Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

How Simple is it for Science to Acquire Wisdom According to its Choicest Aims?

  • Published:
Philosophia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Focusing on Nicholas Maxwell’s thesis that “science, properly understood, provides us the methodological key to the salvation of humanity”, the article discusses Maxwell’s aim oriented empiricism and his conception of Wisdom Inquiry as advocated in Maxwell’s (2009b, pp.1–56) essay entitled “How Can Life of Value Best Flourish in the Real World?” (in Science and the Pursuit of Wisdom: Studies in the Philosophy of Nicholas Maxwell 2009, edited by Leemon McHenry) and in Maxwell (2004 & 2009a).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Feyerabend, P. K. (1975). Against method: Outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge. NLB, Verso ed.

  • Feyerabend, P. K. (1978). Science in a free society. NLB, Verso ed.

  • Fuller, S. (2009). Prolegomena to a critique of pure wisdom. In L. McHenry (Ed.), Science and the pursuit of wisdom: Studies in the Philosophy of Nicholas Maxwell (pp. 83–91). Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilllies, D. (2009): How should research be organized? An alternative to the UK research assessment exercise. In L. McHenry (Ed.), Science and the pursuit of wisdom: Studies in the philosophy of Nicholas Maxwell (pp. 147–168). Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, N. (1976). What is Wrong with Science? Bran’s Head Books (1st ed.).

  • Maxwell, N. (1984). From Knowledge to Wisdom. Oxford: Blackwell. The central thesis of Maxwell (2009a) is more clearly and consistently restated in this book.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, N. (1998). The comprehensibility of the universe: A new conception of science. Oxford: Oxford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, N. (2004). Is science neurotic. London: Imperial College.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, N. (2009a): What is Wrong with Science? (2nd ed.). London: Pentire. First published by Bran’s Head Books 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, N. (2009b). How can life of value best flourish in the real world? In Leemon (pp. 1–56).

  • Maxwell, N. (2009c). Are universities undergoing an intellectual revolution? In Oxford Magazine.

  • Maxwell, N. (2010). Review—science, policy, and the value-free ideal. In Heather Douglas, University of Pittsburgh Press, 2009, Metapsychology Online Reviews, March 9th 2010 (Volume 14, Issue 10).

  • McHenry, L. (Ed.). (2009). Science and the pursuit of wisdom: Studies in the philosophy of Nicholas Maxwell. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag.

  • Pandit, G. L. (1995). Von der Oekologie des Bewusstseins zum Umweltrealismus—Die Wiederentdeckung menschlicher und nicht-menschlicher Interessenssphaeren. Wiener Vorlesungen Band 41. Wien: Picus Verlag.

  • Pandit,G. L. (2001). Participate and reconnect: the problem of improving the human condition. In Gerard de Zeeuw, Martha Vahl and Ed Mennuti (Eds.) Problems of Participation and Connection, a Special Issue of Systemica 13 (2001, 337–341), the Journal of the Dutch Systems Group. Proceedings of the International Conference held in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 5–9 April 1999. Lincoln Research Centre.

  • Pandit, G. L. (2005). World's refugees: what humanity owes to them. World Affairs: The Journal of International Issues, 9, 148–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandit, G. L. (2006). Exclusion and Uprootment in Kashmir: From a Political Tragedy to an Ecological Catastrophe. World Affairs: The Journal of International Issues, 10, 152–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandit, G. L. (2007a). Emergence of the Human Interests Studies: The Environmental Dimension. In Gerard de Zeeuw, Martha Vahl and Ed Mennuti (Eds.) Problems of Individual Emergence, special issue: Systemica—Journal of the Dutch Systems Group—Vol. 14 (2007: 295–312), Lincoln Research Centre UK, 2007, ISSN 0167-9961. Proceedings of a Conference held in Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 16–20 April, 2001.

  • Pandit, G. L. (2007b). Rethinking Science-Studies with a Return to Natural Philosophy. Friends of Wisdom News Letter (No. 1, Nov. 2007: 28–32), A Review Essay based on Nicholas Maxwell: Is Science Neurotic? Imperial College Press: 2004, pp.xx+240. For details, visit FoW archive at: www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/friendsofwisdom.html.

  • Pandit, G. L. (2008). Universities with a room for wisdom inquiry. Friends of Wisdom News Letter, 3, 4–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandit, G. L (2009) Aim Oriented Empiricism: How We Might Improve the Aims and Methods of Science, Making it More Rational, Responsible and Far Reaching. Friends of Wisdom Newsletter, No.6, January 2010, pp. 30–37, a Review Essay based on Nicholas Maxwell: What is Wrong with Science? Second Edition, London (first published by Bran's Head Books 1976): Pentire Press.

  • Popper, K. R. (1934). Logik der Forschung, Vienna

  • Popper, K. R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R. (1963). Conjectures and refutations. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R. (1972). Objective knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R. (1975). Rationality of scientific revolutions. In R. Harre (Ed.), Problems of scientific revolution (pp. 72–101). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R. (1982). Quantum theory and the schism in physics. In W. W. Bartley III (Ed.), The postscript to the logic of scientific discovery (Vol. 3). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R. (1983) Realism and the aim of science, from the Postscript to the Logic of Scientific Discovery, Vol. III, ed. by W. W. Bartley, III. London/New York: Routledge. Paperback ed. 1985

  • Popper, K. R. (1994). Alles Leben ist Problemloesen. Piper: Muenchen/Zuerich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roger, K. (2009). Metaphysics and methodology: Aim-oriented empiricism. In L. McHenry (Ed.), Science and the pursuit of wisdom: Studies in the philosophy of Nicholas Maxwell (pp. 217–232). Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. (1948). Human knowledge: Its scope and limits. London:Allen and Unwin; New York: Simon and Schuster.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author wishes to thank the anonymous referees for detailed comments on previous versions, resulting in many improvements in the text. The author gratefully acknowledges the support of the Fondation Maison des Sciences de l'Homme (54, Boulevard Raspail, 75006—PARIS), France, for research, during a visit in 2009.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy, University of Delhi South Campus, New Delhi – 110021, India

    Giridhari Lal Pandit

Authors
  1. Giridhari Lal Pandit
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giridhari Lal Pandit.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pandit, G.L. How Simple is it for Science to Acquire Wisdom According to its Choicest Aims?. Philosophia 38, 649–666 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-010-9252-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-010-9252-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation