Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Consistency of Nonparametric Classification in Cognitive Diagnosis

  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Latent class models for cognitive diagnosis have been developed to classify examinees into one of the 2K attribute profiles arising from a K-dimensional vector of binary skill indicators. These models recognize that response patterns tend to deviate from the ideal responses that would arise if skills and items generated item responses through a purely deterministic conjunctive process. An alternative to employing these latent class models is to minimize the distance between observed item response patterns and ideal response patterns, in a nonparametric fashion that utilizes no stochastic terms for these deviations. Theorems are presented that show the consistency of this approach, when the true model is one of several common latent class models for cognitive diagnosis. Consistency of classification is independent of sample size, because no model parameters need to be estimated. Simultaneous consistency for a large group of subjects can also be shown given some conditions on how sample size and test length grow with one another.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ayers, E., Nugent, R., & Dean, N. (2008). Skill set profile clustering based on student capability vectors computed from online tutoring data. In: R.S.J.d. Baker, T. Barnes, & J.E. Beck (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1st international conference on education data mining, Montreal (pp. 218–225).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, T. (2010). Novel derivation and application of skill matrices: the q-matrix method. In Handbook on educational data mining (pp. 159–172). Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, C., & Douglas, J. (2013). A nonparametric approach to cognitive diagnosis by proximity to ideal response patterns. Journal of Classification, 30, 225–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, C., Douglas, J., & Li, X. (2009). Cluster analysis for cognitive diagnostic theory and applications. Psychometrika, 74, 633–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de la Torre, J. (2011). The generalized DINA model framework. Psychometrika, 76, 179–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartz, S., Roussos, L., Henson, R., & Templin, J. (2005). The Fusion Model for skill diagnosis: blending theory with practicality. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Henson, R., Templin, J., & Willse, J. (2009). Defining a family of cognitive diagnosis models using log-linear models with latent variables. Psychometrika, 74, 191–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Junker, B.W., & Sijtsma, K. (2001). Cognitive assessment models with few assumptions, and connections with nonparametric item response theory. Applied Psychological Measurement, 25, 258–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macready, G.B., & Dayton, C.M. (1977). The use of probabilistic models in the assessment of mastery. Journal of Educational Statistics, 2, 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maris, E. (1999). Estimating multiple classification latent class models. Psychometrika, 64, 187–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, Y., & Lee, Y. (2011). IERI monograph series: issues and methodologies in large-scale assessments: Vol. 4. Diagnostic cluster analysis of mathematics skills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roussos, L., Templin, J., & Henson, R. (2007). Skills diagnosis using IRT-based latent class models. Journal of Educational Measurement, 44(4), 293–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rupp, A.A., & Templin, J.L. (2007). Unique characteristics of cognitive diagnosis models. In: The annual meeting of the National Council for Measurement in Education, Chicago, April 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatsuoka, K. (1983). Rule-space: an approach for dealing with misconceptions based on item response theory. Journal of Educational Measurement, 20, 34–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatsuoka, K. (1985). A probabilistic model for diagnosing misconceptions in the pattern classification approach. Journal of Educational Statistics, 12, 55–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatsuoka, K. (1990). Architecture of knowledge structures and cognitive diagnosis: a statistical pattern classification approach. In: P. Nichols, S. Chipman, & R. Brennan (Eds.), Cognitively diagnostic assessments (pp. 327–359). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatsuoka, K., & Tatsuoka, M. (1987). Bug distribution and pattern classification. Psychometrika, 52, 193–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Davier, M. (2005). A general diagnostic model applied to language testing data (ETS Research Report RR-05-16). Princeton: Educational Testing Service.

  • Willse, J., Henson, R., & Templin, J. (2007). Using sum scores or IRT in place of cognitive diagnosis models: can existing or more familiar models do the job? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago, Illinois.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeff Douglas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, S., Douglas, J. Consistency of Nonparametric Classification in Cognitive Diagnosis. Psychometrika 80, 85–100 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-013-9372-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-013-9372-y

Key words

Navigation