nach oben

The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment

Erschienen in:

01.03.2013 | LAND USE IN LCA

Life-cycle climate impacts of peat fuel: calculation methods and methodological challenges

verfasst von: Juha Grönroos, Jyri Seppälä, Sirkka Koskela, Antti Kilpeläinen, Pekka Leskinen, Anne Holma, Juha-Pekka Tuovinen, Jukka Turunen, Saara Lind, Marja Maljanen, Pertti J. Martikainen

Erschienen in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment | Ausgabe 3/2013

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Purpose

There has been lively debate, especially in Finland and Sweden, on the climate impacts of peat fuel. Previous studies of peat fuel's life-cycle climate impacts were controversial in their interpretation. The aim of this paper is conclusive examination of the issues of LCA methodology, derived from critical review of previous studies and recalculation based on the latest knowledge of greenhouse gas balances related to peat fuel’s utilisation and the radiative forcing impacts of greenhouse gases.

Methods

The most recent findings on emissions and the gas fluxes between soil, vegetation and atmosphere were used in calculation of the life-cycle climate impacts of the various peat fuel utilisation chains by means of LCA methodology. In the main, the calculation methods and rules were the same as in the previous studies, with the aim being to distinguish the impact of peat fuel’s utilisation from that of the natural or semi-natural situation. A dynamic method was employed for assessing changes in radiative forcing. The results of alternative peat fuel utilisation chains were compared to the corresponding result for coal.

Results

There are many steps in peat fuel LCA, where different assumptions lead to different outcomes. Determining the functional unit, reference situations and system boundaries, as well as the emission calculation methods, is important from this point of view. Determination of the initial reference situation emerged as one of the critical points in the calculations. Time scale can strongly affect the final outcomes in a study where effects of long-term land-use change are considered.

Conclusions

Each peatland area is unique. The higher the greenhouse gas emissions in the initial reference situation, the greater is the climate impact of the area and the more suitable the area is for peat extraction. The study showed that more greenhouse gas flux measurements are needed, for better assessment of the climate impacts of different potential peat extraction sites. Climate change mitigation requires quick actions, and uncertainties related to emissions are higher for longer time spans. Therefore, it can be concluded that a perspective spanning more than 100 years is inappropriate in peat fuel's life-cycle climate impact assessments.

Vorheriger Artikel Life cycle assessment of desktop PCs in Macau

Nächster Artikel System delimitation in life cycle assessment (LCA) of aquaculture: striving for valid and comprehensive environmental assessment using rainbow trout farming as a case study

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Alm J, Shurpali NJ, Minkkinen K, Aro L, Hytönen J, Laurila T, Lohila A, Maljanen M, Martikainen PJ, Mäkiranta P, Penttilä T, Saarnio S, Silvan N, Tuittila E-S, Laine J (2007) Emission factors and their uncertainty for the exchange of CO₂, CH₄ and N₂O in Finnish managed peatlands. Boreal Env Res 12:191–209

Aurela M, Laurila T, Tuovinen J-P (2004) The timing of snow melt controls the annual CO₂ balance in a subarctic fen. Geophys Res Lett 31:L16119CrossRef

Aurela M, Riutta T, Laurila T, Tuovinen J-P, Vesala T, Tuittila E, Rinne J, Haapanala S, Laine J (2007) CO₂ exchange of a sedge fen in southern Finland—the impact of a drought period. Tellus 59B:826–837

Aurela M, Lohila A, Tuovinen J-P, Hatakka J, Riutta T, Laurila T (2009) Carbon dioxide exchange on a northern boreal fen. Boreal Env Res 14:699–710

Hagberg L, Holmgren K (2008) The climate impact of future energy peat production. IVL report B-1796. Stockholm

Hillebrand K (1993) The greenhouse effects of peat production and use compared with coal, oil, natural gas and wood. VTT Tiedotteita (‘Research Notes’) 1494, Espoo

Holmgren K, Kirkinen J, Savolainen I (2006) The climate impact of energy peat utilisation – comparison and sensitivity analysis of Finnish and Swedish results. Swedish Environmental Research Institute (IVL). IVL report B-1681. Stockholm. 48 p. + appendices

IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2006) In: Eggleston S, Buendia L, Miwa K, Ngara T, Tanabe K (eds) 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories, prepared by the national greenhouse gas inventories programme. IGES, Japan

ISO (International Organization for Standaardization) (2006a) ISO 14040. Environmental management—life cycle assessment—principles and framework. Geneva

ISO (International Organization for Standaardization) (2006b) ISO 14044. Environmental management—life cycle assessment—requirements and guidelines. Geneva

Kilpeläinen A, Alam A, Strandman H, Kellomäki S (2011) Life cycle assessment tool for estimating net CO₂ exchange of forest production. GCB Bioenergy 3:461–471CrossRef

