Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 1/2014

01.03.2014

The dialectical potential of Cultural Historical Activity Theory for researching sustainable CSCL practices

verfasst von: Sue Timmis

Erschienen in: International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning | Ausgabe 1/2014

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This article explores conceptual and methodological challenges in researching sustainable computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) within authentic educational settings. It argues that to investigate the sustainability of CSCL in such settings, we need to understand how new innovations become enculturated as part of educational communities and the shared repertoires and practices of learners and teachers. The potential for Cultural Historical Activity Theory (CHAT) as a relational, dialectical framework for researching collaborative learning is examined. The article argues that, although CHAT is increasingly being used for researching educational settings, it is often employed only descriptively or as a set of guiding principles and the dialectical method, which focuses on emergent contradictions and tensions, is not always fully explored. An integrated conceptual and methodological CHAT framework is proposed for understanding the complex interrelations between discourse, actions and community and as a result how new technological innovations and knowledge creation practices can be appropriated and sustained. This is illustrated through the analytical processes undertaken in a recent empirical study of undergraduates working on an online collaborative research project. The article concludes by arguing that the dialectical method at the heart of CHAT is both unifying and problematizing and could allow us to develop a richer, more integrated and explanatory picture of sustainable CSCL activities.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
Sustainability from an ecological perspective refers to a capacity for endurance over time (Bromley 2008), which can also be seen as an important aim of education.
 
2
The works of Vygotsky and Leont’ev referred to in this paper are all translations from the original Russian texts.
 
3
Ritva Engeström is related to and has worked with Yrjo Engeström, the leading proponent of CHAT, but should not be confused with him.
 
4
Names used in the paper are all pseudonyms.
 
5
Where permission was not given, communications were removed from the data set.
 
6
This account of the research design and data collection methods has been limited by constraints on space and the need for brevity (see Timmis et al. 2010; Timmis 2012 for more information)
 
