Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Revisiting the convergence of carbon emission phenomenon in OECD countries: new evidence from Fourier panel KPSS test

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis which was developed by Grossman and Krueger implies that clean environment demand increases over a certain level of income. Convergence of carbon emission can be considered an extension of EKC hypothesis, which emphasizes that the carbon emissions of countries will converge to a certain level. Convergence is important for the identification of the trend of carbon emission and to design emission abatement policies. This study investigates the stochastic convergence of per capita carbon emission in Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries for 1960–2014 under cross-sectional dependence by using recently developed panel data methods. Empirical results are as follows: (i) per capita carbon emission is generally non-stationary according to the CADF test and the CIPS test. (ii) Panel KPSS test indicates that carbon emission per capita is overwhelmingly stationary in both country-specific and panel levels; (iii) Fourier panel KPSS test indicates that per capita carbon emission is overwhelmingly stationary at the country-specific level and non-stationary at the panel level. These findings are strongly in favor of convergence of per capita carbon emission among OECD countries. Consequently, it can be said that emission abatement policies aren’t essential among these countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acaravci A, Akalin G (2017) Environment–economic growth nexus: a comparative analysis of developed and developing countries. Int J Energy Econ Policy 7(5):34–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Acaravci A, Erdogan S (2016) The convergence behavior of CO2 emissions in seven regions under multiple structural breaks. Int J Energy Econ Policy 6(3):575–580

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldy JE (2006) Per capita carbon dioxide emissions: convergence or divergence. Environ Resour Econ 33:533–555

    Google Scholar 

  • Aslan A, Destek MA, Okumus I (2018) Bootstrap rolling window estimation approach to analysis of the Environment Kuznets Curve hypothesis: evidence from the USA. Environ Resour Econ 25:2402–2408

    Google Scholar 

  • Bai J, Ng S (2001) A new look at panel testing of stationarity and the PPP hypothesis. https://dlib.bc.edu/islandora/object/bc-ir%3A103102. Accessed 30 Jan 2018

  • Baltagi B (2013) Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. Wiley, West Sussex

    Google Scholar 

  • Barassi MR, Cole MA, Elliott RJR (2008) Stochastic divergence or convergence of per capita carbon dioxide emissions: re-examining the evidence. Environ Resour Econ 40:121–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro R, Sala-I Martin X (1999) Economic growth. The MIT Press, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker R, Enders W, Lee J (2006) A stationarity test in the presence of an unknown number of smooth breaks. J Time Ser Anal 27:381–409

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilgili F, Ulucak R (2018) Is there deterministic, stochastic, and/or club convergence in ecological footprint indicator among G20 countries? Environ Resour Econ 25(35):35404–35419

    Google Scholar 

  • Bimonte S (2009) Growth and environmental quality: testing the double convergence hypothesis. Ecol Econ 68:2406–2411

    Google Scholar 

  • Breusch TS, Pagan AR (1980) The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. Rev Econ Stud 47(1):239–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai Y, Chang T, Inglesi-Lotz R (2018) Asymmetric persistence in convergence for carbon dioxide emissions based on quantile unit root test with Fourier function. Energy 161:470–481

    Google Scholar 

  • Carion-i Silvestre JL, Del Barrio-Castro T, Lopez-Bazo E (2005) Breaking the panels: an application to the GDP per capita. Econ J 8:159–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlino GA, Mills LO (1993) Are U.S. Regional incomes converging? A time series analysis. J Monet Econ 32:335–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Chudik A, Pesaran MH (2013) Large panel data models with cross-sectional dependence: a survey. https://www.dallasfed.org/~/media/documents/institute/wpapers/2013/0153.pdf. Accessed 5 March 2019

  • Enders W (1995) Applied econometric time series. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1991) Environmental impacts of a north American free trade agreement. The National Bureau of Economic Research. http://www.nber.org/papers/w3914.pdf. Accessed 16 June 2018

  • Guloglu B, Ispir S (2011) Is natural rate of unemployment or hysteresis? Sector-specific panel unit root test analysis for Turkey. Ege Acad Rev 11(2):205–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadri K (2000) Testing for stationarity in heterogeneous panels. Econ J 3:148–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadri K, Kurozumi E (2011) A locally optimal test for no unit root in cross-sectionally dependent panel data. Hitotsubashi J Econ 52(2):165–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadri K, Kurozumi E (2012) A simple panel stationarity test in the presence of serial correlation and a common factor. Econ Lett 115:31–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Haider S, Akram V (2019) Club convergence of per capita carbon emission: global insight from disaggregated level data. Environ Resour Econ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04573-9

  • Herrerias MJ (2012) CO2 weighted convergence across the EU-25 countries (1920–2007). Appl Energy 92:9–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrerias MJ (2013) The Environmental convergence hypothesis: carbon dioxide emissions according to the source of energy. Energy Policy 61:1140–1150

