vol. 4). London: Routledge, and Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

  • Hayek, F. A. (Undated). “Inductive Base”, material collected for Hayek biography by W.W. Bartley III. (Copyright the Estate of F. A. Hayek.)

  • Klausinger, H. (2004). “Two Minutes of Austrian Economics.” Fritz Machlup’s journalistic writings, 1932–1934. Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology, 22-B: Documents On and From the History of Economic Thought, 97–130.

  • Klausinger, H. (2012). “The Austrian economists and academic politics in the inter-war period. A preliminary investigation,” in H. M. Krämer, H. Kurz, & H.-M. Trautwein, eds., Macroeconomics and the History of Economic Thought. Festschrift in honour of Harald Hagemann. London: Routledge.

  • Klausinger, H. (2013). “Hans Mayer, rearguard of the Austrian school”, Paper presented at the Annual Conference of ESHET, London-Kingston.

  • Klausinger, H. (Forthcoming). “Krise und Niedergang der Nationalökonomie an der Wiener Universität nach 1917”, in Studien zur Geschichte der ökonomischen Theorie. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

  • Knight, F. (1938). Notes. American Economic Review, 28, 868–869.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maass, S. (2010). Dritter Weg und Wahrer Staat. Othmar Spann – Ideengeber der Konservativen Revolution. Kiel: Regin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machlup, F. (1980). My early work on international monetary problems. Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review, 133, 115–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matis, H. (1997). Zwischen Anpassung und Widerstand. Die Akademie der Wissenschaften in den Jahren 1938–1945. Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, H. (1938). Editor’s note. Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie, 9, 145–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, H. (1939). “Adolf Menzel,” in Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien, Almanach für das Jahr 1938 (Vol. 88). Vienna: Verlag der Akademie der Wissenschaften.

  • Mayer, H. (1952). “Selbstdarstellung,” in N. Grass, ed. Österreichische Rechts- und Staatswissenschaften der Gegenwart in Selbstdarstellungen. Innsbruck: Wagner.

  • Meissel, F.-St., Th. Olechowski, I. Reiter-Zatloukal, and St. Schima, eds. (2012). Vertriebenes Recht – Vertreibendes Recht. Vienna: Manz (Juridicum Spotlight, vol. 2).

  • Melichar, P. (2006). Definieren, Identifizieren, Zählen. Antisemitische Praktiken in Österreich vor 1938. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Geschichtswissenschaften, 17, 114–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mises, L. von (1912). Theorie des Geldes und der Umlaufsmittel. Munich-Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot; the 2nd ed. translated 1934. The Theory of Money and Credit. London: Cape.

  • Mises, L. von (1978a). Erinnerungen. Stuttgart-New York: Fischer; translated 1978b. Notes and Recollections. Spring Mills: Libertarian Press.

  • Müller, R. (1996/97). Zwischen Schreibstube und Garten. Othmar Spann 1945 bis 1950. Seine Briefe an Hans und Hanna Riehl. AGSÖ-Newsletter 14, 11–36, and 15, 15–39.

  • Müller, R. (2013). “Soziologie in Österreichc”. Website: http://agso.uni-graz.at/sozio/index.htm. Accessed: 2013-03-04.

  • Nemec, B. and Taschwer, K. (2013). “Terror gegen Tandler. Kontext und Chronik der antisemitischen Attacken am I. Anatomischen Institut der Universität Wien, 1910 bis 1933”, in Rathkolb, ed. (2013a), 146–171.

  • Rathkolb, O. (1989). “Die Rechts- und Staatswissenschaftliche Fakultät der Universität Wien zwischen Antisemitismus, Deutschnationalismus und Nationalsozialismus 1938, davor und danach,” in G. Heiß, S. Matt, S. Meissl, E. Saurer, & K. Stuhlpfarrer ,eds. Willfährige Wissenschaft. Die Universität Wien 1938–1945. Vienna: Verlag für Gesellschaftskritik.

  • Rathkolb, O., ed. (2013). Der lange Schatten des Antisemitismus. Kritische Auseinandersetzungen mit der Geschichte der Universität Wien im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert. Göttingen: Vienna University Press.

  • Reder, M. W. (2000). The anti-Semitism of some eminent economists. History of Political Economy, 32, 833–856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rellstab, U. (1991). Ökonomie und Spiele. Die Entstehungsgeschichte der Spieltheorie aus dem Blickwinkel des Ökonomen Oskar Morgenstern. Chur: Rüegger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, L. (1971). Autobiography of an Economist. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenstein-Rodan, P. (1926). Article “Grenznutzen”, in Handwörterbuch der Staatswissenschaften, 4th ed., L. Elster, A. Weber, and F. Wieser, eds., vol. 4, Jena: Fischer, 1190–1223; translated 1960. “Marginal Utility”, International Economic Papers, vol. 10, London: Macmillan, 71–106.

  • Schartner, I. (2011). Die Staatsrechtler der juridischen Fakultät der Universität Wien im “Ansturm” des Nationalsozialismus. Frankfurt et al.: Peter Lang.

  • Siegert, M. (1971). Warum Max Adler nicht Ordinarius wurde. Neues Forum (Nov/Dec), 30–31.

  • Spann, O. (1911). Die Haupttheorien der Volkswirtschaftslehre auf dogmengeschichtlicher Grundlage. Leipzig: Quelle & Meyer; reprinted as vol. 2 of Othmar Spann-Gesamtausgabe (27th ed.), Graz: Akademische Drucks- und Verlagsanstalt 1967; translated 1930. Types of Economic Theory. London: Allen & Unwin.

  • Spann, O. (1921). Der wahre Staat. Vorlesungen über Abbruch und Neubau der Gesellschaft. Leipzig: Quelle & Meyer; reprinted as vol. 5 of Othmar Spann-Gesamtausgabe (5th ed.), Graz: Akademische Drucks- und Verlagsanstalt 1972.

  • Spann, O. (1928). Review of Handwörterbuch der Staatswissenschaften. Nationalwirtschaft, 1, 395–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spann, O. (1929a). Vom Wesen des Volkstums. Was ist deutsch? Berlin: Widerstands-Verlag (3rd ed.); reprinted in Othmar Spann-Gesamtausgabe, vol. 6: Kleine Schriften zur Wirtschafts- und Gesellschaftslehre, Graz: Akademische Drucks- und Verlagsanstalt 1975, 3–46.

  • Spann, O. (1929b). Rasse und Gesellschaft. Nationalwirtschaft, 2, 675–680.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staudacher, A. L. (2009). In R. Walter, W. Ogris, & T. Olechowski (Eds.), Hans Kelsen: Leben – Werk – Wirksamkeit (pp. 41–53). Vienna: Manz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, J. (2010). Black Vienna, Red Vienna: The Struggle for Intellectual and Political Hegemony in Interwar Vienna, 1918–1938. Ph. D. thesis, Washington University in Saint Louis.

  • Weintraub, E. R. (2013). “MIT’s openness to Jewish economists”, CHOPE Working Paper 2013-05.

  • Weiss, F. X. (1921). Produktionsumwege und Kapitalzins. Zeitschrift für Volkswirtschaft und Sozialpolitik, 1, 493–592.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieser, F. (1926). Das Gesetz der Macht. Vienna: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Archival Sources

  • Archiv der Universität Wien (AdU): Personalakten (PA), Rigorosenakten (RA).

  • Rubenstein Rare Book and Manuscript Library, Duke University (DL): Oskar Morgenstern Papers (OMP).

  • Hoover Institution Archives, Stanford University (HIA): Gottfried Haberler Papers (GHP), Fritz Machlup Papers (FMP).

  • Österreichisches Staatsarchiv (ÖStA), Allgemeines Verwaltungsarchiv (AVA) and Archiv der Republik (AdR).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hansjoerg Klausinger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Klausinger, H. Academic Anti-Semitism and the Austrian School: Vienna, 1918–1945. Atl Econ J 42, 191–204 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11293-014-9410-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11293-014-9410-x

Keywords

JEL

Navigation