Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The impact of economic structure to the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis: evidence from European countries

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the role of economic structure of European countries into testing the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis for European countries for the period 1980 to 2014. This study is inspired by the work of Lin et al. (J Clean Prod 133:712–724, 2016), which made the first effort to investigate the phenomenon looking only at African countries. The main finding of the study is that the overall economic growth is the factor with which CO2 emissions exhibit an inverted U-shaped relationship in the studied country group. On the contrary, when using their industrial share as a proxy to capture the countries’ economic structure, the EKC hypothesis is not confirmed – but a U-shaped relationship is confirmed. The industrial share decreases emissions through the development and absorption of technologies that are energy efficient and environmental friendly. The EKC hypothesis is confirmed when the aggregate GDP growth is considered, taking into account the improvement of the overall economic conditions of the countries regardless of the economic structure and role of industrialization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Apergis N, Ozturk I (2015) Testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Asian countries. Ecol Indic 52:16–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow K, Bolin B, Costanza R, Dasgupta P, Folke C, Holling CS et al (1996) Economic growth, carrying capacity, and the environment. Ecol Appl 6:13–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Balsalobre-Lorente DB, Alvarez-Herranz A (2016) An approach to the effect of energy innovation on environmental Kuznets curve: an introduction to inflection point. Bull Energy Econ 4(3):224–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilgili F, Kocak E, Bulut U (2016) The dynamic impact of renewable energy consumption on CO2 emissions: a revisited environmental Kuznets curve approach. Renew Sust Energ Rev 54:838–845

    Google Scholar 

  • Boden TA, Marland G, Andres RJ (2011) Gobal, regional and national fossil fuel CO2 emissions. US Department of Energy. Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center

  • Brock W, Taylor MS (2005) Economic growth and environment: a review of theory and empirics. In: Durlauf S, Aghion P (eds) The handbook of economic growth. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1749–1821

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton E (2000) The compact city: just or just compact? A preliminary analysis. Urban Stud 37:1969–2001

    Google Scholar 

  • Canadell JG, Raupach MR, Houghton RA (2008) Anthropogenic CO2 emissions in Africa. Biogeosciences Discussion

  • Capello R, Camagni R (2000) Beyond optimal city size: an evaluation of alternative urban growth patterns. Urban Stud 37:1479–1496

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson RT (2010) The environmental Kuznets curve: seeking empirical regularity and theoretical structure. Rev Environ Econ Policy 4:3–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Lin S (2015) Decomposition and allocation of energy-related carbon dioxide emission allowance over provinces of China. Nat Hazards 76(3):1893–1909

    Google Scholar 

  • Chertow MR (2008) The IPAT Equation and its variants. J Ind Ecol 4(4):13–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi I (2001) Unit root tests for panel data. J Int Money Financ 20:249–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi S-W (2014) Economic growth and terrorism: domestic , international, and suicide. Oxf Econ Pap 67(1):1–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpu036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chow GC, Li J (2014) Environmental Kuznets curve: conclusive econometric evidence for CO2. Pac Econ Rev 19:1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Destek MA, Ulucak R, Dogan E (2018) Analyzing the environmental Kuznets curve for the EU countries; the role of ecological footprint. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:29387–29396

    Google Scholar 

  • El Montasser G, Ajmi AN, Nguyen DK (2018) Carbon emissions- income relationships with structural breaks: the case of the middle eastern and north African countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 1:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Gertler P, Shelef O, Wolfram C, Fuchs A (2013) How pro-poor growth affects the demand for energy. NBER, Cambridge Working paper series No 19092

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghazali A, Ali G (2019) Investigation of key contributors of CO2 emissions in extended STIRPAT model for newly industrialized countries: a dynamic common correlated estimator (DCCE) approach. Energy Rep 5:242–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1995) Economic growth and the environment. Q J Econ 110(2):353–377

  • Hao Y, Liu Y, Weng J-H, Gao Y (2016) Does the environmental Kuznets curve for coal consumption in China exist? New evidence from spatial econometric analysis. Energy 114:1214–1223

    Google Scholar 

  • Harbaugh B, Levinson A, Wilson DM (2002) Reexamining the empirical evidence for an environmental Kuznets curve. Rev Econ Stat 84:541–551

    Google Scholar 

  • He Y, Lin B (2019) Investigating environmental Kuznets curve from an energy intensity perspective: empirical evidence from China. J Clean Prod 234:1013–1022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horii R, Ikefuji M (2014) Environment and Growth. MPRA, Munich Paper no 53624

    Google Scholar 

  • Im KS, Pesaran MH, Shin Y (2003) Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. J Econ 115:53–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaika D, Zervas E (2013) The environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) theory - part B: critical issues. Energy Policy 62:1403–1411

    Google Scholar 

  • Kao C (1999) Spurious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data when the cross-section and time series dimensions are comparable. J Econ 90:1–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuznets S (1955) Economic growth and income inequality. Am Econ Rev 45:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee C, Chui Y, Sun C (2010) The environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for water pollution: do regions matter? Energy Policy 38:12–23

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liddle B (2012) The importance of energy quality in energy intensive manufacturing: evidence from panel cointegration and panel FMOLS. Energy Econ 34:1819–1825

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin B, Omoju OE, Nwakeze NM, Okonkwo JU (2016) Is the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis a sound basis for environmental policy in Africa? J Clean Prod 133:712–724

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin S, Wang S, Marinova D, Zhao D, Hong J (2017) Impacts of urbanization and real economic development on CO2 emissions in non-high income countries: empirical research based on the extended STIRPAT model. J Clean Prod 166:952–966

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Zarzoso I (2008) The impact of urbanization on CO2 emissions evidence from developing countries. Nota Di Lavoro 50, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, Milan

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozcan B, Ozturk I (2019) In: Ozcan B, Ozturk I (eds) Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC). Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Pachauri S (2004) An analysis of cross-sectional variations in total household energy requirements in India using micro survey data. Energy Policy 32:1723–1735

    Google Scholar 

  • Pachauri S, Jiang L (2008) The household energy transition in India and China. Energy Policy 36:4022–4035

    Google Scholar 

  • Paudel KP, Zapata H, Susanto D (2005) An empirical test of environmental Kuznets curve for water pollution. Environ Resour Econ 31:325–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedroni P (2004) Panel cointegration: asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Economic Theory 20:597–625

    Google Scholar 

  • Perman R, Stern DI (2003) Evidence from panel unit root and cointegration tests that the environmental Kuznets curve does not exist. Aust J Agric Resour Econ 47:325–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Philips PC, Hansen BE (1990) Statistical inference in instrumental variables regression with I(1) processes. Rev Econ Stud 57:99–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Poumanyvong P, Kaneko S (2010) Does urbanization lead to less energy use and lower CO2 emissions? A cross-country analysis. Ecol Econ:434–444

  • Roy M, Basu S, Pal P (2017) Examining the driving forces in moving toward a low carbon society: an extended STIRPAT analysis for a fast growing vast economy. Clean Techn Environ Policy 19(9):2265–2276

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadorsky P (2014) The effect of urbanisation on CO2 emissions in emerging economies. Energy Econ 41:147–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafik N (1994) Economic development and environmental quality: an econometric analysis. Oxf Econ Pap 46:757–773

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz M, Solarin SA, Sbia R, Bibi S (2015) Does energy intensity contribute to CO2 emissions? A trivariate analysis in selected African countries. Ecol Indic 50:215–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz M, Solarin SA, Hammoudeh S, Shahzad S (2017) Bounds testing approach to analyzing the environment Kuznets curve hypothesis with structural beaks: the role of biomass energy consumption in the United States. Energy Econ:548–565

  • Sinha A, Shahbaz M, Balsalobre D (2019) Chapter 7 - data selection and environmental Kuznets curve models - environmental Kuznets curve models, data choice, data sources, missing data, balanced and unbalanced panels. In: Özcan B, Öztürk I (eds) Environmental Kuznets curve (EKC). Academic, Cambridge, pp 65–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816797-7.00007-2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Song ML, Guo X, Wu KY, Wang GX (2015) Driving effect analysis of energy consumption carbon emissions in the Yangtze River Delta region. J Clean Prod 103:620–628

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern DI (2004) The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve. World Dev 32:1419–1439

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern DI, Common MS (2001) Is there an environmental Kuznets curve for sulphur? J Environ Econ Environ Manag 41:162–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokey N (1998) Are there limits to growth? Int Econ Rev:1–31

  • Thompson A (2014) Environmental Kuznets curve for water pollution: the case of border countries. Mod Econ 5:66–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Tursun H, Li ZY, Liu R, Li Y, Wang XH (2015) Contribution weight of engineering technology on pollutant emission reduction based on IPAT and LMDI methods. Clean Techn Environ Policy 17(1):225–235

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wachernagel M, Rees W (1996) Our ecological footprint: reducing human impact on earth. New Society Problishers, Gabriola The New Catalyst Bioregional Series

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang YN, Zhao T (2015) Impacts of energy-related CO2 emissions: evidence from under developed, developing and highly developed regions in China. Ecol Indic 50:186–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang P, Wu W, Zhu B, Wei Y (2013) Examining the impact factors of energy-related CO2 emissions using the STIRPAT model in Guangdong Province, China. Appl Energy 106:65–71

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Han R, Kubota J (2016) Is there an environmental Kuznets curve for SO2 emissions? A semi-parametric panel data analysis for China. Renew Sust Energ Rev 54:1182–1188

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang C, Wang F, Zhang X, Yang Y, Su Y, Ye Y, Zhang H (2017) Examining the driving factors of energy related carbon emissions using the extended STIRPAT model based on IPAT identity in Xinjiang. Renew Sust Energ Rev 67:51–61

    Google Scholar 

  • You J (2011) China's energy consumption and sustainable development: comparative evidence from GDP and genuine savings. Renew Sust Energ Rev 15:2984–2989

    Google Scholar 

  • Zafar F, Anwar S, Hussain Z, Ahmad N (2013) Impact of trade liberalisation and corruption on environmental degradation in Pakistan. J Financ Econ 1:2984–2989

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economics, Abdullah Gul University, Office A210, Kayseri, Turkey

    Eyup Dogan

  2. Department of Economics, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa

    Roula Inglesi-Lotz

Authors
  1. Eyup Dogan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Roula Inglesi-Lotz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eyup Dogan.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dogan, E., Inglesi-Lotz, R. The impact of economic structure to the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis: evidence from European countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27, 12717–12724 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-07878-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-07878-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation