Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Fast life cycle assessment of synthetic chemistry (FLASC™) tool

  • Life Cycle Management (Subject Editor: Gerald Rebitzer)
  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background, Aim and Scope

There is a clear need for simple methodology to deliver metrics that may be used to determine and benchmark the ‘greenness’ or relative sustainability of synthetic processes for Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs). Such methodology and metrics should facilitate more informed and sustainable business choices. This capability is particularly important at an early stage in R&D development activities when route and processes are being selected and detailed environmental data are not available. FLASC™ (Fast Life cycle Assessment of Synthetic Chemistry) is a web-based tool and methodology designed to meet these requirements.

Materials and Methods

FLASC™ was developed from a detailed assessment of the cradle-to-gate life cycle environmental impacts associated with the manufacture of materials used in a typical pharmaceutical process.

Results

This paper describes the methodology used to develop FLASC™ and provides examples of the type of information and guidance FLASC™ provides.

Discussion

Both Hierarchical Cluster Analysis (HCA) and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) were used for the statistical analysis during the development of FLASC™. Benchmarking within the pharmaceutical industry and use of normalization for molecular complexity were also integrated to the tool.

Conclusions

FLASC™ represents an important part of the overall efforts of GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) to incorporate and maintain sustainable business practices for manufacture of APIs used in its pharmaceutical products.

Recommendations and Perspectives

This tool is not intended to assess waste from GSK operations nor solvent recovery and currently does not incorporate specific chemical-related health and safety data. However, these are already routinely assessed within GSK R&D at appropriate milestones and the use of FLASC™ is complementary to these evaluations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Curzons A, Constable D, Mortimer D, Cunningham V (2001): So you think your process is green, how do you know? Using Principles of Sustainability to determine what is green — A corporate perspective. Green Chemistry 3, 1–6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Constable D, Curzons A, Cunningham V (2002): Metrics to ‘green’ chemistry — Which are the best? Green Chemistry 4, 521–527

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Jiménez-González C, Curzons A, Constable D, Cunningham V (2004): Cradle-to-Gate Life Cycle Inventory and Assessment of Pharmaceutical Compounds: a Case-Study. Int J LCA 9(2) 114–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jiménez-Gonzálcz C, Kim S, Overcash M (2000): Methodology of developing gate-to-gate life cycle analysis information. Int J LCA 5(3) 153–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jiménez-González C (2000): Life cycle assessment in pharmaceutical applications. Ph.D. Thesis, North Carolina State University, 257pp

  6. US Department of Transportation, 1997 Economic Census. Transportation. 1997 Commodity Flow Survey (1999): US Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration. US Census Bureau. US Department of Transportation. Bureau of Transportation Statistics. EC97TFC-US

  7. Pirouette, Infometrix, Inc., P.O. Box 1528, Woodinville, WA 〈http://www.infometrix.com

  8. Malinowski E (1991): Factor analysis in chemistry. Second Edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. Massart D, Vandeginste B, Deming S, Michotte Y, Kaufman L (1988): Chemometrics: A textbook. Elsevier, New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. Breen J, Robinson P (eds) (1985): Environmental applications of chemometrics. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  11. Curran M (1996): Environmental life cycle assessment. McGraw Hill, New York, NY, USA

    Google Scholar 

  12. SETAC (1993): A conceptual framework for life cycle impact assessment. SETAC foundation for environmental education inc., Pensacola, FL, USA, 105pp

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jiménez-González C, Curzons A, Constable D, Cunningham V (2005): Expanding GSK’s solvent selection guide — Application of life cycle assessment to enhance solvent selections. Clean Technology and Environmental Policy 7(1) 42–50

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. International Organization of Standardization (1997): ISO 14040 — Environmental management — Life cycle assessment — Principles and framework. ISO 14040:1997(E), Geneva, Switzerland, Switzerland, 12 pp

    Google Scholar 

  15. International Organization of Standardization (2000): ISO 14042 — Environmental management — Life cycle assessment — Life cycle impact assessment. ISO 14042:2000(E), Geneva, Switzerland, 16 pp

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Concepción Jiménez-González.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Curzons, A.D., Jiménez-González, C., Duncan, A.L. et al. Fast life cycle assessment of synthetic chemistry (FLASC™) tool. Int J Life Cycle Assess 12, 272–280 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2007.03.315

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2007.03.315

Keywords

Navigation