Skip to main content
Erschienen in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 2/2018

15.05.2017 | SOCIETAL LCA

Assessing the social impacts of nano-enabled products through the life cycle: the case of nano-enabled biocidal paint

verfasst von: Vrishali Subramanian, Elena Semenzin, Alex Zabeo, Peter Saling, Tom Ligthart, Toon van Harmelen, Ineke Malsch, Danail Hristozov, Antonio Marcomini

Erschienen in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment | Ausgabe 2/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Purpose

Assessment of the social aspects of sustainability of products is a topic of significant interest to companies, and several methodologies have been proposed in the recent years. The significant environmental health and safety concerns about nano-enabled products calls for the early establishment of a clear benefit-risk framework in order to decide which novel products should be developed further. This paper proposes a method to assess the social impacts of nano-enabled products through the life cycle that is (a) quantitative, (b) integrates performance and attitudinal dimensions of social impacts and (c) considers the overall and stakeholder balance of benefits and costs. Social life cycle assessment (s-LCA) and multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) are integrated to address this need, and the method is illustrated on a case study of a nano-enabled product.

Methods

The s-LCA framework comprises 15 indicators to characterize the social context of the product manufacture placed within the classification structure of benefit/cost and worker/community. The methodology includes four steps: (a) normalization of company level data on the social indicator to country level data for the year, (b) nested weighting at stakeholder and indicator level and its integration with normalized scores to create social indicator scores, (c) aggregation of social indicator scores into benefit score, cost score and net benefit scores as per the s-LCA framework and (d) classification of social indicator scores and aggregated scores as low/medium/high based on benchmarks created using employment and value-added proxies.

Results and discussion

A prospective production scenario involving novel product, a nano-copper oxide (n-CuO)-based paint with biocidal functionality, is assessed with respect to its social impacts. The method was applied to 12 indicators at the company level. Classification of social indicator scores and aggregated scores showed that the n-CuO paint has high net benefits.

Conclusions

The framework and method offer a flexible structure that can be revised and extended as more knowledge and data on social impacts of nano-enabled products becomes available. The proposed method is being implemented in the social impact assessment sub-module of the SUN Decision Support (SUNDS) software system. Companies seeking to improve the social footprint of their products can also use the proposed method to consider relevant social impacts to achieve this goal.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
LICARA NanoSCAN is the only assessment tool that specifically addresses nano-enabled products.
 
2
“Cost” in the SIA methodology means a negative social benefit or risk and do not include real economic costs which are considered in the economic assessment methodology of SUNDS to be described in an upcoming publication.
 
