Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Bees reflect better on their ecosystem health than their products

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Beehives constitute a source of environmental contaminants because forager bees explore their habitat and unintentionally accumulate them while foraging for food. Therefore, this review paper investigated different bee species and products from 55 countries to identify how they can help environmental biomonitoring by giving an overview of the past 11 years. Thereby is presented in this study the beehive’s use as a bioindicator for metals, analytical techniques, data analysis, environmental compartments, common inorganic contaminants, reference thresholds for some metal concentrations in bees and honey, and other factors over more than 100 references. Most authors agree that the honey bee is a suitable bioindicator to assess toxic metal contamination, and among its products, propolis, pollen, and beeswax are more suited than honey. However, in some situations, when comparing bees with their products, bees are more efficient as potential environmental biomonitors. Some factors such as the colony location, floral sources, regional effects, and activities surrounding the apiary influence the bees, and the composition of their products is reflected by alterations in their chemical profile, making them suitable bioindicators.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

Farias, R. A. thanks Capes for the master’s scholarship.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available online in the following repositories: PubMed, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, Google Scholar, Semantic Scholar, CAFe-CAPES, and Taylor & Francis online.

Funding

This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior — Brasil (CAPES) — Finance Code 001.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Draft of the work, literature search, and data analysis by Renata Almeida Farias. Critical revision, analysis, and interpretation of data by Chalder Nogueira Nunes. Critical revision for important intellectual content, had the idea for the article, and approved the version to be published by Sueli Pércio Quináia.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Renata Almeida Farias.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

All authors agreed with the content, all authors gave explicit consent to submit, and we obtained consent from the responsible authorities at the institute/organization where the work was carried out, before the work was submitted.

Consent for publication

All authors gave the publisher the permission to publish the work.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 126 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Farias, R.A., Nunes, C.N. & Quináia, S.P. Bees reflect better on their ecosystem health than their products. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 79617–79626 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-28141-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-28141-4

Keywords

Navigation