Kirkinen J, Minkkinen K, Penttilä T, Kojola S, Sievänen R, Alm J, Saarnio S, Silvan N, Laine J, Savolainen I (2007) Greenhouse impact due to different peat utilization chains in Finland—a life-cycle approach. Boreal Env Res 12:211–223

Kirkinen J, Palosuo T, Holmberg K, Savolainen I (2008) Greenhouse impact due to the use of combustible fuels: Life cycle viewpoint and relative radiative forcing commitment. Env Manag 42:458–469CrossRef

Korhonen R, Savolainen I, Sinisalo J (1993) Assessing the impact of CO₂ emission control scenarios on radiative forcing and greenhouse effect. Env Manag 17:797–805CrossRef

Leskinen P, Miina J, Mehtätalo L, Kangas A (2009) Model correlation in stochastic forest simulators—a case of a multilevel multivariate model for seedling establishment. Ecol Model 220:545–555CrossRef

Lloyd SM, Ries R (2007) Characterizing, propagating, and analyzing uncertainty in life-cycle assessment. J Ind Ecol 11:161–180CrossRef

Lohila A, Aurela M, Tuovinen J-P, Laurila T (2004) Annual CO₂ exchange of a peat field growing spring barley or perennial forage. J Geophys Res 109:D18116CrossRef

Lohila A, Minkkinen K, Laine J, Savolainen I, Tuovinen J-P, Korhonen L, Laurila T, Tietäväinen H, Laaksonen A (2010) Forestation of boreal peatlands: Impacts of changing albedo and greenhouse gas fluxes on radiative forcing. J Geophys Res 115:G04011CrossRef

Mäkiranta P, Hytönen J, Aro L, Maljanen M, Pihlatie M, Potila H, Shurpali NJ, Laine J, Lohila A, Martikainen PJ, Minkkinen K (2007) Soil greenhouse gas emissions from afforested organic soil croplands and peat extraction peatlands. Boreal Env Res 12:159–175

Maljanen M, Hytönen J, Mäkiranta P, Alm J, Minkkinen K, Laine J, Martikainen PJ (2007) Greenhouse gas emissions from cultivated and abandoned organic croplands in Finland. Boreal Env Res 12:133–140

Maljanen M, Hytönen J, Martikainen PJ (2009) Cold-season nitrous oxide dynamics in a drained boreal peatland differ depending on land-use practice. Can J Forest Res 40(3):565–572CrossRef

Mattila T, Leskinen P, Soimakallio S, Sironen S (2012) Uncertainty in environmentally conscious decision making: beer or wine. The Int J Life Cycle Assess 17(6):696–705CrossRef

Meinshausen M, Meinshausen N, Hare W, Raper SCB, Frieler K, Knutti R, Frame DC, Allen MR (2009) Greenhouse-gas emission targets for limiting global warming to 2 °C. Nature 458:1158–1163CrossRef

Minkkinen K, Laine J (2006) Vegetation heterogeneity and ditches create spatial variability in methane fluxes from peatland drained for forestry. Plant Soil 285:289–304CrossRef

Minkkinen K, Laine J, Nykänen H, Martikainen PJ (1997) Importance of drainage ditches in emissions of methane from mires drained for forestry. Can J Forest Res 27:949–952CrossRef

Minkkinen K, Laine J, Shurpali NJ, Mäkiranta P, Alm J, Penttilä T (2007a) Heterotrophic soil respiration in forestry-drained peatlands. Boreal Environ Res 12:115–126

Minkkinen K, Penttilä T, Laine J (2007b) Tree stand volume as a scalar for methane fluxes in forestry-drained peatlands in Finland. Boreal Environ Res 12:127–132

Monni S, Korhonen R, Savolainen I (2003) Radiative forcing due to anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions from Finland: methods for estimating forcing of a country or an activity. Env Manag 31:401–411CrossRef

Nilsson K, Nilsson M (2004) The climate impact of energy peat utilisation in Sweden—the effect of former land-use and after-treatment. IVL report B-1606, p 91

Nykänen H, Silvola J, Alm J, Martikainen PJ (1996) Fluxes of greenhouse gases CH₄, CO₂ and N₂O on some peat mining areas in Finland. In: Laiho R, Laine J, Vasander H (eds) Northern Peatlands in Global Climate Change. Proceedings of the international workshop held in Hyytiälä, Finland, on 8–12 October 1995, Publications of the Academy of Finland, Helsinki 1/96, pp 141–147

Paappanen T, Leinonen A, Hillebrand K (2006) Fuel peat industry in EU, Research Report VTT-R-00545-06. p 20

Repo A, Tuomi M, Liski J (2010) Indirect carbon dioxide emissions from producing bioenergy from forest harvest residues. GCB Bioenergy 3:107–115CrossRef

Repo A, Känkänen R, Tuovinen J-P, Antikainen R, Tuomi M, Vanhala P, Liski J (2011) Forest bioenergy climate impact can be improved by allocating forest residue removal. GCB Bioenergy 4(2):202–212CrossRef

