Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 2/2017

10.07.2017

Joint interactions in large online knowledge communities: The A3C framework

verfasst von: Heisawn Jeong, Ulrike Cress, Johannes Moskaliuk, Joachim Kimmerle

Erschienen in: International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning | Ausgabe 2/2017

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Social interaction is crucial for understanding individual and collective processes in knowledge communities. We describe how technology has changed the way people interact in large communities. Building on this description, we propose a framework that distinguishes four types of joint interactions in online knowledge communities: Attendance, Coordination, Cooperation, and Collaboration (A3C framework). These four types of interactions vary depending on the extent to which community members share their goals, processes, and outcomes. Attendance, the weakest form of joint interaction, is characterized by individualistic orientations; people may belong to a community but are still driven by individualistic goals, work as individuals, and produce outcomes for personal benefits. Coordination, a stronger form of interaction, is characterized by interdependence among community members; members still act largely as individuals, but their goals, processes, and outcomes are now interdependent or contingent on other community members. Cooperation is characterized by shared goals and outcomes, but the process of achieving the goal is not fully shared; members coordinate their activities and may also engage in some joint processes but work individually for most of the time. Collaboration is characterized by sharing in all of the dimensions involved; people share the processes, as well as the goals and outcomes of their work. These four types of joint interactions are not mutually exclusive, but instead build on each other. We discuss how the A3C framework may serve as a guide for future research and can support design efforts in online knowledge communities.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Ahn, Y. Y., Bagrow, J. P., & Lehmann, S. (2010). Link communities reveal multiscale complexity in networks. Nature, 466, 761–764.CrossRef Ahn, Y. Y., Bagrow, J. P., & Lehmann, S. (2010). Link communities reveal multiscale complexity in networks. Nature, 466, 761–764.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Anthony, D., Smith, S. W., & Williamson, T. (2009). Reputation and reliability in collective goods the case of the online encyclopedia Wikipedia. Rationality and Society, 21(3), 283–306.CrossRef Anthony, D., Smith, S. W., & Williamson, T. (2009). Reputation and reliability in collective goods the case of the online encyclopedia Wikipedia. Rationality and Society, 21(3), 283–306.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. Austin: University of Texas Press. Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Barron, B., Martin, C. K., Mertl, V., & Yassine, M. (2016). Citizen science: Connecting to nature through networks. In U. Cress, J. Moskaliuk, & H. Jeong (Eds.), Mass collaboration and education (pp. 257–284). Cham: Springer International.CrossRef Barron, B., Martin, C. K., Mertl, V., & Yassine, M. (2016). Citizen science: Connecting to nature through networks. In U. Cress, J. Moskaliuk, & H. Jeong (Eds.), Mass collaboration and education (pp. 257–284). Cham: Springer International.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Beaudoin, M. F. (2002). Learning or lurking? Tracking the “invisible” online student. Internet and Higher Education, 5(2), 147–155.CrossRef Beaudoin, M. F. (2002). Learning or lurking? Tracking the “invisible” online student. Internet and Higher Education, 5(2), 147–155.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bientzle, M., Steffen, W., Jeong, H., Cress, U., & Kimmerle, J. (2017). Text chatting in collaborative writing: Its role in coordinating activities, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (pp. 771–772). Philadelphia: International Society of the Learning Sciences. Bientzle, M., Steffen, W., Jeong, H., Cress, U., & Kimmerle, J. (2017). Text chatting in collaborative writing: Its role in coordinating activities, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (pp. 771–772). Philadelphia: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Zurück zum Zitat Butler, B., Sproull, L., Kiesler, S., & Kraut, R. (2013). Community effort in online groups: who does the work and why? In S. P. Weisband (Ed.), Leadership at a distance: Research in technologically-supported work (pp. 171–193). New York: Erlbaum. Butler, B., Sproull, L., Kiesler, S., & Kraut, R. (2013). Community effort in online groups: who does the work and why? In S. P. Weisband (Ed.), Leadership at a distance: Research in technologically-supported work (pp. 171–193). New York: Erlbaum.
