Skip to main content
Erschienen in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 5/2008

01.08.2008 | CASE STUDY

Life cycle assessment of commercial furniture: a case study of Formway LIFE chair

verfasst von: Gayathri Babarenda Gamage, Carol Boyle, Sarah J. McLaren, Jake McLaren

Erschienen in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment | Ausgabe 5/2008

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Background, aims and scope

The environmental aspects of companies and their products are becoming more significant in delivering competitive advantage. Formway Furniture, a designer and manufacturer of office furniture products, is a New Zealand-based company that is committed to sustainable development. It manufactures two models of the light, intuitive, flexible and environmental (LIFE) office chair: one with an aluminium base and one with a glass-filled nylon (GFN) base. It was decided to undertake a life cycle assessment (LCA) study of these two models in order to: (1) determine environmental hotspots in the life cycle of the two chairs (goal 1); (2) compare the life cycle impacts of the two chairs (goal 2); and (3) compare alternative potential waste-management scenarios (goal 3). The study also included sensitivity analysis with respect to recycled content of aluminium in the product.

Materials and methods

The LIFE chair models consist of a mix of metal and plastic components manufactured by selected Formway suppliers according to design criteria. Hence, the research methodology included determining the specific material composition of the two chair models and acquisition of manufacturing data from individual suppliers. These data were compiled and used in conjunction with pre-existing data, specifically from the ecoinvent database purchased in conjunction with the SimaPro7 LCA software, to develop the life cycle inventory of the two chair models. The life cycle stages included in the study extended from raw-material extraction through to waste management. Impact assessment was carried out using CML 2 baseline 2000, the methodology developed by Leiden University’s Institute for Environmental Sciences.

Results

This paper presents results for global warming potential (GWP100). The study showed a significant impact contribution from the raw-material extraction/refinement stage for both chair models; aluminium extraction and refining made the greatest contribution to GWP100. The comparison of the two LIFE chair models showed that the model with the aluminium base had a higher GWP100 impact than the model with the GFN base. The waste-management scenario compared the GWP100 result when (1) both chair models were sent to landfill and (2) steel and aluminium components were recycled with the remainder of the chair sent to landfill. The results showed that the recycling scenario contributed to a reduced GWP100 result. Since production and processing of aluminium was found to be significant, a sensitivity analysis was carried out to determine the impact of using aluminium with different recycled contents (0%, 34% and 100%) in both waste-management scenarios; this showed that increased use of recycled aluminium was beneficial. The recycling at end-of-life scenarios was modelled using two different end-of-life allocation approaches, i.e. consequential and attributional, in order to illustrate the variation in results caused by choice of allocation approach. The results using the consequential approach showed that recycling at end-of-life was beneficial, while use of the attributional method led to a similar GWP100 as that seen for the landfill scenario.

Discussion

The results show that the main hotspot in the life cycle is the raw-material extraction/refinement stage. This can be attributed to the extraction and processing of aluminium, a material that is energy intensive. The LIFE chair model with the aluminium base has a higher GWP100 as it contains more aluminium. Sensitivity analysis pertaining to the recycled content of aluminium showed that use of aluminium with high recycled content was beneficial; this is because production of recycled aluminium is less energy intensive than production of primary aluminium. The waste-management scenario showed that recycling at end-of-life resulted in a significantly lower GWP100 than landfilling at end-of-life. However, this result is dependent upon the modelling approach used for recycling.

Conclusions

With respect to goal 1, the study found that the raw-material extraction/refinement stage of the life cycle was a significant factor for both LIFE chair models. This was largely due to the use of aluminium in the product. For goal 2, it was found that the LIFE chair model with the aluminium base had a higher GWP100 than the GFN model, again due to the material content of the two models. Results for goal 3 illustrated that recycling at end-of-life is beneficial when using a system expansion (consequential) approach to model recycling; if an attributional ‘cut-off’ approach is used to model recycling at end-of-life, there is virtually no difference in the results between landfilling and recycling. Sensitivity analysis pertaining to the recycled content of aluminium showed that use of higher recycled contents leads to a lower GWP100 impact.

