Abstract
The collection of repeated measures in psychological research is one of the most common data collection formats employed in survey and experimental research. The behavioral decision theory literature documents the existence of the dynamic evolution of preferences that occur over time and experience due to learning, exposure to additional information, fatigue, cognitive storage limitations, etc. We introduce a Bayesian dynamic linear methodology employing an empirical Bayes estimation framework that permits the detection and modeling of such potential changes to the underlying preference utility structure of the respondent. An illustration of revealed stated preference analysis (i.e., conjoint analysis) is given involving students’ preferences for apartments and their underlying attributes and features. We also present the results of several simulations demonstrating the ability of the proposed procedure to recover a variety of different sources of dynamics that may surface with preference elicitation over repeated sequential measurement. Finally, directions for future research are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Addelman S. (1962) Orthogonal main-effect plans for asymmetrical factorial experiments. Technometrics 4:21–46
Aguilar O., West M. (2000) Bayesian dynamic factor models and portfolio allocation. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 18:338–357
Anderson N. H. (1971) Integration theory and attitude change. Psychological Review 78:171–206
Anderson N. H. (1981) Foundations of information integration theory. San Diego, CA: Academic Press
Bechtel G. G. (1976) Multidimensional preference scaling. The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton
Berlyne D. E. (1960) Conflict, Arousal and Curiosity New York: Mc-Graw Hill
Berlyne D. E. (1974) Studies in the new experimental aesthetics. Washington, D.C.:Hemisphere
Bernardo J. M. (1979) Reference posterior distributions for Bayesian inference (with discussion) Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Ser. B 41:113–148
Bhattacharjee B., Sinha K. C., Krogmeier J. V. (2001) Modeling the effects of traveler information on freeway origin-destination demand prediction. Transportation Research Part C-Emerging Technologies 9:381–398
Brickman P., D’Amato B. (1975) Exposure effects in a free-choice situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 32 (Sept):415–420
Cacioppo J. T., Petty R. E. (1979) Effects of message repetition and position of cognition response, recall, and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37 (January):97–109
Cargnoni C., Muller P., West M. (1997) Bayesian forecasting of multinomial time series through conditionally Gaussian dynamic models. Journal of the American Statistical Association 92:640–647
Carroll J.D. (1969) Categorical conjoint measurement. Meeting of Mathematical Psychology. Ann Arbor, MI
Cook T. D., Campbell D. T. (1979) Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings Boston: Houghton-Mifflin
Fischhoff B., Slovic P., Lichtenstein S. (1980) Knowing what you want: Measuring labile values. In T. Wallstein (Ed.), Cognitive processes in choice and decision behavior (pp 117–141) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Fruhwirth-Schnatter S. (2001) Markov chain monte-carlo estimation of classical and dynamic switching and mixture models. Journal of the American Statistical Association 96:194–209
Gelman A., Carlin J. B., Stern H. S., Rubin D. B. (1997) Bayesian data analysis. London: Chapman and Hall
Gilbert D. T. (1989) Thinking lightly about others: Automatic components of the social inference process. In J. S. Uleman, J. A. Bargh, (Eds.), Unintended Thought (pp. 189–211) New York: Guilford
Gilbert D. T., Krull D.S., Pelham B.W. (1988) Of thoughts unspoken: Social inference and the self-regulation of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 55:685–694
Green P.E. (1974) On the design of choice experiments involving multifactor alternatives. Journal of Consumer Research 1:61–68
Green P.E., Rao V.R. (1971) Conjoint measurement for quantifying judgmental data. Journal of Marketing Research 8:355–363
Green P.E., Rao V.R. (1971) Conjoint measurement for quantifying judgmental data. Journal of Marketing Research 8:355–363
Hair J. E., Anderson R. E., Tatham R. L., Black W.C. (1995) Multivariate data analysis (4th ed.) Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall
Herr P. M. (1989) Priming price: Prior knowledge and context effects. Journal of Consumer Research 16:67–75
Huber J., Wittink D.R., Johnson R. M., Miller R. (1992) Learning effects in preference tasks: Choice-based versus standard conjoint. In Sawtooth Software Conference Proceedings, Sequim, WA: Sawtooth Software, Inc.