7
There were a total of 18 Sigs across the two modules.
 
8
A new conversation was counted once an elapsed time of 60 min or more had taken place
 
9
For a fuller account of the results of this study, see (Timmis et al. 2010; Timmis 2012)
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Arnseth, H. C., & Ludvigsen, S. (2006). Approaching institutional contexts: Systemic versus dialogic research in CSCL. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(2), 167–185.CrossRef Arnseth, H. C., & Ludvigsen, S. (2006). Approaching institutional contexts: Systemic versus dialogic research in CSCL. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(2), 167–185.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Arvaja, M., Salovaara, H., Hakkinen, P., & Jarvela, S. (2007). Combining individual and group-level perspectives for studying collaborative knowledge construction in context. Learning and Instruction, 17(4), 448–459.CrossRef Arvaja, M., Salovaara, H., Hakkinen, P., & Jarvela, S. (2007). Combining individual and group-level perspectives for studying collaborative knowledge construction in context. Learning and Instruction, 17(4), 448–459.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech Genres and Other Late Essays (trans: McGee, V. W.). Austin, Texas: University of Texas Press. Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech Genres and Other Late Essays (trans: McGee, V. W.). Austin, Texas: University of Texas Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Zurück zum Zitat Brew, A. (2006). Research and teaching: Beyond the divide. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Brew, A. (2006). Research and teaching: Beyond the divide. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Zurück zum Zitat Chan, C. (2011). Bridging research and practice: Implementing and sustaining knowledge building in Hong Kong classrooms. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(2), 147–186.CrossRef Chan, C. (2011). Bridging research and practice: Implementing and sustaining knowledge building in Hong Kong classrooms. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(2), 147–186.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Cole, M., & Engeström, Y. (1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 1–46). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cole, M., & Engeström, Y. (1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 1–46). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Crook, C. (2000). Motivation and the ecology of collaborative learning. In R. Joiner, D. Miell, K. Littleton, & D. Faulkner (Eds.), Rethinking collaborative learning. London: Free Association Press. Crook, C. (2000). Motivation and the ecology of collaborative learning. In R. Joiner, D. Miell, K. Littleton, & D. Faulkner (Eds.), Rethinking collaborative learning. London: Free Association Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Crook, C. (2011). Versions of computer supported collaborating in higher education. In S. Ludvigsen, A. Lund, I. Rasmussen, & R. Säljö (Eds.), Learning across sites: New tools, infrastructures and practices (pp. 156–171). Abingdon: Routledge. Crook, C. (2011). Versions of computer supported collaborating in higher education. In S. Ludvigsen, A. Lund, I. Rasmussen, & R. Säljö (Eds.), Learning across sites: New tools, infrastructures and practices (pp. 156–171). Abingdon: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Daniels, H. (2001). Vygotsky and pedagogy. London: RoutledgeFalmer. Daniels, H. (2001). Vygotsky and pedagogy. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Zurück zum Zitat Daniels, H. (2006). Analysing institutional effects in Activity Theory: First steps in the development of a language of description. Outlines: Critical Social Studies, 2(2006), 43–58. Daniels, H. (2006). Analysing institutional effects in Activity Theory: First steps in the development of a language of description. Outlines: Critical Social Studies, 2(2006), 43–58.
Zurück zum Zitat Daniels, H. (2011). Analysing trajectories of professional learning in changing workplaces. Culture & Psychology, 17(3), 359–377.CrossRef Daniels, H. (2011). Analysing trajectories of professional learning in changing workplaces. Culture & Psychology, 17(3), 359–377.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat de Lange, T., & Lund, A. (2008). Digital tools and instructional rules: A study of how digital technologies become rooted in classroom procedures. Outlines: Critical Social Studies, 10(2), 36–58. de Lange, T., & Lund, A. (2008). Digital tools and instructional rules: A study of how digital technologies become rooted in classroom procedures. Outlines: Critical Social Studies, 10(2), 36–58.
Zurück zum Zitat Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by ‘collaborative learning’? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1–19). Oxford: Elsevier. Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by ‘collaborative learning’? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1–19). Oxford: Elsevier.
Zurück zum Zitat Dillenbourg, P., Järvelä, S., & Fischer, F. (2009). The Evolution of research on computer-supported collaborative learning: From design to orchestration. In N. Balachef, S. Ludvigsen, T. de Jong, A. Lazonder, & S. Barnes (Eds.), Technology-enhanced learning: Principles and products (pp. 3–20). Dortrecht: Springer.CrossRef Dillenbourg, P., Järvelä, S., & Fischer, F. (2009). The Evolution of research on computer-supported collaborative learning: From design to orchestration. In N. Balachef, S. Ludvigsen, T. de Jong, A. Lazonder, & S. Barnes (Eds.), Technology-enhanced learning: Principles and products (pp. 3–20). Dortrecht: Springer.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Edwards, A. (2005). Relational agency: Learning to be a resourceful practitioner. International Journal of Educational Research, 43, 168–182.CrossRef Edwards, A. (2005). Relational agency: Learning to be a resourceful practitioner. International Journal of Educational Research, 43, 168–182.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit. Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
Zurück zum Zitat Engeström, R. (1995). Voice as communicative action. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 2(3), 192–215.CrossRef Engeström, R. (1995). Voice as communicative action. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 2(3), 192–215.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Engeström, Y. (1999a). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R. Punamaki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19–38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Engeström, Y. (1999a). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R. Punamaki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19–38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Engeström, Y. (1999b). Communication, discourse and activity. The Communication Review, 3(1), 165–185.CrossRef Engeström, Y. (1999b). Communication, discourse and activity. The Communication Review, 3(1), 165–185.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Engeström, Y. (1999c). Innovative learning in work teams: Analyzing cycles of knowledge creation in practice. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R. Punamaki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 377–404). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Engeström, Y. (1999c). Innovative learning in work teams: Analyzing cycles of knowledge creation in practice. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R. Punamaki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 377–404). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156. Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156.
Zurück zum Zitat Engeström, Y. (2009). The future of activity theory: A rough draft. In A. Sannino, H. Daniels, & K. D. Gutiérrez (Eds.), Learning and expanding with activity (pp. 303–328). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Engeström, Y. (2009). The future of activity theory: A rough draft. In A. Sannino, H. Daniels, & K. D. Gutiérrez (Eds.), Learning and expanding with activity (pp. 303–328). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fenwick, T. (2010). Re-thinking the “thing”: Sociomaterial approaches to understanding and researching learning in work. Journal of Workplace Learning, 22(1), 104–116.CrossRef Fenwick, T. (2010). Re-thinking the “thing”: Sociomaterial approaches to understanding and researching learning in work. Journal of Workplace Learning, 22(1), 104–116.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall. Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Zurück zum Zitat Hakkarainen, K. (2009). A knowledge-practice perspective on technology-mediated learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4, 213–231.CrossRef Hakkarainen, K. (2009). A knowledge-practice perspective on technology-mediated learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4, 213–231.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hyysalo, S. (2005). Objects and motives in a product design process. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 12(1), 19–36.CrossRef Hyysalo, S. (2005). Objects and motives in a product design process. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 12(1), 19–36.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ilyenkov, E. V. (1977). Dialectical Logic: Essays in its History and Theory. Moscow: Progress. Ilyenkov, E. V. (1977). Dialectical Logic: Essays in its History and Theory. Moscow: Progress.
Zurück zum Zitat Jaworski, B., & Goodchild, S. (2006). Inquiry community in an activity theory frame. In J. Novotná, H. Moraová, M. Krátká, & N. Stehlíková (Eds.), Proceedings 30th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 353–360). Prague: PME. Jaworski, B., & Goodchild, S. (2006). Inquiry community in an activity theory frame. In J. Novotná, H. Moraová, M. Krátká, & N. Stehlíková (Eds.), Proceedings 30th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 353–360). Prague: PME.
Zurück zum Zitat Jaworski, B., & Potari, D. (2009). Bridging the macro- and micro-divide: Using an activity theory model to capture sociocultural complexity in mathematics teaching and its development. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 72(2), 219–236.CrossRef Jaworski, B., & Potari, D. (2009). Bridging the macro- and micro-divide: Using an activity theory model to capture sociocultural complexity in mathematics teaching and its development. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 72(2), 219–236.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Revisiting activity theory as a framework for designing student-centred learning environments. In D. H. Jonassen & S. Land (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of learning environments. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum. Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Revisiting activity theory as a framework for designing student-centred learning environments. In D. H. Jonassen & S. Land (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of learning environments. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Zurück zum Zitat Jones, C., & Healing, G. (2010). Net generation students: Agency and choice and the new technologies. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(5), 344–356.CrossRef Jones, C., & Healing, G. (2010). Net generation students: Agency and choice and the new technologies. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(5), 344–356.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(1), 39–103.CrossRef Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(1), 39–103.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kaptelinin, V. (2005). The object of activity: Making sense of the sense-maker. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 12(1), 4–18.CrossRef Kaptelinin, V. (2005). The object of activity: Making sense of the sense-maker. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 12(1), 4–18.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Karasavvidis, I. (2009). Activity theory as a conceptual framework for understnading teacher approaches to information and communication technologies. Computers in Education, 53, 436–444.CrossRef Karasavvidis, I. (2009). Activity theory as a conceptual framework for understnading teacher approaches to information and communication technologies. Computers in Education, 53, 436–444.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Koschmann, T. (1996). Paradigm shifts and instructional technology: An introduction. In T. Koschmann (Ed.), CSCL, theory and practice of an emerging paradigm. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Koschmann, T. (1996). Paradigm shifts and instructional technology: An introduction. In T. Koschmann (Ed.), CSCL, theory and practice of an emerging paradigm. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Zurück zum Zitat Koschmann, T. (1999). Toward a dialogic theory of learning: Bakhtin’s contribution to understanding learning in settings of collaboration. In C. Hoadley (Ed.), Computer support for collaborative learning (pp. 308–313). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum. Koschmann, T. (1999). Toward a dialogic theory of learning: Bakhtin’s contribution to understanding learning in settings of collaboration. In C. Hoadley (Ed.), Computer support for collaborative learning (pp. 308–313). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Zurück zum Zitat Koschmann, T., Stahl, G., & Zemel, A. (2007). The video analyst’s manifesto (or the implications of Garfinkel’s policies for studying practice within design-based research). In R. Goldman, R. D. Pea, B. Barron, & S. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Koschmann, T., Stahl, G., & Zemel, A. (2007). The video analyst’s manifesto (or the implications of Garfinkel’s policies for studying practice within design-based research). In R. Goldman, R. D. Pea, B. Barron, & S. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Zurück zum Zitat Langemeyer, I., & Nissen, M. (2005). Activity theory. In B. Somekh & C. Lewin (Eds.), Research methods in the social sciences (pp. 188–196). London: Sage. Langemeyer, I., & Nissen, M. (2005). Activity theory. In B. Somekh & C. Lewin (Eds.), Research methods in the social sciences (pp. 188–196). London: Sage.
