Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

SETAC Europe LCA Steering Committee — The early years

  • Editorials
  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Accompanying Literature in Int J LCA

  • Braam J, Tanner TM, Askham C, Hendriks N, Maurice B, Malkki H, Vold M, Wessman H, de Beaufort ASH (2001): Energy, transport and waste models availability and quality of energy, transport and waste models and data. Int J LCA 6, 135–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Canals LMI, Clift R, Basson L, Hansen Y, Brandao M (2006): Expert workshop on land use impacts in life cycle assessment (LCA). Int J LCA 11, 363–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Canals LMI, Bauer C, Depestele J, Dubreuil A, Knuchel RF, Gaillard G, Michelsen O, Muller-Wenk R, Rydgren B (2007): Key elements in a framework for land use impact assessment within LCA. Int J LCA 12, 5–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Curran MA (2006): Report on activity of task force 1 in the life cycle inventory programme: Data registry — Global life cycle inventory data resources. Int J LCA 11, 284–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Larderel JA, Fava J (2003): Int J LCA — Associated journal of the UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative. Int J LCA 8, 117–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekvall T, Weidema BP P (2004): System boundaries and input data in consequential life cycle inventory analysis. Int J LCA 9, 161–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Fava JA (2002): Life cycle initiative: A joint UNEP/SETAC partnership to advance the life-cycle economy. Int J LCA 7, 196–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Gloria TP, Russel AJ, Atherton J, Baker SR, Cook M (2006): Ecological toxicity methods and metals — An examination of two case studies. Int J LCA 11, 26–33

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hischier R, Baitz M, Bretz R, Frischknecht R, Jungbluth N, Marheineke T, McKeown P, Oele M, Osset P, Renner I, Skone T, Wessman H, de Beaufort ASH (2001): Guidelines for consistent reporting of exchanges from/to nature within life cycle inventories (LCI). Int J LCA 6, 192–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Huijbregts MAJ, Norris G, Bretz R, Ciroth A, Maurice B, von Bahr B, Weidema BP, de Beaufort ASH (2001): Framework for modelling data uncertainty in life cycle inventories. Int J LCA 6, 127–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolliet O, Muller-Wenk R, Bare J, Brent A, Goedkoop M, Heijungs R, Itsubo N, Pena C, Pennington D, Potting J, Rebitzer G, Stewart M, de Haes HU, Weidema BP (2004): The LCIA midpoint-damage framework of the UNEP/SETAC life cycle initiative. Int J LCA 9, 394–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolliet O, Dubreuil A, Gloria T, Hauschild M (2005): Progresses in Life Cycle Impact Assessment within the UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative. Int J LCA 10, 447–448

    Google Scholar 

  • Klöpffer W (2005): The critical review process according to ISO 14040-43 — An analysis of the standards and experiences gained in their application. Int J LCA 10, 98–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klöpffer W (2006): The role of SETAC in the development of LCA. Int J LCA 11, 116–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Rebitzer G, Fullana P, Jolliet O, Klöpffer W (2001): An update on the liaison of the two LCA-Planets: 11th SETAC Europe Annual Meeting, 6–10 May 2001 in Madrid, Spain. Int J LCA 6, 187–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt WP, Butt F (2006): Life cycle tools within Ford of Europe’s Product Sustainability Index — Case study Ford S-MAX & Ford Galaxy. Int J LCA 11, 315–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonnemann G (2003): Corner: UNEP/SETAC life cycle initiative — Looking ahead to 2003. Int J LCA 8, 48–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonnemann G (2004): Crosscutting issues to be explored by the UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative in 2004. Int J LCA 9, 67–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart M, Jolliet O (2004): User needs analysis and development of priorities for life cycle impact assessment. Int J LCA 9, 153–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Toffoletto L, Bulle C, Godin J, Reid C, Deschenes L (2007): LUCAS — A new LCIA method used for a Canadian-specific context. Int J LCA 12, 93–102

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Töpfer K (2002): Editorial for int J LCA on the launch of the UNEPSETAC life cycle initiative. Int J LCA 7, 191–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Hoof G, de Beaufort A, Hochfeld C, James K (2001): Driving forces for data exchange. Int J LCA 6, 133–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Weidema BP (2006): The integration of economic and social aspects in life cycle impact assessment. Int J LCA 11, 89–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Udo de Haes HA, Jolliet O, Norris G, Saur K (2002): UNEP/SETAC life cycle initiative: Background, aims and scope. Int J LCA 7, 192–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Udo de Haes HA (2003): The UNEP/SETAC life cycle initiative — A personal view of the results after one year. Int J LCA 8, 307–309

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. FORCE Technology, Brøndby, Park Allé 345, 2605, Brøndby, Denmark

    Allan Astrup Jensen

  2. Mulberry House, LCA Consultant, Conwy Road, Tal-y-Bont, Conwy, LL32 8SF, Waltes, UK

    Dennis Postlethwaite

Authors
  1. Allan Astrup Jensen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dennis Postlethwaite
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Allan Astrup Jensen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jensen, A.A., Postlethwaite, D. SETAC Europe LCA Steering Committee — The early years. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13, 1–6 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2007.12.371

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2007.12.371

Search

Navigation