Huber J., Hansen D. (1986) Testing the impact of dimensional complexity and affective differences of paired concepts in adaptive conjoint analysis. In M. Wallendorf P. Anderson (Eds.), Advances in Consumer Research (Vol. 14, pp. 159–163) Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research
Huynh H. (1980) A nonrandomized Minimax solution for passing scores in the binomial error model. Psychometrika 45:167–182
Jeffreys H. (1961) Theory of Probability, (3rd ed) Oxford University Press: London
Johar G. V., Jedidi K., Jacoby J. (1997) A varying-parameter averaging model of on-line brand evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research 24:232–246
Johnson E. J., Meyer R. J. (1984) Compensatory choice models of noncompensatory processes: The effect of varying context. Journal of Consumer Research 11:528–541
Johnson R. M., Orme B. K. (1996) How many questions should you ask in choice-based conjoint studies? Technical Report Sequim, WA: Sawtooth Software, Inc
Kahneman D., Tversky A. (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision making under risk. Econometrica 47:263–291
Kardes F. R., Kalyanaram G. (1992) Order-of-entry effects on consumer memory and judgment: An information integration perspective. Journal of Marketing Research 29:343–357
Kass R., Raftery A.E., (1995) Bayes factors. Journal of the American Statistical Association 90:40–60
Kruskal J.B. (1965) Analysis of factorial experiments by estimating monotone transformations of the data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B27:251–263
Lopes L. L. (1982) Toward a procedural theory of judgment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin
Louviere J.J., Hensher D.A., Swait J.D. (2000) Stated choice models: Analysis and application. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press
Luce R. D., Tukey J. W. (1964) Simultaneous conjoint measurement: A new type of fundamental measurement. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 1:1–27
March J. G. (1978) Bounded rationality, ambiguity, and the engineering of choice. Bell Journal of Economics 9:587–608
Meyer R. J. (1987) The learning of multiattribute judgment policies. Journal of Consumer Research 14:155–173
Moore D. A. (1999) Order effects in preference judgments: evidence for context dependence in the generation of preferences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 78:146–165
Pole A., West M., Harrison J. (1994) Applied bayesian forecasting and time series analysis. New York: Chapman and Hall
Prado R., West M., Krystal A. D. (1999) Multi-channel EEG analyses via dynamic regression models with time-varying lag lead structure. Applied Statistics 50:95–110
Simonson I., Tversky A. (1992) Choice in context: tradeoff contrast and extremeness aversion. Journal of Marketing Research 29:281–295
P. Slovic, D. Griffin, A. Tversky (1990) Compatibility affects in judgment and choice. In R. M. Hogarth (Ed.), Insights in decision making: A tribute to Hillel J. Einhorn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Tonellato S. F. (2001) A multivariate time series model for the analysis and prediction of carbon monoxide atmospheric concentrations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C-Applied Statistics 50:187–200
Torgerson W. S. (1958) Theory and methods of scaling. New York: Wiley
West M., Harrison J. (1997) Bayesian forecasting and dynamic models. New York: Springer
Young F.W. (1969) Polynomial conjoint analysis of similarities: Definitions for a special algorithm. Research Paper No. 76. University of North Carolina: Psychometric Laboratory
Zajonc R. B. (1968) Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Monograph Supplement 9 (Part 2):1–28
Zajonc R. B., Markus H., Wilson W. R. (1974) Exposure affects and associative learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology 10:248–263
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The authors wish to acknowledge and thank the Editor, the Associate Editor, and two anonymous reviewers for their constructive and insightful comments. Duncan K.H. Fong’s work was sponsored in part by a research grant from the Smeal College.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
DeSarbo, W.S., Fong, D.K.H., Liechty, J. et al. Evolutionary preference/utility functions: A dynamic perspective. Psychometrika 70, 179–202 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-002-0976-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-002-0976-x