Zurück zum Zitat Chi, M. T. H., Roy, M., & Hausmann, R. G. (2008). Observing tutorial dialogues collaboratively: Insights about human tutoring effectiveness from vicarious learning. Cognitive Science, 32, 301–341.CrossRef Chi, M. T. H., Roy, M., & Hausmann, R. G. (2008). Observing tutorial dialogues collaboratively: Insights about human tutoring effectiveness from vicarious learning. Cognitive Science, 32, 301–341.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cress, U., & Kimmerle, J. (2008). A systemic and cognitive view on collaborative knowledge building with wikis. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(2), 105–122.CrossRef Cress, U., & Kimmerle, J. (2008). A systemic and cognitive view on collaborative knowledge building with wikis. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(2), 105–122.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cress, U., Stahl, G., Ludvigsen, S., & Law, N. (2015). The core features of CSCL: Social situation, collaborative knowledge processes and their design. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 10(2), 109–116. Cress, U., Stahl, G., Ludvigsen, S., & Law, N. (2015). The core features of CSCL: Social situation, collaborative knowledge processes and their design. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 10(2), 109–116.
Zurück zum Zitat Cress, U., Jeong, H., & Moskaliuk, J. (2016). Mass collaboration as an emerging paradigm for education? Theories, cases, and research methods. In U. Cress, J. Moskaliuk, & H. Jeong (Eds.), Mass collaboration and education (pp. 3–27). Cham: Springer International.CrossRef Cress, U., Jeong, H., & Moskaliuk, J. (2016). Mass collaboration as an emerging paradigm for education? Theories, cases, and research methods. In U. Cress, J. Moskaliuk, & H. Jeong (Eds.), Mass collaboration and education (pp. 3–27). Cham: Springer International.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dehler, J., Bodemer, D., Buder, J., & Hesse, F. W. (2011). Guiding knowledge communication in CSCL via group knowledge awareness. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(3), 1068–1078.CrossRef Dehler, J., Bodemer, D., Buder, J., & Hesse, F. W. (2011). Guiding knowledge communication in CSCL via group knowledge awareness. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(3), 1068–1078.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dennen, V. P. (2008). Pedagogical lurking: Student engagement in non-posting discussion behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(4), 1624–1633.CrossRef Dennen, V. P. (2008). Pedagogical lurking: Student engagement in non-posting discussion behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(4), 1624–1633.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by “collaborative learning”? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (Vol. 1, pp. 1–15). Oxford: Elsevier. Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by “collaborative learning”? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (Vol. 1, pp. 1–15). Oxford: Elsevier.
Zurück zum Zitat Doan, A., Ramakrishnan, R., & Halevy, A. Y. (2010). Mass collaboration systems on the World-Wide Web. Communications of the ACM, 54, 86–96.CrossRef Doan, A., Ramakrishnan, R., & Halevy, A. Y. (2010). Mass collaboration systems on the World-Wide Web. Communications of the ACM, 54, 86–96.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Eberle, J., Stegmann, K., & Fischer, F. (2014). Legitimate peripheral participation in communities of practice: Participation support structures for newcomers in faculty student councils. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(2), 216–244.CrossRef Eberle, J., Stegmann, K., & Fischer, F. (2014). Legitimate peripheral participation in communities of practice: Participation support structures for newcomers in faculty student councils. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(2), 216–244.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Elliott, M. (2016). Stigmergic collaboration: A framework for understanding and designing mass collaboration. In U. Cress, J. Moskaliuk, & H. Jeong (Eds.), Mass collaboration and education (pp. 65–84). Cham: Springer International.CrossRef Elliott, M. (2016). Stigmergic collaboration: A framework for understanding and designing mass collaboration. In U. Cress, J. Moskaliuk, & H. Jeong (Eds.), Mass collaboration and education (pp. 65–84). Cham: Springer International.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fischer, G. (2001). Communities of Interest: Learning through the interaction of multiple knowledge systems. In S. Bjornestad, R. Moe, A. Morch, & A. Opdahl (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th IRIS Conference (pp. 1–14). Bergen: Department of Information Science. Fischer, G. (2001). Communities of Interest: Learning through the interaction of multiple knowledge systems. In S. Bjornestad, R. Moe, A. Morch, & A. Opdahl (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th IRIS Conference (pp. 1–14). Bergen: Department of Information Science.