Recommendation and perspectives

Most of the GWP100 impact was contributed during the raw-material extraction/refinement stage of the life cycle; thus, the overall impact of both LIFE chair models may be reduced through engaging in material choice and supply chain environmental management with respect to environmental requirements. The study identified aluminium components as a major contributor to GWP100 for both LIFE chair models and also highlighted the sensitivity of the results to its recycled content. Thus, it is recommended that the use of aluminium in future product designs be limited unless it is possible to use aluminium with a high recycled content. With respect to waste management, it was found that a substantial reduction in the GWP100 impact would occur if the chairs are recycled rather than landfilled, assuming an expanding market for aluminium. Thus, recycling the two LIFE chair models at end-of-life is highly recommended.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Babarenda Gamage G, Boyle C (2006) Developing the use of environmental impact assessment in commercial organisations: a case study of Formway furniture. Proceedings of the 13th CIRP International Conference on Life Cycle Engineering, Leuven, 31 May 31–2 June 2006, http://www.mech.kuleuven.be/lce2006/072.pdf Babarenda Gamage G, Boyle C (2006) Developing the use of environmental impact assessment in commercial organisations: a case study of Formway furniture. Proceedings of the 13th CIRP International Conference on Life Cycle Engineering, Leuven, 31 May 31–2 June 2006, http://​www.​mech.​kuleuven.​be/​lce2006/​072.​pdf
Zurück zum Zitat Baumann H, Tillman A (2004) The hitch hiker’s guide to LCA: an orientation in life cycle assessment methodology and application. Studentlitteratur, Lund, Switzerland Baumann H, Tillman A (2004) The hitch hiker’s guide to LCA: an orientation in life cycle assessment methodology and application. Studentlitteratur, Lund, Switzerland
Zurück zum Zitat Ekvall T, Finnveden G (2000) The application of life cycle assessment to integrated solid waste management. Trans Instit Chem Eng, Part B 78:288–294 Ekvall T, Finnveden G (2000) The application of life cycle assessment to integrated solid waste management. Trans Instit Chem Eng, Part B 78:288–294
Zurück zum Zitat Ekvall T, Weidema BP (2004) System boundaries and input data in consequential life cycle inventory analysis. Int J LCA 9(3):161–171 Ekvall T, Weidema BP (2004) System boundaries and input data in consequential life cycle inventory analysis. Int J LCA 9(3):161–171
Zurück zum Zitat Fet A, Skaar C (2006) Eco-labeling, product category rules and certification procedures based on ISO 14025 requirements. Int J LCA 11(1):49–54CrossRef Fet A, Skaar C (2006) Eco-labeling, product category rules and certification procedures based on ISO 14025 requirements. Int J LCA 11(1):49–54CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Frischknecht R, Jungbluth N, Althaus H, Doka G, Dones R, Heck T, Hellweg S, Hischier R, Nemecek T, Rebitzer G, Spielmann M (2005) The ecoinvent database: overview and methodological framework. Int J LCA 10(1):3–9 Frischknecht R, Jungbluth N, Althaus H, Doka G, Dones R, Heck T, Hellweg S, Hischier R, Nemecek T, Rebitzer G, Spielmann M (2005) The ecoinvent database: overview and methodological framework. Int J LCA 10(1):3–9
Zurück zum Zitat Guinée JB, Gorree R, Heijungs G, Huppes R, Kleijn R, Udo de Haes HA (2000) Environmental life cycle assessment: backgrounds. Centre of Environmental Science (CML). Leiden University, The Netherlands Guinée JB, Gorree R, Heijungs G, Huppes R, Kleijn R, Udo de Haes HA (2000) Environmental life cycle assessment: backgrounds. Centre of Environmental Science (CML). Leiden University, The Netherlands
Zurück zum Zitat Guinée J, Gorree M, Heijungs R, Huppes G, Kleijn R, Udo de Haes HA, Van der Voet E, Wrisberg M (2002) Life cycle assessment. An operational guide to ISO standards, vols 1, 2, 3. Centre of Environmental Science (CML). Leiden University, The Netherlands Guinée J, Gorree M, Heijungs R, Huppes G, Kleijn R, Udo de Haes HA, Van der Voet E, Wrisberg M (2002) Life cycle assessment. An operational guide to ISO standards, vols 1, 2, 3. Centre of Environmental Science (CML). Leiden University, The Netherlands
Zurück zum Zitat Heijungs R, Guinée JB (2007) Allocation and ‘what-if’ scenarios in life cycle assessment of waste management systems. Waste Manag 27(8):997–1005CrossRef Heijungs R, Guinée JB (2007) Allocation and ‘what-if’ scenarios in life cycle assessment of waste management systems. Waste Manag 27(8):997–1005CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ISO (1997) ISO 14040 Environmental management, life cycle assessment, principles and framework. International Standards Organization, Geneva, Switzerland ISO (1997) ISO 14040 Environmental management, life cycle assessment, principles and framework. International Standards Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
Zurück zum Zitat ISO (1999) ISO 14041: Environmental management—life cycle assessment—goal and scope definition and inventory analysis. International Standards Organization, Geneva, Switzerland ISO (1999) ISO 14041: Environmental management—life cycle assessment—goal and scope definition and inventory analysis. International Standards Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
Zurück zum Zitat ISO (2004) ISO 14001 Environmental management systems—specifications with guidance for use. International Standards Organization, Geneva, Switzerland ISO (2004) ISO 14001 Environmental management systems—specifications with guidance for use. International Standards Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
Zurück zum Zitat ISO (2006) ISO 14044: Environmental management—life cycle assessment—requirements and guidelines. International Standards Organization, Geneva, Switzerland ISO (2006) ISO 14044: Environmental management—life cycle assessment—requirements and guidelines. International Standards Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
Zurück zum Zitat Klöpffer W (1996) Allocation rules for open-loop recycling in life cycle assessment—a review. Int J LCA 1(1):27–31 Klöpffer W (1996) Allocation rules for open-loop recycling in life cycle assessment—a review. Int J LCA 1(1):27–31
Zurück zum Zitat Lewis L, Gertsakis J, Grant T, Morelli N, Sweatman A (2001) Design + environment: A global guide to designing greener goods. Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield, UK Lewis L, Gertsakis J, Grant T, Morelli N, Sweatman A (2001) Design + environment: A global guide to designing greener goods. Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield, UK
Zurück zum Zitat PRé Consultants (2006) SimaPro v. 7.0. Amersfoort, The Netherlands PRé Consultants (2006) SimaPro v. 7.0. Amersfoort, The Netherlands
Zurück zum Zitat Rossi M, Charon S, Wing G, Ewell J (2006) Design for the next generation: incorporating cradle-to-cradle design into Herman Miller Products. J Indust Ecol 10(4):193–210CrossRef Rossi M, Charon S, Wing G, Ewell J (2006) Design for the next generation: incorporating cradle-to-cradle design into Herman Miller Products. J Indust Ecol 10(4):193–210CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat SETAC (1993) Guidelines for life-cycle assessment: A ‘Code of Practice’. From the SETAC workshop held at Sesimbra, Portugal, 30 March–April 1993, Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, USA SETAC (1993) Guidelines for life-cycle assessment: A ‘Code of Practice’. From the SETAC workshop held at Sesimbra, Portugal, 30 March–April 1993, Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, USA
Zurück zum Zitat Steelcase (2004) Think: environmental product declaration: a presentation of quantified environmental life cycle product information for the Think work chair in North America, Steelcase Inc Steelcase (2004) Think: environmental product declaration: a presentation of quantified environmental life cycle product information for the Think work chair in North America, Steelcase Inc
Zurück zum Zitat Todd J, Curran M (1999) Streamlined life-cycle assessment: a final report from the SETAC North America Streamlined LCA Workgroup. Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry and SETAC Foundation for Environmental Education Todd J, Curran M (1999) Streamlined life-cycle assessment: a final report from the SETAC North America Streamlined LCA Workgroup. Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry and SETAC Foundation for Environmental Education
Zurück zum Zitat Udo de Haes HA, Jolliet O, Finnveden G, Hauschild M, Krewitt W, Müller-Wenk R (1999a) Best available practice regarding impact categories and category indicators in life cycle impact assessment, Part 1. Int J LCA 4(2):66–74 Udo de Haes HA, Jolliet O, Finnveden G, Hauschild M, Krewitt W, Müller-Wenk R (1999a) Best available practice regarding impact categories and category indicators in life cycle impact assessment, Part 1. Int J LCA 4(2):66–74
Zurück zum Zitat Udo de Haes HA, Jolliet O, Finnveden G, Hauschild M, Krewitt W, Müller-Wenk R (1999b) Best available practice regarding impact categories and category indicators in life cycle impact assessment, Part 2. Int J LCA 4(3):167–174 Udo de Haes HA, Jolliet O, Finnveden G, Hauschild M, Krewitt W, Müller-Wenk R (1999b) Best available practice regarding impact categories and category indicators in life cycle impact assessment, Part 2. Int J LCA 4(3):167–174
Zurück zum Zitat Weidema B (2001) Avoiding co-product allocation in life-cycle assessment. J Indust Ecol 4(3):11–33CrossRef Weidema B (2001) Avoiding co-product allocation in life-cycle assessment. J Indust Ecol 4(3):11–33CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Life cycle assessment of commercial furniture: a case study of Formway LIFE chair
verfasst von
Gayathri Babarenda Gamage
Carol Boyle
Sarah J. McLaren
Jake McLaren
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2008
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment / Ausgabe 5/2008
Print ISSN: 0948-3349
Elektronische ISSN: 1614-7502
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-008-0002-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2008

The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 5/2008 Zur Ausgabe