Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

E-Learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning

  • Book Reviews
  • Published:
Educational Technology Research and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Ausobel, D. P. (2000). The acquisition and retention of knowledge: A cognitive view. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook I: The cognitive domain. New York: David McKay.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. C., &. Mayer, R. E. (2003). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, M., &. Levie, H. W. (1993). Instructional message design. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:

    Google Scholar 

  • Educational Technology Publications. Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1997). Training complex cognitive skills: A four-component instructional design model for technical training. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, M. D. (1983). Component display theory, In C. M. Reigeluth, Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of their current status. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  • Moore, D. R., & Lockee, B. B. (2000). Design strategies for Web training: Using bandwidth effectively. In B. Khan (Ed.), Web-based training. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novak, J. D., & Gowin, B. D. (1984). Learning how to learn. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shambaugh, R. N., & Magliaro, S. G. (1997). Mastering the possibilities: A process approach to instructional design. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Instructional Technology, Ohio University, Athens, OH

    David Richard Moore (Assistant Professor)

Authors
  1. David Richard Moore
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Richard Moore.

Additional information

Reviewed by David Richard Moore

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moore, D.R. E-Learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning. EDUCATION TECH RESEARCH DEV 54, 197–200 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-006-8254-8

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-006-8254-8

Search

Navigation