Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Experimental Study on Crashworthiness of Functionally Graded Thickness Thin-Walled Tubular Structures

  • Published:
Experimental Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper is an experimental investigation of the crashworthiness behavior of functionally graded thickness (FGT) thin-walled tubular structures. Aluminum alloy AA6061-T5 was chosen because of its high strength to weight ratio and high stiffness. A series of FGT tubes with thicknesses varying linearly from one end to the other were evaluated in quasi-static crushing and three- and four-point bending tests for the purpose of evaluating their energy absorption characteristics. AA6061-T5 FGT tubes with four thickness distributions were considered, namely: t top = 0.6, 0.8, 1.0, 1.2 mm, t bottom = 1.5 mm. Specific energy absorption (SEA) and crush force efficiency (CFE) under maximum deformed displacement (δ max) were measured from the tests to infer crashworthiness of the FGT tubes. It was found that the FGT tubes exhibit superior performance relative to a uniform thickness (UT) counterpart especially at the highest displacements and deformed more stably in overall crashing behaviors or collapsed modes. For example, the CFE of the AA6061-T5 FGT tube with t top = 0.6 mm at δ = 80 mm was ~105 %; however, that for an AA6061-T5 UT counterpart with a 1.5 mm thickness tube is only 62 %. This suggests the possibility that crash energy absorption management in ground transportation vehicles may be enhanced through the use of the FGT tube designs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wierzbicki T, Abramowicz W (1983) On the crushing mechanics of thin-walled structures. J Appl Mech 50:727–734

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Abramowicz W, Wierzbicki T (1989) Axial crushing of multicorner sheet metal columns. J Appl Mech 56:113–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ghamarian A, Abadi MT (2011) Axial crushing analysis of end-capped circular tubes. Thin-Walled Struct 49:743–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Song J, Chen Y, Lu G (2012) Axial crushing of thin-walled structures with origami patterns. Thin-Walled Struct 54:65–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang X, Zhang H (2012) Experimental and numerical investigation on crush resistance of polygonal columns and angle elements. Thin-Walled Struct 57:25–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jones N (2011) Structural impact, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

  7. Lu G, Yu T (2003) Energy absorption of structures and materials. Elsevier, Woodhead Publishing Limited

  8. Zhao H, Abdennadher S (2004) On the strength enhancement under impact loading of square tubes made from rate insensitive metals. Int J Solids Struct 41:6677–6697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. DiPaolo B, Tom J (2006) A study on an axial crush configuration response of thin-wall, steel box components: the quasi-static experiments. Int J Solids Struct 43:7752–7775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gu G, Xia Y, Zhou Q (2012) On the fracture possibility of thin-walled tubes under axial crushing. Thin-Walled Struct 55:85–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Reddy T, Al-Hassani S (1993) Axial crushing of wood-filled square metal tubes. Int J Mech Sci 35:231–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim H-S (2002) New extruded multi-cell aluminum profile for maximum crash energy absorption and weight efficiency. Thin-Walled Struct 40:311–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang X, Zhang H (2014) Axial crushing of circular multi-cell columns. Int J Impact Eng 65:110–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang X, Zhang H (2013) Energy absorption of multi-cell stub columns under axial compression. Thin-Walled Struct 68:156–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang X, Zhang H, Wen Z (2014) Experimental and numerical studies on the crush resistance of aluminum honeycombs with various cell configurations. Int J Impact Eng 66:48--59

  16. Zhang X, Zhang H (2012) Numerical and theoretical studies on energy absorption of three-panel angle elements. Int J Impact Eng 46:23–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang X, Huh H (2010) Crushing analysis of polygonal columns and angle elements. Int J Impact Eng 37:441–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Song Y, Hua L (2014) Influences of thickness ratio of base sheets on formability of tailor welded blanks. Procedia Eng 81:730–735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Arman Khan VVN (2014) Satya suresh, srinivasa prakash regalla. Effect of thickness ratio on weld line displacement in deep drawing of aluminium steel tailor welded blanks. Procedia Mater Sci 6:401–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Feistauer EE, Bergmann LA, Barreto LS, Santos JF (2014) Mechanical behaviour of dissimilar friction stir welded tailor welded blanks in Al–Mg alloys for Marine applications. Mater Des 59:323–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pan F, Zhu P, Zhang Y (2010) Metamodel-based lightweight design of B-pillar with TWB structure via support vector regression. Comput Struct 88:36–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Shi Y, Lin Z, Zhu P, Han S (2008) Impact modeling of the weld line of tailor-welded blank. Mater Des 29:232–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hariharan K, Kalaivani K, Balachandran G (2012) Foil optimization in tailor welded blank of an automotive floor component. Mater Manuf Process 27:936–942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pan F, Zhu P (2011) Lightweight design of vehicle front–end structure: contributions of multiple surrogates. Int J Veh Des 57:124–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Shin J-K, Lee K-H, Song S-I, Park G-J (2002) Automotive door design with the ULSAB concept. using structural optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 23:320–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Davies R, Grant G, Smith M, Oliver E (2000) Formability and fatigue of aluminum tailor welded blanks. SAE Trans: J Mater Manuf 109:911–918

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tao H, Tong W, Hector LG Jr, Zavattieri PD (2008) Uniaxial tensile and simple shear behavior of resistance spot-welded dual-phase steel joints. ASME J Manuf Sci Eng 17:517–534

