Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Learning for sharing: an empirical analysis of organizational learning and knowledge sharing

  • Published:
International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Knowledge is one of the most strategically important resources to sustain competitive advantage in an organization. So its creation and management has attracted the attention of managers and researchers alike. Organizational learning has been positively associated with innovation and performance and knowledge sharing has been associated with innovation performance. Although, some authors argued that organizational learning and knowledge sharing are complementary, there are few studies that have empirically tested the relationship between them. The purpose of this study was to analyze its relation and to empirically test it in the hospitality industry. Based on the results of the structural equation modeling approach on 244 Spanish hotels we confirmed a positive relationship between the variables. The findings are discussed; implications and future lines of research are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Eisa, A. S., Furayyan, M. A., & Alhemoud, A. M. (2009). An empirical examination of the effects of self-efficacy, supervisor support and motivation to learn on transfer intention. Management Decision, 47(8), 1221–1244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baggio, R., & Cooper, C. (2010). Knowledge transfer in a tourism destination: The effects of a network structure. Service Industries Journal, 30(10), 1757–1771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cegarra-Navarro, J. G., & Rodrigo-Moya, B. (2007). Learning culture as a mediator of the influence of an individual’s knowledge on market orientation. Service Industries Journal, 27(5), 653–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cegarra-Navarro, J. G., Cordoba-Pachon, J.-R., & Fernandez de Bobadilla, G. W. (2009). Creating environmental knowledge through ‘green communities’ in the Spanish pharmaceutical industry. Service Industries Journal, 29(12), 1745–1761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cegarra-Navarro, J.-G., Wensley, A. K. P., & Martínez-Conesa, E.-Á. (2010). A multi-sector comparison of relational learning and information and communication technologies adoption. Service Industries Journal, 30(6), 991–1005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlin, T., Doutriaux, J., & Hector, J. (2010). Business success factors and innovation in Canadian service sectors: An initial investigation of inter-sectoral differences. Service Industries Journal, 30(2), 225–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, Y.-W., & Ku, E. (2010). Customer focus, service process fit and customer relationship management profitability: The effect of knowledge sharing. Service Industries Journal, 30(2), 203–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiol, C. M., & Lyles, M. A. (1985). Organizational learning. The Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 803–813.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firestone, J. M., & McElroy, M. W. (2004). Organizational learning and knowledge management: The relationship. The Learning Organization, 11(2), 177–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garvin, D. A. (1993). Building a learning organization. Harvard Business Review, 71(4), 78–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold, A. H., Malhotra, A., & Segars, A. H. (2001). Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 185–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendriks, P. (1999). Why share knowledge? The influence of ICT on the motivation for knowledge sharing. Knowledge and Process Management, 6(2), 91–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hult, G. T. M., & Ferrell, O. C. (1997). Global organizational learning capacity in purchasing: Construct and measurement. Journal of Business Research, 40(2), 97–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ipe, M. (2003). Knowledge sharing in organizations: A conceptual framework. Human Resource Development Review, 2(4), 337–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamasak, R., & Bulutlar, F. (2010). The influence of knowledge sharing on innovation. European Business Review, 22(3), 306–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, T., & Lee, G. (2011). A modified and extended Triandis model for the enablers-process-outcomes relationship in hotel employees’ knowledge sharing. The Service Industries Journal, 1–32.

  • Kuo, R. Z., & Lee, G. G. (2009). KMS adoption: The effects of information quality. Management Decision, 47(10), 1633–1651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S.-C., Liang, H., & Liu, C.-Y. (2010). The effects of absorptive capacity, knowledge sourcing strategy, and alliance forms on firm performance. Service Industries Journal, 30(14), 2421–2440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, H. F. (2007). Knowledge sharing and firm innovation capability: An empirical study. International Journal of Manpower, 28(3/4), 315–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, A., & Tikkanen, H. (2010). Knowledge creation and business format franchising. Management Decision, 48(2), 179–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, I.-Y., Su, T.-H., & Huang, I.-C. (2010). Consulting knowledge and organisation’s absorptive capacity: A communication chain perspective. Service Industries Journal, 30(12), 2007–2022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, M. T., Vaughan, D. R., & Edwards, J. (2010). Knowledge networks in the tourism sector of the Bournemouth, Poole, and Christchurch conurbation: Preliminary analysis. Service Industries Journal, 30(10), 1651–1667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehrizi, M. H. R., & Bontis, N. (2009). A cluster analysis of the KM field. Management Decision, 47(5), 792–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palacios-Marques, D., & Garrigos-Simon, F. J. (2005). A measurement scale for knowledge management in the biotechnology and telecommunications industries. International Journal of Technology Management, 31(3/4), 358–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shang, K.-C. (2009). Integration and organisational learning capabilities in third-party logistics providers. Service Industries Journal, 29(3), 331–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shieh, C.-J. (2011). Study on the relations among the customer knowledge management, learning organization, and organizational performance. Service Industries Journal, 31(5), 791–807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spender, J.-C. (2008). Organizational learning and knowledge management: Whence and whither? Management Learning, 39(2), 159–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Hooff, B., & Van Weenen, F. (2004). Committed to share: Commitment and CMC use as antecedents of knowledge sharing. Knowledge and Process Management, 11(1), 13–24. doi:10.1002/kpm.187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, J.-T. (2007). The impact of knowledge sharing on organizational learning and effectiveness. Journal of Knowledge Management, 11(2), 83–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, J.-T. (2009). Individual attitudes to learning and sharing individual and organisational knowledge in the hospitality industry. Service Industries Journal, 29(12), 1723–1743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, B., Watkins, K. E., & Marsick, V. J. (2004). The construct of the learning organization: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 15(1), 31–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeung, A. C. L., Lai, K.-H., & Yee, R. W. Y. (2007). Organizational learning, innovativeness, and organizational performance: A qualitative investigation. International Journal of Production Research, 45(11), 2459–2477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yi, J. (2009). A measure of knowledge sharing behavior: Scale development and validation. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 7(1), 65–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leonardo Iebra Aizpurúa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Iebra Aizpurúa, L., Zegarra Saldaña, P.E. & Zegarra Saldaña, A. Learning for sharing: an empirical analysis of organizational learning and knowledge sharing. Int Entrep Manag J 7, 509–518 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-011-0206-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-011-0206-z

Keywords

Navigation