3
The EU countries used to calculate the relative potential index include Belgium, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Denmark, Germany, Estonia, Greece, Spain, Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Austria, Poland, Slovenia, Slovakia, Finland, Sweden, United Kingdom and Norway. Data was extracted from Eurostat.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Althaus H-J, Pablo A, Bouamrane M et al (2009) In: Benoît C, Mazijn B (eds) Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products. UNEP-DTIE, Paris Althaus H-J, Pablo A, Bouamrane M et al (2009) In: Benoît C, Mazijn B (eds) Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products. UNEP-DTIE, Paris
Zurück zum Zitat Benoît C, Norris GA, Valdivia S, Ciroth A, Moberg A, Bos U, Prakash S, Ugaya C, Beck T (2010) The guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products: just in time! Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:156–163CrossRef Benoît C, Norris GA, Valdivia S, Ciroth A, Moberg A, Bos U, Prakash S, Ugaya C, Beck T (2010) The guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products: just in time! Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:156–163CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Benoit-Norris C (2012b) Social life cycle assessment: a technique providing a new wealth of information to inform sustainability-related decision making. In: Curran MA (ed) Life cycle assessment handbook: a guide for environmentally sustainable products. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, pp 433–451CrossRef Benoit-Norris C (2012b) Social life cycle assessment: a technique providing a new wealth of information to inform sustainability-related decision making. In: Curran MA (ed) Life cycle assessment handbook: a guide for environmentally sustainable products. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, pp 433–451CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Benoit-Norris C, Cavan DA, Norris G (2012a) Identifying social impacts in product supply chains: overview and application of the social hotspot database. Sustainability 4:1946–1965CrossRef Benoit-Norris C, Cavan DA, Norris G (2012a) Identifying social impacts in product supply chains: overview and application of the social hotspot database. Sustainability 4:1946–1965CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat European Commission (EC) Report (2009) Impact Assessment Guidelines. SEC(2009) Accessed 03.09.2015 European Commission (EC) Report (2009) Impact Assessment Guidelines. SEC(2009) Accessed 03.09.2015
Zurück zum Zitat Foolmaun RK, Ramjeeawon T (2013) Comparative life cycle assessment and social life cycle assessment of used polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottles in Mauritius. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:155–171CrossRef Foolmaun RK, Ramjeeawon T (2013) Comparative life cycle assessment and social life cycle assessment of used polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottles in Mauritius. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:155–171CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Freeman MH, McIntyre CR (2008) A comprehensive review of copper-based wood preservatives. Forest Prod J 58:6 Freeman MH, McIntyre CR (2008) A comprehensive review of copper-based wood preservatives. Forest Prod J 58:6
Zurück zum Zitat Giove S, Brancia A, Satterstrom FK, Linkov I (2009) Decision Support Systems and Environment: Role of MCDA. In Decision Support Systems for Risk-Based Management of Contaminated Sites, eds. A. Marcomini, G. W. Suter II and A. Critto Springer US Giove S, Brancia A, Satterstrom FK, Linkov I (2009) Decision Support Systems and Environment: Role of MCDA. In Decision Support Systems for Risk-Based Management of Contaminated Sites, eds. A. Marcomini, G. W. Suter II and A. Critto Springer US
Zurück zum Zitat Hosseinijou SA, Mansour S, Shirazi MA (2014) Social life cycle assessment for material selection: a case study of building materials. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:620–645CrossRef Hosseinijou SA, Mansour S, Shirazi MA (2014) Social life cycle assessment for material selection: a case study of building materials. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:620–645CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hunkeler D (2006) Societal LCA method and case study. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:371–382CrossRef Hunkeler D (2006) Societal LCA method and case study. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:371–382CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jørgensen A, Le Bocq A, Nazarkina L, Hauschild M (2008) Methodologies for social life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:96CrossRef Jørgensen A, Le Bocq A, Nazarkina L, Hauschild M (2008) Methodologies for social life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:96CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lebow ST (2010) Wood preservation. General Technical Report FPL–GTR–190 Lebow ST (2010) Wood preservation. General Technical Report FPL–GTR–190
Zurück zum Zitat Lehmann A, Zschieschang E, Traverso M, Finkbeiner M, Schebek L (2013) Social aspects for sustainability assessment of technologies—challenges for social life cycle assessment (SLCA). Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1581–1592CrossRef Lehmann A, Zschieschang E, Traverso M, Finkbeiner M, Schebek L (2013) Social aspects for sustainability assessment of technologies—challenges for social life cycle assessment (SLCA). Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1581–1592CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Manik Y, Leahy J, Halog A (2013) Social life cycle assessment of palm oil biodiesel: a case study in Jambi Province of Indonesia. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1386–1392CrossRef Manik Y, Leahy J, Halog A (2013) Social life cycle assessment of palm oil biodiesel: a case study in Jambi Province of Indonesia. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1386–1392CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Norris GA (2006) Social impacts in product life cycles-towards life cycle attribute assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:97–104 Norris GA (2006) Social impacts in product life cycles-towards life cycle attribute assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:97–104
Zurück zum Zitat O’Brien M, Doig A, Clift R (1996) Social and environmental life cycle assessment (SELCA). Int J Life Cycle Assess 1:231–237CrossRef O’Brien M, Doig A, Clift R (1996) Social and environmental life cycle assessment (SELCA). Int J Life Cycle Assess 1:231–237CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ramirez PKS, Petti L, Brones F, Ugaya CML (2016) Subcategory assessment method for social life cycle assessment. Part 2: application in Natura’s cocoa soap. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21:106–117CrossRef Ramirez PKS, Petti L, Brones F, Ugaya CML (2016) Subcategory assessment method for social life cycle assessment. Part 2: application in Natura’s cocoa soap. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21:106–117CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Schmidt I, Meurer M, Saling P, Kicherer A, Reuter W, Gensch C-O (2004) SEEbalance. Greener Management International, pp 78–94 Schmidt I, Meurer M, Saling P, Kicherer A, Reuter W, Gensch C-O (2004) SEEbalance. Greener Management International, pp 78–94
Zurück zum Zitat Siebert A, Bezama A, O’Keeffe S, Thrän D (2016) Social life cycle assessment: in pursuit of a framework for assessing wood-based products from bioeconomy regions in Germany. Int J Life Cycle Assess. doi:10.1007/s11367-016-1066-0 Siebert A, Bezama A, O’Keeffe S, Thrän D (2016) Social life cycle assessment: in pursuit of a framework for assessing wood-based products from bioeconomy regions in Germany. Int J Life Cycle Assess. doi:10.​1007/​s11367-016-1066-0
Zurück zum Zitat Smith J, Barling D (2014) Social impacts and life cycle assessment: proposals for methodological development for SMEs in the European food and drink sector. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:944–949CrossRef Smith J, Barling D (2014) Social impacts and life cycle assessment: proposals for methodological development for SMEs in the European food and drink sector. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:944–949CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Subramanian V, Semenzin E, Zabeo A, Hristozov D, Malsch I, Mcalea E, Murphy F, Mullins M, Van Harmelen T, Ligthart T, Linov I, Marcomini A (2016a) Sustainable nanotechnology decision support system: bridging risk management, sustainable innovation and risk Governance. J Nanopart Res 18:89CrossRef Subramanian V, Semenzin E, Zabeo A, Hristozov D, Malsch I, Mcalea E, Murphy F, Mullins M, Van Harmelen T, Ligthart T, Linov I, Marcomini A (2016a) Sustainable nanotechnology decision support system: bridging risk management, sustainable innovation and risk Governance. J Nanopart Res 18:89CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Subramanian V, Semenzin E, Zabeo A, Hristozov D, Malsch I, Saling P, Van Harmelen T, Ligthart T, Marcomini A (2016b) Integrating the social impacts into risk Governance of nanotechnology. In: Murphy F, Mcalea E, Mullins M (eds) Managing risk in nanotechnology: topics in Governance, assurance and transfer. Springer, New York Subramanian V, Semenzin E, Zabeo A, Hristozov D, Malsch I, Saling P, Van Harmelen T, Ligthart T, Marcomini A (2016b) Integrating the social impacts into risk Governance of nanotechnology. In: Murphy F, Mcalea E, Mullins M (eds) Managing risk in nanotechnology: topics in Governance, assurance and transfer. Springer, New York
Zurück zum Zitat van Harmelen T, Zondervan-van den Beuken EK, Brouwer DH, Kuijpers E, Fransman W, Buist HB, Ligthart TN, Hincapié I, Hischier R, Linkov I, Nowack B (2016) LICARA nanoSCAN - A tool for the self-assessment of benefits and risks of nanoproducts. Environ Int 91:150 van Harmelen T, Zondervan-van den Beuken EK, Brouwer DH, Kuijpers E, Fransman W, Buist HB, Ligthart TN, Hincapié I, Hischier R, Linkov I, Nowack B (2016) LICARA nanoSCAN - A tool for the self-assessment of benefits and risks of nanoproducts. Environ Int 91:150
Zurück zum Zitat WBCSD (2016) Social Metrics for Chemical Products in their Application - A guide by the chemical sector to assess and report on the social impact and value of products in a life cycle perspective WBCSD (2016) Social Metrics for Chemical Products in their Application - A guide by the chemical sector to assess and report on the social impact and value of products in a life cycle perspective
Metadaten
Titel
Assessing the social impacts of nano-enabled products through the life cycle: the case of nano-enabled biocidal paint
verfasst von
Vrishali Subramanian
Elena Semenzin
Alex Zabeo
Peter Saling
Tom Ligthart
Toon van Harmelen
Ineke Malsch
Danail Hristozov
Antonio Marcomini
Publikationsdatum
15.05.2017
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment / Ausgabe 2/2018
Print ISSN: 0948-3349
Elektronische ISSN: 1614-7502
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-017-1324-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2018

The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 2/2018 Zur Ausgabe