    Google Scholar 

  28. Tong W, Hector LG Jr, Dasch C, Tao H, Jiang XQ (2007) Local plastic deformation and failure behavior of Nd:YAG laser welded AA5182- O and AA6111-T4 sheet metals. Metall Mater Trans A 38:3063–3086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Marya M, Wang K, Hector LG Jr, Gayden XH (2006) Tensile-shear forces and fracture modes in single and multiple weld specimens in dual-phase steels. J Manuf Sci Eng 128:287–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hector LG Jr, Chen YL, Agarwal S, Briant CL (2004) Texture characterization of autogenous Nd:YAG laser welds in AA5182-O and AA6111-T4 aluminum alloys. Metall Mater Trans A 35(9):3032–3037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Agarwal S, Briant CL, Hector LG Jr, Chen YL (2007) Friction stir processed AA5182-O and AA6111-T4 aluminum alloys. Part 1: electron backscattered diffraction analysis. J Mater Eng Perform 16(4):391–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hector LG Jr, Chen YL, Agarwal S, Briant CL (2007) Friction stir processed AA5182-O and AA6111-T4 aluminum alloys. Part 2: tensile properties and strain field evolution. J Mater Eng Perform 16(4):404–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Yang RJ, Fu Y, Li G, Application of tailor rolled blank in vehicle front end for frontal impact. SAE Technical Paper 2007-01-0675

  34. Chuang C, Yang R, Li G, Mallela K, Pothuraju P (2008) Multidisciplinary design optimization on vehicle tailor rolled blank design. Struct Multidiscip Optim 35:551–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Cengiz B, Merve T (2014) Energy absorption of circular aluminium tubes with functionally graded thickness under axial impact loading. Int J Crashworthiness. doi:10.1080/13588265.2014.982269

    Google Scholar 

  36. Savic V, Passive pedestrian protection approach for vehicle hoods. SAE Technical Paper 2014-01-0513.

  37. Fang H, Rais-Rohani M, Liu Z, Horstemeyer MF (2005) A comparative study of metamodeling methods for multiobjective crashworthiness optimization. Comput Struct 83(25–26):2121–2136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kang CY, Seo JW, Kim JH, Joo YB (2013) Ultra high strength steel b Pillar reinforcement structure to enhance Side impact and roof crash as reducing weight. In: Proceedings of the FISITA 2012 world automotive congress, Springer, pp. 53–71

  39. Lugo M, Jordon JB, Solanki KN, Hector LG Jr, Bernard JD, Luo AA, Horstemeyer MF (2013) Role of different material processing methods on the fatigue behavior of AZ31 magnesium alloy. Int J Fatigue 52:131–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Marya M, Hector LG Jr, Verma R, Tong W (2006) Microstructural effects of AZ31 magnesium alloy on its tensile deformation and failure behaviors. Mater Sci Eng A 418(1–2):341–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Carter JT, Melo AR, Savic V, Hector Jr LG, Krajewski PE. Structural evaluation of an experimental aluminum/magnesium decklid. SAE Technical Paper 2011-01-0075

  42. Savic V, Hector LG Jr, Kim S, Verma R (2010) Local mechanical properties of a magnesium hood inner component formed at elevated temperature. ASME J Eng Mater Technol 132(021006):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  43. Hector Jr LG, Krupitzer R, Sachdev AK (2013) Integrated Computational Materials Engineering (ICME) for third generation advanced high-strength steels: a new four-year project. Proceedings of the Int. symposium on new developments in advanced high-strength steels, Vail, CO, pp. 341–349, AIST, Warrendale

  44. Coryell J, Savic V, Hector Jr LG, Mishra S. Temperature effects on the deformation and fracture of a quenched-and-partitioned steel. SAE Technical Paper 2013-01-0610.

  45. Krajewski PE, Hector LG Jr, Qi Y, Mishra RK, Sachdev AK, Bower AF, Curtin WA (2011) Atoms to autos: a multi-scale approach to modeling aluminum deformation. JOM 63:24–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Yang X, Hector LG Jr, Wang J (2014) A combined theoretical/experimental approach for reducing ringing artifacts in low dynamic testing with servo-hydraulic load frames. Exp Mech 54:775–789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Thomas S, Reid S, Johnson W (1976) Large deformations of thin-walled circular tubes under transverse loading—I: an experimental survey of the bending of simply supported tubes under a central load. Int J Mech Sci 18:325–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by The National Natural Science Foundation of China (61232014) for providing financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Automotive Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Hubei Wuhan, 430070, China

    F. Xu

  2. Hubei Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology of Automotive Parts, Wuhan University of Technology, Hubei Wuhan, 430070, China

    F. Xu

  3. State Key Laboratory of Advanced Design and Manufacturing for Vehicle Body, Hunan University, Hunan Changsha, 410082, China

    X. Tian & G. Li

  4. Center for Intelligent New Energy Vehicle, Hunan University, Hunan Changsha, 410082, China

    G. Li

Authors
  1. F. Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. X. Tian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. G. Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Xu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, F., Tian, X. & Li, G. Experimental Study on Crashworthiness of Functionally Graded Thickness Thin-Walled Tubular Structures. Exp Mech 55, 1339–1352 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-015-9994-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-015-9994-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation