Skip to main content
Log in

The multivoicedness of game play: Exploring the unfolding of a student’s learning trajectory in a gaming context at school

  • Published:
International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to gain knowledge about how interactions in a gaming context become constituted as effective resources for a student’s learning trajectory. In addition, this detailed study of a learning trajectory documents how a computer game becomes a learning resource for working on a specific topic in school. The article reports on a qualitative study of students at an upper secondary school who have played the computer game Global Conflicts: Palestine to learn about the complexity of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. A sociocultural and dialogic approach to learning and meaning-making is employed as an analytical framework. Analyzing different interactional episodes, in which important orientations and reorientations are located, documents how the student’s learning trajectory developed and changed during the project. When engaged in game play in educational settings, experiences with playing computer games outside of school can relevantly be invoked and become part of the collaborative project of finding out how to play the game. However, these ways of engaging with a computer game might not necessarily facilitate a subtle understanding of the specific topic that is addressed in the game. The findings suggest that the constitution of a computer game as a learning resource is a collaborative project, in which multiple resources for meaning-making are in play, and for which the teacher has an important role in facilitating student’s adoption of a multiperspective on the conflict. Furthermore, the findings shed light on what characterizes student-teacher interactions that contribute to a subtle understanding, and offer a framework for important issues upon which to reflect in game-based learning (GBL).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. All talk and writing appeared originally in Norwegian, and has been translated by the author. See Appendix 2 at Electronic Supplementary material for the transcripts of the original spoken action and the original version of Jonas’s news article from the final test. The Appendix is available online at the Springer site, doi:10.1007/s11412-011-9132-x.

References

  • Arnseth, H. C. (2006). Learning to play or playing to learn: A critical account of the models of communication informing educational research on computer gameplay. Game Studies: The International Journal of Computer Game Research, 6(1).

  • Arnseth, H. C., & Ludvigsen, S. (2006). Approaching institutional contexts: Systemic versus dialogic research in CSCL. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(2), 167–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A., & Halverson, R. (2010). The second educational revolution: Rethinking education in the age of technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1), 18–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Freitas, S. (2006). Learning in immersive worlds. Bristol: Joint Information Systems Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Freitas, S., & Oliver, M. (2006). How can exploratory learning with games and simulations within the curriculum be most effectively evaluated? Computers & Education, 46(3), 249–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreier, O. (1999). Personal trajectories of participation across contexts of social practice. Outlines: Critical Social Studies, 1(1), 5–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreier, O. (2003). Learning in personal trajectories of participation. In N. Stephenson, H. L. Radtke, R. Jorna, & H. J. Stam (Eds.), Theoretical psychology: Critical contributions (pp. 20–29). Concord: Captus Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egenfeldt-Nielsen, S. (2006). Overview of research on the educational use of video games. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 1(3), 184–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egenfeldt-Nielsen, S., Smith, J. H., & Tosca, S. P. (2008). Understanding video games: The essential introduction. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, R. (1995). Voice as communicative action. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 2(3), 192–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (2004). Situated language and learning: A critique of traditional schooling. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, C., & Duranti, A. (1992). Rethinking context: An introduction. In A. Duranti & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interpretive phenomenon (pp. 1–42). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gredler, M. E. (1996). Games and simulations and their relationships to learning. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 571–581). New York: Macmillan Library Reference USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gros, B. (2007). Digital games in education: The design of games-based learning environments. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40(1), 23–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanghøj, T. (2011). Clashing and emerging genres: The interplay of knowledge forms in educational gaming. Designs for Learning, 4(1), 22–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, S. B., & Street, B. V. (2008). On ethnography: Approaches to language and literacy research. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellermann, J. (2008). Social actions for classroom language learning. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ke, F. (2008). Alternative goal structures for computer game-based learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(4), 429–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koschmann, T. (1996). CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koschmann, T. (1999). Toward a dialogic theory of learning: Bakhtin’s contribution to understanding learning in settings of collaboration. In C. M. Hoadley & J. Roschelle (Eds.), Proceedings of the Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL) 1999 Conference (pp. 308–313). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koschmann, T. (2001). Revisiting the paradigms of instructional technology. In G. Kennedy, M. Keppell, C. McNaught, & T. Petrovic (Eds.), Meetings at the crossroads. Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference of the Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (pp. 15–22). Melbourne: Biomedical Multimedia Unit, The University of Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leander, K., Phillips, N., & Taylor, K. (2010). The changing social spaces of learning: Mapping new mobilities. Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, J. (2000). Across the scales of time: Artifacts, activity, and meanings in ecosocial systems. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 7(4), 273–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ligorio, M. B., & Ritella, G. (2010). The collaborative construction of chronotopes during computer-supported collaborative professional tasks. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5(4), 433–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linell, P. (1998). Approaching dialogue: Talk, interaction and contexts in dialogical perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linell, P. (2009). Rethinking language, mind, and world dialogically: Interactional and contextual theories of human sense-making. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludvigsen, S., Rasmussen, I., Krange, I., Moen, A., & Middleton, D. (2011). Intersecting trajectories of participation: Temporality and learning. In S. R. Ludvigsen, R. Säljö, I. Rasmussen, & A. Lund (Eds.), Learning across sites: New tools, infrastructures and practices (pp. 105–121). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marková, I., & Linell, P. (1996). Coding elementary contributions to dialogue: Individual acts versus dialogical interactions. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 26(4), 353–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, C., & Sahlström, F. (2010). Learning as longitudinal interactional change: From Other-repair to Self-repair in physiotherapy treatment. Discourse Processes, 47(8), 668–697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, A., & Savill-Smith, C. (2004). The use of computer and video games for learning: A review of the literature. London: Ultralab: Learning and Skills Development Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mondada, L., & Doehler, S. P. (2004). Second language acquisition as situated practice: Task accomplishment in the French second language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 88(4), 501–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash, P., & Shaffer, D. W. (2010). Mentor modeling: The internalization of modeled professional thinking in an epistemic game. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning.

  • O’Connor, M. C., & Michaels, S. (1993). Aligning academic task and participation status through revoicing: Analysis of a classroom discourse strategy. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 24, 318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peräkylä, A. (2004). Reliability and validity in research based on natural occuring social interaction. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice (pp. 283–304). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prensky, M. (2001). Digital game-based learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raphael, C., Bachen, C., Lynn, K., Baldwin-Philippi, J., & McKee, K. (2010). Games for civic learning: A conceptual framework and agenda for research and design. Games and Culture, 5(2), 199–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W. (2001). Situating cognition. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10(1), 27–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Säljö, R. (2010). Digital tools and challenges to institutional traditions of learning: Technologies, social memory and the performative nature of learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1), 53–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandford, R., Ulicsak, M., Facer, K., & Rudd, T. (2006). Teaching with games: Using commercial off-the-shelf computer games in formal education. Bristol: Futurelab.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schott, G. (2006). Agency in and around play. In D. Carr, D. Buckingham, A. Burn, & G. Schott (Eds.), Computer games: Text, narrative and play (pp. 133–148). Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, D. W. (2006). How computer games help children learn. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Silseth, K., & Arnseth, H. C. (2011). Learning and identity construction across sites: A dialogical approach to analysing the construction of learning selves. Culture & Psychology, 17(1), 65–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Squire, K. (2003). Video games in education. International Journal of Intelligent Simulations and Gaming, 1(1).

  • Squire, K. (2005). Changing the game: What happens when video games enter the classroom? Innovate, 1(6).

  • Squire, K., & Barab, S. (2004). Replaying history: Engaging urban underserved students in learning world history through computer simulation games. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Learning Sciences.

  • Stahl, G. (2006). Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suthers, D. D. (2006). Technology affordances for intersubjective meaning making: A research agenda for CSCL. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(3), 315–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegerif, R. (2006). A dialogic understanding of the relationship between CSCL and teaching thinking skills. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(1), 143–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wegerif, R. (2007). Dialogic education and technology: Expanding the space of learning. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J. (1998). Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

In particular, I would like to thank Hans Christian Arnseth for providing insightful and productive comments during my trajectory of writing this article. I would also like to thank Jerry Andriessen, Ola Erstad, Anniken Larsen Furberg, Per Linell, and Sten Ludvigsen for valuable comments on an earlier draft. Furthermore, comments from three reviewers of the CSCL community have contributed to the strengthening of my argument, and I am also in debt to Magnus Hontvedt for his contribution to the data collection.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenneth Silseth.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOCX 29.4 kb)

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

Transcription conventions

Sign

Explanation

(.)

Pause that lasts less than half a second

(..)

Pause that lasts between half a second and 1 s

(…)

Pause that lasts longer than 1 s

-

Interruption

(overlapping)

Overlapping talk

“---”

Garbled words or expressions

×

Words that cannot be deciphered at all

Caps

Emphasizing words and expressions

e-e-e

Words or sounds that are held

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Silseth, K. The multivoicedness of game play: Exploring the unfolding of a student’s learning trajectory in a gaming context at school. Computer Supported Learning 7, 63–84 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-011-9132-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-011-9132-x

Keywords

Navigation