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao C (1985) Benefits and limitations of panel data. Econ Rev 4(1):121–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao C (2007) Panel data analysis-advantages and ahgallenges. Test 16:1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Jobert T, Karanfil F, Tykhonenko A (2010) Convergence of per capita carbon dioxide emissions in the EU: legend or reality. Energy Econ 32:1364–1373

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones PM, Enders W (2014) On the use of the flexible fourier form in unit root tests, Endogenous breaks, and parameter instability. In: Ma J, Wohar M (eds) Recent Advances in Estimating Nonlinear Models. Springer, New York, pp 59–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurozumi E (2002) Testing for stationarity with a break. J Econ 108(1):63–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurozumi E, Tanaka S (2010) Reducing the size distortion of the KPSS test. J Time Ser Anal 31(6):415–426

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurozumi E, Yamazaki D, Hadri K (2013) Covariate unit root test for cross-sectionally dependent panel data. ftp://ftp.qub.ac.uk/pub/users/repec/qub/wpaper/MS_WPS_ECO_13_01.pdf. Accessed 2 Feb 2018

  • Lee CC, Chang CP (2008) New evidence on the convergence of per capita carbon dioxide emissions from panel seemingly unrelated regressions augmented dickey–fuller tests. Energy 33:1468–1475

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee CC, Chang CP (2009) Stochastic convergence of per capita carbon dioxide emissions and multiple structural breaks in OECD countries. Econ Model 26:1375–1381

    Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Lin B (2013) Global convergence in per capita CO2 emissions. Renew Sust Energ Rev 24:357–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Tang DP, Chang T (2014) CO2 emission convergence in the 50 U.S. states-sequential panel selection method. Econ Model 40:320–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Nazlioglu S, Karul C (2017) A panel stationarity test with gradual structural shifts: re-investigate the international commodity price shocks. Econ Model 61:181–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen-Van P (2005) Distribution dynamics of CO2 emissions. Environ Resour Econ 32:495–508

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne EJ, Vizek M, Lee J (2017) Stochastic convergence in per capita fossil fuel consumption in U.S. states. Energy Econ 62:382–395

    Google Scholar 

  • Perron P (1989) The great crash, the oil price shock, and the unit root hypothesis. Econometrica 57(6):1361–1401

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran MH (2007) A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. J Appl Econ 22:265–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran MH, Ullah A, Yamagata T (2008) A bias-adjusted LM Test for error cross-section independence. Econ J 11:105–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer D (2012) Advanced macroeconomics. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero-Avila D (2008) Convergence in carbon dioxide emissions among industrialized countries revisited. Energy Econ 30:2265–2282

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow R (1956) A Contribution to the theory of economic growth. Q J Econ 70(1):65–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Soz S (1997) India rejects incorporation of new environmental commitments for developing countries. Presented at the 3rd session of the conference of the parties to the framework convention on climate change Kyoto, Japan. http://www.m2.com/m2/web/story.php/1997852568440080DDE88025683A0025702A. Accessed 19 Jan 2018

  • Stegman A, McKibbin WJ (2005) Convergence in per capita carbon emissions. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/5223844. Accessed 19 Jan 2018

  • Strazicich MC, List JA (2003) Are CO2 emission levels converging among industrial countries? Environ Resour Econ 24:263–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Sul D, Phillips PCB, Choi CY (2005a) Prewhitening bias in HAC estimation. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2005.00130.x. Accessed 18 June 2018

  • Sul D, Phillips PCB, Choi CY (2005b) Prewhitening bias in HAC estimation. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 67(4):517–546

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2015) Overview of greenhouse gasses. https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/overview-greenhouse-gases. Accessed 23 Jan 2018

  • Ulucak R, Apergis N (2018) Does convergence really matter for the environment? An application based on club convergence and on the ecological footprint concept for the EU countries. Environ Sci Pol 80:21–27

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (1997) The earth summit. https://www.un.org/geninfo/bp/enviro.html. Accessed 27 April 2019

  • United Nations (2019) Sustainable development goals. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/?menu=1300. Accessed 27 April 2019

  • United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (2019a) What is the Kyoto Protocol? https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-kyoto-protocol/what-is-the-kyoto-protocol/what-is-the-kyoto-protocol. Accessed 27 April 2019

  • United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (2019b) Climate Get the big picture https://unfccc.int/resource/bigpicture/#content-the-paris-agreemen. Accessed 27 April 2019

  • Westerlund J, Basher SA (2008) Testing for convergence in carbon dioxide emissions using a century of panel data. Environ Resour Econ 40:109–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Yavuz CN, Yilanci V (2013) Convergence in per capita carbon dioxide emissions among G7 countries: a TAR panel unit root approach. Environ Resour Econ 54:283–291

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, 31060, Hatay, Turkey

    Sinan Erdogan & Ali Acaravci

Authors
  1. Sinan Erdogan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ali Acaravci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Acaravci.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Erdogan, S., Acaravci, A. Revisiting the convergence of carbon emission phenomenon in OECD countries: new evidence from Fourier panel KPSS test. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26, 24758–24771 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05584-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05584-2

Keywords

JEL classification

Search

Navigation