Zurück zum Zitat Lemke, J. L. (1990). Making meaning: The principles of social semiotics, chapter 8 in talking science: Language and learning and values. Westport: Ablex. Lemke, J. L. (1990). Making meaning: The principles of social semiotics, chapter 8 in talking science: Language and learning and values. Westport: Ablex.
Zurück zum Zitat Leont’ev, A. N. (1981). The problem of activity in psychology. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in soviet psychology (pp. 37–71). Armonk: M.E. Sharpe Inc. Leont’ev, A. N. (1981). The problem of activity in psychology. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in soviet psychology (pp. 37–71). Armonk: M.E. Sharpe Inc.
Zurück zum Zitat Lewis, R. (1997). An activity theory framework to explore distributed communities. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 13, 210–218.CrossRef Lewis, R. (1997). An activity theory framework to explore distributed communities. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 13, 210–218.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Linell, P. (2009). Rethinking language, mind and world dialogically: Interactional and contextual theories of human sense-making. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing. Linell, P. (2009). Rethinking language, mind and world dialogically: Interactional and contextual theories of human sense-making. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
Zurück zum Zitat Lipponen, L., Hakkarainen, & Paavola, S. (2004). Practices and orientation of computer-supported collaborative learning. In J. Strijbos, P. Kirschner, & R. Martens (Eds.), What we know about CSCL, and implementing it in higher education (pp. 31–50). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRef Lipponen, L., Hakkarainen, & Paavola, S. (2004). Practices and orientation of computer-supported collaborative learning. In J. Strijbos, P. Kirschner, & R. Martens (Eds.), What we know about CSCL, and implementing it in higher education (pp. 31–50). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nardi, B. A. (1996). Studying context: A comparison of activity theory, situated action models and distributed cognition. In B. A. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness (pp. 69–102). Cambridge: MIT Press. Nardi, B. A. (1996). Studying context: A comparison of activity theory, situated action models and distributed cognition. In B. A. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness (pp. 69–102). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Nussbaumer, D. (2011). An overview of cultural historical activity theory (CHAT) use in classroom research 2000 to 2009. Educational Review, 64(1), 37–55. Nussbaumer, D. (2011). An overview of cultural historical activity theory (CHAT) use in classroom research 2000 to 2009. Educational Review, 64(1), 37–55.
Zurück zum Zitat Oliver, M. (2011). Technological determinism in educational technology research: Some alternative ways of thinking about the relationship between learning and technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(5), 373–384.CrossRef Oliver, M. (2011). Technological determinism in educational technology research: Some alternative ways of thinking about the relationship between learning and technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(5), 373–384.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Perkins, D. N. (1993). Person-plus: A distributed view of thinking and learning. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 88–110). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Perkins, D. N. (1993). Person-plus: A distributed view of thinking and learning. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 88–110). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Rasmussen, I., & Ludvigsen, S. (2009). The hedgehog and the fox: A discussion of the approaches to the analysis of ICT reforms in teacher education of Larry Cuban and Yrjö Engeström. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 16(1), 83–104.CrossRef Rasmussen, I., & Ludvigsen, S. (2009). The hedgehog and the fox: A discussion of the approaches to the analysis of ICT reforms in teacher education of Larry Cuban and Yrjö Engeström. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 16(1), 83–104.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ritella, G., & Hakkarainen, K. (2012). Instrumental genesis in technology-mediated learning: From double stimulation to expansive knowledge practices. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 7(2), 239–258.CrossRef Ritella, G., & Hakkarainen, K. (2012). Instrumental genesis in technology-mediated learning: From double stimulation to expansive knowledge practices. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 7(2), 239–258.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rommetveit, R. (2003). On the role of “a psychology of the second person” in studies of meaning, language, and mind. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 10(3), 205–218.CrossRef Rommetveit, R. (2003). On the role of “a psychology of the second person” in studies of meaning, language, and mind. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 10(3), 205–218.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Roschelle, J., & Teasely, S. D. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In C. O’Malley (Ed.), Computer supported collaborative learning (pp. 69–97). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.CrossRef Roschelle, J., & Teasely, S. D. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In C. O’Malley (Ed.), Computer supported collaborative learning (pp. 69–97). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Roth, W. M. (2004). Activity theory and education: An introduction. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 11(1), 1–8.CrossRef Roth, W. M. (2004). Activity theory and education: An introduction. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 11(1), 1–8.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Roth, W. M. (2007). Emotion at work: A contribution to third-generation cultural-historical activity theory. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 14(1), 40–63.CrossRef Roth, W. M. (2007). Emotion at work: A contribution to third-generation cultural-historical activity theory. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 14(1), 40–63.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Roth, W. M., & Lee, Y. J. (2007). “Vygotsky’s neglected legacy”: Cultural-historical activity theory. Review of Educational Research, 77(2), 186.CrossRef Roth, W. M., & Lee, Y. J. (2007). “Vygotsky’s neglected legacy”: Cultural-historical activity theory. Review of Educational Research, 77(2), 186.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Selwyn, N. (2011). Education and technology: Key issues and debates. London: Continuum. Selwyn, N. (2011). Education and technology: Key issues and debates. London: Continuum.
Zurück zum Zitat Siyahhan, S., Barab, S. A., & Downton, M. (2010). Using activity theory to understand intergenerational play: The case of family quest. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5(4), 415–432.CrossRef Siyahhan, S., Barab, S. A., & Downton, M. (2010). Using activity theory to understand intergenerational play: The case of family quest. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5(4), 415–432.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Stahl, G. (2005). Group cognition in computer assisted collaborative learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 79–90.CrossRef Stahl, G. (2005). Group cognition in computer assisted collaborative learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 79–90.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Stahl, G., & Hesse, F. (2010). Beyond folk theories of CSCL. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5(4), 355–358.CrossRef Stahl, G., & Hesse, F. (2010). Beyond folk theories of CSCL. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5(4), 355–358.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 409–426). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 409–426). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Strijbos, J. W., & Fischer, F. (2007). Methodological challenges for collaborative learning research. Learning and Instruction, 17, 389–393.CrossRef Strijbos, J. W., & Fischer, F. (2007). Methodological challenges for collaborative learning research. Learning and Instruction, 17, 389–393.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Suthers, D. (2006). Technology affordances for intersubjective meaning making: A research agenda for CSCL. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(3), 315–377.CrossRef Suthers, D. (2006). Technology affordances for intersubjective meaning making: A research agenda for CSCL. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(3), 315–377.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Timmis, S. (2012). Constant companions: Instant messaging conversations as sustainable supportive study structures amongst undergraduate peers. Computers in Education, 59(1), 3–18.CrossRef Timmis, S. (2012). Constant companions: Instant messaging conversations as sustainable supportive study structures amongst undergraduate peers. Computers in Education, 59(1), 3–18.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Timmis, S., Joubert, M., Manuel, A., & Barnes, S. (2010). Transmission, transformation and ritual: An investigation of students’ and researchers’ digitally mediated communications and collaborative work. Learning, Media and Technology, 35(3), 307–322. Timmis, S., Joubert, M., Manuel, A., & Barnes, S. (2010). Transmission, transformation and ritual: An investigation of students’ and researchers’ digitally mediated communications and collaborative work. Learning, Media and Technology, 35(3), 307–322.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Aalst, J., & Hill, C. M. (2006). Activity theory as a framework for analysing knowledge building. Learning Environments Research, 9, 23–44.CrossRef Van Aalst, J., & Hill, C. M. (2006). Activity theory as a framework for analysing knowledge building. Learning Environments Research, 9, 23–44.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Van Oers, B. (1998). From context to contextualizing. Learning and Instruction, 8(6), 473–488.CrossRef Van Oers, B. (1998). From context to contextualizing. Learning and Instruction, 8(6), 473–488.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and Language (trans: Kozulin, A.). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT press. Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and Language (trans: Kozulin, A.). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT press.
Zurück zum Zitat Wells, G. (2007). The mediating role of discoursing in activity. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 14(3), 160–177.CrossRef Wells, G. (2007). The mediating role of discoursing in activity. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 14(3), 160–177.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A socio-cultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A socio-cultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Williams, J., Davis, P., & Black, L. (2007). An agenda for CHAT in educational research: An editorial response. International Journal of Educational Research, 46, 104–107.CrossRef Williams, J., Davis, P., & Black, L. (2007). An agenda for CHAT in educational research: An editorial response. International Journal of Educational Research, 46, 104–107.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Yamagata-Lynch, L. C. (2003). Using activity theory as an analytic lens for examining technology professional development in schools. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 10(2), 100–119.CrossRef Yamagata-Lynch, L. C. (2003). Using activity theory as an analytic lens for examining technology professional development in schools. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 10(2), 100–119.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The dialectical potential of Cultural Historical Activity Theory for researching sustainable CSCL practices
verfasst von
Sue Timmis
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2014
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning / Ausgabe 1/2014
Print ISSN: 1556-1607
Elektronische ISSN: 1556-1615
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-013-9178-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2014

International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 1/2014 Zur Ausgabe