Rogelj J, Hare W, Lowe J, van Vuuren DP, Riahi K, Matthews B, Hanaoka T, Jiang K, Meinshausen M (2011) Emission pathways consistent with a 2 °C global temperature limit. Nat Clim Change 1:413–418CrossRef

Saarnio S, Morero M, Shurpali NJ, Tuittila E-S, Mäkilä M, Alm J (2007) Annual CO₂ and CH₄ fluxes of pristine boreal mires as a background for the lifecycle analyses of peat energy. Boreal Env Res 12:101–113

Savolainen I, Hillebrand K, Nousiainen I, Sinisalo J (1994) Comparison of radiative forcing impacts of the use of wood, peat and fossil fuels. World Resour Rev 6:248–262

Seppälä J, Koskela S, Siret T, Põld P, Sokka L, Hiltunen M-R, Karvosenoja N, Tohka A, Kulczycka J, Lehtla R (2005) Comparison of the environmental performances of oil shale and coal electricity. LCM2005, International Conference, September 5–7, Barcelona, Volume 2

Seppälä J, Grönroos J, Koskela S, Holma A, Leskinen P, Liski J, Tuovinen J-P, Laurila T, Turunen J, Lind S, Maljanen M, Martikainen PJ, Kilpeläinen A (2010) Climate impacts of peat fuel utilization chains—a critical review of the Finnish and Swedish life cycle assessments. Finnish Environment 16/2010. The Finnish Environment 16/2010, Environmental Protection, p 122

Shurpali NJ, Hyvönen NP, Huttunen JT, Biasi C, Nykänen H, Pekkarinen N, Martikainen PJ (2008) Bare soil and reed canary grass ecosystem respiration in peat extraction site in Eastern Finland. Tellus 60B:200–209

Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Alley RB, Berntsen T, Bindoff NL, Chen Z, Chidthaisong A, Gregory JM, Hegerl GC, Heimann M, Hewitson B, Hoskins BJ, Joos F, Jouzel J, Kattsov V, Lohmann U, Matsuno T, Molina M, Nicholls N, Overpeck J, Raga G, Ramaswamy V, Ren J, Rusticucci M, Somerville R, Stocker TF, Whetton P, Wood RA, Wratt D (2007) Technical summary. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Avery KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Statistics Finland (2005) Greenhouse gas emissions in Finland 1990–2003. National inventory report to the UNFCCC. 27 May 2005. Statistics Finland, Helsinki

Statistics Finland (2010) Greenhouse gas emissions in Finland 1990–2008. National Inventory Report to the UNFCCC.25 May 2010. Statistics Finland, Helsinki

Sundh I, Nilsson M, Mikkelä C, Granberg G, Svensson BH (2000) Fluxes of methane and carbon dioxide on peat-mining areas in Sweden. Ambio 29:499–503

Tuomi M, Thum T, Järvinen H, Fronzek S, Berg B, Harmon M, Trofymow JA, Sevanto S, Liski J (2009) Leaf litter decomposition—estimates of global variability based on Yasso07 model. Ecol Model 220(23):3362–3371CrossRef

Uppenberg S, Zettenberg L, Åhman M (2001) Climate impact from peat utilisation in Sweden. IVL report B-1423. Stockholm

Vesterinen R (2003) Estimation of CO₂ emission factors for peat combustion on the basis of analyses of peat delivered to power plants. Jyväskylä, Finland: VTT Processes, Energy Production, Research Report. 25 p + appendices (5 p)

von Arnold K, Weslien P, Nilsson M, Svensson BH, Klemedtsson L (2005) Fluxes of CO₂, CH₄ and N₂O from drained coniferous forests on organic soils. Forest Ecol Manag 210:239–254CrossRef

WEC (World Energy Council). (2007) Survey of energy resources 2007. p 586

Titel: Life-cycle climate impacts of peat fuel: calculation methods and methodological challenges
verfasst von: Juha Grönroos
Jyri Seppälä
Sirkka Koskela
Antti Kilpeläinen
Pekka Leskinen
Anne Holma
Juha-Pekka Tuovinen
Jukka Turunen
Saara Lind
Marja Maljanen
Pertti J. Martikainen
Publikationsdatum: 01.03.2013
Verlag: Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment / Ausgabe 3/2013
Print ISSN: 0948-3349
Elektronische ISSN: 1614-7502
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-012-0512-x

Springer Professional

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2013

Life-cycle assessment of continuous pad-dyeing technology for cotton fabrics

Dynamic life cycle assessment: framework and application to an institutional building

Comparative LCA of ethanol versus gasoline in Brazil using different LCIA methods

Review of methods addressing freshwater use in life cycle inventory and impact assessment

Life cycle assessment of composite packaging waste management—a Chinese case study on aseptic packaging

Comparative LCA of treatment options for US scrap tires: material recycling and tire-derived fuel combustion