Skip to main content
Erschienen in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 8/2013

01.09.2013 | SOCIETAL LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT

Social aspects for sustainability assessment of technologies—challenges for social life cycle assessment (SLCA)

verfasst von: Annekatrin Lehmann, Eva Zschieschang, Marzia Traverso, Matthias Finkbeiner, Liselotte Schebek

Erschienen in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment | Ausgabe 8/2013

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Purpose

Technologies can contribute to sustainable development (e.g., improving living conditions) and at the same time cause sustainability problems (e.g., emissions). Decisions on alternative technologies should thus ideally be based on the principle to minimize the latter. Analyzing environmental, economic, and social aspects related to technologies supports decisions by identifying the “more sustainable” technology. This paper focuses on social issues. First, it discusses the applicability of the social life cycle assessment (SLCA) guidelines for a comparative technology analysis, taking the example of two case studies in developing countries. Indicating technologies as “sustainable” also means that they are indeed operated over the expected lifetime, which, in development projects, is often not guaranteed. Consequently, social aspects related to implementation conditions should be considered in an SLCA study as well. Thus, a second focus is laid on identifying appropriate indicators to address these aspects.

Methods

First, the SLCA guidelines were examined with regard to applying this product-related approach to two real case studies (analysis of technologies/plants for water supply and for decentralized fuel production) for a comparative technology analysis. Suitable indicators are proposed. To address the second focus, a literature research on technology assessment and implementation in developing countries was conducted. Moreover, socioeconomic studies in the investigation areas of the case studies were consulted. Based on this, indicators addressing implementation conditions were identified from the SLCA guidelines and additional literature.

Results and discussion

The study shows social issues and indicators found in the SLCA guidelines and considered suitable for a comparative technology analysis in the case studies. However, for a sustainability assessment of technologies, especially in developing countries, further indicators are required to address technology implementation conditions. A set of additional social indicators like reported trust in institutions or fluctuation of personnel is proposed. Though these indicators were derived based on specific case studies, they can also be suggested to other technologies and are not necessarily limited to developing countries.

Conclusions

The study pointed out that an application of the SLCA guidelines considering the whole life cycle was not (yet) feasible for the case studies considered. This is mainly due to the lack of data. Regarding technology implementation, it was examined which indicators are available in this SLCA approach and which could additionally be integrated and applied. This is relevant as a potential contribution of technologies to sustainable development can only be achieved when the technologies are successfully implemented.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
Oxford (2012) defines indicator among others as “a thing that indicates the state or level of something” or as “a device providing specific information on the state or condition of something.” It can be differentiated between quantitative indicators using numbers to describe an issue, qualitative indicators using words, and semiquantitative indicators that categorize qualitative indicators in a yes/no form or in a scale (e.g., low, middle, high) (e.g., UNEP/SETAC 2009, 2011). Regarding social indicators, a number of definitions exist, summarized, e.g., in Noll (2004). According to Zapf (1977, p. 236), for example, social indicators are “all data which enlighten us in some way about structures and processes, goals and achievements, values and opinions.”
 
2
Within the SLCA guidelines, the term impact encompasses effects, consequences, social change processes, and social attributes. Following the concept of Vanclay (2002), in this paper, social impacts refer only to impacts that can be experienced by humans. Otherwise, the terms social aspects or social issues are used, which—when they undergo a change—may lead to impacts.
 
3
The lifetime of the technologies is assumed to be about 50–100 years. As data are not available with regard to if and how technologies will be deconstructed/disposed, this life cycle stage is excluded from the study.
 
4
Similarly to Vanclay (2002), Macombe et al. (2011) emphasize the difference between state and change when talking about social impacts. Depending on the perspective, the specific features of technologies addressed here can be both understood as consequences of (or changes due to) the implementation of the technologies as well as state features of the technologies. The latter are considered relevant regarding a comparative technology analysis.
 
5
This is challenging as well because the evaluation of impacts resulting from a decision for a certain company or product also requires the evaluation of the impacts resulting from the “non-implemented product” life cycle have to be assessed as well (Jørgensen et al. 2010).
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Bauler T (2007) Identifying methodological challenges. In: Hák T, Moldan B, Dahl AL (eds) Sustainability indicators. A scientific assessment. Island Press, Washington, pp 49–64 Bauler T (2007) Identifying methodological challenges. In: Hák T, Moldan B, Dahl AL (eds) Sustainability indicators. A scientific assessment. Island Press, Washington, pp 49–64
Zurück zum Zitat Benoît-Norris C, Vickery-Niederman G, Valdivia S, Franze J, Traverso M, Ciroth A, Mazijn B (2011) Introducing the UNEP/SETAC methodological sheets for subcategories of social LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16(7):682–690CrossRef Benoît-Norris C, Vickery-Niederman G, Valdivia S, Franze J, Traverso M, Ciroth A, Mazijn B (2011) Introducing the UNEP/SETAC methodological sheets for subcategories of social LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16(7):682–690CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Carrera DG, Mack A (2010) Sustainability assessment of energy technologies via social indicators: result of a survey among European energy experts. Energ Policy 38:1030–1039CrossRef Carrera DG, Mack A (2010) Sustainability assessment of energy technologies via social indicators: result of a survey among European energy experts. Energ Policy 38:1030–1039CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Christian DE (1974) International social indicators: the OECD experience. Soc Indic Res 1:169–186CrossRef Christian DE (1974) International social indicators: the OECD experience. Soc Indic Res 1:169–186CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dreyer L, Hauschild M, Schierbeck J (2006) A framework for social life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(2):88–97CrossRef Dreyer L, Hauschild M, Schierbeck J (2006) A framework for social life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(2):88–97CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ekener Petersen E, Finnveden G (2013) Potential hotspots identified by social LCA -- part 1: a case study of a laptop computer. Int J of Life Cycle Assess 18(1):127–143 Ekener Petersen E, Finnveden G (2013) Potential hotspots identified by social LCA -- part 1: a case study of a laptop computer. Int J of Life Cycle Assess 18(1):127–143
Zurück zum Zitat Finkbeiner M, Reimann K, Ackermann R (2008) Life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA) for products and processes. Paper presented at SETAC Europe 18th Annual Meeting, 25–29 May, Warsaw, Poland Finkbeiner M, Reimann K, Ackermann R (2008) Life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA) for products and processes. Paper presented at SETAC Europe 18th Annual Meeting, 25–29 May, Warsaw, Poland
Zurück zum Zitat Finkbeiner M, Schau EM, Lehmann A, Traverso M (2010) Towards life cycle sustainability assessment. Sustainability 2:3309–3322CrossRef Finkbeiner M, Schau EM, Lehmann A, Traverso M (2010) Towards life cycle sustainability assessment. Sustainability 2:3309–3322CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Franze J, Ciroth A (2011a) A comparison of cut roses from Ecuador and the Netherlands. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16(4):366–379CrossRef Franze J, Ciroth A (2011a) A comparison of cut roses from Ecuador and the Netherlands. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16(4):366–379CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Franze J, Ciroth A (2011b) Social and environmental LCA of an ecolabeled notebook. Presentation, LCM 2011, 28–31 August, Berlin, Germany Franze J, Ciroth A (2011b) Social and environmental LCA of an ecolabeled notebook. Presentation, LCM 2011, 28–31 August, Berlin, Germany
Zurück zum Zitat Hutchins MJ, Sutherland JW (2008) An exploration of measures of social sustainability and their application to supply chain decisions. J Cleaner Prod 16:1688–1698CrossRef Hutchins MJ, Sutherland JW (2008) An exploration of measures of social sustainability and their application to supply chain decisions. J Cleaner Prod 16:1688–1698CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat IAIA (1994) Interorganizational Committee on Guidelines and Principles for Social Impact Assessment. Guidelines and principles for social impact assessment. NOAA technical memorandum NMFS-F/SPO. International Association for Impact Assessment (IAIA), Belhaven IAIA (1994) Interorganizational Committee on Guidelines and Principles for Social Impact Assessment. Guidelines and principles for social impact assessment. NOAA technical memorandum NMFS-F/SPO. International Association for Impact Assessment (IAIA), Belhaven
Zurück zum Zitat International Standard Organisation (2006) ISO14044:2006. Environmental management—life cycle assessment—requirements and guidelines. International Standard Organisation, Geneva International Standard Organisation (2006) ISO14044:2006. Environmental management—life cycle assessment—requirements and guidelines. International Standard Organisation, Geneva
Zurück zum Zitat Jørgensen A, Le Bocq A, Nazarkina L, Hauschild MZ (2008) Methodologies for social life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(2):96–103CrossRef Jørgensen A, Le Bocq A, Nazarkina L, Hauschild MZ (2008) Methodologies for social life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(2):96–103CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jørgensen A, Finkbeiner M, Jørgensen MS, Hauschild MZ (2010) Defining the baseline in social life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:376–384CrossRef Jørgensen A, Finkbeiner M, Jørgensen MS, Hauschild MZ (2010) Defining the baseline in social life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:376–384CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jørgensen A, Dreyer L, Wrangel A (2012) Addressing the effect of social life cycle assessments. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17:828–839CrossRef Jørgensen A, Dreyer L, Wrangel A (2012) Addressing the effect of social life cycle assessments. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17:828–839CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kloepffer W (2007) Life-cycle based sustainability assessment as part of LCM. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Life Cycle Management, 27–29 August, Zurich, Switzerland Kloepffer W (2007) Life-cycle based sustainability assessment as part of LCM. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Life Cycle Management, 27–29 August, Zurich, Switzerland
Zurück zum Zitat Kloepffer W (2008) Life cycle sustainability assessment of products (with Comments by Helias A. Udo de Haes, p. 95). Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(2):89–95CrossRef Kloepffer W (2008) Life cycle sustainability assessment of products (with Comments by Helias A. Udo de Haes, p. 95). Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(2):89–95CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kopfmueller J, Brandl V, Joerissen J, Paetau M, Banse G, Coenen R, Grunwald A (2001) Nachhaltige Entwicklung integrativ betrachtet—Konstitutive Elemente, Regeln, Indikatoren. Global zukunftsfähige Entwicklung—Perspektiven für Deutschland, 1st edn. Sigma, Berlin, Germany Kopfmueller J, Brandl V, Joerissen J, Paetau M, Banse G, Coenen R, Grunwald A (2001) Nachhaltige Entwicklung integrativ betrachtet—Konstitutive Elemente, Regeln, Indikatoren. Global zukunftsfähige Entwicklung—Perspektiven für Deutschland, 1st edn. Sigma, Berlin, Germany
Zurück zum Zitat Lehmann A, Russi D, Bala A, Finkbeiner M, Fullana-i-Palmer P (2011a) Integration of social aspects in decision support, based on life cycle thinking. Sustainability 3(4):562–577CrossRef Lehmann A, Russi D, Bala A, Finkbeiner M, Fullana-i-Palmer P (2011a) Integration of social aspects in decision support, based on life cycle thinking. Sustainability 3(4):562–577CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lehmann A, Zschieschang E, Schebek L, Finkbeiner M (2011b) Feasibility of current SLCA methodology for technology assessment. Poster presented at SETAC Europe 21st Annual Meeting, 15–19 May, Milan, Italy Lehmann A, Zschieschang E, Schebek L, Finkbeiner M (2011b) Feasibility of current SLCA methodology for technology assessment. Poster presented at SETAC Europe 21st Annual Meeting, 15–19 May, Milan, Italy
Zurück zum Zitat Long ND, Ogunlana S, Quang T, Lam KC (2004) Large construction projects in developing countries: a case study from Vietnam. Int J Project Management 22(7):553–561CrossRef Long ND, Ogunlana S, Quang T, Lam KC (2004) Large construction projects in developing countries: a case study from Vietnam. Int J Project Management 22(7):553–561CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Macombe C, Feschet P, Loeillet D, Garrabé M (2011) International seminar on social LCA. Recent developments in assessing the social impacts of the product life cycles. Synthesis of the Proceedings, 5–6 May, Montpellier, France Macombe C, Feschet P, Loeillet D, Garrabé M (2011) International seminar on social LCA. Recent developments in assessing the social impacts of the product life cycles. Synthesis of the Proceedings, 5–6 May, Montpellier, France
Zurück zum Zitat Martínez Blanco J, Lehmann A, Munoz P, Anton A, Traverso M, Rieradevall J, Finkbeiner M (2013) Social life cycle assessment of compost and mineral fertilizers use in horticulture. Challenges and recommendations for social performance in a real case study. J Cleaner Prod (in press) Martínez Blanco J, Lehmann A, Munoz P, Anton A, Traverso M, Rieradevall J, Finkbeiner M (2013) Social life cycle assessment of compost and mineral fertilizers use in horticulture. Challenges and recommendations for social performance in a real case study. J Cleaner Prod (in press)
Zurück zum Zitat Meadows DH (1998) Indicators and information systems for sustainable development. The Sustainable Institute, Hartland Four Corners Meadows DH (1998) Indicators and information systems for sustainable development. The Sustainable Institute, Hartland Four Corners
Zurück zum Zitat Nayono S, Lehn H, Kopfmueller J, Londong J, Lehmann A (2011) Baseline indicators to support decision making in sanitation case study: Integrated Water Resources Management project in rural karst area of Gunung Kidul, Java, Indonesia. In: Proceedings IWRM 2011 Conference, 12–13 October, Dresden, Germany Nayono S, Lehn H, Kopfmueller J, Londong J, Lehmann A (2011) Baseline indicators to support decision making in sanitation case study: Integrated Water Resources Management project in rural karst area of Gunung Kidul, Java, Indonesia. In: Proceedings IWRM 2011 Conference, 12–13 October, Dresden, Germany
Zurück zum Zitat Nieuwenhout FDJ, van Dijk A, Lasschuit PE, van Roekel G, van Dijk VAP, Hirsch D, Arriaza H, Hankins M, Sharma BD, Wade H (2001) Experience with solar home systems in developing countries: a review. Prog Photovolt: Res Appl 9:455–474CrossRef Nieuwenhout FDJ, van Dijk A, Lasschuit PE, van Roekel G, van Dijk VAP, Hirsch D, Arriaza H, Hankins M, Sharma BD, Wade H (2001) Experience with solar home systems in developing countries: a review. Prog Photovolt: Res Appl 9:455–474CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Noll HH (2004) Social indicators and quality of life research: background, achievements, and current trends. In: Genov N (ed) Advances in sociological knowledge over half a century. VS Verlag fuer Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden Noll HH (2004) Social indicators and quality of life research: background, achievements, and current trends. In: Genov N (ed) Advances in sociological knowledge over half a century. VS Verlag fuer Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden
Zurück zum Zitat Oertel M (2010) Konzept für Capacity Building in der Abwasserbehandlung Konzeptentwurf für Capacity Building für die Abwasserbehandlung des Krankenhauses Wonosari/Java, Indonesien. (Concept for capacity building in sanitation. Concept draft for capacity building for a sanitation in the Wonosari Hospital, Java, Indonesia). Unpublished Master’s thesis, Karlsruhe Institute for Technology Oertel M (2010) Konzept für Capacity Building in der Abwasserbehandlung Konzeptentwurf für Capacity Building für die Abwasserbehandlung des Krankenhauses Wonosari/Java, Indonesien. (Concept for capacity building in sanitation. Concept draft for capacity building for a sanitation in the Wonosari Hospital, Java, Indonesia). Unpublished Master’s thesis, Karlsruhe Institute for Technology
Zurück zum Zitat Prakash S (2012) Application of S-LCA: from artisanal mining to complex products. Workshop: Practical Aspects of Social Life Cycle Assessment, Berlin, 25 May Prakash S (2012) Application of S-LCA: from artisanal mining to complex products. Workshop: Practical Aspects of Social Life Cycle Assessment, Berlin, 25 May
Zurück zum Zitat Puspitasari CP (2009) Analysis of governmental institutions performance concerning Integrated Water Resources Management. Case study in Gunung Kidul, Indonesia. Karlsruhe Institut für Technologie (KIT), Karlsruhe Puspitasari CP (2009) Analysis of governmental institutions performance concerning Integrated Water Resources Management. Case study in Gunung Kidul, Indonesia. Karlsruhe Institut für Technologie (KIT), Karlsruhe
Zurück zum Zitat Renn O, Jaeger A, Deuschle J, Weimler-Jehle W (2009) A normative-functional concept of sustainability and its indicators. Int J Global Env 9(4):291–317CrossRef Renn O, Jaeger A, Deuschle J, Weimler-Jehle W (2009) A normative-functional concept of sustainability and its indicators. Int J Global Env 9(4):291–317CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Renn O, Kuhn R, Sellke P (2012) Final selection of social indicators. Report prepared within the EC 7th framework project: development and application of a standardized methodology for the PROspective SUstaInability assessment of Technologies (PROSUITE), Stuttgart. Available at http://www.prosuite.org Renn O, Kuhn R, Sellke P (2012) Final selection of social indicators. Report prepared within the EC 7th framework project: development and application of a standardized methodology for the PROspective SUstaInability assessment of Technologies (PROSUITE), Stuttgart. Available at http://​www.​prosuite.​org
Zurück zum Zitat Sahay S, Avgerou C (2002) Introducing the special issue on information and communication technologies in developing countries. Inf Soc 18:73–76CrossRef Sahay S, Avgerou C (2002) Introducing the special issue on information and communication technologies in developing countries. Inf Soc 18:73–76CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Saleth RM, Dinar A (1999) Evaluating water institutions and water sector performance. World Bank Technical Paper No. 447. World Bank, Washington, DC Saleth RM, Dinar A (1999) Evaluating water institutions and water sector performance. World Bank Technical Paper No. 447. World Bank, Washington, DC
Zurück zum Zitat Schultz J, Brand F, Kopfmueller J, Ott K (2009) Building a ‘theory of sustainable development’: two salient conceptions within the German discourse. Int J Environ Sustainable Dev 7(4):465–481CrossRef Schultz J, Brand F, Kopfmueller J, Ott K (2009) Building a ‘theory of sustainable development’: two salient conceptions within the German discourse. Int J Environ Sustainable Dev 7(4):465–481CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Swarr T, Hunkeler D, Kloepffer W, Pesonen HL, Ciroth A, Brent AC, Pagan R (2011) Environmental life cycle costing: a code of practice. ISBN: 978-1-880611-87-6 Swarr T, Hunkeler D, Kloepffer W, Pesonen HL, Ciroth A, Brent AC, Pagan R (2011) Environmental life cycle costing: a code of practice. ISBN: 978-1-880611-87-6
Zurück zum Zitat Tébar-Less C, McMillan S (2005) Achieving the successful transfer of environmentally sound technologies: trade-related aspects. OECD Working Paper No. 2005-02 Tébar-Less C, McMillan S (2005) Achieving the successful transfer of environmentally sound technologies: trade-related aspects. OECD Working Paper No. 2005-02
Zurück zum Zitat Ugaya C (2012) S-LCA of cocoa soap. Workshop: Practical Aspects of Social Life Cycle Assessment, Berlin, 25 May Ugaya C (2012) S-LCA of cocoa soap. Workshop: Practical Aspects of Social Life Cycle Assessment, Berlin, 25 May
Zurück zum Zitat UNEP/SETAC (2009) Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products. UNEP/SETAC life cycle initiative. Druk in de weer, Belgium UNEP/SETAC (2009) Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products. UNEP/SETAC life cycle initiative. Druk in de weer, Belgium
Zurück zum Zitat UNEP/SETAC (2011) Towards a life cycle sustainability assessment. Making informed choices on products. UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative UNEP/SETAC (2011) Towards a life cycle sustainability assessment. Making informed choices on products. UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative
Zurück zum Zitat Vanclay F (2002) Conceptualising social impacts. Environ Impact Assess 22:183–211 Vanclay F (2002) Conceptualising social impacts. Environ Impact Assess 22:183–211
Zurück zum Zitat Weidema BP (2006) The integration of economic and social aspects in life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(1):89–96CrossRef Weidema BP (2006) The integration of economic and social aspects in life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(1):89–96CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zapf W (1977) Soziale Indikatoren—eine Zwischenbilanz. In: Krupp HJ, Zapf W (eds) Sozialpolitik und Sozialberichterstattung. Campus, Frankfurt a.M./New York, pp 231–246 Zapf W (1977) Soziale Indikatoren—eine Zwischenbilanz. In: Krupp HJ, Zapf W (eds) Sozialpolitik und Sozialberichterstattung. Campus, Frankfurt a.M./New York, pp 231–246
Metadaten
Titel
Social aspects for sustainability assessment of technologies—challenges for social life cycle assessment (SLCA)
verfasst von
Annekatrin Lehmann
Eva Zschieschang
Marzia Traverso
Matthias Finkbeiner
Liselotte Schebek
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2013
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment / Ausgabe 8/2013
Print ISSN: 0948-3349
Elektronische ISSN: 1614-7502
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0594-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2013

The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 8/2013 Zur Ausgabe