Zurück zum Zitat Fischer, G. (2016). Exploring, understanding, and designing innovative socio-technical environments for fostering and supporting mass collaboration. In U. Cress, J. Moskaliuk, & H. Jeong (Eds.), Mass collaboration and education (pp. 43–63). Cham: Springer International.CrossRef Fischer, G. (2016). Exploring, understanding, and designing innovative socio-technical environments for fostering and supporting mass collaboration. In U. Cress, J. Moskaliuk, & H. Jeong (Eds.), Mass collaboration and education (pp. 43–63). Cham: Springer International.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hakkarainen, K. (2009). A knowledge-practice perspective on technology-mediated learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4, 213–231.CrossRef Hakkarainen, K. (2009). A knowledge-practice perspective on technology-mediated learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4, 213–231.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Heylighen, F. (2016). Stigmergy as a universal coordination mechanism I : Definition and components. Cognitive Systems Research, 38, 4–13.CrossRef Heylighen, F. (2016). Stigmergy as a universal coordination mechanism I : Definition and components. Cognitive Systems Research, 38, 4–13.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Janssen, J., & Bodemer, D. (2013). Coordinated computer-supported collaborative learning: Awareness and awareness tools. Educational Psychologist, 48, 40–55.CrossRef Janssen, J., & Bodemer, D. (2013). Coordinated computer-supported collaborative learning: Awareness and awareness tools. Educational Psychologist, 48, 40–55.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Järvelä, S., Kirschner, P. A., Hadwin, A., Järvenoja, H., Malmberg, J., Miller, M., & Laru, J. (2016). Socially shared regulation of learning in CSCL: Understanding and prompting individual- and group-level shared regulatory activities. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 11, 263–280.CrossRef Järvelä, S., Kirschner, P. A., Hadwin, A., Järvenoja, H., Malmberg, J., Miller, M., & Laru, J. (2016). Socially shared regulation of learning in CSCL: Understanding and prompting individual- and group-level shared regulatory activities. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 11, 263–280.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jeong, H., & Chi, M. H. (2007). Knowledge convergence and collaborative learning. Instructional Science, 35, 287–315.CrossRef Jeong, H., & Chi, M. H. (2007). Knowledge convergence and collaborative learning. Instructional Science, 35, 287–315.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jeong, H., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2016). Seven affordances of computer-supported collaborative learning: How to support collaborative learning? How can technologies help? Educational Psychologist, 51, 247–265.CrossRef Jeong, H., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2016). Seven affordances of computer-supported collaborative learning: How to support collaborative learning? How can technologies help? Educational Psychologist, 51, 247–265.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jirschitzka, J., Kimmerle, J., Halatchliyski, I., Hancke, J., Meurers, D., & Cress, U. (2017). A productive clash of perspectives? The interplay between articles’ and authors’ perspectives and their impact on Wikipedia edits in a controversial domain. PloS One, 12, e0178985. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0178985.CrossRef Jirschitzka, J., Kimmerle, J., Halatchliyski, I., Hancke, J., Meurers, D., & Cress, U. (2017). A productive clash of perspectives? The interplay between articles’ and authors’ perspectives and their impact on Wikipedia edits in a controversial domain. PloS One, 12, e0178985. doi:10.​1371/​journal.​pone.​0178985.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kimmerle, J., Thiel, A., Gerbing, K.-K., Bientzle, M., Halatchliyski, I., & Cress, U. (2013). Knowledge construction in an outsider community: Extending the communities of practice concept. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1078–1090.CrossRef Kimmerle, J., Thiel, A., Gerbing, K.-K., Bientzle, M., Halatchliyski, I., & Cress, U. (2013). Knowledge construction in an outsider community: Extending the communities of practice concept. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1078–1090.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kimmerle, J., Moskaliuk, J., Oeberst, A., & Cress, U. (2015). Learning and collective knowledge construction with social media: A process-oriented perspective. Educational Psychologist, 50, 120–137.CrossRef Kimmerle, J., Moskaliuk, J., Oeberst, A., & Cress, U. (2015). Learning and collective knowledge construction with social media: A process-oriented perspective. Educational Psychologist, 50, 120–137.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kittur, A., & Kraut, R. E. (2008). Harnessing the wisdom of crowds in Wikipedia: Quality through coordination. In: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work (pp. 37–46). ACM. Kittur, A., & Kraut, R. E. (2008). Harnessing the wisdom of crowds in Wikipedia: Quality through coordination. In: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work (pp. 37–46). ACM.
Zurück zum Zitat Lakhani, K., & von Hippel, E. (2003). How open source software works: “Free” user-to-user assistance. Research Policy, 6(32), 923–943.CrossRef Lakhani, K., & von Hippel, E. (2003). How open source software works: “Free” user-to-user assistance. Research Policy, 6(32), 923–943.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ludvigsen, S. (2016). CSCL: Connecting the social, emotional and cognitive dimensions. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 11, 115–121.CrossRef Ludvigsen, S. (2016). CSCL: Connecting the social, emotional and cognitive dimensions. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 11, 115–121.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ludvigsen, S., Stahl, G., Law, N., & Cress, U. (2015). Collaboration and the formation of new knowledge artifacts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 10, 1–6.CrossRef Ludvigsen, S., Stahl, G., Law, N., & Cress, U. (2015). Collaboration and the formation of new knowledge artifacts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 10, 1–6.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Matschke, C., Moskaliuk, J., & Cress, U. (2012). Knowledge exchange using Web 2.0 technologies in NGOs. Journal of Knowledge Management, 16, 159–176.CrossRef Matschke, C., Moskaliuk, J., & Cress, U. (2012). Knowledge exchange using Web 2.0 technologies in NGOs. Journal of Knowledge Management, 16, 159–176.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Oeberst, A., Halatchliyski, I., Kimmerle, J., & Cress, U. (2014). Knowledge construction in Wikipedia: A systemic-constructivist analysis. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23, 149–176.CrossRef Oeberst, A., Halatchliyski, I., Kimmerle, J., & Cress, U. (2014). Knowledge construction in Wikipedia: A systemic-constructivist analysis. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23, 149–176.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Orr, J. E. (1990). Sharing knowledge, celebrating identity: War stories and community memory among service technicians. In D. S. Middelton & D. Edwards (Eds.), Collective remembering: Memory in society (pp. 169–181). London: Sage. Orr, J. E. (1990). Sharing knowledge, celebrating identity: War stories and community memory among service technicians. In D. S. Middelton & D. Edwards (Eds.), Collective remembering: Memory in society (pp. 169–181). London: Sage.
Zurück zum Zitat Paavola, S., & Hakkarainen, K. (2005). The knowledge creation metaphor–An emergent epistemological approach to learning. Science & Education, 14, 535–557.CrossRef Paavola, S., & Hakkarainen, K. (2005). The knowledge creation metaphor–An emergent epistemological approach to learning. Science & Education, 14, 535–557.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Paavola, S., & Hakkarainen, K. (2014). Trialogical approach for knowledge creation. In S. C. Tan, H. J. So, & J. Yeo (Eds.), Knowledge creation in education (pp. 53–73). Singapore: Springer. Paavola, S., & Hakkarainen, K. (2014). Trialogical approach for knowledge creation. In S. C. Tan, H. J. So, & J. Yeo (Eds.), Knowledge creation in education (pp. 53–73). Singapore: Springer.
Zurück zum Zitat Paavola, S., Lipponen, L., & Hakkarainen, K. (2004). Modeling innovative knowledge communities: A knowledge-creation approach to learning. Review of Educational Research, 74, 557–576.CrossRef Paavola, S., Lipponen, L., & Hakkarainen, K. (2004). Modeling innovative knowledge communities: A knowledge-creation approach to learning. Review of Educational Research, 74, 557–576.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Preece, J., Nonnecke, B., & Andrews, D. (2004). The top five reasons for lurking: Improving community experiences for everyone. Computers in Human Behavior, 20(2), 201–223.CrossRef Preece, J., Nonnecke, B., & Andrews, D. (2004). The top five reasons for lurking: Improving community experiences for everyone. Computers in Human Behavior, 20(2), 201–223.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ren, Y., Kraut, R., & Kiesler, S. (2007). Applying common identity and bond theory to design of online communities. Organization Studies, 28(3), 377–408.CrossRef Ren, Y., Kraut, R., & Kiesler, S. (2007). Applying common identity and bond theory to design of online communities. Organization Studies, 28(3), 377–408.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Resnick, M. (2012). Mother's Day, Warrior Cats, and Digital Fluency: Stories from the Scratch online community. In Proceedings of the Constructionism 2012 Conference: Theory, practice and impact (pp. 52–58). Resnick, M. (2012). Mother's Day, Warrior Cats, and Digital Fluency: Stories from the Scratch online community. In Proceedings of the Constructionism 2012 Conference: Theory, practice and impact (pp. 52–58).
Zurück zum Zitat Roque, R., Rusk, N., & Resnick, M. (2016). Supporting diverse and creative collaboration in the Scratch online community. In U. Cress, J. Moskaliuk, & H. Jeong (Eds.), Mass collaboration and education (pp. 241–256). Cham: Springer International.CrossRef Roque, R., Rusk, N., & Resnick, M. (2016). Supporting diverse and creative collaboration in the Scratch online community. In U. Cress, J. Moskaliuk, & H. Jeong (Eds.), Mass collaboration and education (pp. 241–256). Cham: Springer International.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rummel, N., & Spada, H. (2005). Learning to collaborate: An instructional approach to promoting collaborative problem solving in computer-mediated settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), 201–241.CrossRef Rummel, N., & Spada, H. (2005). Learning to collaborate: An instructional approach to promoting collaborative problem solving in computer-mediated settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), 201–241.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735.CrossRef Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Smith (Ed.), Liberal education in a knowledge society (pp. 67–98). Peru, IL: Open Court. Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Smith (Ed.), Liberal education in a knowledge society (pp. 67–98). Peru, IL: Open Court.
Zurück zum Zitat Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 265–283.CrossRef Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 265–283.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., & Drucker, A. P. (2003). Knowledge building. In: Encyclopedia of education (Vol. 2, pp. 1370–1373). Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., & Drucker, A. P. (2003). Knowledge building. In: Encyclopedia of education (Vol. 2, pp. 1370–1373).
Zurück zum Zitat Schoor, C., Narciss, S., & Körndle, H. (2015). Regulation during cooperative and collaborative learning: A theory-based review of terms and concepts. Educational Psychologist, 50(2), 97–119.CrossRef Schoor, C., Narciss, S., & Körndle, H. (2015). Regulation during cooperative and collaborative learning: A theory-based review of terms and concepts. Educational Psychologist, 50(2), 97–119.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors of learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4–13.CrossRef Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors of learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4–13.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Shirky, C. (2010). Cognitive surplus: Creativity and generosity in a connected age. London: Penguin Books. Shirky, C. (2010). Cognitive surplus: Creativity and generosity in a connected age. London: Penguin Books.
Zurück zum Zitat Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2. Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2.
Zurück zum Zitat Slavin, R. E. (1990). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall. Slavin, R. E. (1990). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Zurück zum Zitat Stahl, G. (2006). Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge. Cambridge: MIT Press. Stahl, G. (2006). Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group processes and productivity. New York: Academic Press. Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group processes and productivity. New York: Academic Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel (Ed.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel (Ed.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
Zurück zum Zitat Trausan-Matu, S. (2009). The polyphonic model of hybrid and collaborative learning. In Handbook of research on hybrid learning models: Advanced tools, technologies, and applications (pp. 466–486). Hershey: Information Science Reference. Trausan-Matu, S. (2009). The polyphonic model of hybrid and collaborative learning. In Handbook of research on hybrid learning models: Advanced tools, technologies, and applications (pp. 466–486). Hershey: Information Science Reference.
Zurück zum Zitat Viégas, F. B., Wattenberg, M., Kriss, J., & Ham, F. Van. (2007). Talk before you type: Coordination in Wikipedia. In: Hawaii International Conference on System Science (pp. 78–87). Viégas, F. B., Wattenberg, M., Kriss, J., & Ham, F. Van. (2007). Talk before you type: Coordination in Wikipedia. In: Hawaii International Conference on System Science (pp. 78–87).
Zurück zum Zitat Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2006). A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 46(1), 71–95.CrossRef Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2006). A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 46(1), 71–95.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization, 7(2), 225–246.CrossRef Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization, 7(2), 225–246.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Yeager, C., Hurley-Dasgupta, B., & Bliss, C. A. (2013). CMOOCs and global learning: An authentic alternative. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 17(2), 133–147. Yeager, C., Hurley-Dasgupta, B., & Bliss, C. A. (2013). CMOOCs and global learning: An authentic alternative. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 17(2), 133–147.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang, J., Scardamalia, M., Reeve, R., & Messina, R. (2009). Designs for collective cognitive responsibility in knowledge-building communities. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(1), 7–44.CrossRef Zhang, J., Scardamalia, M., Reeve, R., & Messina, R. (2009). Designs for collective cognitive responsibility in knowledge-building communities. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(1), 7–44.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang, J., Hong, H.-Y., Scardamalia, M., Teo, C. L., & Morley, E. a. (2011). Sustaining knowledge building as a principle-based innovation at an elementary school. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20(2), 262–307.CrossRef Zhang, J., Hong, H.-Y., Scardamalia, M., Teo, C. L., & Morley, E. a. (2011). Sustaining knowledge building as a principle-based innovation at an elementary school. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20(2), 262–307.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Joint interactions in large online knowledge communities: The A3C framework
verfasst von
Heisawn Jeong
Ulrike Cress
Johannes Moskaliuk
Joachim Kimmerle
Publikationsdatum
10.07.2017
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning / Ausgabe 2/2017
Print ISSN: 1556-1607
Elektronische ISSN: 1556-1615
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-017-9256-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2017

International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 2/2017 Zur Ausgabe